Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 227(11): 1303-1312, 2023 05 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36484441

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We report 2-year persistence of immune response to Takeda's prophylactic purified formalin-inactivated whole Zika virus vaccine candidate (TAK-426) compared with that observed after natural infection. METHODS: A randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-selection, phase 1 trial was conducted in 18-49-year-old adults at 9 centers (7 in the United States, 2 in Puerto Rico) from 13 November 2017 to 24 November 2020. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of 3 increasing doses of TAK-426 administered as 2 doses 28 days apart to flavivirus (FV)-naive and FV-primed adults. Here, we report on safety and persistence of immunity up to 2 years after primary vaccination with 10-µg TAK-426, the highest dose, and compare neutralizing antibody responses with those observed after natural infection. RESULTS: TAK-426 at 10-µg had an acceptable safety profile in FV-naive and FV-primed adults up to 24 months after dose 2. Seropositivity for neutralizing antibodies was 100% at 1 year, and 93.8% and 76.2% at 2 years in FV-naive and FV-primed groups, respectively. TAK-426 responses were comparable in magnitude and kinetics with those elicited by natural Zika virus infection. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the further clinical development of TAK-426 for both FV-naive and FV-primed populations. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03343626.


Assuntos
Infecção por Zika virus , Zika virus , Humanos , Adulto , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Seguimentos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Infecção por Zika virus/prevenção & controle , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Método Duplo-Cego , Anticorpos Antivirais
2.
Lancet ; 399(10323): 461-472, 2022 01 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35065705

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A range of safe and effective vaccines against SARS CoV 2 are needed to address the COVID 19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine SCB-2019. METHODS: This ongoing phase 2 and 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was done in adults aged 18 years and older who were in good health or with a stable chronic health condition, at 31 sites in five countries (Belgium, Brazil, Colombia, Philippines, and South Africa). The participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using a centralised internet randomisation system to receive two 0·5 mL intramuscular doses of SCB-2019 (30 µg, adjuvanted with 1·50 mg CpG-1018 and 0·75 mg alum) or placebo (0·9% sodium chloride for injection supplied in 10 mL ampoules) 21 days apart. All study staff and participants were masked, but vaccine administrators were not. Primary endpoints were vaccine efficacy, measured by RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 of any severity with onset from 14 days after the second dose in baseline SARS-CoV-2 seronegative participants (the per-protocol population), and the safety and solicited local and systemic adverse events in the phase 2 subset. This study is registered on EudraCT (2020-004272-17) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04672395). FINDINGS: 30 174 participants were enrolled from March 24, 2021, until the cutoff date of Aug 10, 2021, of whom 30 128 received their first assigned vaccine (n=15 064) or a placebo injection (n=15 064). The per-protocol population consisted of 12 355 baseline SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (6251 vaccinees and 6104 placebo recipients). Most exclusions (13 389 [44·4%]) were because of seropositivity at baseline. There were 207 confirmed per-protocol cases of COVID-19 at 14 days after the second dose, 52 vaccinees versus 155 placebo recipients, and an overall vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 of 67·2% (95·72% CI 54·3-76·8), 83·7% (97·86% CI 55·9-95·4) against moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and 100% (97·86% CI 25·3-100·0) against severe COVID-19. All COVID-19 cases were due to virus variants; vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 due to the three predominant variants was 78·7% (95% CI 57·3-90·4) for delta, 91·8% (44·9-99·8) for gamma, and 58·6% (13·3-81·5) for mu. No safety issues emerged in the follow-up period for the efficacy analysis (median of 82 days [IQR 63-103]). The vaccine elicited higher rates of mainly mild-to-moderate injection site pain than the placebo after the first (35·7% [287 of 803] vs 10·3% [81 of 786]) and second (26·9% [189 of 702] vs 7·4% [52 of 699]) doses, but the rates of other solicited local and systemic adverse events were similar between the groups. INTERPRETATION: Two doses of SCB-2019 vaccine plus CpG and alum provides notable protection against the entire severity spectrum of COVID-19 caused by circulating SAR-CoV-2 viruses, including the predominating delta variant. FUNDING: Clover Biopharmaceuticals and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Compostos de Alúmen/uso terapêutico , Bélgica , Brasil , Colômbia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oligodesoxirribonucleotídeos/uso terapêutico , Filipinas , Multimerização Proteica , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , África do Sul , Eficácia de Vacinas , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Infect Dis ; 225(2): 327-331, 2022 01 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34888662

RESUMO

A significant correlation has been shown between the binding antibody responses against original severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein and vaccine efficacy of 4 approved coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines. We therefore assessed the immune response against original SARS-CoV-2 elicited by the adjuvanted S-Trimer vaccine, SCB-2019 + CpG/alum, in the same assay and laboratory. Responses to SCB-2019 were comparable or superior for antibody to original and Alpha variant when compared with 4 approved vaccines. The comparison accurately predicted success of the recently reported efficacy trial of SCB-2019 vaccine. Immunogenicity comparisons to original strain and variants of concern should be considered as a basis for authorization of vaccines.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas
4.
Lancet ; 397(10275): 682-694, 2021 02 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524311

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As part of the accelerated development of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), we report a dose-finding and adjuvant justification study of SCB-2019, a protein subunit vaccine candidate containing a stabilised trimeric form of the spike (S)-protein (S-Trimer) combined with two different adjuvants. METHODS: Our study is a phase 1, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial at a specialised clinical trials centre in Australia. We enrolled healthy adult volunteers in two age groups: younger adults (aged 18-54 years) and older adults (aged 55-75 years). Participants were randomly allocated either vaccine or placebo using a list prepared by the study funder. Participants were to receive two doses of SCB-2019 (either 3 µg, 9 µg, or 30 µg) or a placebo (0·9% NaCl) 21 days apart. SCB-2019 either had no adjuvant (S-Trimer protein alone) or was adjuvanted with AS03 or CpG/Alum. The assigned treatment was administered in opaque syringes to maintain masking of assignments. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after each vaccination. Humoral responses were measured as SCB-2019 binding IgG antibodies and ACE2-competitive blocking IgG antibodies by ELISA and as neutralising antibodies by wild-type SARS-CoV-2 microneutralisation assay. Cellular responses to pooled S-protein peptides were measured by flow-cytometric intracellular cytokine staining. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04405908; this is an interim analysis and the study is continuing. FINDINGS: Between June 19 and Sept 23, 2020, 151 volunteers were enrolled; three people withdrew, two for personal reasons and one with an unrelated serious adverse event (pituitary adenoma). 148 participants had at least 4 weeks of follow-up after dose two and were included in this analysis (database lock, Oct 23, 2020). Vaccination was well tolerated, with two grade 3 solicited adverse events (pain in 9 µg AS03-adjuvanted and 9 µg CpG/Alum-adjuvanted groups). Most local adverse events were mild injection-site pain, and local events were more frequent with SCB-2019 formulations containing AS03 adjuvant (44-69%) than with those containing CpG/Alum adjuvant (6-44%) or no adjuvant (3-13%). Systemic adverse events were more frequent in younger adults (38%) than in older adults (17%) after the first dose but increased to similar levels in both age groups after the second dose (30% in older and 34% in younger adults). SCB-2019 with no adjuvant elicited minimal immune responses (three seroconversions by day 50), but SCB-2019 with fixed doses of either AS03 or CpG/Alum adjuvants induced high titres and seroconversion rates of binding and neutralising antibodies in both younger and older adults (anti-SCB-2019 IgG antibody geometric mean titres at day 36 were 1567-4452 with AS03 and 174-2440 with CpG/Alum). Titres in all AS03 dose groups and the CpG/Alum 30 µg group were higher than were those recorded in a panel of convalescent serum samples from patients with COVID-19. Both adjuvanted SCB-2019 formulations elicited T-helper-1-biased CD4+ T-cell responses. INTERPRETATION: The SCB-2019 vaccine, comprising S-Trimer protein formulated with either AS03 or CpG/Alum adjuvants, elicited robust humoral and cellular immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, with high viral neutralising activity. Both adjuvanted vaccine formulations were well tolerated and are suitable for further clinical development. FUNDING: Clover Biopharmaceuticals and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/farmacologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Austrália , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Subunidades Proteicas , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/imunologia
5.
J Infect Dis ; 224(10): 1699-1706, 2021 11 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34480575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported the safety and immunogenicity 4 weeks after 2 doses of the Clover coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine candidate, SCB-2019, a stabilized prefusion form of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein (S-trimer). We now report persistence of antibodies up to 6 months after vaccination, and cross-neutralization titers against 3 variants of concern (VoCs). METHODS: In a phase 1 study, adult (18-54 years of age) and elderly (55-75 years of age) volunteers received 2 vaccinations 21 days apart with placebo or 3-, 9-, or 30-µg. We measured immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against SCB-2019, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) competitive binding antibodies, and neutralizing antibodies against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-Hu-1) at days 101 and 184, and neutralizing antibodies against 3 VoCs, Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), and Gamma (P.1), in day 36 sera. RESULTS: Titers waned from their peak at days 36-50, but SCB-2019 IgG antibodies, ACE2 competitive binding antibodies, and neutralizing antibodies against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 persisted at 25%-35% of their observed peak levels at day 184. Day 36 sera also demonstrated dose-dependent increases in neutralizing titers against the 3 VoCs. CONCLUSIONS: SCB-2019 dose-dependently induced immune responses against wild-type SARS-CoV-2, which persisted up to day 184. Neutralizing antibodies were cross-reactive against 3 of the most prevalent VoCs.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Adulto , Idoso , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2 , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Imunidade , Imunoglobulina G , Recém-Nascido , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 59 Suppl 7: S408-14, 2014 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25425719

RESUMO

Maternal immunization is an effective strategy to prevent and/or minimize the severity of infectious diseases in pregnant women and their infants. Based on the success of vaccination programs to prevent maternal and neonatal tetanus, maternal immunization has been well received in the United States and globally as a promising strategy for the prevention of other vaccine-preventable diseases that threaten pregnant women and infants, such as influenza and pertussis. Given the promise for reducing the burden of infectious conditions of perinatal significance through the development of vaccines against relevant pathogens, the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH) sponsored a series of meetings to foster progress toward clinical development of vaccines for use in pregnancy. A multidisciplinary group of stakeholders convened at the NIH in December 2013 to identify potential barriers and opportunities for scientific advancement in maternal immunization.


Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Imunização , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Vacinas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Materno-Adquirida , Programas de Imunização , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas/imunologia , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle
7.
BMC Pediatr ; 14: 295, 2014 Nov 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25433534

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rotaviruses are the leading cause of severe acute gastroenteritis in children aged <5 years worldwide. A live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine, RIX4414 has been developed to reduce the global disease burden associated with rotavirus gastroenteritis. Serum anti-rotavirus immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody measured in unvaccinated infants during clinical trials of RIX4414 reflects natural rotavirus exposure, and may inform the optimal timing for rotavirus vaccination. METHODS: We reviewed phase II and III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted by GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium between 2000 and 2008 which used the commercial formulation of RIX4414 lyophilized vaccine. We included trials for which demographic data and pre-dose-1 and post-last-dose anti-rotavirus IgA antibody status were available from placebo recipients. RESULTS: Sixteen clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. The studies were conducted across Africa (N = 3), Asia (N = 4), Latin America (N = 4), Europe (N = 4) and North America (N = 1). Overall, 46,398 infants were enrolled and among these, 20,099 received placebo. The mean age at pre-dose-1 time point ranged from 6.4 - 12.2 weeks while the mean age at post-last-dose time point ranged from 13.5 - 19.6 weeks. The anti-RV IgA seropositivity rates at both time points were higher in less developed countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America (pre-dose-1: 2.1%-26.3%; post-last-dose: 6.3%-34.8%) when compared to more developed countries of Asia, Europe and North America (pre-dose-1: 0%-9.4%; post-last-dose: 0%-21.3%), indicating that rotavirus infections occurred at a younger age in these regions. CONCLUSION: Exposure to rotavirus infection occurred early in life among infants in most geographical settings, especially in developing countries. These data emphasize the importance of timely rotavirus vaccination within the Expanded Program on Immunization schedule to maximize protection.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Países em Desenvolvimento , Gastroenterite/virologia , Imunoglobulina A/sangue , Infecções por Rotavirus/virologia , Rotavirus/imunologia , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Masculino , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Vacinas Atenuadas
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2301632, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206168

RESUMO

We assessed the non-inferiority of homologous boosting compared with heterologous boosting with the recombinant protein vaccine, SCB-2019, in adults previously immunized with different COVID-19 vaccines. Three equal cohorts (N ~ 420) of Philippino adults (18-80 years) previously immunized with Comirnaty, CoronaVac or Vaxzevria COVID-19 vaccines were randomized 1:1 to receive homologous or heterologous (SCB-2019) boosters. Neutralizing antibodies against prototype SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-Hu-1) were measured in all participants and against Delta variant and Omicron sub-lineages in subsets (30‒50 per arm) 15 days after boosting. Participants recorded solicited adverse events for 7 days and unsolicited and serious adverse events until Day 60. Prototype SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing responses on Day 15 after SCB-2019 were statistically non-inferior to homologous Vaxzevria boosters, superior to CoronaVac, but lower than homologous Comirnaty. Neutralizing responses against Delta and Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5 variants after heterologous SCB-2019 were higher than homologous CoronaVac or Vaxzevria, but lower than homologous Comirnaty. Responses against Omicron BF.7, BQ.1.1.3, and XBB1.5 following heterologous SCB-2019 were lower than after homologous Comirnaty booster but significantly higher than after Vaxzevria booster. SCB-2019 reactogenicity was similar to CoronaVac or Vaxzevria, but lower than Comirnaty; most frequent events were mild/moderate injection site pain, headache and fatigue. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Heterologous SCB-2019 boosting was well tolerated and elicited neutralizing responses against all tested SARS-COV-2 viruses including Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.4, BA.5, BF.7, BQ.1.1.3, and XBB1.5 sub-lineages that were non-inferior to homologous boosting with CoronaVac or Vaxzevria, but not homologous Comirnaty booster.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas , Adulto , Humanos , Vacina BNT162 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Imunização
9.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 112(9): 574-7, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24079716

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: This Phase-IV study evaluated the human rotavirus (RV) vaccine Rotarix (RIX4414) to provide additional local clinical data to the Taiwan Food and Drug Association (NCT01198769). Healthy infants aged 6-12 weeks who were given a hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) dose after birth, received two doses of RIX4414 (0, 2-month schedule). Anti-RV IgA antibody concentrations were measured using ELISA. A total of 15 infants were enrolled, and included in the according-to-protocol cohort. The anti-RV IgA antibody seroconversion rate 2 months post-Dose 2 was 100% (95% confidence interval = 78.2-100) and the geometric mean concentration was 254.7 U/ml (95% confidence interval = 145.0-447.7). Two episodes of gastroenteritis were reported, and one stool sample was tested for RV, which was negative. No fatal serious adverse events were reported during the study period between November 2010 and April 2011. The two-dose regimen of RIX4414 was highly immunogenic and safe when administered to healthy Taiwanese infants who received a HBIg dose after birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01198769.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulinas/imunologia , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/imunologia , Rotavirus/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia
10.
Vaccine ; 41(11): 1875-1884, 2023 03 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36781334

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated immunogenicity of SCB-2019, a subunit vaccine candidate containing a pre-fusion trimeric form of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)-protein adjuvanted with CpG-1018/alum. METHODS: The phase 2/3, double-blind, randomized SPECTRA trial was conducted in five countries in participants aged ≥ 18 years, either SARS-CoV-2-naïve or previously exposed. Participants were randomly assigned to receive two doses of SCB-2019 or placebo administered intramuscularly 21 days apart. In the phase 2 part of the study, on days 1, 22, and 36, neutralizing antibodies were measured by pseudovirus and wild-type virus neutralization assays to SARS-CoV-2 prototype and variants, and ACE2-receptor-binding antibodies and SCB-2019-binding antibodies were measured by ELISA. Cell-mediated immunity was measured by intracellular cytokine staining via flow cytometry. RESULTS: 1601 individuals were enrolled between 24 March and 13 September 2021 and received at least one vaccine dose. Immunogenicity analysis was conducted in a phase 2 subset of 691 participants, including 428 SARS-CoV-2-naïve (381 vaccine and 47 placebo recipients) and 263 SARS-CoV-2-exposed (235 vaccine and 28 placebo recipients). In SARS-CoV-2-naïve participants, GMTs of neutralizing antibodies against prototype virus increased 2 weeks post-second dose (day 36) compared to baseline (224 vs 12.7 IU/mL). Seroconversion rate was 82.5 %. In SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, one SCB-2019 dose increased GMT of neutralizing antibodies by 48.3-fold (1276.1 IU/mL on day 22) compared to baseline. Seroconversion rate was 92.4 %. Increase was marginal post-second dose. SCB-2019 also showed cross-neutralization capability against nine variants, including Omicron, in SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants at day 36. SCB-2019 stimulated Th1-biased cell-mediated immunity to the S-protein in both naïve and exposed participants. The vaccine was well tolerated, no safety concerns were raised from the study. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of SCB-2019 was immunogenic in SARS-CoV-2-exposed individuals, whereas two doses were required to induce immune response in SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals. SCB-2019 elicited a cross-neutralizing response against emergent SARS-CoV-2 variants at antibody levels associated with clinical protection, underlining its potential as a booster. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT04672395; EudraCT: 2020-004272-17.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Subunidades Proteicas , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Método Duplo-Cego , Imunogenicidade da Vacina
11.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(1): 2206359, 2023 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37226504

RESUMO

We previously demonstrated the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine candidate, SCB-2019, in adults in the SPECTRA phase 2/3 efficacy study. We extended the study to include 1278 healthy 12-17-year-old adolescents in Belgium, Colombia, and the Philippines who received either two doses of SCB-2019 or placebo 21 days apart, to assess immunogenicity as neutralizing antibodies against prototype SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern, and safety and reactogenicity as solicited and unsolicited adverse events with a comparator group of young adults (18-25 years). In participants with no evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection SCB-2019 immunogenicity in adolescents was non-inferior to that in young adults; respective geometric mean neutralizing titers (GMT) against prototype SARS-CoV-2 14 days after the second vaccination were 271 IU/mL (95% CI: 211-348) and 144 IU/mL (116-178). Most adolescents (1077, 84.3%) had serologic evidence of prior SAR-CoV-2 exposure at baseline; in these seropositive adolescents neutralizing GMTs increased from 173 IU/mL (135-122) to 982 IU/mL (881-1094) after the second dose. Neutralizing titers against Delta and Omicron BA SARS-CoV-2 variants were also increased, most notably in those with prior exposure. SCB-2019 vaccine was well tolerated with generally mild or moderate, transient solicited and unsolicited adverse events that were comparable in adolescent vaccine and placebo groups except for injection site pain - reported after 20% of SCB-2019 and 7.3% of placebo injections. SCB-2019 vaccine was highly immunogenic against SARS-CoV-2 prototype and variants in adolescents, especially in those with evidence of prior exposure, with comparable immunogenicity to young adults. Clinical trial registration: EudraCT 2020-004272-17; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04672395.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Subunidades Proteicas , SARS-CoV-2
12.
BMC Infect Dis ; 12: 213, 2012 Sep 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22974466

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rotaviruses are the most important cause of severe acute gastroenteritis worldwide in children <5 years of age. The human, G1P[8] rotavirus vaccine Rotarix™ significantly reduced severe rotavirus gastroenteritis episodes in a Phase III clinical trial conducted in infants in South Africa and Malawi. This paper examines rotavirus vaccine efficacy in preventing severe rotavirus gastroenteritis, during infancy, caused by the various G and P rotavirus types encountered during the first rotavirus-season. METHODS: Healthy infants aged 5-10 weeks were enrolled and randomized into three groups to receive either two (10 and 14 weeks) or three doses of Rotarix™ (together forming the pooled Rotarix™ group) or three doses of placebo at a 6,10,14-week schedule. Weekly home visits were conducted to identify gastroenteritis episodes. Rotaviruses were detected by ELISA and genotyped by RT-PCR and nucleotide sequencing. The percentage of infants with severe rotavirus gastroenteritis caused by the circulating G and P types from 2 weeks post-last dose until one year of age and the corresponding vaccine efficacy was calculated with 95% CI. RESULTS: Overall, 4939 infants were vaccinated and 4417 (pooled Rotarix™ = 2974; placebo = 1443) were included in the per protocol efficacy cohort. G1 wild-type was detected in 23 (1.6%) severe rotavirus gastroenteritis episodes from the placebo group. This was followed in order of detection by G12 (15 [1%] in placebo) and G8 types (15 [1%] in placebo). Vaccine efficacy against G1 wild-type, G12 and G8 types were 64.1% (95% CI: 29.9%; 82%), 51.5% (95% CI:-6.5%; 77.9%) and 64.4% (95% CI: 17.1%; 85.2%), respectively. Genotype P[8] was the predominant circulating P type and was detected in 38 (2.6%) severe rotavirus gastroenteritis cases in placebo group. The remaining circulating P types comprised of P[4] (20 [1.4%] in placebo) and P[6] (13 [0.9%] in placebo). Vaccine efficacy against P[8] was 59.1% (95% CI: 32.8%; 75.3%), P[4] was 70.9% (95% CI: 37.5%; 87.0%) and P[6] was 55.2% (95% CI: -6.5%; 81.3%) CONCLUSIONS: Rotarix™ vaccine demonstrated efficacy against severe gastroenteritis caused by diverse circulating rotavirus types. These data add to a growing body of evidence supporting heterotypic protection provided by Rotarix™. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00241644.


Assuntos
Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Lactente , Malaui/epidemiologia , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Rotavirus/isolamento & purificação , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia
13.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 22(7): 990-1001, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35447085

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the efficacy of the adjuvanted-protein COVID-19 vaccine candidate S-Trimer (SCB-2019) in adults who showed no evidence of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we aimed to investigate the extent of protection afforded by previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 on subsequent COVID-19 infection, as well as the efficacy, safety, and reactogenicity of SCB-2019 in participants who were enrolled in the Study evaluating Protective-Efficacy and safety of Clover's Trimeric Recombinant protein-based and Adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccine (SPECTRA) trial who had already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 before vaccination. METHODS: In a phase 2 and 3 multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (SPECTRA) done at 31 sites in five countries, participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using the Cenduit Interactive Response Technology system (IQVIA, Durham, NC, USA), with a block size of six, to receive two doses of either SCB-2019 or placebo 21 days apart. The primary outcomes of the SPECTRA trial were vaccine efficacy, measured by real-time PCR (rtPCR)-confirmed COVID-19 of any severity, with onset from 14 days after the second vaccine dose, as well as the safety and solicited local and systemic adverse events in the phase 2 subset. Here, we present secondary analyses to calculate the protective efficacy due to previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 against reinfection with COVID-19 according to severity in SPECTRA participants who had evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 at baseline, including efficacy against identified viral variants, as well as efficacy of SCB-2019 vaccination in this population. FINDINGS: We enrolled 30 174 participants between March 24, 2021, and Aug 10, 2021. In the 14 670 participants who were randomly assigned to receive placebo, there were 418 (2·8%) confirmed cases of COVID-19; 65 (0·9%) of 7339 SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, and 353 (4·8%) of 7331 SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (attack rates of 5·5 cases per 100 person-years for SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants and 32·4 cases per 100 person-years for SARS-CoV-2-naive participants). Protective efficacy due to previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 was 83·2% (95% CI 78·0-87·3) against any COVID-19, 92·5% (82·9-97·3) against moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and 100% (59·3-100) against severe COVID-19; no SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants had hospitalisation associated with COVID-19. Protective efficacy against variants were 100% for alpha (B.1.1.7) and lambda (C.37) variants, 88·6% (14·9-99·7) for B.1.623, 93·6% (80·1-98·7) for gamma (P.1), and 92·4% (81·2-97·6) for mu (B.1.621) variants, and lowest against beta (B.1.351; 72·2% [33·1-89·9]) and delta (B.1.617.2; 77·2% [61·3-87·2]) variants. In addition, one dose of SCB-2019 had 49·9% (1·5-75·6) efficacy against any symptomatic COVID-19, and two doses had 64·2% (26·5-83·8) efficacy. SCB-2019 was well tolerated in SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, but was associated with higher rates of injection site pain (89 [33·8%] of 263 participants) than placebo (16 [6·7%] of 239 participants). Rates of solicited systemic adverse events, severe adverse events, and serious adverse events were similar between vaccine and placebo groups, and with rates in SARS-CoV-2-naive vaccine recipients. INTERPRETATION: Previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 decreased the risk and severity of subsequent COVID-19 infection, even against newly emerging variants. Protection is further enhanced by one or two doses of SCB-2019. FUNDING: Clover Biopharmaceuticals, The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Reinfecção , Vacinação , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas
14.
Hum Vaccin ; 7(1): 74-80, 2011 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21228629

RESUMO

AIM: The lyophilized formulation of the human rotavirus vaccine, RIX4414 (RotarixTM), is recommended to be stored at 2°C-8°C for optimal immunogenicity. In some settings with inadequate infrastructure for vaccine storage, unforeseen circumstances may cause cold chain breakage, resulting in the vaccine to be left at ambient temperatures. This study evaluated the heat stability of lyophilized RIX4414 vaccine in terms of immunogenicity when stored at tropical room temperature (37 °C) for 7 days before reconstitution. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference detected between RIX4414 vaccine stored at 2 °C-8 °C (Group RIX4414_control, n = 171) and that stored at 37 °C for 7 days (Group RIX4414_37 °C, n = 47) in terms of seroconversion rate and vaccine take. The anti-rotavirus IgA seroconversion rate 2 months post-Dose 2 was 84.7% (95% CI: 78.1%-90%) and 87.8% (95% CI: 73.8%-95.9%) in Groups RIX4414_control and RIX4414_37 °C, respectively. None of the 25 infants in placebo group seroconverted. The vaccine take in the respective vaccine groups were 88% (95% CI: 82.1%-92.5%) and 93.5% (95% CI: 82.1%-98.6%) and Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) were 134.4 U/mL (95% CI: 104.5-172.9) and 163.7 U/mL (95% CI: 98.9-271.1). METHODS: Healthy infants aged 6-12 weeks, received two oral doses of either the RIX4414 vaccine stored at 2 °C-8 °C, RIX4414 vaccine stored at 37 °C for 7 days or placebo, according to a 0, 2 month schedule. Seroconversion rates in terms of anti-rotavirus IgA antibody levels (cut off: ≥ 20 U/mL by ELISA), anti-rotavirus IgA antibody GMCs and vaccine take were calculated 2 months post-Dose 2. CONCLUSION: Lyophilized RIX4414 vaccine stored at 37°C for 7 days before reconstitution has similar immunogenicity as the vaccine stored at 2 °C-8 °C. These results supported the use of RIX4414 in settings where the vaccine might be exposed to higher than the recommended storage temperatures.


Assuntos
Armazenamento de Medicamentos/métodos , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/imunologia , Administração Oral , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A/sangue , Lactente , Masculino , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Temperatura , Fatores de Tempo , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia
15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21323176

RESUMO

Combination vaccines have been shown to improve the timeliness of vaccination and vaccine coverage. Safety and reactogenicity of combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTPa-IPV/Hib, Infanrix IPV+Hib, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) was assessed in two clinical studies. In Study A, 2,590 subjects received DTPa-IPV/Hib at 3, 4 and 5 months of age with a booster at 18 months. In Study B, 702 subjects received the same schedule but with DTPa-hepatitis B-IPV/Hib (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib, Infanrix hexa, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) vaccine administered at 5 months of age. Reactogenicity was assessed for four days after each dose using diary cards. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed until 24 months of age. The vaccines were well tolerated. After primary vaccination, irritability was the most frequently reported grade 3 general symptom (0.8% of doses in both studies). Fever (axillary) > 39 degrees C was infrequent (0.3% of doses in Study A; 0.5% of doses in Study B). After the booster dose, the most frequently reported grade 3 symptom was redness (5%) in Study A and pain (0.5%) in Study B. An axillary temperature > 39 degrees C was reported in 1.1% of subjects. Throughout the study period, 646 SAEs were reported, of which 6 SAEs were considered to be vaccination-related. The reactogenicity and safety profile of the combined DTPa-IPV/Hib vaccine was good when used for primary and booster vaccinations in over 3,000 Singaporean infants. Substitution of DTPa-IPV/Hib with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib at Month 5 reduced the number of injections required at this age by one.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/efeitos adversos , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/imunologia , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/imunologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/imunologia , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/imunologia , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/imunologia , Singapura , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Vacinas Combinadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Combinadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Combinadas/imunologia
16.
J Infect Dis ; 202 Suppl: S80-6, 2010 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20684722

RESUMO

Rotavirus gastroenteritis causes more than half a million deaths annually among children aged <5 years, the great majority of which occur in Africa and Asia. Vaccination is considered to be the most effective public health strategy to prevent rotavirus disease and to reduce the significant global burden of rotavirus gastroenteritis. Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) is an oral, live attenuated rotavirus vaccine derived from a human G1P[8] rotavirus strain. Results of phase III studies in Europe, Latin America, and Asia have shown that Rotarix offers sustained high protection against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis during the first 2 years of life, when disease burden is highest, with broad protection demonstrated against each of the 5 main rotavirus types that circulate globally (G1, G2, G3, G4, and G9). Coupled with the availability of local burden of disease data and promising interim efficacy data from an ongoing study in Malawi and South Africa, this further reinforces the case for introduction of this rotavirus vaccine in national childhood immunization programs in Africa, where rotavirus-related mortality is significant.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/imunologia , Administração Oral , África/epidemiologia , Ásia/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Gastroenterite/virologia , Humanos , Lactente , América Latina/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia
17.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 21(9): 1282-1292, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34019802

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Zika virus, a flavivirus transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, is associated with cases of congenital malformations and neurological complications. Absence of specific treatment makes a prophylactic Zika virus vaccine an unmet medical need. We assessed safety and immunogenicity of three doses of a purified, inactivated, Zika virus vaccine candidate in healthy flavivirus-naive and flavivirus-primed adults. METHODS: This two-part, multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial was done at seven medical clinics in the USA and two in Puerto Rico. Eligible participants were healthy adults aged 18-49 years. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), using a sponsor-supplied randomisation scheme, to four groups to receive two intramuscular injections, 28 days apart, of saline placebo or TAK-426 containing 2 µg, 5 µg, or 10 µg antigen. Participants, investigators, and vaccine administrating personnel were masked to group assignment. Part 1 of the study assessed flavivirus-naive participants and part 2 assessed flavivirus-primed participants. The primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity based on solicited local reactions and solicited systemic adverse events in the 7 days after each dose; unsolicited adverse events and serious adverse events in the 28 days after each dose; and geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralising anti-Zika virus antibodies at 28 days after the second dose. Safety assessments were done in all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine. Immunogenicity assessments were in the per-protocol set, comprising all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine and provided valid serology results at baseline and at least one post-vaccination timepoint, with no major protocol violations. The trial is ongoing and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03343626). FINDINGS: Between Nov 13, 2017, and Oct 24, 2018, 894 volunteers were screened and 271 enrolled (125 flavivirus-naive and 146 flavivirus-primed participants). All TAK-426 doses were well tolerated with no deaths, no vaccine-related serious adverse events, and similar rates of mainly mild to moderate adverse events. TAK-426 elicited dose-dependent increases in antibody GMTs in both flavivirus-naive and flavivirus-primed participants. 28 days after dose 2, plaque-reduction neutralisation test GMTs in flavivirus-naive participants were 1130 (95% CI 749-1703) in the 2 µg TAK-426 group, 1992 (1401-2833) in the 5 µg TAK-426 group, and 3690 (2677-5086) in the 10 µg TAK-426 group. In pairwise comparisons, responses after two vaccinations in the 10 µg group were significantly greater than in the 2 µg group (GMT ratio 3·27 [95% CI 1·98-5·39], p<0·0001) and the 5 µg group (GMT ratio 1·85 [1·15-2·98], p=0·012). INTERPRETATION: TAK-426 was well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile, and was immunogenic in both flavivirus-naive and flavivirus-primed adults. Based on the safety and immunogenicity profiles of all TAK-426 doses assessed, the 10 µg TAK-426 dose was selected for further clinical development. FUNDING: Takeda Vaccines and the US Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. TRANSLATION: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Assuntos
Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Infecção por Zika virus/prevenção & controle , Zika virus/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Formação de Anticorpos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinação , Adulto Jovem
18.
Vaccine ; 38(33): 5313-5323, 2020 07 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32563609

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To increase the global supply of affordable IPV vaccine, preferably using Sabin viruses to comply with GAPIII requirements, Takeda has assessed three dosages of a stand-alone sIPV. METHODS: In this phase I/II study two cohorts of 40 adults and 60 toddlers, respectively, were initially assessed for safety after receiving high-dosage sIPV compared with placebo (adults) or Salk IPV (toddlers). A cohort of 240 infants was then enrolled and randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive low-, medium- or high-dosage sIPV, or a reference Salk IPV in a three-dose primary schedule at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age. Parents completed safety diaries for 4 weeks after each dose, and immunogenicity was measured as neutralization antibody titers at baseline and four weeks after vaccination. RESULTS: All vaccinations were generally well-tolerated and sIPV had a comparable safety profile to the control arm in adults or the reference Salk IPV vaccine in toddlers and infants. Infants displayed dosage-dependent immune responses to sIPV when assayed using Sabin strains, which were equivalent to the reference IPV in the high-dosage sIPV group for serotypes 1 and 2, but not for Sabin and Salk serotype 3. Seroconversion rates (SCR) of the low- and medium-dosage groups were significantly lower than the Salk IPV group for both Sabin and Salk serotypes 1 and type 2 (p < 0.05), with no significant differences for Salk or Sabin serotypes 3. Responses to sIPV, particularly to Sabin types 1 and 2, were higher in initially seronegative infants, indicating possible interference by maternally-derived antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: A novel stand-alone Sabin-based IPV vaccine was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile, but less immunogenic than reference Salk IPV at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age for Salk serotypes 1 and 2, with apparent interference by maternal antibodies. Additional preclinical assessments will be made before any further clinical development.


Assuntos
Poliomielite , Poliovirus , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Lactente , Poliomielite/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/efeitos adversos , Vacina Antipólio Oral/efeitos adversos , Soroconversão
19.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 28(3): 225-32, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19209095

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An oral, live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine, RIX4414 has been developed to prevent rotavirus gastroenteritis. An integrated safety summary of 8 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II and III trials of vaccine at potency licensed for use worldwide was performed. METHODS: Healthy 1- to 18-week-old infants (N = 71209) were enrolled to receive 2 doses of RIX4414/placebo according to 0, 1 or 0, 2 month schedules. Solicited (fever, fussiness/irritability, loss of appetite, vomiting, diarrhea, cough/rhinorrhea) and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 8 days and 31 days, respectively, after each dose. Serious adverse events (SAEs) including intussusception and death were collected throughout the entire study periods. Potential imbalances were defined as the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relative risk (RR) stratified by trials excluding "1." RESULTS: Solicited AEs were evaluated in 3286 RIX4414 vaccinees and 2015 placebo recipients. Among solicited AEs, no imbalance was noted between groups. SAEs, including death and intussusception, were evaluated in 36755 RIX4414 and 34454 placebo recipients. Within 31 days after each dose, no imbalances were noted between the groups for all SAEs (RR = 0.9; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.01), deaths (RR = 1.64; 95% CI: 0.92, 3.02), and intussusception (RR 1.23; 95% CI: 0.41, 3.90). SAEs because of gastrointestinal diseases including diarrhea, gastroenteritis (all cause and due to rotavirus), dehydration, and intestinal ileus occurred significantly less often in RIX4414 than placebo recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Across the phase II and III clinical trials, the reactogenicity and safety profile between RIX4414 and placebo was similar, in particular with no increased risk of intussusception.


Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias , Intussuscepção , Infecções por Rotavirus , Rotavirus/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Gastroenteropatias/imunologia , Gastroenteropatias/prevenção & controle , Gastroenteropatias/virologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Intussuscepção/etiologia , Intussuscepção/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Infecções por Rotavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Rotavirus/virologia , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/uso terapêutico
20.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 28(4): 261-6, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19289978

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: : The 2-dose, oral live attenuated human G1P[8] rotavirus vaccine (RIX4414) is highly effective against rotavirus gastroenteritis caused by circulating G1 and non-G1 types. An integrated analysis on vaccine efficacy was undertaken to obtain more precise estimates of the overall protective effect of the RIX4414 vaccine against rotavirus gastroenteritis due to common rotavirus types (G1, G3, G4, G9, P[8]) and less commonly encountered strains such as G2P[4] across heterogenous settings. METHODS: : The studies used in the integrated analysis were all previously reported randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II and III trials with at least 1 report of rotavirus gastroenteritis in the efficacy follow-up period (up to 1 year of age or end of first RV epidemic season after vaccination). The integrated analysis was performed for all circulating rotavirus strains sharing G and/or P genotype and not sharing G or P genotype with the vaccine strain. Vaccine efficacy was estimated as 1 minus rate of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to placebo, using exact Poisson rate ratio stratified by study. RESULTS: : The integrated estimates for vaccine efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis were 87.43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.89-92.86) for G1P[8] strains, 71.42% (95% CI: 20.12-91.11) for G2P[4] strains, 90.19% (95% CI: 55.51-98.94) for G3P[8] strains, 93.37% (95% CI: 51.50-99.85) for G4P[8] strains, and 83.76% (95% CI: 71.18-91.28) for G9P[8] strains. The integrated estimates for vaccine efficacies against rotavirus gastroenteritis of any severity were 82.57% (95% CI: 73.91-88.56) for G1P[8] strains, 81.04% (95% CI: 31.58-95.76) for G2P[4] strains, 87.66% (95% CI: 34.57-98.76) for G3P[8] strains, 84.86% (95% CI: 50.92-96.41) for G4P[8] strains, and 60.64% (95% CI: 38.15-74.96) for G9P[8] strains. CONCLUSIONS: : Two doses of RIX4414 provide overall good clinical protection against all cases of rotavirus gastroenteritis and comparable, high clinical protection against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis caused by circulating rotavirus strains with and without G and P genotypes shared with the vaccine strain, such as G2P[4].


Assuntos
Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Rotavirus/genética , Vacinas Atenuadas , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Fenótipo , Distribuição de Poisson , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA