Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 31(2): 165-171, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29341963

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Given the extremely expensive nature of critical care medicine, it seems logical that intensivists should play an active role in designing efficient systems of care. The true value of intensivists, however, is not well defined. RECENT FINDINGS: Anesthesiologists have taken key roles in improving patient safety in the operating room. Anesthesia-related mortality rates have decreased from 20 deaths per 100 000 anesthetics in the early 1980s to less than one death per 100 000 currently. Anesthesiologist-intensivists remain rare (less than 5% of certified anesthesiologists), but increasingly play multiple roles within multidisciplinary teams. This review outlines the roles of intensivists in performance improvement, perioperative assessment; sedation services, extracorporeal and mechanical support, and code/rapid response teams. Critical-care physicians, by definition, work in collaborative multispecialty and multidisciplinary teams that make it difficult to isolate each team member's precise contribution to healthcare value. SUMMARY: Anesthesiologist-intensivists working outside their usual environment provide leadership and clinical guidance towards improving patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Anestesiologistas , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Equipe de Respostas Rápidas de Hospitais/organização & administração , Papel Profissional , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Cuidados Críticos/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Equipe de Respostas Rápidas de Hospitais/normas , Equipe de Respostas Rápidas de Hospitais/tendências , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Liderança , Segurança do Paciente , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Assistência Perioperatória/tendências , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/organização & administração , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/tendências , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 36(8): 413-419, 2022 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34992191

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the financial and clinical impact of a standardized, multidisciplinary team for surgical clearance and optimization in geriatric hip fracture patients. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-four geriatric patients (age >65 years old) in the preprotocol group (cohort 1; January 2017-December 2018) and 98 geriatric patients in the postprotocol group (cohort 2; October 2019-January 2021) with operative hip fractures. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a multidisciplinary team protocol consisting of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery departments for the assessment of medical readiness and optimization for surgical intervention in geriatric hip fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of cardiology consultation, need for cardiac workup (echocardiography stress testing, heath catheterization), time to medical readiness (TTMR), time to surgery, case-cancellation rate, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization charges. RESULTS: Following implementation of the new protocol, there were significant ( P < 0.001) decreases in TTMR (19 vs. 11 hours), LOS (149 vs. 120 hours), case cancellation rate, and total hospital charges ($84,000 vs. $62,000). There were no significant differences with respect to in-hospital complications or readmission rates/mortality rates at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of a protocolized, multidisciplinary approach to optimizing geriatric fracture patients, we were able to demonstrate a reduction in unnecessary preoperative testing, TTMR for surgery, case cancellation rate, LOS, and total hospitalization charge-without a concomitant increase in complications or mortality. This study highlights that standardization of the perioperative care for geriatric hip fracture patients can provide effective patient care while also lowering financial and logistical burden in care for these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Idoso , Fraturas do Quadril/complicações , Fraturas do Quadril/diagnóstico , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia
6.
Respir Care ; 61(6): 830-8, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27094392

RESUMO

The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) early in the development of ARDS has been a strategy of interest for many years. The use of NMBAs with a concomitant deep sedation strategy can increase oxygenation and possibly decrease mortality when used in the early stages of ARDS. The mechanism by which this occurs is unclear but probably involves a combination of factors, such as improving patient-ventilator synchrony, decreasing oxygen consumption, and decreasing the systemic inflammatory response associated with ARDS. The use of NMBA and deep sedation for these patients is not without consequence. This discussion describes the rationale and evidence behind the use of NMBAs in the setting of ARDS.


Assuntos
Sedação Profunda/métodos , Bloqueadores Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Respiração Artificial
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA