Once-a-day highly active antiretroviral therapy in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults in Senegal.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effectiveness, adherence and tolerance of a once-a-day highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen in adults in Senegal. DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective, open-label one-arm study, 40 treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients took the following three drugs once a day at bedtime: didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA below 500 copies/ml at 6 months. The analysis was done on an intent-to treat basis. RESULTS: Eighty-five per cent of patients were at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stage B or C and the plasma HIV RNA level was 5.4 +/- 0.4 log(10) copies/ml at baseline. The percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA below 500 copies/ml at 6 months was 95% [95% confidence interval (CI), 83-99]. The proportions of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/ml at months 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 were 26% (n = 39; 95% CI, 12-39), 78% (n = 40; 95% CI, 65-90), 70% (n = 40; 95% CI, 56-84), 77% (n = 39; 95% CI, 64-90) and 69% (n = 39; 95% CI, 55-84), respectively. The CD4 cell count was 164 +/- 75 x 106/l at baseline and increased by a mean of 199 +/- 101 x 106/l at month 15. Permanent treatment discontinuation was never necessary for serious adverse effects. Adherence was excellent, as shown by plasma drug concentrations and according to the results of the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The once-daily regimen of didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz was safe, easy-to-take and demonstrated strong antiretroviral and immunologic effects in African patients with advanced HIV infection.

The Senegalese government's highly active antiretroviral therapy initiative: an 18-month follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility, effectiveness, adherence, toxicity and viral resistance in an African government HAART initiative. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study started in Dakar in August 1998. Initial treatment consisted of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and one protease inhibitor. The patients attended monthly medical examinations. Plasma HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell counts were determined at baseline and every 6 months. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight treatment-naive patients, mostly infected by HIV-1 strain CRF02-AG, were enrolled. Most were at an advanced stage of HIV disease (86.2% had AIDS). Adherence was good in 87.9% of patients and treatment was effective in most of them. Thus, HIV-1 RNA was undetectable in 79.6, 71.2, 51.4 and 59.3% of patients at months 1, 6, 12 and 18, respectively and the median viral load reduction was approximately 2.5 log10 copies/ml. The CD4 cell count rose by a median of 82, 147 and 180 x 106 cells/l at months 6, 12 and 18, respectively. At the same time points, the cumulative probability of remaining alive or free of new AIDS-defining events was 94.8, 85.0 and 82.3%. Most adverse effects (80.8%) were mild or moderate and only two cases of drug resistance occurred. CONCLUSION: This study shows that HAART is feasible and well tolerated in African patients. Clinical and biological results were comparable to those seen in western cohorts, despite differences in the HIV-1 subtype distribution and an advanced disease stage when the treatment was initiated. Contrary to other recent studies in Africa, viral resistance rarely emerged.

Long-term efficacy and tolerance of efavirenz- and nevirapine-containing regimens in adult HIV type 1 Senegalese patients.

Owing to their low toxicity, low price, and ease of use, efavirenz (EFV) and nevirapine (NVP) are frequently used as part of antiretroviral regimens for AIDS treatment. Several clinical trials have already studied their efficacy and tolerance. However, long-term observations of the effects of these drugs in patients are limited. We used data from a prospective Senegalese cohort to analyze long-term tolerance and efficacy of these two drugs in a low-resources setting. Patients were included if they started their therapy with EFV or NVP. They were censored after treatment discontinuation. The primary endpoint was the time to treatment discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included time to death, time to disease progression, occurrence of severe adverse effects, CD4 cell recovery, and virological response. Confounding factors were controlled using marginal structural models. The median follow-up time in both EFV and NVP arms was 48 months. The hazard ratio (HR) of drug discontinuation in the EFV arm vs. the NVP arm was 0.84 (0.34; 1.87). There was a borderline difference in virological response [HR 1.38 (0.999; 1.89)] but no differences in time to death [HR 1.15 (0.41; 3.24)], time to AIDS progression [HR 1.25 (0.61; 2.58)], or time to increase in CD4 cell count above 500 cells/mm3. Adverse effects were different between NVP and EFV, but long-term tolerance was good for both. This analysis provided further information on long-term tolerance and efficacy of EFV and NVP in a resource-limited setting.

No difference in clinical progression between patients infected with the predominant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 circulating recombinant form (CRF) 02_AG strain and patients not infected with CRF02_AG, in Western and West-Central Africa: a four-year prospective multicenter study.

To compare human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 disease progression in patients infected by the predominant strain circulating recombinant form (CRF) 02_AG in western and west-central Africa and in patients infected by other strains, a prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in Cameroon and Senegal. Among the 335 patients, a broad HIV-1 group M subtype diversity was observed in the envelope V3-V5 region, but strain CRF02_AG predominated in both Cameroon and Senegal (61.2% and 62.9%, respectively; P<.8). Multivariate analyses showed no difference between patients infected by CRF02 strains and those infected by other strains in terms of survival (adjusted hazards ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.78; P=.5), clinical disease progression (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.50-1.25; P=.3), or square root CD4 cell decline (regression coefficient, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.82 to 0.81; P=.9). This study suggests that the predominance of HIV-1 CRF02_AG strain in western and west-central Africa should have no major clinical consequences.