The influence of migration on women's use of different aspects of maternity care in the German health care system: Secondary analysis of a comparative prospective study with the Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire (MFMCQ).

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 21% of Germany's inhabitants or their parents have been born abroad. There is evidence that immigrant women are starting antenatal care later than nonimmigrants. In Berlin, equality in health care access had improved until 2011-2012, leaving only women with Low German language proficiency and an insecure residence status particularly at risk. With the recent influx of refugees, we analyzed whether access to antenatal and postpartum care differs depending on immigration, residence status, income, and education. METHODS: At our Berlin tertiary care center, a modified version of the Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire was administered to women who delivered in the first half of 2017. Multivariate modeling compared nonimmigrant women, immigrants, and women who are direct descendants of immigrants. RESULTS: The study included 184 nonimmigrant women, 214 immigrant women, and 62 direct descendants of immigrants. Germany is relatively good in prenatal care for immigrant women, as most are getting adequate prenatal care. However, 21% of immigrants compared with 11% of nonimmigrant women started pregnancy care after the first trimester (P = .03). Low income was a more powerful predictor than immigration status for starting prenatal care after the first trimester. Immigrant women (23%) were less informed on postpartum care availability than nonimmigrants (3%) and used less postpartum midwifery care. CONCLUSIONS: When designing health care interventions for immigrant women, not only migration-specific factors should be considered but also low income as a barrier to access to maternity care.

Equal Alternatives or Lower Standards for Immigrant Women-Analyzing Obstetric Care for Immigrant Women in Berlin Within the Framework of Cultural Health Capital.

In obstetric clinics in Berlin, Germany, more than half of the women are immigrants. The main objective of the qualitative study was to explore the staff's experiences with obstetric care for immigrants and juxtapose it with the immigrants' comments on their birth experiences. We analyze potential differences along the framework of a cultural health capital (CHC). Between May and August 2017, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 17 obstetricians and 17 midwives at four obstetric clinics in Berlin. The verbally transcribed interview material was subjected to a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Furthermore, a secondary data from an interview study was analyzed in the purpose of providing some insight into the practitioner study participant perspective. Between January and May 2017, in the postpartum ward at the Berlin Charité Campus Virchow Clinic, an interview study guided by the migrant-friendly maternity care questionnaire was conducted among 410 migrant and non-migrant women. For this study, the free-text comments on the pregnancy care were analyzed. The staff interviewees identified language barrier and legal status as risk factors for the late onset of obstetric care. CHC functioning potentially as alternatives to the established health care structures were voiced. Strong family ties among immigrant families bear a high potential for support. Gratefulness was voiced by the staff and immigrant patients as a source of satisfaction with care. Our study shows that obstetric care for immigrant women remains a challenge. CHC of immigrant women might partially compensate for exclusion.

Reasons for a Lower Rate of Epidural Anesthesia During Birth for Immigrant Women in the Eyes of Medical Staff: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Various studies have shown that immigrant women in comparison to non-immigrant women of the same parity have lower rates of epidural anesthesia (EDA). Data from two studies on immigrant obstetric care in Berlin, Germany were analyzed to answer the following question: What reasons do the medical staff see for the lower rate of EDA in immigrant women? Between May and August 2017, 34 interviews with obstetricians and midwives in four obstetric clinics in Berlin were conducted on the topic of obstetric care for immigrant women. After anonymizing the more than 20 h of interview material, transcripts were coded with MaxQDa and analyzed according to the qualitative content analysis.The quantitative data is from an online survey conducted between May and October 2017, in all but one obstetric clinic in Berlin with obstetricians and midwives. Regarding the research question, 121 questionnaires could be analyzed. In the online survey, (multiple answers were possible), the top reason for a lower rate of EDA given was mostly fear on the part of the immigrant women (64%). A language barrier, which results in logistic and time constrictions, is mentioned as the second most frequent reason (50%). The explorative analysis of the interviews shows that doctors and midwives regard cultural aspects such as different expectations on the birth experience as a reason for a lower EDA rate. Furthermore, within the medical staff the impression persists that in some cases the companion decides on the behalf of the patient about the application of an EDA, which from time to time is against the wish of the immigrant woman giving birth. In the view of the medical staff, the reasons for a lower rate of EDA during birth for immigrant women were varied. On one side, this is attributed to the wishes of the respective women ("demand") but on the other side this can be attributed to the health care system ("supply"). In the case of a language barrier, the "supply" and the access of EDA for immigrant women is limited and can be then shifted to the German-speaking companion to make a decision regarding EDA ("structural deprivation of self-determination").