Asymptomatic viruses detectable in saliva in the first year of life: a narrative review.

Viral infections are common in children. Many can be asymptomatic or have delayed health consequences. In view of increasing availability of point-of-care viral detection technologies, with possible application in newborn screening, this review aimed to (1) identify potentially asymptomatic viruses detectable in infants under one year old, via saliva/nasopharyngeal swab, and (2) describe associations between viruses and long-term health conditions. We systematically searched Embase(Ovid), Medline(Ovid) and PubMed, then further searched the literature in a tiered approach. From the 143 articles included, 28 potentially asymptomatic viruses were identified. Our second search revealed associations with a range of delayed health conditions, with most related to the severity of initial symptoms. Many respiratory viruses were linked with development of recurrent wheeze or asthma. Of note, some potentially asymptomatic viruses are linked with later non-communicable diseases: adenovirus serotype 36 and obesity, Enterovirus-A71 associated Hand, Foot, Mouth Disease and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Ebstein Barr Virus (EBV) and malignancy, EBV and multiple sclerosis, HHV-6 and epilepsy, HBoV-1 and lung fibrosis and Norovirus and functional gastrointestinal disorders. Our review identified many potentially asymptomatic viruses, detectable in early life with potential delayed health consequences, that could be important to screen for in the future using rapid point-of-care viral detection methods. IMPACT: Novel point-of-care viral detection technologies enable rapid detection of viruses, both old and emerging. In view of increasing capability to screen for viruses, this is the first review to explore which potentially asymptomatic viruses, that are detectable using saliva and/or nasopharyngeal swabs in infants less than one year of age, are associated with delayed adverse health conditions. Further research into detecting such viruses in early life and their delayed health outcomes may pave new ways to prevent non-communicable diseases in the future.

Perinatal outcomes after regional analgesia during labour.

BACKGROUND: Regional analgesia is a common and effective form of in-labour analgesia. However, there are concerns whether it is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. AIMS: To examine the association between regional analgesia and maternal and neonatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study of singleton term births in Victoria, Australia, between 2014 and 2020. Women who received regional analgesia were compared with women who did not. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were used. RESULTS: There were 107 013 women who received regional analgesia and 214 416 women who did not. Compared to women who did not receive regional analgesia, regional analgesia was associated with an increased risk of instrumental birth (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.59, 95% CI: 3.52-3.67), caesarean section (aOR = 2.30, 95% CI: 2.24-2.35), longer duration of the second stage of labour (ß coefficient = 26.6 min, 95% CI: 26.3-27.0), Apgar score below seven at five minutes (aOR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.21-1.39), need for neonatal resuscitation (aOR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.40-1.48), need for formula in hospital (aOR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.65-1.72), and the last feed before discharge not exclusively from the breast (aOR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.56-1.62). CONCLUSION: Regional analgesia use in labour was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. These findings may add to the risk-benefit discussion regarding regional analgesia for pain relief and highlight the importance of shared decision-making. Further large prospective studies and randomised controlled trials will be useful.