Stroke Acute Management and Outcomes During the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Cohort Study From the Madrid Stroke Network.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has added challenges to providing quality acute stroke care due to the reallocation of stroke resources to COVID-19. Case series suggest that patients with COVID-19 have more severe strokes; however, no large series have compared stroke outcomes with contemporary non-COVID-19 patients. Purpose was to analyze the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in stroke care and to evaluate stroke outcomes according to the diagnosis of COVID-19. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter cohort study including consecutive acute stroke patients admitted to 7 stroke centers from February 25 to April 25, 2020 (first 2 months of the COVID-19 outbreak in Madrid). The quality of stroke care was measured by the number of admissions, recanalization treatments, and time metrics. The primary outcome was death or dependence at discharge. RESULTS: A total of 550 acute stroke patients were admitted. A significant reduction in the number of admissions and secondary interhospital transfers was found. COVID-19 was confirmed in 105 (19.1%) patients, and a further 19 patients were managed as suspected COVID-19 (3.5%). No differences were found in the rates of reperfusion therapies in ischemic strokes (45.5% non-COVID-19, 35.7% confirmed COVID-19, and 40% suspected COVID-19; P=0.265). However, the COVID-19 group had longer median door-to-puncture time (110 versus 80 minutes), which was associated with the performance of chest computed tomography. Multivariate analysis confirmed poorer outcomes for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratios, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.12-3.76] and 3.56 [95% CI, 1.15-11.05], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that patients with COVID-19 have more severe strokes and poorer outcomes despite similar acute management. A well-established stroke care network helps to diminish the impact of such an outbreak in stroke care, reducing secondary transfers and allowing maintenance of reperfusion therapies, with a minor impact on door-to-puncture times, which were longer in patients who underwent chest computed tomography.

Fewer COVID-19-associated strokes and reduced severity during the second COVID-19 wave: The Madrid Stroke Network.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The experience gained during the first COVID-19 wave could have mitigated the negative impact on stroke care in the following waves. Our aims were to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients with stroke admitted during the second COVID-19 wave and to evaluate the differences in the stroke care provision compared with the first wave. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included consecutive stroke patients admitted to any of the seven hospitals with stroke units (SUs) and endovascular treatment facilities in the Madrid Health Region. The characteristics of the stroke patients with or without a COVID-19 diagnosis were compared and the organizational changes in stroke care between the first wave (25 February to 25 April 2020) and second wave (21 July to 21 November 2020) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 550 and 1191 stroke patients were admitted during the first and second COVID-19 waves, respectively, with an average daily admission rate of nine patients in both waves. During the second wave, there was a decrease in stroke severity (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 5 vs. 6; p = 0.000), in-hospital strokes (3% vs. 8.1%) and in-hospital mortality (9.9% vs. 15.9%). Furthermore, fewer patients experienced concurrent COVID-19 (6.8% vs. 19.1%), and they presented milder COVID-19 and less severe strokes. Fewer hospitals reported a reduction in the number of SU beds or deployment of SU personnel to COVID-19 dedicated wards during the second wave. CONCLUSIONS: During the second COVID-19 wave, fewer stroke patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, and they had less stroke severity and milder COVID-19.

Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry.

Recent case-series of small size implied a pathophysiological association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe large-vessel acute ischemic stroke. Given that severe strokes are typically associated with poor prognosis and can be very efficiently treated with recanalization techniques, confirmation of this putative association is urgently warranted in a large representative patient cohort to alert stroke clinicians, and inform pre- and in-hospital acute stroke patient pathways. We pooled all consecutive patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and acute ischemic stroke in 28 sites from 16 countries. To assess whether stroke severity and outcomes (assessed at discharge or at the latest assessment for those patients still hospitalized) in patients with acute ischemic stroke are different between patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching analyses of our COVID-19 patients with non-COVID-19 patients registered in the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne Registry between 2003 and 2019. Between January 27, 2020, and May 19, 2020, 174 patients (median age 71.2 years; 37.9% females) with COVID-19 and acute ischemic stroke were hospitalized (median of 12 patients per site). The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 10 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-18). In the 1:1 matched sample of 336 patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19, the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was higher in patients with COVID-19 (10 [IQR, 4-18] versus 6 [IQR, 3-14]), P=0.03; (odds ratio, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.08-2.65] for higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score). There were 48 (27.6%) deaths, of which 22 were attributed to COVID-19 and 26 to stroke. Among 96 survivors with available information about disability status, 49 (51%) had severe disability at discharge. In the propensity score-matched population (n=330), patients with COVID-19 had higher risk for severe disability (median mRS 4 [IQR, 2-6] versus 2 [IQR, 1-4], P<0.001) and death (odds ratio, 4.3 [95% CI, 2.22-8.30]) compared with patients without COVID-19. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 associated ischemic strokes are more severe with worse functional outcome and higher mortality than non-COVID-19 ischemic strokes.

Acalculous cholecystitis associated with levodopa-carbidopa intestinal infusion therapy: A case report.

Continuous intra jejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is one of the primary therapies for improving advanced Parkinson's disease symptoms. Placement of the jejunal catheter through the abdominal wall for drug administration requires a percutaneous interventional procedure called percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). PEG is considered a safe and straightforward procedure, and it is performed very commonly in clinical practice. In the context of LCIG treatment, severe adverse events have been identified, such as intestinal bleeding and acute abdomen [1], but acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) has never been reported.

Early-Onset Dementia Associated with a Heterozygous, Nonsense, and de novo Variant in the MBD5 Gene.

The haploinsufficiency of the methyl-binding domain protein 5 (MBD5) gene has been identified as the determinant cause of the neuropsychiatric disorders grouped under the name MBD5-neurodevelopment disorders (MAND). MAND includes patients with intellectual disability, behavioral problems, and seizures with a static clinical course. However, a few reports have suggested regression. We describe a non-intellectually disabled female, with previous epilepsy and personality disorder, who developed early-onset dementia. The extensive etiologic study revealed a heterozygous nonsense de novo pathogenic variant in the MBD5 gene. This finding could support including the MBD5 gene in the study of patients with atypical early-onset dementia.

Factores psicosociales y síndrome de Burnout en médicos generales de Tepic, Nayarit (México) / Psychosocial variables and Burnout syndrome in general physicians in Tepic, Nayarit (México)

Objetivo: Analizar los factores psicosociales que se asocian al síndrome de burnout en los médicos generales que laboran para una institución pública de salud en Tepic, Nayarit (México). Material y métodos: El estudio fue transversal analítico. La población la conformaron 97 médicos generales de manera voluntaria y bajo consentimiento informado. Para captar la información se emplearon dos instrumentos: la guía de identificación de factores psicosociales del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social y la escala de "Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)". Resultados: La prevalencia global para los factores psicosociales fue del 23.7% y del 32% para el síndrome de burnout. Se obtuvieron asociaciones significativas entre algunas áreas de los factores psicosociales con diferentes dimensiones del síndrome de burnout. Se demostró evidencia significativa entre ambas escalas, con un OR de 2.70, IC=1.02-4.30 y p= 0.0441. Conclusiones: Los médicos probablemente manifiestan el síndrome de burnout debido a la exigencia que implica velar la salud y el bienestar de las personas, adecuar las áreas laborales y organización del trabajo y las tareas podría ser una estrategia importante.

Objective: To examine the psychosocial factors that are associated with burnout syndrome in the general physicians who work for a public health institution in Tepic (Nayarit, Mexico). Material and methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was performed. The population was comprised of 97 general physicians who participated voluntarily and signed an informed consent. To collect the information, two instruments were used: the identification of psychosocial factors guide of the Mexican Social Security Institute and the scale of "Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Results: The overall prevalence of psychosocial factors was 23.7% and 32% for the burnout syndrome. Significant associations were obtained between some areas of psychosocial factors with different dimensions of burnout syndrome. It showed significant evidence between both scales, with an OR of 2.70 and a value of p = 0.0441. Conclusions: The physicians may manifest burnout syndrome due to the requirement that deserves health care and welfare of people. Adjustment of work area, job organization and tasks could be an important strategy.