Protein diffusion in a bicontinuous microemulsion: inducing sub-diffusion by tuning the water domain size.

We study the diffusion of an enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP+) in bicontinuous sugar-surfactant based microemulsions. The size of the water domains in such systems is controlled by changes of the oil-to-water ratio. Hence, microemulsions allow to produce confinement effects in a controlled way. At high water content the protein is found to exhibit Fickian diffusion. Decreasing the water domain size leads to a slowing down of the protein diffusion and sub-diffusive behavior is obtained on the scale observed by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Further decrease of the water domain size finally nearly fixes the GFP+ in these domains and forces it to increasingly follow the breathing mode of the microemulsion matrix.

Contrast enhancement in electron beam tomography of the heart: comparison of a monomeric and a dimeric iodinated contrast agent in 59 patients.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to determine whether intravascular time-density course and visualization of the coronary arteries differ with use of a hyperosmolar monomeric versus an iso-osmolar dimeric contrast agent in electron beam tomography (EBT) of the heart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients underwent EBT of the coronary arteries using the monomeric ioversol or the dimeric iodixanol at the same concentration of 320 mg I/mL. Contrast volume was determined relative to body surface area and injected over 40 seconds. Intravascular time-density curves were created for quantitative analysis. For qualitative assessment, visualization of coronary arteries on axial scans and three-dimensional reconstructions was scored. Patients were matched for contrast flow, transit time, and mean pulse rate for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Ioversol produced a significantly greater increase in intravascular density for up to 30 seconds after injection (P < .01) compared with iodixanol. No difference between the two contrast media was seen in the qualitative assessment. CONCLUSION: Monomeric and dimeric contrast media differ in their time-density curves at coronary EBT, a reason for which is not apparent. Qualitative evaluation of coronary arteries is not affected by this difference.