Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of tunnel diameters prior to revision ACL reconstruction: a comparison to computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: Revision ACL reconstruction is becoming more frequent because of a 10% rate of re-ruptures and insufficiencies. Currently, computed tomography (CT) represents the gold standard in detecting and measuring the tunnels of the initial ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare measurement results of CT and thin-sliced MRI sequences, which were modified to a high soft tissue-bone contrast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prior to an ACL revision surgery, 16 consecutive patients had an MRI in addition to the standard CT scan. A dedicated 0.25-T Esaote G-Scan (Esaote Biomedica, Cologne, Germany) with a Turbo 3D T1 sequence was used for MRI. Tunnel diameters were measured at 11 defined points of interest. For the statistical evaluation, the Mann-Whitney U test for connected samples was used. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was additionally calculated. RESULTS: All measured diameters showed significant to highly significant correlations between both diagnostic tools (r = 0.7-0.98). In addition, there was no significant difference (p > 0.5) between the two techniques. Almost all diameters showed nearly perfect intraobserver reliability (ICC 0.8-0.97). Interobserver reliability showed an ICC of 0.91/0.92 for only one diameter in MRI and CT. CONCLUSION: Prior to ACL revision surgery, bone tunnel measurements can be done using a 3D T1-MRI sequence in low-field MRI. MRI measurements show the same accuracy as CT scans. Preoperative radiation exposure in mainly young patients could be reduced. Also the costs of an additional CT scan could be saved.

Evaluation of a modified knee rotation angle in MRI scans with and without trochlear dysplasia: a parameter independent of knee size and trochlear morphology.

PURPOSE: Regarding TT-TG in knee realignment surgery, two aspects have to be considered: first, there might be flaws in using absolute values for TT-TG, ignoring the knee size of the individual. Second, in high-grade trochlear dysplasia with a dome-shaped trochlea, measurement of TT-TG has proven to lack precision and reliability. The purpose of this examination was to establish a knee rotation angle, independent of the size of the individual knee and unaffected by a dysplastic trochlea. METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive MRI scans of knee joints were analysed by two observers, retrospectively. Of these, 59 were obtained from patients with trochlear dysplasia, and another 55 were obtained from patients presenting with a different pathology of the knee joint. Trochlear dysplasia was classified into low grade and high grade. TT-TG was measured according to the method described by Schoettle et al. In addition, a modified knee rotation angle was assessed. Interobserver reliability of the knee rotation angle and its correlation with TT-TG was calculated. RESULTS: The knee rotation angle showed good correlation with TT-TG in the readings of observer 1 and observer 2. Interobserver correlation of the parameter showed excellent values for the scans with normal trochlea, low-grade and high-grade trochlear dysplasia, respectively. All calculations were statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The knee rotation angle might meet the requirements for precise diagnostics in knee realignment surgery. Unlike TT-TG, this parameter seems not to be affected by a dysplastic trochlea. In addition, the dimensionless parameter is independent of the knee size of the individual. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.