Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anesth Analg ; 123(2): 493-500, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27159069

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Single-injection adductor canal block (ACB) provides analgesia after knee surgery. Which nerves that are blocked by an ACB and what influence-if any-local anesthetic volume has on the effects remain undetermined. We hypothesized that effects on the nerve to the vastus medialis muscle (which besides being a motor nerve innervates portions of the knee) are volume-dependent. METHODS: In this assessor- and subject-blinded randomized trial, 20 volunteers were included. On 3 separate days, subjects received an ACB with different volumes (10, 20, and 30 mL) of lidocaine 1%. In addition, they received a femoral nerve block and a placebo ACB. The effect on the vastus medialis (primary endpoint) and the vastus lateralis was evaluated using noninvasive electromyography (EMG). Quadriceps femoris muscle strength was evaluated using a dynamometer. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in EMG response from the vastus medialis, dependent on volume. Thirty-five percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-57) of the subjects had an affected vastus medialis after an ACB with 10 mL compared with 84% (95% CI, 62-94) following 20 mL (P = 0.03) and 100% (95% CI, 84-100) when 30 mL was used (P = 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were found between volume and effect on the vastus lateralis (P = 0.81) or in muscle strength (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: For ACB, there is a positive correlation between local anesthetic volume and effect on the vastus medialis muscle. Despite the rather large differences in EMG recordings, there were no statistically significant differences in quadriceps femoris muscle strength. Subsequent clinical studies comparing different volumes in a surgical setting, powered to show differences not only in analgesic efficacy, but also in adverse events, are required.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Eletromiografia , Nervo Femoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Joelho/cirurgia , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Limiar da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Músculo Quadríceps/inervação , Potenciais de Ação/efeitos dos fármacos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Dinamarca , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Injeções , Contração Isométrica/efeitos dos fármacos , Joelho/inervação , Lidocaína/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Força Muscular/efeitos dos fármacos , Dinamômetro de Força Muscular , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA