EGFR-independent mechanisms of acquired resistance to AZD9291 in EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND: AZD9291 is an oral, irreversible, mutant-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), which specifically targets both sensitizing and resistant T790M mutations. This compound has shown outstanding activity, in a phase I/II (AURA) trial. However, despite impressive tumor responses in T790M-positive patients, acquired resistance to this drug limits the benefit of this compound. Mutations at the EGFR C797 codon, located within the kinase-binding site, were very recently reported to be a potential mechanism of resistance to AZD9291 in T790M-positive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To identify potential mechanisms of resistance to AZD9291, we report here on two patients with resistant biopsy specimens that had been treated with AZD9291. RESULTS: We identified in two distinct cases, HER2 and MET amplification by FISH and CGH as a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKI. Interestingly, this event occurred with complete loss of the T790M mutation. In one case, we observed a different molecular status at two biopsy sites (the T790M mutation at the primary site and wild-type T790M at the metastatic site with different pathways of acquired resistance to AZD9291). CONCLUSION: Our observations suggest that T790M-positive and wild-type T790M clones may coexist at baseline. AZD9291 efficiently suppresses the growth of T790M-positive cells, but a population of wild-type T790M cells at baseline will mediate the development of resistance, here via a by-pass pathway activating either HER2 or MET.

SEED: An Operational Numerical Tool for Dosimetric Reconstruction in Case of External Radiological Overexposure.

ABSTRACT: In the event of a radiological accident involving external exposure of one or more victims and potential high doses, it is essential to know the dose distribution within the body in order to sort the victims according to the severity of the irradiation and then to take them to the most suitable medical facilities. However, there are currently few techniques that can be rapidly deployed on field and capable of characterizing an irradiation. Therefore, a numerical simulation tool has been designed. It can be implemented by a doctor/physicist pairing, projected within a limited time as close as possible to the irradiation accident and emergency response teams. Called SEED (Simulation of External Exposures & Dosimetry), this tool (dedicated to dose reconstruction in case of external exposure) allows a rapid modeling of the irradiation scene and a visual exchange with the victims and witnesses of the event. The user can navigate in three dimensions in the accident scene thanks to a graphical user interface including a "first person" camera. To validate the performance of the SEED tool, two dosimetric benchmarking exercises were performed. The first consisted in comparing the dose value provided by SEED to that given by a reference calculation code: MCNPX. The purpose of the second validation was to perform an experiment irradiating a physical dummy equipped with dosimeters and to reconstruct this irradiation using SEED. These two validation protocols have shown satisfactory results with mean difference less than 2% and 12% for the first and second exercises, respectively. They confirm that this new tool is able to provide useful information to medical teams in charge of dosimetric triage in case of a major external exposure event.

[Radiotherapy for HIV-infected patients]. / Spécificités de la prise en charge par radiothérapie chez les patients séropositifs pour le virus de l'immunodéficience humaine (VIH).

Since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy, cancer incidence is still 2 to 3-fold higher in patients infected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) than in the general population, with an increased incidence of malignancies not associated with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). HIV-infected patients cancer treatment does not differ from that in the general population. However, the management of those patients have some particularities due to preexisting comorbid conditions, including metabolic, cardiovascular, renal or hepatic complications and the risk for potential drug - drug interactions in HIV-infected patients. In this review, we described efficacy and tolerance of radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in this frail population treated for cancer. Utilization of modern radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy may improve the treatment tolerance.

EGFR-mediated macrophage activation promotes colitis-associated tumorigenesis.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling is a known mediator of colorectal carcinogenesis. Studies have focused on the role of EGFR signaling in epithelial cells, although the exact nature of the role of EGFR in colorectal carcinogenesis remains a topic of debate. Here, we present evidence that EGFR signaling in myeloid cells, specifically macrophages, is critical for colon tumorigenesis in the azoxymethane-dextran sodium sulfate (AOM-DSS) model of colitis-associated carcinogenesis (CAC). In a human tissue microarray, colonic macrophages demonstrated robust EGFR activation in the pre-cancerous stages of colitis and dysplasia. Utilizing the AOM-DSS model, mice with a myeloid-specific deletion of Egfr had significantly decreased tumor multiplicity and burden, protection from high-grade dysplasia and significantly reduced colitis. Intriguingly, mice with gastrointestinal epithelial cell-specific Egfr deletion demonstrated no differences in tumorigenesis in the AOM-DSS model. The alterations in tumorigenesis in myeloid-specific Egfr knockout mice were accompanied by decreased macrophage, neutrophil and T-cell infiltration. Pro-tumorigenic M2 macrophage activation was diminished in myeloid-specific Egfr-deficient mice, as marked by decreased Arg1 and Il10 mRNA expression and decreased interleukin (IL)-4, IL10 and IL-13 protein levels. Surprisingly, diminished M1 macrophage activation was also detectable, as marked by significantly reduced Nos2 and Il1b mRNA levels and decreased interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-1ß protein levels. The alterations in M1 and M2 macrophage activation were confirmed in bone marrow-derived macrophages from mice with the myeloid-specific Egfr knockout. The combined effect of restrained M1 and M2 macrophage activation resulted in decreased production of pro-angiogenic factors, CXCL1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and reduced CD31+ blood vessels, which likely contributed to protection from tumorigenesis. These data reveal that EGFR signaling in macrophages, but not in colonic epithelial cells, has a significant role in CAC. EGFR signaling in macrophages may prove to be an effective biomarker of CAC or target for chemoprevention in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Modulation of dialysate levels of dopamine, noradrenaline, and serotonin (5-HT) in the frontal cortex of freely-moving rats by (-)-pindolol alone and in association with 5-HT reuptake inhibitors: comparative roles of beta-adrenergic, 5-HT1A, and 5-HT1B receptors.

(-)-Pindolol, which possesses significant affinity for 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, and beta 1/2-adrenergic receptors (AR)s, dose-dependently increased extracellular levels of dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NAD) versus 5-HT, in dialysates of the frontal cortex (FCX), but not accumbens and striatum, of freely-moving rats. In distinction, the preferential beta 1-AR antagonist, betaxolol, and the preferential beta 2-AR antagonist, ICI118,551, did not increase basal levels of DA, NAD, or 5-HT. Further, they both dose-dependently and markedly blunted the influence of (-)-pindolol upon DA and NAD levels. The selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY100,635, slightly attenuated the (-)-pindolol-induced increase in DA and NAD levels, while the selective 5-HT1B antagonist, SB224,289, was ineffective. These data suggest that (-)-pindolol facilitates frontocortical dopaminergic (and adrenergic) transmission primarily by activation of beta 1/2-ARs and, to a lesser degree, by stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors, whereas 5-HT1B receptors are not involved. (-)-Pindolol potentiated the increase in FCX levels of 5-HT elicited by the 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine and duloxetine, and also enhanced their ability to elevate FCX levels of DA--though not of NAD. In contrast to (-)-pindolol, betaxolol and ICI118,551 did not affect the actions of fluoxetine, whereas both WAY100,635 and SB224,289 potentiated the increase in levels of 5-HT--but not DA or NAD levels--elicited by fluoxetine. In conclusion, (-)-pindolol modulates, both alone and together with 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, dopaminergic, adrenergic, and serotonergic transmission in the FCX via a complex pattern of actions at beta 1/2-ARs, 5-HT1A, and 5-HT1B receptors. These findings have important implications for clinical studies of the influence of (-)-pindolol upon the actions of antidepressant agents.

Inverse agonists and serotonergic transmission: from recombinant, human serotonin (5-HT)1B receptors to G-protein coupling and function in corticolimbic structures in vivo.

The concept of inverse agonism, whereby "antagonists" exert actions opposite to those of agonists at constitutively active receptors, has been documented both at receptor-modulated ion channels as well as at G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) in recombinant expression systems. However, it remains unclear whether physiologically or therapeutically relevant inverse agonists actions at GPCRs occur in the CNS in vivo. The present overview discusses our recent observations concerning 5-HT1B receptors, and focuses on the relationship between actions at heterologous Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) expression systems compared with native CNS populations of receptors. To this end, we have exploited several novel and selective ligands, notably the inverse agonist and neutral antagonist at 5-HT1B receptors, SB224,289 and S18127, respectively. Like 5-HT itself, the agonist, GR46611, markedly increases the binding of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding to h5-HT1B receptors expressed in CHO cells, while the "antagonist", GR127,935, modestly stimulates binding suggesting partial agonist properties. However, SB224,289 markedly suppresses binding at these sites. S18127, which does not alter [35S]GTP gamma S binding alone, abolishes the actions of both GR46611 and SB224,289. Nevertheless, in quantitative autoradiographical studies, S18127 and SB224,289 cannot be distinguished as concerns modulation of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding at substantia nigra and caudate nucleus-localized 5-HT1B receptors, inasmuch as they each block the action of the 5-HT1B agonist, CP93129, yet fail to modify binding alone. Further, S18217 and SB224,289, as well as GR127,935, all abolish the inhibitory influence of GR46611 upon dialysis levels of 5-HT in the frontal cortex of freely moving rats without themselves modifying release. Moreover, they all block the hypothermic actions of GR46611 without themselves modifying core temperature. Thus, differences in intrinsic activity of S18127, SB224,289 and GR127,935 seen at cloned, h5-HT1B receptors cannot be detected in vivo. Most notably, no evidence for opposite actions of the inverse agonist, SB224,289, as compared to 5-HT1B agonists is apparent. These data suggest that in vitro observations of inverse agonist actions cannot necessarily be extrapolated to intact systems in vivo.

Anxiolytic properties of the selective, non-peptidergic CRF(1) antagonists, CP154,526 and DMP695: a comparison to other classes of anxiolytic agent.

The selective, non-peptidergic corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)(1) receptor antagonists, CP154,526 and DMP695, dose-dependently increased punished responses of rats in a Vogel conflict test and enhanced social interaction (SI) of rats in an unfamiliar environment. They were, however, inactive in a plus-maze procedure and failed to reduce ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) associated with an aversive environment. In contrast, the benzodiazepine, chlordiazepoxide, was effective in all these procedures. Further, the serotonin (5-HT)(1A) agonist, flesinoxan, was active in each paradigm (except the plus-maze) while the 5-HT(2C) antagonist, SB242,084, was effective in the SI and Vogel but not the plus-maze and USV procedures. In contrast to chlordiazepoxide, flesinoxan and SB242,084, CP154,526 did not modify dialysate levels of 5-HT, norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) in the frontal cortex (FCX) of freely moving rats. In conclusion, CP154,526 and DMP695 possess a common and distinctive profile of anxiolytic action expressed in the absence of an intrinsic influence upon monoamine release.

(-)-Pindolol increases dialysate concentrations of dopamine and noradrenaline, but not serotonin, in the frontal cortex of freely-moving rats.

(-)-Pindolol (2.5-20.0 mg/kg, s.c.) markedly increased extracellular levels of dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA) in single dialysate samples of the frontal cortex (FCX) of freely-moving rats. This action was specific inasmuch as serotonin (5-HT) levels were not significantly modified. In contrast, (-)-propranolol (2.5) did not modify FCX dialysate levels of DA, NA (or 5-HT) alone and abolished the facilitatory influence of (-)-pindolol (10.0) upon levels of DA, though not NA. In contrast to (-)-propranolol, (-)-pindolol exerts, a facilitatory influence upon frontocortical dopaminergic and adrenergic, but not serotonergic, transmission.

Serotonin (5-HT)2A receptor activation enhances dialysate levels of dopamine and noradrenaline, but not 5-HT, in the frontal cortex of freely-moving rats.

The 5-HT2 receptor agonist, DOI, dose-dependently (0.16-10.0 mg/kg, s.c.) increased dialysate levels of dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA), but not 5-HT, in the frontal cortex (FCX) of freely-moving rats. This action was abolished by the selective 5-HT2A antagonist, MDL100,907 (0.04), which did not, itself, modify levels of DA and NA. In contrast, the selective 5-HT2B/2C antagonist, SB206,553 (0.63), increased levels of DA and NA additively with DOI. Thus, in contrast to a tonic, inhibitory influence of 5-HT2C receptors (see Millan, M.J., Dekeyne, A., Gobert, A., 1998. Serotonin (5-HT)2C receptors tonically inhibit dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NAD), but not 5-HT, release in the FCX in vivo. Neuropharmacology 37, 953-955), 5-HT2A receptors exert a phasic, facilitatory influence upon FCX levels of DA and NA.

Serotonin (5-HT)2C receptors tonically inhibit dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA), but not 5-HT, release in the frontal cortex in vivo.

The novel, preferential 5-HT2C receptor agonist, Ro 60-0175 ((S)-2-(6-chloro-5-fluoroindol-1-yl)-1-methylethylamine) (2.5 mg,kg, s.c.), markedly suppressed dialysate levels of dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA) levels in the frontal cortex of freely-moving rats without affecting levels of 5-HT. In contrast, the novel and selective 5-HT2C receptor antagonist, SB-242084 (6-chloro-5-methyl-1-[6-(2-methylpyridin-3-yloxy) pyridin-3-yl carbamoyl] indoline) (10.0 mg/kg, i.p.), markedly increased dialysate levels of DA and NA without modifying those of 5-HT. These data suggest that 5-HT2C receptors exert a tonic, inhibitory influence upon frontocortical dopaminergic and adrenergic, but not serotonergic, transmission.

The ability of WAY100,635 to potentiate the neurochemical and functional actions of fluoxetine is enhanced by co-administration of SB224,289, but not BRL15572.

The present study employed a combined neurochemical and behavioural approach to address the question of whether blockade of (presynaptic) 5-HT(1B) or 5-HT(1D) receptors enhances the facilitatory influence of 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor antagonism upon the actions of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI). In the presence of the selective 5-HT(1A) antagonist, WAY100,635, the fluoxetine-induced increase in dialysate levels of 5-HT in the frontal cortex (FCX) of freely-moving rats was significantly potentiated. The selective 5-HT(1B) antagonist, SB224,289, likewise potentiated the increase in 5-HT levels evoked by fluoxetine. Further, administered together, WAY100,635 and SB224,289, at least additively, potentiated the influence of fluoxetine upon 5-HT levels. This effect was selective inasmuch as, either alone or together, WAY100,635 and SB224,289 did not modify the influence of fluoxetine upon FCX levels of dopamine (DA) or noradrenaline (NA) quantified in the same dialysis samples. Co-administration of SB224,289 also enhanced the ability of WAY100,635 to potentiate the induction of head-twitches (HTW) by fluoxetine. This response reflects activation of 5-HT(2A) sites in FCX and was abolished by the selective 5-HT(2A) antagonist, MDL100,907. In contrast to SB224,289, the 5-HT(1D) antagonist, BRL15572, failed to enhance the facilitatory influence of WAY100,635 upon the neurochemical or behavioural actions of fluoxetine. In conclusion, co-joint blockade of 5-HT(1B) - but not 5-HT(1D) - with 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors markedly potentiates the neurochemical and functional actions of the SSRI, fluoxetine.

Generalization of serotonin (5-HT)1A agonists and the antipsychotics, clozapine, ziprasidone and S16924, but not haloperidol, to the discriminative stimuli elicited by PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT.

Rats were trained to recognize a discriminative stimulus (DS) elicited by the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor agonist, PD128,907 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.), which suppressed frontocortical release of dopamine (DA) but not 5-HT. The selective 5-HT1A receptor agonists, 8-OH-DPAT and flesinoxan, dose-dependently generalized to PD128,907 with effective dose(50)s (ED50s) of 0.08 and 1.5mg/kg, s.c., respectively, and inhibited the release and synthesis of 5-HT but not of DA. The 'atypical' antipsychotic, clozapine, which displays weak partial agonist properties at 5-HT1A receptors, dose-dependently, though partially, generalized to PD128,907 (50%, 2.5mg/kg, s.c.). Further, S16924 and ziprasidone, which in a like manner, display partial agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors, generalized with ED50s of 0.6 and 2.3mg/kg, s.c., respectively. In contrast, haloperidol, which is devoid of affinity at 5-HT1A sites, was inactive. At doses equivalent to those generalizing to PD128,907, clozapine, S16924 and ziprasidone reduced serotonergic (but not dopaminergic) transmission, whereas haloperidol was inactive. In rats trained to recognize a further D2/D3 agonist, 7-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.), generalization was obtained similarly with 8-OH-DPAT (ED50 = 0.07 mg/kg, s.c.), flesinoxan (3.4) and clozapine (0.6), but not with haloperidol. In conclusion, although PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT do not directly interact with 5-HT1A receptors or influence serotonergic transmission, their DS properties are mimicked by 5-HT1A receptor agonists at doses activating 5-HT1A but not D2/D3 (auto)receptors. These observations likely account for generalization of clozapine, S16924 and ziprasidone to PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT inasmuch as they behave as antagonists at D2/D3 receptors, yet agonists at 5-HT1A (auto)receptors.

Characterization of potent and selective antagonists at postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors in a series of N4-substituted arylpiperazines.

Benzocycloalkyl and benzocycloalkenyl moities linked, directly or via an alkyl chain, to oxygen-bearing heteroarylpiperazines were synthesized, in an attempt to obtain potent and selective antagonists at postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. From the numerous arylpiperazines described in the literature, 1-(2,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodioxin-5-yl)piperazine (3a) was chosen as a model of an arylpiperazine in view of its selectivity for 5-HT1A receptors versus alpha 1-, alpha 2-, and beta-adrenergic receptors, as well as dopamine D1 and D2 receptors. Two other closely-related arylpiperazines, 1-(1,5-benzodioxepin-6-yl)piperazine (3b) and 1-(benzofuran-7-yl)piperazine (3c), were also examined in this study. All compounds showed high affinity at 5-HT1A sites (8.10 < or = pKis < or = 9.35), and the majority behaved as antagonists in vivo in blocking the hypothermia induced by the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT in the absence of a marked effect alone at equivalent doses. An in vivo evaluation of dopamine D2 receptor antagonist properties revealed that the majority of compounds was devoid of activity at this site, in marked contrast to BMY 7378 which displayed virtually no selectivity for 5-HT1A versus dopamine D2 receptors. Moreover, six compounds of the present series, 8, 10, 11, 14, 25, and 37, showed > 10-fold selectivity in vitro for 5-HT1A versus alpha 1-adrenergic receptors. Compound 14 displayed an optimal compromise between potency (pKi = 8.75), marked antagonist activity, and selectivity toward alpha 1-adrenergic (81-fold) and dopamine D2 (195-fold) receptors. These characteristics clearly distinguish 14 from previously-reported ligands such as the postsynaptic 5-HT1A antagonist BMY 7378 and the weak partial agonist NAN 190 which, in contrast to the compounds of this series, belong to the well-exemplified class of imido derivatives of (o-methoxyphenyl)piperazines. The availability of 14 (S 15535) should facilitate the further elucidation of the functional role and potential therapeutic significance of 5-HT1A receptors.

The glutamate-mediated release of dopamine in the rat striatum: further characterization of the dual excitatory-inhibitory function.

A push-pull cannula supplied with an artificial cerebrospinal fluid containing the tritiated precursor of dopamine, [3H]tyrosine, was implanted in the caudate nucleus of rats anesthetized with halothane. The extracellular dopamine and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid were measured in successive 20 min fractions (both in their tritiated and unlabeled form) and the ratio between the two forms calculated. Glutamate was added to the superfusing cerebrospinal fluid to investigate its role in the process of dopamine release. The release of dopamine and the efflux of dihydroxyphenylacetic acid were activated by a low concentration (10(-8) M) of glutamate. In contrast, a higher concentration (10(-4) M) of the amino acid reduced the release of dopamine. These results first confirmed the presence of a dual mechanism of control, by glutamate, of the dopamine release in the striatum depending on the extracellular concentration. Secondly, these treatments affected the dihydroxyphenylacetic acid amount and predominantly the tritiated form of dopamine, suggesting that the glutamate induces an important increase of the amine synthesis, in spite of a moderate effect on the release. The reversal of the inhibition by applications of tetrodotoxin (5 x 10(-7) M) and bicuculline (10(-4) M) confirmed that it was mediated by an indirect mechanism involving a GABAergic neurotransmission. In addition, the increase of the spontaneous dopamine release during bicuculline application suggested the existence of a tonic mechanism of inhibition of dopamine release in the striatum. This was confirmed by the fact that local xylocaine-induced anesthesia of the sensory motor cortex increased the spontaneous release of dopamine in the striatum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Buspirone modulates basal and fluoxetine-stimulated dialysate levels of dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin in the frontal cortex of freely moving rats: activation of serotonin1A receptors and blockade of alpha2-adrenergic receptors underlie its actions.

The serotonin1A receptor partial agonist, buspirone, also displays antagonist properties at D2 receptors and is metabolized to the alpha2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, 1-(2-pyrimidinyl-piperazine). Herein, we examined mechanisms underlying the influence of buspirone alone, and in association with the serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, upon extracellular levels of serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline simultaneously quantified in the frontal cortex of freely moving rats. Buspirone (0.01-2.5 mg/kg, s.c.) dose-dependently decreased dialysate levels of serotonin (-50%), and increased those of dopamine (+100%) and noradrenaline (+140%). The reduction by buspirone of serotonin levels was abolished by the serotonin1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100,635 (0.16), which did not, however, modify its influence upon dopamine and noradrenaline. In contrast to buspirone, the serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine (10.0), increased frontocortical levels of serotonin (+ 120%), dopamine (+55%) and noradrenaline (+90%). Buspirone dose-dependently (0.01-2.5) decreased the induction by fluoxetine of serotonin levels yet potentiated (three-fold) its elevation of dopamine and noradrenaline levels. The serotonin1A agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propyl-amino)-tetralin (0.16), mimicked the action of buspirone in reducing resting levels of serotonin (-60%) and in enhancing those of dopamine (+135%) and noradrenaline (+165%). Like buspirone, it attenuated the influence of fluoxetine upon serotonin levels, yet facilitated its influence upon dopamine and noradrenaline levels. In contrast, WAY 100,635 selectively potentiated the increase in levels of serotonin (two-fold) versus dopamine and noradrenaline elicited by fluoxetine. Further, WAY 100,635 abolished the inhibitory influence of buspirone upon fluoxetine-induced serotonin release, but only partly interfered with its potentiation of fluoxetine-induced increases in dopamine and noradrenaline levels. The D2/D3 receptor antagonist, raclopride (0.16), increased basal dopamine (+60%) levels but little influenced those of serotonin and noradrenaline, and failed to modify the action of fluoxetine. The alpha2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, 1-(2-pyrimidinyl-piperazine) (2.5), which did not modify resting levels of serotonin, markedly increased those of dopamine (+90%) and noradrenaline (+190%) and potentiated (two-fold) the increases in dialysate levels of dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin provoked by fluoxetine. Further, the alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist, S18616, attenuated the enhancement by buspirone of the fluoxetine-induced increase in levels of dopamine and noradrenaline. In conclusion, the inhibitory influence of buspirone upon resting and fluoxetine-stimulated serotonin levels reflects its agonist properties at serotonin1A autoreceptors. The facilitatory influence of buspirone upon resting and fluoxetine-stimulated dopamine and noradrenaline levels may also involve its serotonin1A properties. However, its principal mechanism of action in this respect is probably the alpha2-adrenergic antagonist properties of its metabolite, 1-(2-pyrimidinyl-piperazine). The present observations are of significance to experimental and clinical studies of the influence of buspirone upon depressive states, alone and in association with antidepressant agents.

Simultaneous quantification of serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline levels in single frontal cortex dialysates of freely-moving rats reveals a complex pattern of reciprocal auto- and heteroreceptor-mediated control of release.

In the present study, a novel and exceptionally sensitive method of high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to coulometric detection, together with concentric dialysis probes, was exploited for an examination of the role of autoreceptors and heteroceptors in the modulation of dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin levels in single samples of the frontal cortex of freely-moving rats. The selective D3/D2 receptor agonist, CGS 15855A [(+/-)-trans-1,3,4,4a,5,10b-hexahydro-4-propyl-2H-[1]benzopyrano[3 ,4-b]-pyridin-9-ol], and antagonist, raclopride, respectively decreased (-50%) and increased (+60%) levels of dopamine without significantly modifying those of serotonin and noradrenaline. The selective alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist, dexmedetomidine, markedly decreased noradrenaline levels (-100%) and likewise suppressed those of serotonin and dopamine by -55 and -45%, respectively. This effect was mimicked by the preferential alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist, guanabenz (-100%, -60% and -50%). Furthermore, the alpha2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, RX 821,002 [2(2-methoxy-1,4-benzodioxan-2-yl)-2-imidazoline], and the preferential alpha2A-adrenergic receptor antagonist, BRL 44408 [2-(2H-(1-methyl-1,3-dihydroisoindole)methyl)-4,5-dihydroimidaz ole], both evoked a pronounced elevation in levels of noradrenaline (+212%, +109%) and dopamine (+73%, +85%). In contrast, the preferential alpha(2B/2C)-adrenergic receptor antagonist, prazosin, did not modify noradrenaline and dopamine levels. RX 821,002 and BRL 44408 did not significantly modify levels of serotonin, whereas prazosin decreased these levels markedly (-55%), likely due to its alpha1-adrenergic receptor antagonist properties. The selective serotonin-1A receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), reduced serotonin levels (-65%) and increased those of dopamine and noradrenaline by +100%), and +175%, respectively. The selective serotonin-1A antagonist, WAY 100,635 [N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclo- hexanecarboxamide], which had little affect on monoamine levels alone, abolished the influence of 8-OH-DPAT upon serotonin and dopamine levels and significantly attenuated its influence upon noradrenaline levels. Finally, the selective serotonin-1B agonist, GR 46611 [3-[3-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)-1H-indol-5-yl]-N-(4-methoxybenzyl)acrylamid e], decreased serotonin levels (-49%) and the serotonin-1B antagonist, GR 127,935 [N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)phenyl]-2'-methyl-4'-(5-me thyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)-biphenyl-4-carboxamide], which did not significantly modify serotonin levels alone, abolished this action of GR 46611. Levels of dopamine and noradrenaline were not affected by GR 46611 or GR 127,935. In conclusion, there is a complex pattern of reciprocal autoreceptor and heteroceptor control of monoamine release in the frontal cortex. Most notably, activation of alpha2-adrenergic receptors inhibits the release of noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin in each case, while stimulation of serotonin-1A receptors suppresses serotonin, yet facilitates noradrenaline and dopamine release. In addition, dopamine D2/D3 autoreceptors restrain dopamine release while (terminal-localized) serotonin-1B receptors reduce serotonin release. Control of serotonin release is expressed phasically and that of noradrenaline and dopamine release tonically.

Influence of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester on vagally induced gastric relaxation in the anaesthetized rat.

1. The influence of the nitric oxide (NO) biosynthesis inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) on the gastric relaxation induced by peripheral vagal stimulation was investigated in the anaesthetized rat. 2. Peripheral vagal stimulation (10 Hz, 10 V, 1 ms for 20 s) induced a reproducible biphasic response: a short-lasting increase followed by a more pronounced decrease in intragastric pressure. This response also occurred in reserpinized animals (5 mg kg-1, i.p., 24 h before the experiment) while atropine (1 mg kg-1, i.v.) abolished the initial increase in intragastric pressure. 3. L-NAME (1-30 mg kg-1, i.v.) induced an increase in arterial blood pressure. L-NAME (1 mg kg-1, i.v.) had no influence on the vagally induced gastric response while L-NAME (10 and 30 mg kg-1 i.v.) significantly changed it: the initial increase in intragastric pressure was enhanced while the decrease in intragastric pressure was reduced or abolished. NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 10 mg kg-1, i.v.) had the same effect. 4. An i.v. infusion of phenylephrine (10 micrograms kg-1 min-1) inducing a pressor response similar to that produced by L-NAME (30 mg kg-1, i.v.) did not influence the vagal gastric response. Infusion of L-arginine (300 mg kg-1 bolus, then 100 mg kg-1 h-1) starting 30 min beforehand, reduced the pressor effect and prevented the influence of L-NAME (10 mg kg-1, i.v.) on the vagal gastric response. Infusion of L-arginine (300mgkg-' bolus, then lOOmgkg-lh-') starting 30min beforehand, reduced the pressor effect and prevented the influence of L-NAME (lOmgkg-,i.v.) on the vagal gastric response. After injection of both atropine (lmgkg-', i.v.) and L-NAME (30mgkg-', i.v.), the vagally induced decrease in intragastric pressure was similar to that obtained under control conditions.5. These results are consistent with NO being released and inducing gastric relaxation during peripheral vagal stimulation. In addition to NO, another inhibitory non-adrenergic non-cholinergic neurotransmitter is released.

The selective serotonin (5-HT)1A receptor ligand, S15535, displays anxiolytic-like effects in the social interaction and Vogel models and suppresses dialysate levels of 5-HT in the dorsal hippocampus of freely-moving rats. A comparison with other anxiolytic agents.

RATIONALE: The benzodioxane, S15535, possesses low intrinsic activity and marked selectivity at 5-HT1A receptors, hippocampal populations of which are implicated in anxious states. OBJECTIVE: Herein, we examined its potential anxiolytic actions in relation to its influence upon extracellular levels of 5-HT in the dorsal hippocampus of freely-moving rats. Its effects were compared with those of other anxiolytic agents: the 5-HT1A agonists, buspirone and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin HBr (8-OH-DPAT), the 5-HT2C antagonist, SB206,553 and the benzodiazepine, diazepam. METHODS: Potential anxiolytic actions were evaluated in the Vogel conflict paradigm (increase in punished responses) and the social interaction (SI) test (increase in active SI) in rats. Extracellular levels of 5-HT were determined by microdialysis. RESULTS: In analogy to diazepam. S15535 increased punished responses in the Vogel test. This action was dose dependently expressed over a broad (16-fold) dose range. Buspirone and 8-OH-DPAT were likewise active, but yielded highly biphasic dose-response curves. SB206,553 was dose dependently active in this model. In the SI test, S15535 similarly mimicked the anxiolytic-like effect of diazepam and was active over a broad dose range. Buspirone and 8-OH-DPAT again showed biphasic dose-response curves, as did SB206,553. In both the Vogel and SI tests, the anxiolytic-like effects of S15535 were abolished by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY100,635, which was inactive alone. S15535 exerted its anxiolytic-like effects with a more pronounced separation to motor-disruptive doses than the other drugs. Finally, S15535 suppressed dialysate levels of 5-HT in the dorsal hippocampus, an action abolished by WAY100,635. Buspirone, 8-OH-DPAT and diazepam, but not SB206,553, also reduced 5-HT levels. CONCLUSION: Likely reflecting its distinctive ability to selectively and preferentially activate pre- versus postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors, S15535 suppresses hippocampal 5-HT release and displays marked anxiolytic-like effects over a broad dose range in the relative absence of motor perturbation.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, reboxetine, in rats.

RATIONALE: Although drug discrimination procedures have proven difficult to apply to antidepressant agents, we recently characterized discriminative stimulus properties of the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, citalopram, in rats. However, discriminative stimulus properties of selective norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors remain to be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We determined the potential discriminative stimulus properties of the highly selective NE reuptake inhibitor and antidepressant, reboxetine. METHODS: Employing a two-lever discrimination procedure, rats were trained to discriminate reboxetine (2.5 mg/kg, IP) from saline. In parallel, the influence of reboxetine (2.5 mg/kg) upon dialysate levels of monoamines in frontal cortex and dorsal hippocampus of freely moving rats was determined. RESULTS: After 54+/-10 training sessions, reboxetine elicited robust stimulus recognition, fully generalizing to itself with an ED50 of 1.2 mg/kg. Two further NE reuptake inhibitors, desipramine (5.3) and maprotiline (1.8), as well as the 5-HT/NE reuptake inhibitor, venlafaxine (1.0), likewise generalized. In contrast, the 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, paroxetine, citalopram and sertraline, and the DA reuptake inhibitors, GBR12935 and bupropion, did not show significant generalization. Reboxetine markedly increased dialysate levels of NE, but not 5-HT, in frontal cortex and hippocampus. Dopamine (DA) levels were also (though less markedly) enhanced in frontal cortex. CONCLUSION: In parallel with an elevation in extracellular levels of NE, the selective NE reuptake inhibitor, reboxetine, elicits a specific discriminative stimulus in rats.

The in vivo modulation of dopamine synthesis by calcium ions: influences on the calcium independent release.

To investigate the contribution of the dopamine (DA) synthesis to both the calcium-dependent and the carrier-mediated, mechanisms of DA release in the striatum, anaesthetized rats were locally superfused in the striatum with a push pull cannula supplied with an artificial CSF containing tritiated tyrosine. DA, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and their respective specific activity were measured in effluent and used to evaluate changes in the DA synthesizing rate. Excluding calcium ions from the CSF only partially reduced spontaneous DA release (70%) still leaving a possible carrier-mediated DA release. This effect was not additive with a local superfusion with 0.1 mM a-methyl-p-tyrosine, a blocker of DA synthesis, suggesting that synthesis could already be reduced by calcium-free superfusion. Local superfusion with 100 microM cadmium in the presence or not of calcium ions, increased the DA release (220 and 350%, respectively), simultaneously reducing DA synthesis. Local application of 1 microM calcium ionophore (A23187) was without effect on the basal release of DA but enhanced DA synthesis and increased the amphetamine-evoked and carrier-mediated amine release. We conclude that DA synthesis can be a modulatory process of the firing-independent and carrier-mediated amine release while it weakly affects the classical calcium-dependent release.