Microvascular replantation of head and neck amputated parts: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: As opposed to upper and lower extremity amputations representing a considerable volume of admissions, the prowess of microsurgeons is seldom solicited in complex cases of head and neck replantation. Our aim was to determine the rate of successful replantation of craniofacial parts in a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of English literature using PubMed/MEDLINE for every replantation of a head and neck parts. Articles selected for analysis required to describe microvascular surgical techniques to be considered a replantation. The measured endpoint for a successful replantation was survival at hospital discharge. RESULTS: From 113 articles from the literature, reported cases of replanted craniofacial parts included 90 scalps, 56 ears, 34 lips, 26 noses, 1 eyebrow, and 1 midface. A significant majority of amputations were described as an avulsion mechanism (78.4%), as opposed to cutting/sharp (17.3%) or crush-type (1.9%). The overall success rate at hospital discharge was 72.1%, with a partial failure at 20.2% and a complete failure at 7.7%. CONCLUSION: Urgent replantation of head and neck amputated parts allow patients to recover in a timely manner and to decrease the need for secondary reconstructive procedures. The significant rate of success is a strong argument in favor of promoting access to care for replantation of craniofacial parts.

Face Transplant: Current Update and First Canadian Experience.

SUMMARY: Facial vascularized composite allotransplantation has emerged as a groundbreaking reconstructive solution for patients with severely disfiguring facial injuries. The authors report on the first Canadian face transplant. A 64-year-old man sustained a gunshot wound, which resulted in extensive midface bony and soft-tissue damage involving the lower two-thirds of the face. In May of 2018, he underwent a face transplant consisting of Le Fort III and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies in addition to skin from the lower two-thirds of the face and neck. Virtual surgical planning was used to fabricate osteotomy guides and stereolithographic models. Microsurgical anastomoses of the facial (three branches) and infraorbital nerves were performed bilaterally. At 18-month follow-up, the aesthetic outcome was excellent. Partial restoration of light touch sensation had been observed over the majority of the allograft. Although significantly affected, animation, speech, mastication, and deglutition were continuously improving with intensive therapy. Nevertheless, the patient was now tracheostomy and gastrostomy free. Despite these limitations, he reported a high degree of satisfaction with the procedure and had reintegrated into the community. Four grade I episodes of acute rejection with evidence of endotheliitis were successfully treated. Postoperative complications were mainly infectious, including mucormycosis of the left thigh, treated with surgical resection and antifungal therapy. Undoubtedly, immunosuppression represents the greatest obstacle in the field and limits the indications for facial vascularized composite allotransplantation. Continuous long-term follow-up is mandatory for surveillance of immunosuppression-related complications and functional assessment of the graft.