Prevalence of homologous recombination biomarkers in multiple tumor types: an observational study.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and in 13 genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), the prevalence of genomic loss of heterozygosity and the allelic and hereditary status of BRCA1, BRCA2 and other HRR gene mutations in multiple solid tumor types. Patients & methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients with an advanced/metastatic diagnosis in one of 15 solid tumor types, who were identified in a real-world clinico-genomic database. Results: Tumor tissue samples from 9457 patients were analyzed, among which 4.7% had known or suspected deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations. The prevalence (range) of mutations in HRR genes was 13.6% (2.4%-26.0%) and genomic loss of heterozygosity ≥16% was 20.6% (2.6-34.4%) across all tumor types. Conclusion: The prevalence of mutations varied significantly depending on the type of tumor.

The integrity of the human genome is maintained via multiple pathways of DNA repair, one of the most important of which is homologous recombination repair (HRR), which uses a sister chromatid as a template for high-fidelity restoration of altered DNA sequences. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of deleterious mutations, i.e., changes in the genetic code that interfere with proper cellular function, in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 and in 13 other genes involved in HRR in various types of solid tumors in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. The researchers found that 4.7% of tumor samples had BRCA1/2 mutations, 13.6% had mutations in any of the HRR genes and 20.6% had genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) of at least 16% i.e., loss of sections of chromosomes affecting 16% or more of the genome. BRCA1/2 mutations were most common in ovarian cancer (13.1%), prostate cancer (9.3%), breast cancer (8.2%) and pancreatic cancer (4.9%). Prevalence for mutations in HRR genes ranges from 2.4 to 26.0% and gLOH ≥16% ranged from 2.6 to 34.4% depending on the tumor type. In conclusion, the prevalence of mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, HRR genes and gLOH ≥16% varied widely across 15 tumor types.

Clinical outcomes for previously treated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis.

Aim: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Materials & methods: Databases were searched for studies evaluating treatments for advanced (unresectable and/or metastatic) BTC patients who progressed on prior therapy. Pooled estimates of objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Across 31 studies evaluating chemotherapy or targeted treatment regimens in an unselected advanced BTC patient population, pooled ORR was 6.9%, median OS was 6.6 months and median PFS was 3.2 months. Conclusion: The efficacy of conventional treatments for previously treated advanced BTC patients is poor and could be improved by novel therapies.

What is this article about? Most patients with biliary tract cancer are identified with advanced disease, and almost all go through a worsening of the disease after their first treatment. For patients who go on to receive their next treatment, current guidelines are unclear regarding the best treatment choice. Therefore, we examined the available medical literature and performed an analysis of multiple studies to calculate overall estimates of the clinical value of standard treatments for these patients. Our goal was to develop a benchmark against which to compare the clinical value of new treatments that are currently being assessed in clinical trials. What were the results? We identified 31 studies assessing standard treatments (involving chemotherapy or molecularly targeted treatments) in previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer patients. Across these studies, the objective tumor response rate was 6.9%, median overall survival was 6.6 months and median progression-free survival was 3.2 months. What do the results of the study mean? These results indicate that there is limited clinical value of standard treatments for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer whose disease worsened after first treatment. This medical need could potentially be met by new treatments, such as immunotherapies that restore the immune system's ability to attack cancer cells and thereby prolong patient survival.

Biomarker Testing Journey Among Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors and Treatment Patterns by Homologous Recombination Repair Status: A Clinico-Genomic Database Study.

INTRODUCTION: Defects in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway can include mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCAm) and other HRR genes (HRRm). These mutations are associated with a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) phenotype. We evaluated testing journey and treatment patterns by BRCAm, HRRm, and HRD status in a real-world dataset. METHODS: Deidentified data for patients who had undergone comprehensive genomic profiling using FoundationOne®CDx were collected through December 31, 2020, from a real-world multi-tumor clinico-genomic database (CGDB) capturing data from clinics in the United States. Patients eligible for inclusion in this analysis had a confirmed diagnosis with advanced or metastatic disease between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, for 1 of 15 solid tumor types. Objectives were to evaluate patient treatment patterns by BRCAm, HRRm, and HRD status and to describe the timing of when (throughout disease course) comprehensive genomic profiling was performed. RESULTS: Among 9457 patients included in the overall population with evaluable biomarker status, 7856 (83.1%) received ≥ 1 systemic therapy. Among the 7856 patients who received systemic therapy, 2324 (30.0%) underwent testing before first-line therapy, 4114 (52.4%) were tested after receiving first-line therapy and before receiving subsequent therapy (if any), 970 (12.3%) were tested after second-line therapy and before receiving subsequent therapy (if any), and 447 (5.7%) patients underwent testing after receiving third-line therapy. A higher proportion of patients with BRCAm, HRRm, or HRD-positive status were treated with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors across all lines of therapy. There was no evidence of a meaningful difference in the proportion of patients who received other treatment (including chemotherapy and immunotherapy) by BRCAm, HRRm, or HRD status. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients from this real-world dataset underwent FoundationOne®CDx testing after initiation of first-line treatment. Testing appeared to influence treatment patterns, with a higher proportion of patients with BRCAm, HRRm, and HRD-positive disease receiving PARP inhibitors.

Pembrolizumab in patients from China with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient tumors: KEYNOTE-158.

Aim: To evaluate pembrolizumab in patients of Chinese descent with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors enrolled in KEYNOTE-158 (Cohort L). Methods: Patients with MSI-H/dMMR advanced tumors received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W. Primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 24 patients were enrolled (20 were evaluable for efficacy). With median follow-up of 12.4 months, the ORR was 70%. DOR, PFS and OS were all not reached. A total of 19 (79%) patients had a treatment-related adverse event (AE; grade ≥3 in 4 [17%]), and 8 (33%) had an immune-mediated AE (grade ≥3 in (4 [17%]). Conclusion: Pembrolizumab provided meaningful and durable responses with manageable safety. These results are consistent with those reported for the global trial.