Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 17884, 2024 08 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095553

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the United States. Recent epidemiological evidence demonstrates an increasing incidence of young-onset CRC cases, defined as CRC cases in individuals 50 years old or younger. Studies have established that alterations in both the WNT and TGF-Beta signaling pathways have contributed to CRC development. While this is well understood, the comprehensive analysis of WNT and TGF-Beta pathway alterations in young-onset CRC cases has yet to be investigated. Here, we conducted a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of mutations associated with each of the WNT and TGF-Beta signaling pathways according to age (≤ 50 years old versus > 50 years old) utilizing published genomic data from the cBioPortal. Chi-square results demonstrated no significant difference in WNT alterations between young-onset CRC and those > 50 years old. However, across all age groups, WNT alterations were frequently found in rectal cancers. We also found that WNT alterations were associated with better outcomes. The mutations associated with TGF-beta were observed at a higher rate in older CRC patients when compared to those ≤ 50 years old. Additionally, these mutations were found more frequently in colon primaries.


Assuntos
Idade de Início , Neoplasias Colorretais , Mutação , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta , Via de Sinalização Wnt , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/metabolismo , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/metabolismo , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Via de Sinalização Wnt/genética , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Idoso , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Proteínas Wnt/genética , Proteínas Wnt/metabolismo
2.
Transl Oncol ; 34: 101709, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37302348

RESUMO

Background: Data regarding outcomes among patients with cancer and co-morbid cardiovascular disease (CVD)/cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) after SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited. Objectives: To compare Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related complications among cancer patients with and without co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from 03/17/2020 to 12/31/2021. CVD/CVRF was defined as established CVD or no established CVD, male ≥ 55 or female ≥ 60 years, and one additional CVRF. The primary endpoint was an ordinal COVID-19 severity outcome including need for hospitalization, supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation, ICU or mechanical ventilation plus vasopressors, and death. Secondary endpoints included incident adverse CV events. Ordinal logistic regression models estimated associations of CVD/CVRF with COVID-19 severity. Effect modification by recent cancer therapy was evaluated. Results: Among 10,876 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with cancer (median age 65 [IQR 54-74] years, 53% female, 52% White), 6253 patients (57%) had co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Co-morbid CVD/CVRF was associated with higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted OR: 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]). Adverse CV events were significantly higher in patients with CVD/CVRF (all p<0.001). CVD/CVRF was associated with worse COVID-19 severity in patients who had not received recent cancer therapy, but not in those undergoing active cancer therapy (OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.31-1.74] vs. OR 1.04 [95% CI 0.90-1.20], pinteraction <0.001). Conclusions: Co-morbid CVD/CVRF is associated with higher COVID-19 severity among patients with cancer, particularly those not receiving active cancer therapy. While infrequent, COVID-19 related CV complications were higher in patients with comorbid CVD/CVRF. (COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium Registry [CCC19]; NCT04354701).

3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(3): ofac037, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35198648

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The frequency of coinfections and their association with outcomes have not been adequately studied among patients with cancer and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a high-risk group for coinfection. METHODS: We included adult (≥18 years) patients with active or prior hematologic or invasive solid malignancies and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infection, using data from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19, NCT04354701). We captured coinfections within ±2 weeks from diagnosis of COVID-19, identified factors cross-sectionally associated with risk of coinfection, and quantified the association of coinfections with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Among 8765 patients (hospitalized or not; median age, 65 years; 47.4% male), 16.6% developed coinfections: 12.1% bacterial, 2.1% viral, 0.9% fungal. An additional 6.4% only had clinical diagnosis of a coinfection. The adjusted risk of any coinfection was positively associated with age >50 years, male sex, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal comorbidities, diabetes, hematologic malignancy, multiple malignancies, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, progressing cancer, recent cytotoxic chemotherapy, and baseline corticosteroids; the adjusted risk of superinfection was positively associated with tocilizumab administration. Among hospitalized patients, high neutrophil count and C-reactive protein were positively associated with bacterial coinfection risk, and high or low neutrophil count with fungal coinfection risk. Adjusted mortality rates were significantly higher among patients with bacterial (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.33-1.95) and fungal (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.28-3.76) coinfections. CONCLUSIONS: Viral and fungal coinfections are infrequent among patients with cancer and COVID-19, with the latter associated with very high mortality rates. Clinical and laboratory parameters can be used to guide early empiric antimicrobial therapy, which may improve clinical outcomes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA