Validity of Wearable Electromyographical Compression Shorts to Predict Lactate Threshold During Incremental Exercise in Healthy Subjects.

ABSTRACT: Snarr, RL, Tolusso, DV, Hallmark, AV, and Esco, MR. Validity of wearable electromyographical compression shorts to predict lactate threshold during incremental exercise in healthy subjects. J Strength Cond Res 35(3): 702-708, 2021-Determination of lactate threshold (LT) is an important variable in improving cardiovascular endurance and performance. Unfortunately, monitoring LT during exercise uses a costly, invasive blood analysis. Recently, electromyography (EMG) has been deemed a potential method of monitoring exercise intensity and may provide a noninvasive technique to monitor lactate during exercise. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if wearable surface EMG technology, acquired from specialized compression shorts, could estimate the LT work rate during incremental cycling. Thirteen men (n = 9) and women (n = 4) completed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer. Blood lactate was measured every minute, whereas EMG was recorded throughout at the site of the vastus lateralis. Lactate and EMG thresholds were calculated using the Dmax method and compared using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Results demonstrated no significant differences between lactate and EMG thresholds in regards to work output (p = 0.83), percent maximal heart rate (p = 0.13; Cohen's d = 0.43), or percent peak oxygen consumption (p = 0.64; Cohen's d = 0.09). This confirms that both lactate and EMG exhibit similar properties (i.e., increasing exponential values) during incremental exercise. A possible mechanism includes the rise in blood lactate concentration, which increases motor unit recruitment in an attempt to maintain proper cadence and force output during incremental exercise. Thus, a coincidental, exponential increase in EMG amplitude may occur. Therefore, wearable EMG compression gear may provide a viable field tool for monitoring training intensity and predicting LT work rates.

Comparison of Lactate and Electromyographical Thresholds After an Exercise Bout.

Snarr, RL, Esco, MR, Tolusso, DV, Hallmark, AV, Earley, RL, Higginbotham, JC, Fedewa, MV, and Bishop, P. Comparison of lactate and electromyographical thresholds after an exercise bout. J Strength Cond Res 33(12): 3322-3331, 2019-The electromyographical threshold (EMGT) has been previously validated as a means to predict the work rate at which lactate threshold (LT) occurs. The reliability of these measures has yet to be examined after a bout of exercise. The purpose was to determine the agreement between electromyography (EMG) and LT after a 30-minute bout of steady-state aerobic exercise. Participants completed 2 graded exercise tests (GXT) on a cycle ergometer separated by 30 minutes of steady-state exercise. Blood lactate was measured the last 45 seconds of each stage during both GXTs, whereas EMG of the vastus lateralis was monitored continuously. Individual agreement demonstrated that pre-exercise and post-exercise LT occurred at the same work rate in 2 of 10 participants, whereas EMGT occurred at the same work rate in 6 of 10 participants. Results showed no mean difference between work rates for LT or EMG threshold for the pre-exercise GXT, but LT was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than EMGT during the post-exercise GXT. Post-GXT LT work rates were also determined to be significantly lower than pre-GXT LT (p = 0.034), whereas no differences existed in EMG thresholds. Although both LT and EMGT testing may display similar properties, they are not interchangeable. The physiological responses to increasing exercise intensity between La and EMG signaling seem to be associated, and their interaction may not be cause-effect. Because of poor individual agreement, caution should be used when determining LT through the use of EMG. Further research is needed to determine the ability of these 2 metrics to prescribe training intensities.

Electromyographical Comparison of Pike Variations Performed With and Without Instability Devices.

Snarr, RL, Hallmark, AV, Nickerson, BS, and Esco, MR. Electromyographical comparison of pike variations performed with and without instability devices. J Strength Cond Res 30(12): 3436-3442, 2016-Instability devices are primarily used with the intent of increasing the intensity of traditional exercises by providing further muscular demands of the abdominal wall by decreasing stability. Although there are multiple studies examining these devices, most often they only compare one such device to a stable movement and overlook the comparison among multiple devices. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the electromyographical differences of the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), erector spinae (LSES), and rectus femoris (RF) during pike variations performed on various surfaces. Twenty men and women volunteered for this study. All subjects performed 5 variations of a pike on varying surfaces (i.e., stable ground [PK], Swiss ball [SB], suspension training device [ST], BOSU ball [BOSU], and Core Coaster [CC]). Normalized (%MVC) values were recorded for each muscle during 5 repetitions of each pike variations. For the RA, EO, LSES, and RF, the PK elicited significantly lower values compared with the instability devices. In terms of the EO, the ST was significantly higher than the BOSU, SB, and CC. Results of this investigation demonstrated significant differences between the instability devices and the stable pike. These results indicate that with more freely moving instability devices (e.g., suspension device, Swiss ball, etc.), core musculature may require greater muscular demands. Practitioners should take note that traditional stable pikes may not offer a core musculature challenge to resistance-trained individuals.

Electromyographical Comparison of a Traditional, Suspension Device, and Towel Pull-Up.

Strengthening muscles of the back may have various implications for improving functions of daily living, aiding in the transfer of power in throwing, and assist in injury prevention of the shoulder complex. While several versions of the pull-up exist, there is currently no literature comparing their differences. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the electromyographical activity of the latissimus dorsi, posterior deltoid, middle trapezius, and biceps brachii while performing three variations of the pull-up. Resistance-trained men and women (n =15, age = 24.87 ± 6.52 years) participated in this study by performing traditional pull-ups, suspension device pull-ups, and towel pull-ups in a randomized fashion. Each pull-up was performed for three repetitions with a 1.5 bi-acromial grip-width for each participant. Normalized (%MVC) electromyographical values were recorded for each muscle group during each pull-up variation. No significant differences existed within the latissimus dorsi, biceps brachii or posterior deltoid between any of the exercises. For the middle trapezius, towel pull-ups provided significantly lower muscle activity than the traditional pull-up, while no differences between suspension pull-ups and the other variations occurred. In conclusion, only one muscular difference existed between the exercise variations and all versions examined provided electromyographical values, determined by current literature, to invoke a sufficient stimulus to promote increases in muscle strength and hypertrophy. Although further research is needed, practitioners can be confident when programming any of the movement variations examined when attempting to elicit adaptations of muscular strength and hypertrophy.