Comparison of TestPack Plus Strep A with selective and nonselective culture media for detection of group-A streptococci.

The TestPack Plus Strep A (TPPSA), an immunoassay method, was compared with conventional culture methods including nonselective trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood and selective SXT blood agar for detection of group-A streptococci (GAS). A total of 452 throat swabs was evaluated, of which 261 (57.7%) and 191 (42.3%) were compared with culture using nonselective and selective media, respectively. Of 261 specimens evaluated on nonselective media, 71 (27.1%) were culture positive for GAS. TPPSA demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.6% and a specificity of 94.2% with positive and negative predictive values of 85.5% and 96.8%, respectively. Of 191 specimens evaluated on selective media, 44 (23.0%) were culture positive for GAS. TPPSA demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.2% and a specificity of 98.0% with positive and negative predictive values of 93.2% and 98.0%, respectively. The performance of TPPSA when compared with nonselective and selective media demonstrated a similar sensitivity, but a higher specificity was seen when compared to selective media. Overall, TPPSA was extremely easy to perform, had built-in procedural controls, required minimal technologist time, and was easy to interpret. With an accuracy of 93.5% when compared with nonselective media and 96.9% when compared with selective media, TPPSA could be recommended as a reliable method for detection of GAS.

A comparison of oxoid signal with nonradiometric BACTEC NR-660 for detection of bacteremia.

The Oxoid Signal (Oxoid U.S.A. Inc., Columbia, Maryland) system was compared with the nonradiometric BACTEC NR-660 (Johnston Laboratories, Towson, Maryland) system for detection of bacteria in 2714 blood cultures. The volume of blood collected into 20 ml blood-collection tubes containing sodium polyanetholsulfonate (SPS) (Becton Dickinson, Vacutainer Systems, Rutherford, New Jersey) ranged from 10 to 20 ml with an average of 15 ml. Subsequently, equal volumes of blood were inoculated into each system. A total of 250 organisms was isolated (9.6%), of which 149 (5.5%) were considered significant while 111 isolates from 98 cultures (3.6%) were contaminants. Of the significant isolates 32.9% were aerobic Gram-negative rods, 53.0% aerobic Gram-positive cocci, 5.4% anaerobes, 7.4% yeasts, and two isolates of Neisseria meningitidis. Ninety-five isolates were recovered in both systems, 29 by Bactec only and 25 by Signal only. Of the isolates recovered there were no significant differences in detection between the two systems with the exception of anaerobes (p less than 0.005). The median detection times for many of the most commonly isolated organisms--Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, and Staphylococcus aureus--were very similar in both systems, ranging from 14 to 21 hours. With the remaining organisms recovered, the median times in hours for BAC-TEC and Signal, respectively, were 31 and 47 for Staphylococcus epidermidis, 48 and 60 for Bacteroides, 39 and 168 for yeast, and 16.5 and 168 for N. meningitidis. Oxoid Signal compares favorably with the BACTEC system. Its main advantages are: (1) it requires no instrumentation; (2) it is characterized by ease of detection; and (3) it uses a single-bottle system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of agitation and frequent subculturing on recovery of aerobic and facultative pathogens by Roche Septi-Chek and BACTEC blood culture systems.

The positivity rate and time to recovery of pathogens were compared in Roche Septi-Chek (RSC-TSB) and BACTEC radiometric systems on 3,539 paired blood cultures. Both systems were steadily agitated, with frequent subculturing or processing of the RSC-TSB agar slides and BACTEC bottles, respectively, during the first 24 h of incubation. The RSC-TSB system recovered 249 pathogens (7.0% positivity rate), compared with 234 (6.6% positivity rate) isolates recovered from BACTEC. For the most common isolates, Staphylococcus aureus and the Enterobacteriaceae, the median time to detection was 15.8 h for BACTEC and 18.6 h for the RSC-TSB system. No statistically significant difference was observed in recovery of organisms from the two systems, except for S. aureus (P less than 0.05). In the RSC-TSB system, 42% of S. aureus, 58% of the Enterobacteriaceae, and 45% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates had sufficient growth on the agar slant to allow performance of rapid standardized identification and susceptibility studies. In comparison with other studies using static incubation, it appears that agitation and frequent subculturing of the RSC-TSB system during the first 24 h of incubation decreased the time to detection for the majority of significant blood culture isolates.