Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 182: 115-120, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38262233

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize delays to care in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and the role healthcare access plays in these delays. METHODS: A chart review was performed of patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer who presented with postmenopausal bleeding at a diverse, urban medical center between 2006 and 2018. The time from symptom onset to treatment was abstracted from the medical record. This interval was subdivided to assess for delay to presentation, delay to diagnosis, and delay to treatment. RESULTS: We identified 484 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The median time from symptom onset to treatment was 4 months with an interquartile range of 2 to 8 months. Most patients had stage I disease at diagnosis (88.6%). There was no significant difference in race/ethnicity or disease stage at time of diagnosis between different groups. Patients who had not seen a primary care physician or general obstetrician-gynecologist in the year before symptom onset were more likely to have significantly delayed care (27.7% vs 14.3%, p = 0.02) and extrauterine disease (20.2% vs 4.9%, p < 0.01) compared to those with established care. Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to experience significant delays from initial biopsy to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Delays exist in the evaluation of endometrial cancer. This delay is most pronounced in patients without an established outpatient primary care provider or obstetrician-gynecologist.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Endometrioide , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Feminino , Humanos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/terapia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , População Branca , Hispânico ou Latino , Brancos , Estados Unidos
2.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 30(4): 759-766, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470451

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Our cancer program adopted a method for carboplatin desensitization (4-step 2-bag method) that administers the same intensity of drug exposure with a simplified approach to product management in comparison to a published protocol (4-step 4-bag method). METHODS: The intensity of carboplatin administration for 1:1,000, 1:100, 1:10, and 1:1 dilutions and concomitant fluid administration were compared for the 4-step 2-bag (bags A, B) and 4-step 4-bag (bags 1, 2, 3, 4) methods. Pharmacy preparation of bags A and B is described. A succinct overview of the desensitization procedure is provided. Important considerations germane to pharmacy practice are presented. Chart review of patients who underwent carboplatin desensitization with the 4-step 2-bag method between 7/13/2021 and 11/22/2023 was performed to demonstrate institutional use. RESULTS: The 4-step 2-bag method delivers similar rates of drug intensity from start of desensitization to completion of the planned dose as the previously published 4-step 4-bag method. Accuracy of regimen-based dose administration is assured by infusion of bag B contents irrespective of infusion interruptions or rate changes necessitated by patient tolerance. Bag A provides the 1:1000 dilution in a pharmaceutically elegant manner using administration rates and volumes compatible with clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The 4-step 2-bag method for carboplatin desensitization administers controlled drug titration corresponding to 1:1000, 1:100, 1:10, and 1:1 dilutions for dose administration using two compounded admixture bags. Inaugural clinical use of the 4-step 2-bag method for carboplatin desensitization at our healthcare facility has proceeded with expected patient tolerance.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Carboplatina , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Humanos , Carboplatina/efeitos adversos , Carboplatina/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Feminino , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Embalagem de Medicamentos/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 173: 68-73, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37105059

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as alternatives to injectable medications for both thromboprophylaxis and treatment of VTE. Several recent clinical trials have demonstrated safety and efficacy of DOACs in high risk patients receiving systemic chemotherapy as well as postoperative prophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. Major consensus guidelines from multiple organizations support the use of DOACs for these indications but prescription practices are not well characterized. METHODS: A survey study was sent concurrently to members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Research Survey Pool between May and June of 2021. The study was designed to assess DOAC prescription practices amongst members of these societies who routinely prescribe chemotherapy. Bivariate analyses comparing responses from ASCO participants and SGO participants were compared using chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 103 physicians were included in the ASCO group and 139 in the SGO group. A majority of participants in both groups reported familiarity with prescribing DOACs (99% of ASCO and 96% of SGO respondents). ASCO respondents were more likely to consider DOACs as first line therapy for treatment of cancer-associated VTE than SGO members (82% vs 63%, p < 0.01) and SGO members were more likely to consider low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) the standard of care treatment (66% vs 25% p < 0.01). Most respondents in both groups (75%) felt DOACs were equally safe and effective compared to LMWH but more ASCO members felt DOACs were cost effective (70% vs 49%, p < 0.01). More SGO respondents reported having prescribed prophylactic anticoagulation during chemotherapy than ASCO members (53% vs 35%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: ASCO respondents were more likely to prescribe DOACs for both treatment and prophylaxis of cancer-associated VTE than SGO members. However, SGO members were more likely to prescribe prophylactic anticoagulation to high risk patients initiating chemotherapy compared to ASCO members.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Feminino , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Oncologia
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 160(1): 312-321, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33257014

RESUMO

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in women with gynecologic malignancies. This practice statement provides clinical data and overall quality of evidence regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this patient population. Specifically, it reviews patient selection, safety measures, and nuances of perioperative use of these medications. The scope of this document is limited to DOAC use in gynecologic oncology rather than a broad discussion of VTE prophylaxis and management in general. The following recommendations and examination of extant data are based on DOAC trials conducted primarily in mixed populations with different cancer subtypes. Many of these trials include few, or no, women with gynecologic cancer. However, because there is very limited data in gynecologic cancer-specific populations, the results of these studies represent the best available evidence to support treatment recommendations in our patients. The members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice Committee believe that the results of these studies may be extrapolated, with caution, to VTE treatment and prophylaxis for patients with gynecologic cancer.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/sangue , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Ginecologia/normas , Oncologia/normas , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/patologia , Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Oncologia/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tromboembolia Venosa/patologia
5.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(11): 1882-1888.e5, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33962023

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare residents' perceptions of readiness to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the perceptions of residency program directors in obstetrics and gynecology programs throughout the United States. DESIGN: A survey was administered to all residents taking the 2019 Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology Exam and concurrently to program directors in all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs. SETTING: The survey was designed to assess resident confidence to perform robotic hysterectomies by the time of graduation. PATIENTS: No patients were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: The only intervention was administration of the survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: De-identified survey data were analyzed using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. A total of 5473 resident respondents and 241 residency program directors were included in the study. Fifty-two percent of graduating residents reported that they felt they were given surgical autonomy to perform robotic hysterectomies, and 53.7% reported that they could perform one independently (if it was an "emergency" and they had to). By the time of graduation, only 59% of residents reported confidence performing a robotic hysterectomy, and only 56% reported they felt that it would be an important procedure for their future career. Program directors were significantly more likely to report that their residents were given autonomy to perform robotic hysterectomy by graduation (61.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 54.3-67.3]), could perform a robotic hysterectomy independently (60.9% [95% CI, 53.9-67.6]), or could perform a robotic hysterectomy by graduation (70.2% [95% CI, 63.5-76.3]) than residents themselves (38.6% [95% CI, 37.2-40.0], 22.8% [95% CI, 21.6-24.0], 62.6% [95% CI, 61.2-64.0], respectively). CONCLUSION: At the time of graduation, residents' confidence in performing robotic hysterectomy independently is lower than their confidence in performing all other approaches to hysterectomy.


Assuntos
Ginecologia , Internato e Residência , Laparoscopia , Obstetrícia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Feminino , Ginecologia/educação , Humanos , Histerectomia , Obstetrícia/educação , Gravidez , Estados Unidos
6.
J Transl Med ; 18(1): 323, 2020 08 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32854748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Serum cell-free DNA (cfDNA) holds promise as a non-invasive cancer biomarker. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of cfDNA concentration with clinicopathologic variables of poor prognosis and overall survival among women with uterine cancer compared to benign cancer-free controls. METHODS: cfDNA was extracted from the serum of 91 women with multiple uterine cancer histologies and 22 post-menopausal controls without cancer. Low molecular weight (LMW) cfDNA was separated from contaminating genomic high molecular weight cfDNA using paramagnetic bead purification and its concentration was measured using fluorometric quantification. Clinicopathologic data was abstracted from the electronic medical record. The association between serum cfDNA concentration, clinicopathologic variables, and overall survival was assessed using linear regression modelling, Cox proportional hazards modelling, and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median total serum cfDNA concentration for the cohort was 69.2 ng/mL (IQR 37.4, 132.3) and median LMW cfDNA concentration was 23.8 ng/mL (IQR 14.9, 44.4). There were no significant differences in total serum cfDNA concentration with any clinicopathologic variables. However, LMW cfDNA concentration was significantly higher in serum of women with cancer (25.8 ng/mL IQR 16.0, 49.6) compared to benign controls (15.5 ng/mL IQR 9.3, 25.8 ng/mL) (p < 0.01). It is also significantly higher among women with early stage cancer than benign controls (p < 0.01). There were also significant associations between LMW cfDNA concentration and stage of cancer (p = 0.01) and histology (p = 0.02). Patients with leiomyosarcoma and carcinosarcoma had higher cfDNA concentrations than those with endometrioid cancer. Over a median follow-up of 51.9 months, 75th percentile for overall survival for women with cancer was 24.0 months. Higher LMW cfDNA concentrations is associated with lower survival among women with cancer (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Serum LMW cfDNA concentration is associated with overall survival in women with uterine cancer, and it is higher among women with uterine cancer compared to those of controls.


Assuntos
Ácidos Nucleicos Livres , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Neoplasias Uterinas , Feminino , Humanos , Peso Molecular , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/genética
7.
Gynecol Oncol ; 155(2): 301-304, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31575390

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has similar reported clinical efficacy compared with conventional doxorubicin with less cardiotoxicity. The manufacturer of PLD advises that cardiac function should be evaluated with endomyocardial biopsy, echocardiography or multigated radionucleotide scan (MUGA) pre-treatment and during therapy. This study was designed to assess the necessity of pre-treatment cardiac evaluation in patients receiving PLD. METHODS: After IRB approval, a retrospective study of all women with gynecologic cancer who received PLD from 2006 to 2018 was performed. Demographic information, treatment records, cardiac risk factors, and cardiac surveillance testing were examined. Wilcoxon signed rank sum test and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association of cumulative PLD exposure with cardiotoxicity. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients received PLD for gynecologic cancer. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of PLD with a cumulative dosage of 237 mg over a median follow-up time of 24 months. Sixteen patients in the cohort (7%) had no cardiac surveillance at all. Of the remaining patients who underwent cardiac testing, 183 (84%) received MUGA scans and 36 (16%) had echocardiography. Of the 56 patients who had both pre- and post-treatment cardiac testing, there was no significant difference in median ejection fraction (p = 0.17). Three patients developed PLD-associated cardiac toxicity but only one patient had severe manifestations requiring discontinuation of PLD therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Routine cardiac testing before, during or after treatment with PLD may be unnecessary. Cardiac testing may be more appropriate for individual patients for whom the clinical suspicion of PLD-related cardiac toxicity is high.


Assuntos
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Cardiopatias/induzido quimicamente , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Substituição de Medicamentos , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Cardiopatias/fisiopatologia , Cardiopatias/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Angiografia Cintilográfica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volume Sistólico/efeitos dos fármacos
8.
Gynecol Oncol ; 154(3): 616-621, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31324452

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patients are increasingly using online materials to learn about gynecologic cancer. Providers can refer patients to online educational materials produced by a number of different major medical organizations and pharmacology companies. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American Medical Association (AMA) recommend that patient educational materials (PEMs) are written between a sixth and eighth grade reading level. In this study, we assess the readability of online PEMs published by major medical organizations and industry partners. METHODS: Websites from twelve websites providing educational materials for gynecologic oncology patients were surveyed. Online PEMs were identified and analyzed using seven validated readability indices. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc analysis were performed to detect differences in readability between publishers. RESULTS: Two-hundred and sixty PEMs were included in this analysis. Overall, PEMs were written at a mean 11th±0.6 grade reading level. Only 6.5% of articles were written at the AMA/NIH recommended reading grade level of 6th to 8th grade or below. ANOVA demonstrated a significant difference in readability between publishing associations (p<0.01). PEMs from the Centers for Disease Control had a mean 9th±1.2 grade reading level and were significantly lower than all other organizations. PEMs from The Foundation for Women's Cancer had a mean 13th±1.8 grade reading level and were significantly higher than most other organizations. PEMs from pharmaceutical companies (mean readability=10.1±1.1, N=30) required the lowest reading grade level and were significantly more readable than those from governmental organizations (11.1±1.7, p<0.05) and nonprofit medical associations (12.4±1.7, p<0.01) in ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post hoc analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecologic oncology PEMs available from twelve major organization websites are written well above the recommended sixth to eighth grade reading difficulty level.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Internet/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Leitura , Compreensão , Indústria Farmacêutica , Feminino , Órgãos Governamentais , Letramento em Saúde , Humanos , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos
9.
Gynecol Oncol ; 152(3): 509-513, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30876496

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Network has developed a comprehensive repository of electronic patient reported outcomes measures (ePROs) of major symptom domains that have been validated in cancer patients. Their use for patients with gynecologic cancer has been understudied. Our objective was to establish feasibility and acceptability of PROMIS ePRO integration in a gynecologic oncology outpatient clinic and assess if it can help identify severely symptomatic patients and increase referral to supportive services. METHODS: English-speaking patients with a confirmed history of gynecologic cancer completed PROMIS ePROs on iPads in the waiting area of an outpatient gynecologic oncology clinic. Symptom scores were calculated for each respondent and grouped using documented severity thresholds. Response data was compared with clinicopathologic characteristics across symptom domains. Severely symptomatic patients were offered referral to ancillary services and asked to complete post-exposure surveys assessing acceptability of the ePRO. RESULTS: Of the 336 patients who completed ePROs, 35% had active disease and 19% had experienced at least one disease recurrence. Sixty-nine percent of the cohort demonstrated moderate to severe physical dysfunction (60%), pain (36%), fatigue (28%), anxiety (9%), depression (8%), and sexual dysfunction (32%). Thirty-nine (12%) severely symptomatic patients were referred to services such as psychiatry, palliative care, pain management, social work or integrative oncology care. Most survey respondents identified the ePROs as helpful (78%) and easy to complete (92%). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient PROMIS ePRO administration is feasible and acceptable to gynecologic oncology patients and can help identify severely symptomatic patients for referral to ancillary support services.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Idoso , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
10.
Gynecol Oncol ; 144(1): 77-82, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27789084

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The carboplatin desensitization (CD) protocol presented here allows patients with either a positive skin test or a prior hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) to safely, rapidly and effectively continue with carboplatin infusions. Newly described factors can identify patients at risk for developing adverse events during CD. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent CD between 2005 and 2014. The CD protocol uses a four-step dilution process over 3.5h. RESULTS: 129 patients underwent CD and completed a total of 788cycles. The desensitization protocol prevented HSRs in 96% (753 out of 788) of these cycles. Patients achieved an average of 6.1cycles (SD±4.55, range 0-23) with CD. The CD protocol allowed 73% (94 of 129) of the patients to undergo carboplatin infusion without reaction. Patients with moderate to life-threatening HSRs (grade 2 through 4) were 10.5years younger at initial CD than patients with grades 0 or 1 HSRs (52.3 vs. 63, P = 0.0307). One patient death occurred during her thirteenth desensitization cycle. The HSR in this case was complicated by pre-exisiting pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of its kind showing a safe, effective and rapid (3.5h) CD protocol. The majority of patients with a history of either carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction or a positive skin test completed the CD protocol without HSRs. Age was identified as a risk factor for HSR severity during CD. Age can be employed along with pre-load dependent cardiac conditions as a way to help risk stratify patients undergoing CD.


Assuntos
Carboplatina/efeitos adversos , Carboplatina/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Platina/imunologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes Cutâneos
11.
Gynecol Oncol ; 147(1): 36-40, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28751119

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The goal of our study was to define utilization and clinical results of intraperitoneal (IV/IP) compared to intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in a racially and ethnically diverse population with optimally debulked advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: After IRB approval, all patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer that underwent primary cytoreductive surgery at our institution from 2005 to 2016 were identified. Death was verified by the National Social Security Death Index. Patients who received at least one IV/IP cycle were analyzed in the IV/IP cohort. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were performed. RESULTS: 96 patients with advanced stage optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer (median follow up 33months) were identified. 51% and 49% of patients received IV/IP and IV chemotherapy, respectively. 27%, 22%, and 39% of patients were of white, black, and other race. Compared with IV chemotherapy only, IV/IP chemotherapy was associated with longer OS (log rank <0.002) and IV/IP chemotherapy versus IV chemotherapy alone was associated with a lower risk of death (HR=0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.62, P<0.001). The median overall survival for the IV/IP and IV groups was 76months (95% CI 62 - not estimated) and 38months (95% CI 30-55), respectively. There was a trend toward higher risk of death for patients who completed fewer than 6cycles of IV/IP chemotherapy compared to women who completed 6 IV/IP cycles (HR=3.2, 95% CI 0.98-9.27 (P=0.05). No differences in patient or tumor characteristics were identified between these two groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our racially diverse urban patients, 50% of patients received IV/IP chemotherapy and it was associated with improved overall survival compared to IV chemotherapy alone. Further investigation is needed to identify barriers to use of IV/IP chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais
12.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 25(9): 1711-6, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26332394

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The reported incidence of brain metastasis from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), endometrial cancer (EC), and cervical cancer (CC) is exceedingly rare. As the long-term survival for patients with gynecologic cancer increases, there has been a corresponding increase in the number of diagnosed intracranial metastases. We seek to report our experience with managing brain metastatic disease (BMD) in patients with gynecologic cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with EOC, EC, and CC at our institution revealed 47 patients with concurrent BMD between 2000 and 2013. Demographic data, risk factors, treatment modalities, progression-free data, and overall survival data were collected. RESULTS: Median survival time in patients with brain metastasis from EOC, EC, and CC was 9.0, 4.5, and 3.0 months, respectively. Two-year overall survival rates were 31.6%, 13.6%, and 0%, respectively. Patients received surgery, radiation therapy alone, palliative care, or radiation plus surgery. Radiation combined with surgical resection resulted in a significant hazards ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.86), compared with radiation alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our report provides a large single-institution experience of brain metastases from gynecologic cancer. Patients with BMD have poor prognoses; however, treatment with multimodal therapy including surgical resection and radiation may prolong overall survival.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Carcinoma Endometrioide/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/radioterapia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo
13.
J Surg Educ ; 81(7): 905-911, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705787

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although approximately one-fifth of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents matriculate from osteopathic or international medical schools, most literature regarding the transition to residency focuses on allopathic medical school graduates. To create comprehensive interventions for this educational transition, we must understand the needs of all incoming residents. Our objective was to examine OBGYN residents' perceptions of their transition to residency, and to understand how residents' background and medical school environment influence their perceived sense of readiness. DESIGN: A 16-item survey asked questions about demographics, the transition to residency, resident well-being, burnout, and the transition to fellowship. Perception of preparedness was assessed with the question "I felt that I was well-prepared for the first year of residency" (1=strongly agree, 5=strongly disagree). Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression explored association of perceived preparedness with residents' backgrounds. SETTING: Survey administered at time of the in-training examination in 2022. PARTICIPANTS: All OBGYN residents. RESULTS: Of 5761 eligible participants, 3741 (64.9%) provided consent and completed the survey. Of the 3687 participants who answered the question, 2441 (66.2%) either agreed or strongly agreed that they felt well-prepared. Fewer osteopathic graduates reported feeling prepared compared to allopathic graduates (379/610, 62.1% vs 1,924/2,766, 69.6%) (OR 0.72, 95%CI 0.60-0.86, p < 0.01). International medical school graduates were seven times less likely to report feeling prepared compared to those from allopathic institutions (137/304, 45.1% vs 1924/2776, 69.6%) (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.53-0.68, p < 0.01). Respondents from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds were less likely to report feeling prepared compared to White respondents (276/535, 51.6% vs 1738/2387, 72.8%) (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.33-0.48, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in residents' perceptions of their transition to residency highlight the need to begin offsetting pervasive inequities with comprehensive and accessible resources.


Assuntos
Ginecologia , Internato e Residência , Obstetrícia , Ginecologia/educação , Obstetrícia/educação , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
14.
Radiol Case Rep ; 18(1): 117-121, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36340240

RESUMO

Background: Incidental identification of peritoneal nodules during laparoscopy may present a diagnostic dilemma. The differential diagnosis includes a variety of benign and malignant entities such as peritoneal carcinomatosis. Case: A 44-year-old G2P2 woman presented with recurrent menorrhagia and pelvic pain was found to have large uterine fibroids on imaging studies. Bilateral uterine artery embolization was performed with complete devascularization of the fibroid. Seven years later, she presented with similar symptoms. Imaging studies demonstrated a vascular uterine lesion. A total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy was performed with no complications. During surgery, vesicular peritoneal implants were incidentally identified posterior to the uterus between the uterosacral ligaments. Biopsy and pathologic analysis of these nodules confirmed that they contained foreign material consistent with embolization beads. Pathologic analysis of the uterus demonstrated an intramural uterine fibroid, and presence of embolization beads in cervix, myometrium and bilateral peritubal regions. Conclusion: Non-target peritoneal implantation of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization is a rare entity that can result in vesicular appearing nodules.

15.
Obstet Gynecol ; 141(6): 1154-1159, 2023 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37053588

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate residents planning fellowship, their preferences for fellowship start date, and the acceptability of resultant gaps in pay and insurance coverage. METHODS: A survey was conducted during the 2022 in-service training examination querying obstetrics and gynecology residents about their desire to pursue fellowship, their preferred fellowship start date (understanding the salary gap), and the acceptability of a medical insurance gap. RESULTS: Survey analysis of respondents planning to pursue fellowship demonstrated that, acknowledging the pay gap that would occur, 93.9% preferred a fellowship start date after July 1, with the majority (65.1%, 593/911) preferring an August 1 fellowship start date. Most respondents (87.7%, 798/910) found the potential resultant gap in medical insurance coverage acceptable. Survey data showed that racial and ethnic identity was not a determining factor in either of these issues. CONCLUSION: The majority of current residents planning to pursue fellowship prefer a delayed fellowship start date, even if it means a gap in salary and insurance coverage. The results of this study, requested by a specialty-wide, consensus-building workgroup, informed a statement signed by the majority (88.9%) of workgroup constituents supporting an August 1 clinical fellowship start date.


Assuntos
Ginecologia , Internato e Residência , Obstetrícia , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Ginecologia/educação , Obstetrícia/educação , Bolsas de Estudo , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
Cureus ; 14(7): e26663, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35949786

RESUMO

Currently, the application of peritoneal washings as a diagnostic tool for endometrial cancer staging is not well defined. The case described aims to highlight the current ambiguity surrounding the use of peritoneal washings in clinical practice.  A 69-year-old G3P3003 presented to her gynecologist with complaints of new-onset heavy vaginal bleeding. The patient sought an endometrial biopsy, which suggested serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC) focally suspicious for invasive carcinoma, with the involvement of polyps. Based on these results, a robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, bilateral sentinel lymph node dissection, and omentectomy were performed. Results from her final pathology exhibited a stage IA uterine serous carcinoma (USC) involving a polyp (4.2 cm in greatest dimension) with no myometrial or lymphovascular invasion, but washings were positive for adenocarcinoma. Based on her family history of malignancy, the patient underwent germline panel testing. The patient's somatic tumor testing demonstrated proficient DNA mismatch repair status, microsatellite stability, low tumor mutational burden (4 mut/Mb), low loss of heterozygosity (9%), amplification of the ERBB2 (HER2/neu) gene by both immunohistochemistry (3+, 20% positive) and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Her tumor also had weakly positive estrogen receptor expression (1+, 10% positive); furthermore, some pathogenic variants in KRAS (c.37G>T), PIK3CA (c.263G>A), and TP53 (c.743G>A) were identified. Given the incongruent findings found with the positive peritoneal washing and negative lymph node involvement in addition to molecular testing, management for this patient was unclear. Ultimately, this case highlights a number of advances within the field of gynecological oncology but also emphasizes the persistent ambiguity and incongruency in the management of patients with early-stage high-risk histologies. Moving forward it will become increasingly important to be able to develop a more standardized process to assess how these diagnostic tools should inform prognosis and treatment plans.

17.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 4(1): 100505, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34656733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Operative vaginal delivery is used to expedite a safe vaginal delivery in the second stage of labor and is considered an essential part of residency training in obstetrics and gynecology. OBJECTIVE: To assess the self-reported readiness of obstetrics and gynecology residents in the United States to perform vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and forceps-assisted vaginal delivery compared with the perceptions of program directors. STUDY DESIGN: The Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology surveyed the residents in all US training programs about their readiness to perform forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted deliveries. The program directors were simultaneously surveyed about the readiness of their cohort to perform operative deliveries with and without attending oversight. The primary outcome of the survey was the residents' self-reported confidence in their ability to autonomously and independently perform operative deliveries. RESULTS: Α total of 5084 out of 5514 (92.9%) resident physicians and 241 out of the 292 (83%) residency program directors completed the survey. Eighty-seven percent (95% confidence interval, 84.9-88.9) of the graduating residents reported feeling that they could autonomously perform a vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, compared with 49.5% (95% confidence interval, 46.6-52.4) for forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (P<.01). Similarly, whereas 95.9% (95% confidence interval, 94.6-97.0) of the residents felt that they could confidently perform an emergency vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, only 42.3% (95% confidence interval, 39.4-45.2) felt confident performing an emergency forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (P<.01). The residency program directors significantly overestimated their residents' confidence in independently performing an emergency forceps-assisted vaginal delivery or vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery than the residents themselves (54% [95% confidence interval, 47.1-60.5] vs 24% [95% confidence interval, 22.5-24.9] and 98.6% [95% confidence interval, 97.0-100] vs 71.9 [95% confidence interval, 70.6-73.2] respectively P<.01). Trainees in military-based residency programs and those interested in pursuing a career as generalists or maternal-fetal medicine specialists reported significantly higher preparedness to perform a forceps-assisted vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: Graduating obstetrics and gynecology residents report feeling less prepared to independently perform a forceps-assisted vaginal delivery than a vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. The program directors had more confidence in the ability of their residents to perform an operative vaginal delivery than the residents themselves.


Assuntos
Ginecologia , Internato e Residência , Obstetrícia , Competência Clínica , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Humanos , Obstetrícia/educação , Gravidez , Estados Unidos
18.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259188, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34739493

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the microbiota of postmenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for endometrioid (EAC) or uterine serous cancers (USC) compared to controls with non-malignant conditions. METHODS: Endometrial, cervicovaginal and anorectal microbial swabs were obtained from 35 postmenopausal women (10 controls, 14 EAC and 11 USC) undergoing hysterectomy. Extracted DNA was PCR amplified using barcoded 16S rRNA gene V4 primers. Sequenced libraries were processed using QIIME2. Phyloseq was used to calculate α- and ß- diversity measures. Biomarkers associated with case status were identified using ANCOM after adjustment for patient age, race and BMI. PICRUSt was used to identify microbial pathways associated with case status. RESULTS: Beta-diversity of microbial communities across each niche was significantly different (R2 = 0.25, p < 0.001). Alpha-diversity of the uterine microbiome was reduced in USC (Chao1, p = 0.004 and Fisher, p = 0.007) compared to EAC. Biomarkers from the three anatomical sites allowed samples to be clustered into two distinct clades that distinguished controls from USC cases (p = 0.042). The USC group was defined by 13 bacterial taxa across the three sites (W-stat>10, FDR<0.05) including depletion of cervicovaginal Lactobacillus and elevation of uterine Pseudomonas. PICRUSTt analysis revealed highly significant differences between the USC-associated clades within the cervicovaginal and uterine microbiota. CONCLUSIONS: The microbial diversity of anatomic niches in postmenopausal women with EAC and USC is different compared to controls. Multiple bacteria are associated with USC case status including elevated levels of cervicovaginal Lactobacillus, depletion of uterine Pseudomonas, and substantially different functional potentials identified within cervicovaginal and uterine niches.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/microbiologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias Uterinas/microbiologia , Idoso , Canal Anal/microbiologia , Canal Anal/patologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Carcinoma Endometrioide/microbiologia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologia , Colo do Útero/microbiologia , Colo do Útero/patologia , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Endométrio/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Microbiota/genética , Microbiota/fisiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Reto/microbiologia , Reto/patologia , Membrana Serosa/microbiologia , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologia , Vagina/microbiologia , Vagina/patologia
19.
J Grad Med Educ ; 13(2): 257-265, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33897960

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Residency applications have increased in the last decade, creating growing challenges for applicants and programs. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated factors associated with application and match into obstetrics and gynecology residency. METHODS: During the annual in-training examination administered to all obstetrics and gynecology residents in the United States, residents were surveyed on the residency application process. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (5094 of 5347) residents responded to the survey. Thirty-six percent reported applying to 30 or fewer programs, 26.7% applied to more than 31 programs, and 37.1% opted not to answer this question. Forty-nine percent of residents received honors in their obstetrics and gynecology clerkship and 37.1% did not. The majority of residents (88.6%) reported scoring between 200 and 250 on USMLE Step 1. Eighty-six percent matched into one of their top 5 programs. The only factor associated with matching in residents' top 5 programs was receiving honors in their clerkship (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.08-1.54; P < .005). The only factor associated with matching below the top 5 programs was a couples match (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.43-0.72; P < .001). In choosing where to apply, residents identified program location and reputation as the most important factors, while for ranking, location and residency culture were the most important. CONCLUSIONS: Most obstetrics and gynecology residents reported matching into their top 5 choices. Receiving an honors grade in the clerkship was the only factor associated with matching in applicants' top 5 programs. Location was the most important factor for applying to and ranking of programs.


Assuntos
Ginecologia , Internato e Residência , Obstetrícia , Feminino , Ginecologia/educação , Humanos , Obstetrícia/educação , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
20.
Curr Probl Cancer ; 45(2): 100655, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32994074

RESUMO

The use of opioids across all specialties has increased greatly over the last 2 decades and along with it, opioid misuse, overdose and death. The contribution of opioids prescribed for gynecologic cancers to this problem is unknown. Data from other surgical specialties show prescriber factors including gender, geographic location, board certification, experience, and fellowship training influence opioid prescribing. To characterize national-level opioid prescription patterns among gynecologic oncologists treating Medicare beneficiaries. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database was used to access Medicare Part D opioid claims prescribed by gynecologic oncologists in 2016. Prescription and prescriber characteristics were recorded including medication type, prescription length, number of claims, and total day supply. Region of practice was determined according to the US Census Bureau Regions. Board certification data were obtained from American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology website. Bivariate statistical analysis and linear regression modeling were performed using Stata version 14.2. In 2016, 494 board-certified US gynecologic oncologists wrote 24,716 opioid prescriptions for a total 267,824 days of treatment (median 8 [interquartile range {IQR} 6, 11] prescribed days per claim). Gynecologic oncologists had a median of 33 opioid claims (IQR 18, 64). Male physicians had significantly more opioid prescription claims than females (P < 0.01) including after adjustment for differences in years of experience. There was no difference in prescribed days per claim between male and female physicians. Physicians in the South had the greatest number of opioid prescription claims and significantly more than physicians in all other regions (P < 0.01). Gynecologic oncologists who were board certified for >15 years had a greater number of median opioid claims (28 IQR 16, 50) than those with <5 years since board certification (22 IQR 15, 38) (P= 0.04). Physicians who were board certified in palliative care (n = 19) had significantly more opioids claims (median 40; IQR 18, 91) than those without (median 32; IQR 18, 64) (P< 0.01). In 2016, there were gender-based, regional, and experience-related variations in opioid prescribing by providers caring for Medicare-insured patients.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Oncologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Ginecologia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare Part D , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA