Molecular profile of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas bearing p16 high phenotype.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine biomarker expression differences in head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCCs) based on p16/human papillomavirus (HPV) classification. In addition, our aim was to explore how expression of biomarkers is modulated after E6/E7 repression in HPV16⁺ oropharyngeal cancer cells. METHODS: HPV16⁺ and HPV⁻ HNSCC cells were infected with retroviruses expressing short hairpin RNA targeting HPV16 E6/E7. Components of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway before and after E6/E7 gene silencing were analyzed by immunoblotting and qRT-PCR. Protein expression of 13 biomarkers was analyzed using AQUA on a tissue microarray (TMA). The HPV16 status was determined using HPV16 in situ hybridization (ISH). RESULTS: In HPV16⁺ cells, E6/E7 silencing was associated with PTEN upregulation and reduction of phosphorylated EGFR. Tumors were classified into four categories based on the HPV and p16 status. HPV⁺/p16⁺ tumors expressed significantly higher levels of E-cadherin (P = 0.003), PTEN (P = 0.004), lower levels of PI3Kp110 and ß-catenin (P = 0.07). There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS, P = 0.016) among the four subsets. The median OS was 24.83 months for p16⁻/HPV⁻ patients, 11.63 for p16⁻/HPV⁺ patients and was not reached for p16⁺/HPV⁻ and p16⁺/HPV⁺ groups. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant EGFR signaling contributes to malignant conversion of HPV16⁺ HNSCC cells. These results validate ß-catenin as a distinct biomarker in HPV⁺/p16⁺ HNSCC. Wnt signaling inhibitors merit exploration in HPV⁺/p16⁺ HNSCC.

Nivolumab-induced lichenoid granulomatous stomatitis in a patient with advanced melanoma: A case report.

Lichenoid granulomatous reactions (LGR) are granulomatous inflammations of the skin and oral mucosa, also sharing features of lichenoid lesions. Thus, the present study refers to lichenoid granulomatous dermatitis (LGD) and lichenoid granulomatous stomatitis (LGS). LGR is a condition that can be triggered by drugs, diseases or environmental causes. In the present case study, anti-PD1 (nivolumab) medication had a detrimental effect on the oral mucosa, which clinicaly and histologicaly proved to be LGS. Checkpoint inhibitors consitute a cornerstone in the current treatment of several types of cancer, of which cutaneous melanoma is the best example. Oral lichenoid responses following anti-PD-1 therapy have been recorded in few case reports and small case series. To the best of our knowledhe, this is the first case of LGS being reported as a side effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of carboplatin and paclitaxel combination in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-seven eligible patients with measurable advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma were treated with carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) 5] and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for 6-9 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were 10 complete responses (CRs) (21%) and 19 partial responses (PRs) (41%) for an overall response rate (RR) of 62% (29 patients) (95% confidence interval [CI], 47-76%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months (95% CI, 7.3-22.7 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 25 months (95% CI, 19.0-31.0 months). No difference was found in RR and OS in patients with primary advanced disease and those with recurrent tumors. Similarly, no difference was found in PFS and OS for patients with serous/clear tumors and those with endometrioid tumors. Toxicity was generally mild except for myelotoxicity. Neutropenia grade 3/4 was recorded in 36% of patients and 6% experienced febrile neutropenia. One patient each developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia and anemia. Grade 3 sensory neuropathy was recorded in 6% of patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel appears to have activity in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Topoisomerase I protein expression in primary colorectal cancer and recurrences after 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to investigate whether chemotherapy with 5-FU induces an alteration in the levels of topoisomerase I (topo I) in colorectal neoplastic tissues METHODS: Twenty-five colorectal cancer patients were included in our study; these had undergone surgical resection of the primary tumor, received post-operatively 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy and then suffered from recurrences. In a standard three-step immunohistochemical procedure, a monoclonal antibody to topo I was applied in both specimens from each patient (one from the primary location and a second one from the recurrence). Statistical analysis was subsequently performed. RESULTS: Malignant cells from the recurrences displayed a statistical significant increase, concerning the levels of topoisomerase I, by comparison with the primary tumors (P=0.01). The increase in topo I levels did not demonstrate significant correlations with Duke's stage (Fisher's Exact Test P value=0.496), differentiation grade (P value=0.661), localization (P value=0.072), patient sex (P value=0.434), nor with relapse free interval (P value=0.493). There was a statistically significant relationship between the age of patients and increase in topo I levels (P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Topo I expression may be part of the malignant cells' phenotype in recurrent colorectal carcinomas, suggesting a potential role for Topo I in the acquisition of a metastatic phenotype. The increase of topo I immunohistochemical status is likely to be attributed to 5-FU and given the fact that high levels of topo I correlate with sensitivity to camptothecin, advanced colorectal cancer patients seem to benefit from topo I targeted anticancer drug therapy.

Two different schedules of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma relapsing after a 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combination. A randomized study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan as second-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) failing or relapsing after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (LV) standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Irinotecan was randomly administered in two different schedules (once every 3 weeks, and every 10 days) in patients failing prior 5-FU plus LV. Patients were randomized to two treatment groups: group A received irinotecan 350 mg/m2 every 21 days and group B received irinotecan 175 mg/m2 days 1 and 10 every 21 days. RESULTS: Group A comprised 60 patients: 34 male/26 female, median age 64 years (range 48-70 years), and median Karnofsky performance status (PS) 90. Their metastatic sites included liver (n=47), lymph nodes (n=27), lung (n=14), abdomen (n=14), pelvis (n=8), "other" (n=2), and local recurrence (n=12). Group B comprised 60 patients: 36 male/24 female, median age 62 years (46-70 years), and median PS 90. Their metastatic sites included liver (n=49), lymph nodes (n=29), lung (n=17), abdomen (n=16), pelvis (n=11), "other" (n=2), and local recurrence (n=13). Group A showed the following responses: complete response (CR) 2, partial response (PR) 12, stable disease (SD) 21, progressive disease (PD) 26, overall response rate (ORR) 23%, tumor growth control 58%. Group B showed the following responses: CR 1, PR 14, SD 22, PD 23; ORR 25%; tumor growth control 62%. Toxicities included acute cholinergic syndrome (group A 53%, group B 19%; P<0.0001), late-onset diarrhea grade 1/2 (group A 21%, group B 46%) and grade 3/4 (group A 41%, group B 66%; P<0.0001), nausea and vomiting grade 1/2 (group A 34%, group B 59%) and grade 3/4 (group A 30%, group B 12%; P<0.0001), neutropenia grade 3/4 (group A 27%, group B 28%; P<0.03), with febrile neutropenia seen in only four patients in group A, anemia grade more than 2 (group A 28%, group B 12%; P<0.05), asthenia grade more than 3 (group A 24%, group B 18%; P<0.001), and alopecia grade more than 3 (group A 40%, group B 34%; P<0.2). CONCLUSIONS: . The present study indicates that, in patients with ACC who have relapsed after 5-FU plus LV, the administration of irinotecan fractionated into two doses every 21 days yields a similar efficacy to, but a much lower incidence of toxicity than, the same total dose of irinotecan administered once every 21 days.

Leucovorin and fluorouracil vs levamisole and fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 6-month therapy with leucovorin (LV) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) vs 12 months of therapy with levamisole (LVZ) + 5-FU, as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected Dukes' stage B2 or C rectal cancer. One hundred and fifty patients with surgically resected rectal carcinoma, were enrolled in the present study; Dukes' stage B2 (n=70) or C (n=80), were randomly assigned to chemotherapy with 5-FU + LV x 6 months or 5-FU + LVZ x 12 months. Patient characteristics were equally balanced between the examined groups. Adjuvant CT consisted of LV 20 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) plus 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) i.v., on days 1-5 every 4 weeks for 6 cycles or 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) i.v. every week plus LVZ 50 mg t.i.d x 3 days for 1 year. All patients received radiotherapy with a three-field technique to a total dose of 45 Gy, over 5 weeks. After a median follow-up of 7.4 years there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups with respect to the recurrence rates (P=0.821). Moreover, there was no difference in disease-free survival for patients stage Dukes' B2 (log-rank p=0.73); median for LV group 90 (8-131) months, and for LVZ group 86.5 (3-129) months. No difference was noted in disease-free survival for patients stage Dukes' C (log-rank p=0.73); median for LV group 60 (17-128) months, and for LVZ group 64 (2-123) months. There was no difference in overall survival for patients stage Dukes' B2 (log-rank p=0.75); median for LV group 90 (22-131) months, and for LVZ group 86 (10-129) months. For stage Dukes' C (log-rank p=0.73); median for LV group 67 (17-128) months, and for LVZ group 64 (5-123) months. Toxicities were as follows in the 5-FU + LVZ vs 5-FU + LV group; myelosuppression (leucopenia grade 3, 12% vs 4%, p<0.04), diarrhea (grade 0, 60% vs 76%, p<0.02), and liver toxicity (increase of transaminases >3-fold, 12 patients vs 2, p<0.03), were more frequent in LVZ group. None of the patients stopped chemotherapy because of the toxicity, and there were no toxicity-related deaths. In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy in RC with LV + 5-FU for 6 months is equally effective and less toxic than LVZ + 5-FU for 12 months.

Immune changes in patients with colorectal cancer treated by adjuvant therapy with monoclonal antibody 17-1A: a pilot study.

We investigated the efficacy of Mo17-1A to improve important immunological parameters in vivo and in vitro in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients receiving no second-line treatment. Eighteen CRC patients stage Dukes' C were treated postoperatively with 5 doses of Mo17-1A. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were analyzed for proliferative responses and cytolytic activity. Serum levels of cytokines were determined during treatment. Enhancement in the proliferative activity of patients' T cells, improvement in their lymphocytes' killing ability of natural killer (NK) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) sensitive tumor targets, and an in vivo increase in serum levels of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-12, IL-15, interferon (IFN)-gamma and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were noted. We conclude that treatment of CRC patients with Mo17-1A partially restores deficient cellular immune responses and the secretion of cytokines with immuno-enhancing properties. The development of novel immunotherapeutic protocols using combinations of Mo17-1A with stimuli that enhance the lytic capacity of effector cells (e.g. cytokines), may improve clinical responses in these types of patients.