RESUMO
PURPOSE: Hypoxia mediates treatment resistance in solid tumors. We evaluated if oxygen-enhanced (OE)-MRI-derived hypoxic volume (HVMRI) is repeatable and can detect radiotherapy-induced hypoxia modification in HPV-associated oropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 27 patients were recruited prospectively between March 2021 and January 2024. HVMRI was measured in primary and nodal tumors prior to standard-of-care (chemo)radiotherapy then at weeks 2 and 4 (W2, W4) into therapy. Two pre-treatment scans assessed biomarker within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and repeatability coefficient (RC). Cohort treatment response was measured using mixed-effects modelling. Responding lesions were identified by comparing HVMRI change to RC limits of agreement (LOA). RESULTS: OE-MRI identified hypoxia in all lesions. HVMRI wCV was 24.6% and RC LOA were -45.7% to 84.1%. Cohort median pre-treatment HVMRI of 11.3 cm3 reduced to 6.9 cm3 at W2 and 5.9 cm3 at W4 (both p < 0.001). HVMRI was reduced in 54.5% of individual lesions by W2 and in 88.2% by W4. All lesions with W2 hypoxia reduction showed persistent modification at W4. HVMRI reduced in some lesions that showed no overall volume change. Hypoxia modification was discordant between primary and nodal tumors in 50.0% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation-induced hypoxia modification can occur as early as W2, but onset varies between patients and was not necessarily associated with overall size change. Half of all patients had discordant changes in primary and nodal tumors. These findings have implications for patient selection and timing of dose de-escalation strategies in HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: High-energy Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) commenced in England in 2018 and NHS England commissions PBT for 1.5% of patients receiving radical radiotherapy. We sought expert opinion on the level of provision. METHODS: Invitations were sent to 41 colleagues working in PBT, most at one UK centre, to contribute by completing a spreadsheet. 39 responded: 23 (59%) completed the spreadsheet; 16 (41%) declined, arguing that clinical outcome data are lacking, but joined six additional site-specialist oncologists for two consensus meetings. The spreadsheet was pre-populated with incidence data from Cancer Research UK and radiotherapy use data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service. 'Mechanisms of Benefit' of reduced growth impairment, reduced toxicity, dose escalation and reduced second cancer risk were examined. RESULTS: The most reliable figure for percentage of radical radiotherapy patients likely to benefit from PBT was that agreed by 95% of the 23 respondents at 4.3%, slightly larger than current provision. The median was 15% (range 4-92%) and consensus median 13%. The biggest estimated potential benefit was from reducing toxicity, median benefit to 15% (range 4-92%), followed by dose escalation median 3% (range 0 to 47%); consensus values were 12 and 3%. Reduced growth impairment and reduced second cancer risk were calculated to benefit 0.5% and 0.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The most secure estimate of percentage benefit was 4.3% but insufficient clinical outcome data exist for confident estimates. The study supports the NHS approach of using the evidence base and developing it through randomised trials, non-randomised studies and outcomes tracking. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Less is known about the percentage of patients who may benefit from PBT than is generally acknowledged. Expert opinion varies widely. Insufficient clinical outcome data exist to provide robust estimates. Considerable further work is needed to address this, including international collaboration; much is already underway but will take time to provide mature data.