Stress fracture of capitate bone-A case report of an unusual fracture.

INTRODUCTION: The capitate is the largest, most central bone and the first to ossify in the wrist. It has a well-protected anatomic location, making traumatic or stress fractures extremely rare in clinical practice. Isolated fractures of the capitate bone are very uncommon and often without displacement due to the great stability provided by the intracarpal ligaments. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to report a case of isolated stress fracture of the capitate related to the work activity of a mechanic. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 23-year-old patient complaining of pain and swelling in the left wrist for 2 months without improvement after using analgesics. On physical examination, he presented pain on palpation in the central region of the wrist, pain when performing flexion and extension movements of the wrist, and frustrated edema. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosed a stress fracture of the capitate bone. Conservative treatment with forearm-palmar immobilization for 2 months, analgesic medication, and physical therapy rehabilitation after immobilization were performed. After the complete resolution of the symptoms, the patient started to work in a new role. DISCUSSION: There are five case reports of stress fractures in the capitate-two in teenagers and three in adults, but none of them was a mechanic. Clinical suspicion can be formulated when repetitive activity is associated with the wrist in extension and specific location of pain and swelling. Individuals with an immature skeleton are more susceptible. The development of occupational disease should be considered in similar cases of insidious and persistent pain in the palm of people with high work demands. CONCLUSION: Stress fractures of the capitate bone are a disease that must be suspected in insidious and persistent pain in the palm of the hand. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best image test to diagnose this disorder, and conservative treatment is indicated.

What is the Prognosis of Triple Arthrodesis in the Treatment of Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity (AAFD)?

Objective The present study aims to evaluate the ability of triple arthrodesis in eliminating the main complaints presented by patients with adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD): 1) disabling hindfoot pain; 2) major deformities, such as medial arch collapse, valgus, abduction, and supination. Methods A total of 17 patients (20 feet) with advanced AAFD who underwent surgical correction by triple arthrodesis were evaluated after a mean follow-up period of 43 months (range: 18-84 months). The average age of the patients at surgery was 62 years old (range: 38-79 years old). The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score were used to assess the final results. Results According to the VAS, the average residual pain was 3 points; the AOFAS hindfoot score points increased 23% after the surgery; and the correction of deformities was considered satisfactory in 10 out of 20 feet; partially satisfactory in 4 out of 20 feet; partially unsatisfactory in 5 out of 20 feet; and unsatisfactory in 1 out of 20 feet. Conclusion Despite the high index of bone fusion after triple arthrodesis, which is the gold standard treatment in advanced AAFD, the incomplete correction of major deformities and the persistence of residual pain contributed to a high disappointment rate of the patients with the surgical results.

Cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the translation and cultural adaptation of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese, and verifies the reliability and validity of this new version. METHODS: A cross-cultural adaptation of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire was performed using the following steps: translation, back-translation, committee review, and pre-testing phase (50 subjects). The psychometric properties were evaluated by application of the questionnaire to 102 patients. Reliability was assessed by homogeneity and stability of measures. The criterion-related validity was tested by comparing scores of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Oswestry and Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short questionnaires. RESULTS: Excellent internal consistency was found in both test (Cronbach's α of 0.90) and re-test (Cronbach's α of 0.91). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire showed good reliability and the correlations ranged from reasonable (0.64) to very good (r=0.91). CONCLUSION: The Brazilian Portuguese version of Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short was easy to apply and understand. The questionnaire had a great impact on assessment and multidimensional care of patients with low back pain.

What is the Prognosis of Triple Arthrodesis in the Treatment of Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity (AAFD)? / Qual o prognóstico da artrodese tríplice quando utilizada no tratamento do pé plano adquirido do adulto (PPAA)?

Abstract Objective The present study aims to evaluate the ability of triple arthrodesis in eliminating the main complaints presented by patients with adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD): 1) disabling hindfoot pain; 2) major deformities, such asmedial arch collapse, valgus, abduction, and supination. Methods A total of 17 patients (20 feet) with advanced AAFD who underwent surgical correction by triple arthrodesis were evaluated after a mean follow-up period of 43 months (range: 18-84 months). The average age of the patients at surgery was 62 years old (range: 38-79 years old). The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score were used to assess the final results. Results According to the VAS, the average residual pain was 3 points; the AOFAS hindfoot score points increased 23% after the surgery; and the correction of deformities was considered satisfactory in 10 out of 20 feet; partially satisfactory in 4 out of 20 feet; partially unsatisfactory in 5 out of 20 feet; and unsatisfactory in 1 out of 20 feet. Conclusion Despite the high index of bone fusion after triple arthrodesis, which is the gold standard treatment in advanced AAFD, the incomplete correction of major deformities and the persistence of residual pain contributed to a high disappointment rate of the patients with the surgical results.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a capacidade da artrodese tríplice de aliviar as principais queixas dos pacientes que apresentam pé plano adquirido do adulto (PPAA): 1) dor incapacitante localizada no médio e retropé; 2) deformidades marcadas pelo colapso do arco medial, valgo, abdução e supinação. Método Avaliamos 17 pacientes (20 pés) portadores de PPAA em estado avançado que foram submetidos à correção cirúrgica pela artrodese tríplice modelante. A média de idade dos pacientes no momento da cirurgia foi de 62 anos (variação de 38 a 79 anos), e o tempo médio de seguimento foi de 43 meses (variação de 18 a 84 meses). Utilizamos critérios clínicos empregando a escala visual analógica da dor (EVAD) e a escala funcional da American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS, na sigla em inglês) do retropé para avaliar a eficácia da cirurgia. Resultados A dor residual mensurada pela EVAD foi de três pontos, em média. Observamos incremento médio de 23% nos valores da escala AOFAS do retropé após o tratamento cirúrgico. A correção das deformidades foi satisfatória em 10 de 20 pés; parcialmente satisfatória em 4 de 20 pés; parcialmente insatisfatória em 5 de 20 pés; e insatisfatória em 1 de 20 pés. Conclusão Apesar da artrodese tríplice modelante indicada no tratamento do PPAA em estágio avançado apresentar alto índice de consolidação óssea, a correção incompleta das deformidades pré-existentes e a persistência de dor residual contribuíram para a elevada taxa de decepção dos pacientes com o resultado da cirurgia.

Cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese / Adaptação cultural, confiabilidade e validade do Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire para o português brasileiro

ABSTRACT Objective To describe the translation and cultural adaptation of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese, and verifies the reliability and validity of this new version. Methods A cross-cultural adaptation of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire was performed using the following steps: translation, back-translation, committee review, and pre-testing phase (50 subjects). The psychometric properties were evaluated by application of the questionnaire to 102 patients. Reliability was assessed by homogeneity and stability of measures. The criterion-related validity was tested by comparing scores of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Oswestry and Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short questionnaires. Results Excellent internal consistency was found in both test (Cronbach's α of 0.90) and re-test (Cronbach's α of 0.91). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire showed good reliability and the correlations ranged from reasonable (0.64) to very good (r=0.91). Conclusion The Brazilian Portuguese version of Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short was easy to apply and understand. The questionnaire had a great impact on assessment and multidimensional care of patients with low back pain.

RESUMO Objetivo Realizar a tradução e a adaptação cultural para a língua portuguesa do Brasil do Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire para avaliação de dor lombar, e verificar a confiabilidade e a validade da nova versão. Métodos A adaptação cultural foi realizada de acordo com as seguintes etapas: tradução, retrotradução, revisão por comitê e pré-teste (50 indivíduos). Após, as propriedades psicométricas foram avaliadas aplicando-se o questionário (teste) em 102 pacientes. A confiabilidade foi verificada por avaliação da homogeneidade e da estabilidade das medidas. A validade de critério foi testada comparando-se as pontuações do Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire com os questionários Oswestry e Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short. Resultados Observou-se excelente consistência interna no pré-teste (Cronbach α de 0,90) e no teste (Cronbach α de 0,91). O Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire apresentou boa confiabilidade, e as correlações variaram de razoável (0,64) a muito boa (r=0,91). Conclusão A versão em língua portuguesa do Brasil é de fácil aplicação e compreensão, além de apresentar grande acréscimo na avaliação e no cuidado multidimensional de pacientes portadores de dor lombar.