"We black women have to kill a lion everyday": An intersectional analysis of racism and social determinants of health in Brazil.

The concept of intersectionality has been used to analyze and understand how multiple forms of identity and oppression interact to shape life experiences of marginalized groups. We conducted a qualitative study to explore how Black Brazilian women experience the intersections of race, class, and gender and the ways in which these intersecting experiences act as social determinants of health. Nine focus groups were conducted with Black, White, and mixed-race women of childbearing age (n = 37), social and health activists (n = 11), and health professionals (n = 20). The focus groups took place in two cities in the Brazilian state of Bahia during October and November 2012. Using a comparative approach, we describe participants' responses regarding the life experiences of women of differing racial and class backgrounds. Our findings highlight how the intersectional relationship between race, class, and gender alters women's social context and life course opportunities, as well as their stressors and protective buffers. We argue that the differing intersectional experiences of women due to race and class create unique social contexts that define the parameters of health and wellness. In addition, we argue that the experiences at each intersection (i.e., raceXclass, raceXgender, classXgender, raceXclassXgender) have a unique character that can be qualitatively described. Improved specification of exposures experienced by marginalized populations who experience intersecting forms of oppression can help explain intra- and inter-group differences in health outcomes, and may also lead to improved intervention models.

Achieving Breastfeeding Equity: A Study of a National Breastfeeding Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Equity in breastfeeding could reduce excess morbidity and mortality among children and mothers of color. Few programs that support breastfeeding have been evaluated for their capacity to create equity. The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which a diverse set of national breastfeeding programs actively promoted equity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Qualitative data collection was conducted between December 2012 and July 2013 by visits to 29 of 58 breastfeeding programs selected by the funder. Programs underwent a site visit with open-ended interviews of staff. Investigators used Atlas.ti software to code data and content analysis of qualitative evaluation data. Key categories and themes were identified to answer the questions: how do the programs conceptualize equity? and how do the organizations operationalize an approach to equity? RESULTS: Programs had widely divergent and often limited conceptualizations of equity. Nine categories describe the equity approaches' programs used. The social, political, and environmental contexts in which programs operated varied in the degree of challenge they pose for implementing equity-focused breastfeeding methods. We found only a few programs that matched the social, cultural, and economic realities and context of women of color. CONCLUSIONS: Breastfeeding equity programs need to explicitly define and envision outcomes, and need to identify equity inhibiting policies and practices. Equity attainment is more likely to emerge from institutional transformational processes that collaborate with the populations at risk. These findings have implications for other programs addressing equity in health.