Efficacy and safety of the Aria pulmonary endovascular device in pulmonary hypertension.

AIMS: A common feature of various forms of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is progressive decline of pulmonary arterial compliance (CPA), which correlates with reduced survival. In this acute study, we evaluated feasibility, safety and haemodynamic performance of the Aria pulmonary endovascular device in patients with PH associated with left heart disease (PH-LHD) and chronic lung disease (PH-CLD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients with PH-LHD and 10 patients with PH-CLD were included in this study. The device was placed in the main pulmonary artery via the right femoral vein and was connected by a catheter to a gas-filled reservoir outside the body. During systole, gas shifts from the balloon to the reservoir, leading to deflation of the balloon. In diastole, the gas returns from the reservoir to the balloon, leading to balloon inflation and enhancing diastolic blood flow to the distal pulmonary capillary bed. Haemodynamics were assessed at baseline, and again with device off, device on and device off. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of serious adverse events through 30 days after the procedure. No complications or investigational device-related serious adverse events occurred. Device activation in PH-LHD and PH-CLD patients decreased pulmonary arterial pulse pressure by 5.6 ± 4.2 mmHg (-12%; p = 0.003) and 4.2 ± 2.2 mmHg (-11%; p < 0.001), increased CPA by 0.4 ± 0.2 ml/mmHg (+23%; p = 0.004) and 0.4 ± 0.3 ml/mmHg (+25%; p = 0.001), and increased right ventricular-to-pulmonary vascular (RV-PV) coupling by 0.24 ± 0.18 (+40%; p = 0.012) and 0.11 ± 0.07 (+21%; p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary implantation of the Aria endovascular device was feasible and safe. Device activation resulted in acute improvement of CPA and RV-PV coupling.

Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is characterized by obstruction of major pulmonary arteries with organized thrombi. Clinical risk factors for pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease including metabolic syndrome, left-sided valvular heart disease, and ischemic heart disease are common in CTEPH patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate prevalence and prognostic implications of elevated left ventricular filling pressures (LVFP) in CTEPH. METHODS: A total of 593 consecutive CTEPH patients undergoing a first diagnostic right and left heart catheterization were included in this study. Mean pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (mPAWP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were utilized for assessment of LVFP. Two cutoffs were applied to identify patients with elevated LVFP: 1) for the primary analysis mPAWP and/or LVEDP >15 mm Hg, as recommended by the current pulmonary hypertension guidelines; and 2) for the secondary analysis mPAWP and/or LVEDP >11 mm Hg, representing the upper limit of normal. Clinical and echocardiographic features, and long-term mortality were assessed. RESULTS: LVFP was >15 mm Hg in 63 (10.6%) and >11 mm Hg in 222 patients (37.4%). Univariable logistic regression analysis identified age, systemic hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, calcific aortic valve stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and left atrial volume as significant predictors of elevated LVFP. Atrial fibrillation, calcific aortic valve stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and left atrial volume remained independent determinants of LVFP in adjusted analysis. At follow-up, higher LVFPs were measured in patients who had meanwhile undergone pulmonary endarterectomy (P = 0.002). LVFP >15 mm Hg (P = 0.021) and >11 mm Hg (P = 0.006) were both associated with worse long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated LVFP is common, appears to be due to comorbid left heart disease, and predicts prognosis in CTEPH.