[Outcome after surgical treatment of calcaneal fractures]. / Outcome nach operativer Therapie von Kalkaneusfrakturen.

BACKGROUND: After controversial discussions in the literature about therapy regimens for calcaneal fractures, a retrospective study of patients operatively treated in a maximum care trauma center was conducted. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of the influencing factors on the treatment quality of operatively treated patients with calcaneal fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2013 a total of 90 patients with calcaneal fractures were surgically treated in this hospital with locking plate osteosynthesis. A total of 48 patients with 55 fractures were retrospectively investigated. The assessment with respect to posttraumatic arthrosis was made radiologically and Böhler's and Gissane's angles were also determined. Clinically AOFAS and SF-36 scores were documented. The results were statistically tested with respect to possible risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 9 patients (18.8%) were found with complications necessitating operative revision, with 8 patients requiring subtalar arthrodesis and 1 patient with a deep wound infection. Nicotine abuse and a long interval between trauma and reconstructive surgery were identified as factors that influenced the development of wound healing problems. The average AOFAS score was 68 points and the SF-36 was 58.86 points. A poor result in the scores was caused by the development of symptomatic arthritis and the type of insurance. In this cohort factors, such as age and complexity of fractures were not correlated with a poor result. CONCLUSION: In this patient collective nicotine abuse and a long interval between trauma and surgery were risk factors for development of wound infections. Other factors with an influence on the outcome were the postoperative development of arthritis and the type of health insurance; however, patient age had no impact on the outcome.

[Implant augmentation in pelvic surgery. Options and technique]. / Implantataugmentation am Becken. Optionen und Technik.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis are an increasing problem in trauma surgery. Sufficient implant anchorage is reduced due to the poor bone stock; however, early mobilization is especially necessary for geriatric patients in order to prevent additional complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implant augmentation may be one technique to increase implant anchorage and stability in osteoporotic bone. This procedure is currently used in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the dorsal pelvic ring. Beside the augmentation of iliosacral screws in the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures, cement augmentation with lumbar or sacral pedicle screws is used for increased stability. INDICATIONS AND RISKS: Implant augmentation in pelvic surgery should be indicated crucially due to the specific risks of the procedure. Cement leakage and heat generation during cement curing (when PMMA--polymethylmetacrylate--cement is used) can compromise neurovascular structures. Potential complications like cement embolism are possible. CONCLUSION: The use of special implants (cannulated and perforated screws) as well as intraoperative navigation and 3D imaging increase patient safety and help to make implant augmentation a low risk procedure.