Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 9: 28, 2009 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19602246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A care gap exists between recommendations and practice regarding the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fracture patients. The current study was designed to determine rates and predictors of in-hospital diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients admitted with fragility hip fractures, and to assess differences in these rates since the outset of the multipronged "Fracture? Think Osteoporosis" (FTOP) Program, which includes education of geriatrics and rehabilitation teams. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted with data from two Hamilton, Ontario, university-based tertiary-care hospitals, and represents a follow-up to a previous study conducted 8 years earlier. Data pertaining to all 354 patients, age > or = 50, admitted between March 2003 and April 2004, inclusive, with a diagnosis of fragility hip fracture were evaluated. Twelve patients were excluded leaving 342 patients for analysis, with 75% female, mean age 81.Outcomes included: Primary -- In-hospital diagnosis of osteoporosis and/or initiation of anti-resorptive treatment ("new osteoporosis diagnosis/treatment"). Secondary -- In-hospital mortality, BMD referrals, pre-admission osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: At admission, 27.8% of patients had a pre-existing diagnosis of osteoporosis and/or were taking anti-resorptive treatment. Among patients with no previous osteoporosis diagnosis/treatment: 35.7% received a new diagnosis of osteoporosis, 21% were initiated on anti-resorptive treatment, and 14.3% received a BMD referral. The greatest predictor of new osteoporosis diagnosis/treatment was transfer to a rehabilitation or geriatrics unit: 79.5% of rehabilitation/geriatrics versus 18.5% of patients receiving only orthopedics care met this outcome (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: New diagnosis of osteoporosis among patients admitted with hip fracture has improved from 1.8% in the mid 1990's to 35.7%. Initiation of bisphosphonate therapy has likewise improved from 0% to 21%. Although multiple factors have likely contributed, the differential response between rehabilitation/geriatrics versus orthopedics patients suggests that education of the geriatric and rehabilitation teams, including one-on-one and group-based sessions, implemented as part of the FTOP Program, has played a role in this improvement. A significant care gap still exists for patients discharged directly from orthopedic units. The application of targeted inpatient and post-discharge initiatives, such as those that comprise the entire FTOP Program, may be of particular value in this setting.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Conscientização , Geriatria/métodos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/métodos , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Osteoporose/reabilitação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Feminino , Geriatria/normas , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Fraturas do Quadril/diagnóstico , Fraturas do Quadril/reabilitação , Fraturas do Quadril/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/terapia , Reabilitação , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Clin J Sport Med ; 18(6): 508-21, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19001884

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To review within a prescribed evidence-based framework (1) the relationship between intermittent or lifelong physical activity and the subsequent onset or progression of osteoarthritis (OA) in later life and (2) the effect of structured exercise routines on the management of OA in the elderly. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE (1950 to April Week 2, 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to 2008 Week 16) was carried out using the Ovid interface. Relevant mapped terms addressing the identified objectives were combined and exploded according to a defined protocol. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that met relevancy criteria and were of high methodologic quality (prospective cohort studies for the risk factor component and systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials for the therapy component) were extracted and then hand searched for any additional studies. Final inclusion was based on agreement between two independent assessors, according to prescribed criteria. Any studies that were not in the English language, did not address the questions of interest in humans, or did not include a population that had at least a mean age of 55 years at the time of study termination, were excluded. Only land-based regimens were included in the therapy component of the review. DATA EXTRACTION: Pertinent information on subjects, risks, and outcomes (when assessing physical activity as a risk factor for OA in the elderly) and subjects, interventions, and outcomes (when evaluating the application of exercise in the management of OA in older persons) was extracted from the selected studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten studies met entry criteria for examining the relationship between physical activity and the development or progression of OA. Likely because of study variations and differences in the nature, duration and intensities of exercise regimens, no clearcut consensus was apparent on whether or not physical activity was a risk factor for OA. Six scientific reviews and ten single blinded randomized controlled trials were included when evaluating the effect of exercise on OA management. Regardless of wide variability in the included studies, a majority demonstrated that structured exercise programs were effective in the management of older subjects with OA. CONCLUSIONS: : Nuances of study design, differences in age and type of target populations, variability in the intensity, duration, and nature of physical activity in the respective studies, and lack of standardization in the way radiographic data are interpreted are among the factors that prevent consensus regarding the effect of physical activity on later development of OA. Similarly, there is considerable heterogeneity in the studies that assessed exercise in the treatment of OA. Nonetheless, there is substantive evidence in support of the benefits of one or another strength training or aerobic exercise regimen in the management of OA in middle-aged and elderly subjects.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Osteoartrite/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Articulações/fisiopatologia , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco
3.
Clin J Sport Med ; 18(6): 539-48, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19001887

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current review is to synthesize the available evidence from prospective clinical trials that are relevant to the clinical question: "What, if any, are the effects of regular aerobic and/or resistance exercise on the immune system in healthy older adults?" DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases were searched, using terms pertaining to immunology, exercise, and aging. Using the Ovid interface, the following databases were explored: Allied and Complimentary Medicine (AMED) (1985 to 2008), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982 to 2008), all EBM Reviews (Cochrane DSR, ACP Journal Club, DARE, CCTR, CMR, HTA, and NHSEED), EMBASE (1980 to 2008), and MEDLINE (1950 to 2008). The MEDLINE database was searched a second time through the PubMed interface. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective controlled clinical trials were selected for review if they investigated the effects of an exercise intervention (minimum 4 weeks in duration) on an immune outcome measure in an older but otherwise healthy population. A total of 19 articles representing 17 trials were identified. DATA EXTRACTION: Quality assessment of the relevant articles was performed using the Jadad et al criteria. Data extraction was performed using a standardized instrument. Data regarding the participants, interventions, and laboratory and clinical immunologic outcomes were synthesized. DATA SYNTHESIS: Available data provide no clear evidence of acute or chronic effects of exercise on lymphocyte or natural killer (NK) cell numbers or phenotype (ie, surface markers)/activity, with 2 exceptions: (1) strength or endurance exercise may cause an acute transient elevation in circulating CD8+ T cells, and (2) regular aerobic exercise appears to enhance immunologic memory in the context of vaccination. The effects of strength training on NK cell activity are unclear. Furthermore, regular aerobic exercise appears to be associated with a reduction in chronic inflammation. Finally, no prospective controlled trials have clearly documented clinical immunologic benefits of regular exercise, which may well relate to underpowering of these studies. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in healthy older adults, regular, particularly aerobic, exercise appears to be a friend of the immune system, helping to offset diminished adaptive responses and chronic inflammation. The possibility exists that particularly strenuous exercise may cause acute immunologic changes, such as diminished NK cell activity, which could predispose to infection in certain individuals. However, given the possible benefits of regular exercise on the immune system and the many definite benefits on other systems, the evidence presented here should not dissuade practitioners from suggesting regular exercise to otherwise healthy older adults.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Sistema Imunitário/fisiologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA