Neuroma morphology: A macroscopic classification system.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Neuromas come in different shapes and sizes; yet the correlation between neuroma morphology and symptomatology is unknown. Therefore, we aim to investigate macroscopic traits of excised human neuromas and assess the validity of a morphological classification system and its potential clinical implications. METHODS: End-neuroma specimens were collected from prospectively enrolled patients undergoing symptomatic neuroma surgery. Protocolized images of the specimens were obtained intraoperatively. Pain data (Numeric rating scale, 0-10) were prospectively collected during preoperative interview, patient demographic and comorbidity factors were collected from chart review. A morphological classification is proposed, and the inter-rater reliability (IRR) was assessed. Distribution of neuroma morphology with patient factors, was described. RESULTS: Forty-five terminal neuroma specimens from 27 patients were included. Residual limb patients comprised 93% of the population, of which 2 were upper (8.0%) and 23 (92.0%) were lower extremity residual limb patients. The proposed morphological classification, consisting of three groups (bulbous, fusiform, atypical), demonstrated a strong IRR (Cohen's kappa = 0.8). Atypical neuromas demonstrated higher preoperative pain, compared with bulbous and fusiform. Atypical morphology was more prevalent in patients with diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. DISCUSSION: A validated morphological classification of neuroma is introduced. These findings may assist surgeons and researchers with better understanding of symptomatic neuroma development and their clinical implications. The potential relationship of neuroma morphology with the vascular and metabolic microenvironment requires further investigation.

Early Post-operative Pain Course Following Primary and Secondary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation - a Temporal Description of Pain Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective surgical treatment of neuropathic pain for amputees. However, limited data exists regarding the early post-operative pain course for patients who undergo either Primary (<14 days since amputation) or Secondary (≥14 days) TMR. This study aims to outline the post-operative pain course for Primary and Secondary TMR during the first six post-operative months, to aid in patient education and expectation management. METHODS: Patients were eligible if they underwent TMR surgery between 2017 and 2023. Prospectively collected patient-reported outcome measures of pain scores, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity were analyzed. Multilevel mixed-effect models were utilized to visualize and compare pain courses between Primary and Secondary TMR patients. RESULTS: A total of 203 amputees were included, with 40.9% being Primary and 59.1% being Secondary TMR patients. Primary TMR patients reported significantly lower pain scores over the full 6-month post-operative trajectory (p<0.001) compared to Secondary TMR patients, with a difference of Δ-1.0 at day of TMR (Primary=4.5, Secondary=5.5), and a difference of Δ-1.4 at the 6-month mark (Primary=3.6, Secondary=5.0). Primary TMR patients also reported significantly lower Pain Interference (p<0.001) and Pain Intensity scores (p<0.001) over the complete trajectory of their care. CONCLUSION: Primary TMR patients report lower pain during the first six months post-operatively compared to secondary TMR patients. This may reflect how pre-existing neuropathic pain is more challenging to mitigate through peripheral nerve surgery. The current trends may assist in both understanding the post-operative pain course and in managing patient expectations following TMR.

Predictive Value of Preoperative Pain Sketches in Lower Extremity Amputees Undergoing Secondary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Treatment of Neuropathic Pain.

BACKGROUND: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is an effective surgical treatment for neuropathic pain in amputees. Qualitative descriptions of pain, depicted by pain sketches, could enhance the understanding of symptomatic improvement following surgery. Our aim is to assess whether pre-operative pain sketches, drawn by lower extremity (LE) amputees, can predict surgical outcomes following Secondary TMR surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Eligible patients were LE amputees who underwent Secondary TMR surgery between 2017 and 2023. Pain sketches and pain scores were prospectively collected both before and after surgery. The pain trajectory, as categorized by pre-operative pain sketches, was analyzed and assessed for improvement, defined as reaching the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The transition into different pain sketches and the occurrence of phantom drawings were evaluated for their association with improvement. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included, of which 18 (31.1%) depicted diffuse pain (DP), 26 (44.8%) depicted focal pain (FP), and 18 (24.1%) depicted radiating pain (RP) in their pre-operative sketch. FP sketches were associated with the lowest pre- and post-operative pain scores and most frequently developed into sketches indicating "no pain". RP sketches were associated with the least pain improvement, the lowest likelihood of achieving the MCID, and were more prevalent in patients with diabetes or depression. RP sketches were associated with phantom drawings; no other sketch types developed into RP sketches at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In LE amputees who underwent Secondary TMR, pre-operative pain sketches could serve as a helpful tool in predicting pain outcomes. RP sketches seemed to be associated with worse outcomes, and FP sketches with the most improvement.

Targeted muscle reinnervation at the time of amputation to prevent the development of neuropathic pain.

INTRODUCTION: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an established modality for the surgical management of neuropathic pain. Although the preventive effect of primary (acute) TMR at the time of amputation has been demonstrated previously, it remains unclear how many and which patients benefit most. Therefore, this study investigated the proportion of patients achieving sustained pain prophylaxis following amputation, as well as factors associated with its efficacy. METHODS: Primary patients who underwent TMR with a minimum follow-up of 6 months between 2018 and 2023 were enrolled. Pain outcomes (numeric rating scale [NRS], 0-10), comorbidities, and surgical factors were collected from chart review. Patients achieving sustained pain prophylaxis (NRS of ≤3 for ≥3 months until final follow-up) were identified. Multilevel mixed-effect models and multivariable regression were used to visualize pain courses and identify associated factors. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients who underwent primary TMR were included (median follow-up: 2.0 years), of whom 57.3% achieved sustained pain prophylaxis whereas 26.7% reported pain disappearance. Distal amputation levels (p = 0.036), a lower Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (p = 0.001), and the absence of psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.039) were associated with pain prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that more than half of all patients undergoing primary TMR achieved sustained pain prophylaxis, and approximately a quarter of patients achieved sustained pain disappearance. Several factors associated with these favorable outcomes are described. These results will aid in preoperative counseling, managing patient expectations, and selecting patients who may benefit most from primary TMR surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV - Therapeutic.

Phalangeal fractures: A retrospective comparison of open reduction and internal fixation vs. closed reduction and percutaneous pinning.

The treatment of phalangeal fractures is guided by fracture characteristics, patient factors and surgeon judgment. This study retrospectively compares characteristics of phalangeal fractures treated with closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) with those of fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to identify risk factors associated with reoperation. A total of 901 phalangeal fractures were included and treated operatively by either CRPP (748 fractures, 83 â€‹%) or ORIF (153 fractures, 17 â€‹%). Demographics, surgical management, and complication data were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to stratify risk associations and identify potential predictors of reoperation. With multivariate analysis and bootstrapped LASSO regression, fractures addressed by means of ORIF (vs. CRPP), work-related fractures, and open fractures were found to be independently associated with reoperation. These findings can be used to guide patient selection, surgical planning and timing of fracture repair. Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic.

Biology and pathophysiology of symptomatic neuromas.

ABSTRACT: Neuromas are a substantial cause of morbidity and reduction in quality of life. This is not only caused by a disruption in motor and sensory function from the underlying nerve injury but also by the debilitating effects of neuropathic pain resulting from symptomatic neuromas. A wide range of surgical and therapeutic modalities have been introduced to mitigate this pain. Nevertheless, no single treatment option has been successful in completely resolving the associated constellation of symptoms. While certain novel surgical techniques have shown promising results in reducing neuroma-derived and phantom limb pain, their effectiveness and the exact mechanism behind their pain-relieving capacities have not yet been defined. Furthermore, surgery has inherent risks, may not be suitable for many patients, and may yet still fail to relieve pain. Therefore, there remains a great clinical need for additional therapeutic modalities to further improve treatment for patients with devastating injuries that lead to symptomatic neuromas. However, the molecular mechanisms and genetic contributions behind the regulatory programs that drive neuroma formation-as well as the resulting neuropathic pain-remain incompletely understood. Here, we review the histopathological features of symptomatic neuromas, our current understanding of the mechanisms that favor neuroma formation, and the putative contributory signals and regulatory programs that facilitate somatic pain, including neurotrophic factors, neuroinflammatory peptides, cytokines, along with transient receptor potential, and ionotropic channels that suggest possible approaches and innovations to identify novel clinical therapeutics.

"Pain Sketches Demonstrate Patterns of Pain Distribution and Pain Progression following Primary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Amputees."

BACKGROUND: Numerical scales are validated methods to report pain outcomes after Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) but do not include the assessment of qualitative pain components. This study evaluates the application of pain sketches within a cohort of patients undergoing primary TMR and describes differences in pain progression according to early postoperative sketches. METHODS: This study included 30 patients with major limb amputation and primary TMR. Patients' drawings were categorized into four categories of pain distribution (focal (FP), radiating (RP), diffuse (DP) and no pain (NP)) and inter-rater reliability was calculated. Secondly, pain outcomes were analyzed for each category. Pain scores were the primary and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability for the sketch categories was good (overall Kappa coefficient of 0.8). The NP category reported a mean decrease in pain of 4.8 points, followed by the DP (2.5 points) and FP categories (2.0 points). The RP category reported a mean increase in pain of 0.5 points. For PROMIS Pain Interference and Pain Intensity, the DP category reported a mean decrease of 7.2 and 6.5 points respectively, followed by the FP category (5.3 and 3.6 points). The RP category reported a mean increase of 2.0 points in PROMIS Pain Interference and a mean decrease of 1.4 points in PROMIS Pain Intensity. Secondary outcomes for the NP category were not reported. CONCLUSIONS: Pain sketches demonstrated reliability in pain morphology assessment and might be an adjunctive tool for pain interpretation in this setting.

Clinical outcomes in patients with scaphoid non-union treated with the vascularized medial femoral condyle technique a case series.

INTRODUCTION: Non-union is a prevalent complication of scaphoid fractures. Late diagnosis is common and has a clinical impact due to functional limitations for the patient. Multiple treatments have been proposed to manage this complication, ranging from conservative (i.e., orthopedic) to surgical treatment. The vascularized medial femoral condyle technique has shown satisfactory clinical and paraclinical results, mainly in presence of avascular necrosis of the proximal pole but data regarding functional outcomes and patient satisfaction is scarce. This case series aims to describe the clinical and patient-reported outcomes in a consecutive series of patients with non-union of the proximal third of the scaphoid treated with vascularized medial femoral condyle technique. METHODS: Case series reporting results for a consecutive - initial cohort of patients who presented with a non united fracture of the proximal pole of the scaphoid, avascular necrosis of the proximal pole was documented by CT od MRI imaging preoperatively in all patients. Measurement instruments include the q-DASH and PRWE questionnaires, radiographic images, goniometry, and assessment of grip strength. RESULTS: Twelve consecutive patients are included and they represent the initial cases for all surgeons involved; bone union was obtained in 10 patients (83%) after a mean follow-up time of 31 months (6-72), successful improvement in the range of motion and grip strength was documented. A high rate of satisfaction expressed by the patient was obtained, with an average score in Q-DASH of 17.3 and 20.1 in PRWE. CONCLUSIONS: The vascularized medial condyle technique in cases of nonunion of scaphoid fracture is a reproducible treatment in clinical terms, both in imaging and functional terms, and in patient satisfaction. The learning curve is flat for a dedicated multi surgeon team.

Epidemiology and Fracture Patterns of Traumatic Phalangeal Fractures.

Background: Despite the relatively high incidence of phalangeal fractures, there is an imperfect understanding of the epidemiology and anatomical distribution of these fractures. This study describes the patient characteristics, anatomic distribution, and detailed fracture patterns of phalangeal fractures among a large adult cohort in the United States. Methods: A retrospective study was performed among patients with phalangeal fractures in the United States between January 2010 and January 2015. Included patients were 18 years old or older and had a diagnosis of a phalangeal fracture. A total of 2140 phalangeal fractures in 1747 patients were included, and a manual chart review was performed to collect epidemiological and radiographic information. Fractures were classified based on location and fracture pattern. Results: The median age at the time of injury was 45 years (interquartile range, 30-57), and 65% of patients were men. The small finger had the highest incidence of fractures (26%) followed by the ring finger (24%). Distal and proximal phalanges demonstrated the highest incidence of fractures at 39% each. The dominant hand was affected in 44% of cases. Eighteen percent of fractures were due to a work-related trauma mechanism, and the most common mechanism of injury was blunt trauma (46%). Conclusion: This study provides a detailed overview of the anatomic distribution and fracture patterns of phalangeal fractures in an adult US population and, thus, may aid hand surgeons treating these injuries.

Phalangeal Fractures Requiring Vascular Reconstruction: Epidemiology and Factors Predictive of Reoperation.

BACKGROUND: Demographic information related to phalangeal fractures that undergo simultaneous vascular repair, as well as their complication and reoperation profiles, remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to examine the patient and fracture characteristics influencing the outcomes after these injuries in a large Unites States adult patient cohort and to identify risk factors associated with unplanned reoperation of these fractures. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed, identifying 54 phalangeal fractures in 48 patients; all fractures were also associated with vascular injuries requiring repair. Patients with digital amputations were excluded. A manual chart review was performed to collect epidemiologic, radiographic, and surgical outcome information. RESULTS: The incidence of phalangeal fractures undergoing vascular repair was higher in the non-dominant hand, middle finger, proximal phalanx, and phalangeal shaft. Most (52.9%) fractures were due to occupational injury, with the most common mechanism being sharp injuries. More than half of the fractures had a nerve injury, and 13% required a vein graft for vascular repair. More than half of the fractures required at least one reoperation, most commonly due to "stiffness/tendon adhesion" (50%) and "nonunion or delayed union" (21.4%). In multivariable analysis, thumb (odds ratio [OR]: 35.1, P = .043) and index (OR: 14.0, P = .048) fingers' fractures were found to be independently associated with unplanned reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Phalangeal fractures requiring vascular repair occurred most often in the occupational setting and more than 50% required at least one unplanned reoperation. Injuries sustained in the thumb and index finger were more likely to undergo unplanned reoperation, which may guide initial treatment decision-making and postoperative follow-up.

Nonoperative vs Operative Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Appendectomy remains the standard of care for uncomplicated acute appendicitis despite several randomized clinical trials pointing to the safety and efficacy of nonoperative management of this disease. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials may contribute to the body of evidence and help surgeons select which patients may benefit from surgical and nonsurgical treatment. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of nonoperative management vs appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Data Sources: A systematic review was conducted using indexed sources (Embase and PubMed) to search for published randomized clinical trials in English comparing nonoperative management with appendectomy in adult patients presenting with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. To increase sensitivity, no limits were set for outcomes reported, sex, or year of publication. All nonrandomized or quasi-randomized trials were excluded, and validated primers were used. Study Selection: Among 1504 studies imported for screening, 805 were duplicates, and 595 were excluded for irrelevancy. A further 96 were excluded after full-text review, mainly owing to wrong study design or inclusion of pediatric populations. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for the meta-analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Meta-extraction was conducted with independent extraction by multiple reviewers using the Covidence platform for systematic reviews and in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data were pooled by a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment success and major adverse effects at 30 days' follow-up. Results: The main outcome (treatment success proportion at 30 days of follow-up) was not significantly different in the operative and nonoperative management cohorts (risk ratio [RR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.11). Likewise, the percentage of major adverse effects was similar in both cohorts (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.79). However, in the nonoperative management group, length of stay was significantly longer (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70), and a median cumulative incidence of 18% of recurrent appendicitis was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: These results point to the general safety and efficacy of nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, this strategy may be associated with an increase in duration of hospital stay and a higher rate of recurrent appendicitis. This meta-analysis may help inform decision-making in nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Translated Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score.

Introduction The purpose of this study is to perform a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the translated Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score exclusively for pathologies of the wrist. Materials and Methods A methodological study of cross-cultural validation of clinical scores was performed through a test-retest reliability analysis, internal consistency, response to change, and criterion validity assessment. Results The test was applied to 57 patients with 139 surveys. Stability evaluated through Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.98, with 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97-0.99; Cronbach's alpha was > 0.91; the difference in score was 24.26 (standard deviation: 26.59); the standardized response mean was 0.912; the effect size was 0.924; the Spearman's coefficient between the differences of PRWE and DASH-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand-scores was r = 0.899, with 95% CI = 0.811-0.947; Spearman's nonparametric correlation test between PRWE and DASH was 0.82, with 95% CI = 0.711-0.890. Conclusions We successfully validated the Spanish translation of the PRWE scale. It showed valid and reliable interpretation of functional status and response to treatment after distal radius fracture, for Colombian population. Level of Evidence This is a level II, methodological study for scale validation.

Neurotización del nervio circunflejo por vía axilar, estudio cadavérico / Neurotization of the circumflex nerve through an axillary approach, cadaveric study

Objetivo Confirmar factibilidad técnica de la neurotización del nervio axilar por la rama motora de la porción larga del tríceps con el fin de definir la anatomía quirúrgica de los nervios radial y axilar. Materiales y métodos Veinte hombros de cadáver fueron intervenidos para transferencia de la rama del Nervio Radial para la porción larga del tríceps a la rama anterior del Nervio Axilar por abordaje axilar. Se confirmó la escogencia correcta del nervio receptor por abordaje posterior. Resultados Se logró una disección adecuada de la primera rama motora del nervio radial del nervio axilar y de la rama anterior del Nervio Axilar. El origen de la rama motora se encontró en promedio a 3,8mm (+/- 7,3mm) distal al borde superior del tendón del dorsal ancho. El nervio axilar se encontró cefálico al borde superior del dorsal ancho a una distancia promedio de 11,3mm (+/-2,13mm) y distal al redondo menor 3.05mm (+/- 1,3mm), sutura con la primera rama del radial en el 100% de los casos sin tensión y se confirmó la adecuada transferencia en todos los casos. Conclusión La neurotización del nervio axilar con la primera rama del nervio radial se logró con éxito en el 100% por vía axilar. Este abordaje es adecuado, evitando tener que realizar cambios de posición a prono y doble abordaje, y si se requiere procedimientos adicionales de reconstrucción en el mismo tiempo quirúrgico tipo Oberlin y exploraciones supraclaviculares del plexo braquial se pueden realizar sin cambio de posición.

Objective To confirm the technical feasibility of neurotization of the axillary nerve by the motor branch of the long head of the triceps in order to define the surgical anatomy of the radial and axillary nerves. Materials and method Twenty cadaver shoulders were operated on for transfer of the radial nerve branch for the long head of the triceps to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve by axillary approach. The correct choice of the receiving nerve was confirmed by posterior approach. Results An adequate dissection of the first motor branch of the radial nerve of the axillary nerve and of the anterior branch of the Axillary Nerve was achieved, The origin of the motor branch was found on average at 3.8mm (+/−7.3mm) distal to the superior border of the latissimus dorsi tendon. The axillary nerve was found 11.3mm (+/−2.13mm) cephalad to the upper border of the latissimus dorsi and 3.05mm (+/−1.3mm) distal to the teres minor. A tensionless coaptation was obtained in all cases. Conclusion Neurotization of the axillary nerve with the first branch of the radial nerve was successfully achieved through the axillary approach. This approach is adequate, avoiding position change to prone and double approach, and if additional reconstruction procedures are required at the same surgical time, Oberlin type and supraclavicular explorations of the brachial plexus can be performed without changing position.