Comparative outcomes among inlay grafted incised plate, onlay preputial flap and tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for the repair of distal penile hypospadias with a narrow urethral plate.

PURPOSE: We conducted this study, comparing the outcomes among Transverse Onlay Island Flap, inlay grafted incised plate and our previous records of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) in patients with narrow urethral plates, aiming to determine which method of repair provides a good outcome. METHODS: This hybrid study included two datasets. The first from a prospective randomized study evaluating outcomes of two treatment modalities; Inlay graft and only flap for distal hypospadias with shallow urethral plate with 80 patients (40 patients in each group) included, the second based on our previous records of TIPU in 40 patients with distal primary hypospadias with narrow urethral plate. RESULTS: The success rate in inlay graft urethroplasty group (n = 40) was 87.5%; glandular dehiscence occurred in one case (2.5%), fistulas occurred in 2 cases (5%), and narrow meatus occurred in two cases (5%). Success rate in onlay flap urethroplasty group (n = 40) was 82.5%; glandular dehiscence occurred in two cases (5%), fistulas occurred in two cases (5%), and narrow meatus occurred in three cases (7.5%). TIPU group (n = 40) had success rate of 62.5%; glandular dehiscence occurred in eight cases (20%), fistulas occurred in five cases (12.5%), and narrow meatus occurred in seven cases (17.5%), with five cases exhibiting both narrow meatus with fistula. CONCLUSION: Inlay graft and onlay flap urethroplasty for repair of distal penile hypospadias with narrow urethral plate had higher success rate and fewer complications than traditional TIPU. Moreover, operative time was shorter in TIPU.

Anterior or posterior SWL in proximal ureteral stones opposite to 4th and 5th lumbar vertebrae?

BACKGROUND: Results of SWL in treatment of upper ureteral calculi are conflicting which is definitely affected by stone locations along the proximal ureter, which is may be due to the more deep and medial course of the ureter distally over the thick and strong abdominal back wall which may hinder shock waves. METHODOLOGY: One hundred patients with radiopaque proximal ureteral stone opposite 4th and 5th lumbar vertebrae who had SWL were randomized into two groups. First group had SWL through anterior belly wall in supine position with countertraction, the second group had standard posterior SWL. Patient's demographics and stone characters were evaluated assessing stone burden and calculating S.T.O.N.E score. Patients were followed up to assess stone-free rate using serial digital plain X-ray KUB. RESULTS: Anterior approach needed less power to reach SFR (p = 0.05) in less number of sessions where 90% of cases in anterior group had only one session to reach SFR versus 52% in posterior group (p = 0.001). Also, post-SWL pain, hematuria, obstruction and infection were significantly less in anterior group (p = 0.005). Although patients who had anterior approach showed statistically significant shorter time to stone expulsion. SFR does not differed significantly between study groups (p = 0.02). On further analysis; anterior SWL had a better chance to reach SFR (HR = 1.6, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: It seems that anterior SWL approach in supine position is safe and effective especially in mild obese patient with floppy abdomen. Patients who had anterior SWL approach had a better chance to achieve stone-free rate.

Contralateral Coupling During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Stones in Ectopic Kidney: Is It Feasible?

Purpose: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) results in a lower stone-free rate (SFR) for ectopic kidneys when using the standard technique, directing the shock wave from the same side of the stone; however, this may not be the optimal approach when the ectopic kidney is located more medial and anterior than the normally positioned kidney. Thus, contralateral coupling where waves come from the opposite direction may result in a better outcome. We tested the feasibility and outcome of contralateral coupling during SWL for stone in ectopic kidney. Materials and Methods: We prospectively recruited 20 patients with simple renal ectopia, who presented with renal stones that were amenable for SWL in the period between 2014 and 2018 at outpatient clinic of urology department, Minia University. Patients received SWL in Private Nile SWL Center were included to benefit from the ability of the electromagnetic SWL lithotripter. We did SWL in a supine position, and then contralateral coupling was performed from the opposite side of the affected kidney, rather than using the standard ipsilateral coupling approach. The SFR and various pre-, intra-, and postprocedural SWL variables were assessed, including stone characteristics, body habitus, shock wave numbers, and auxiliary measures. Count and percentages were calculated. Results: The mean stone radius was 14.7 mm with a mean S.T.O.N.E. (size, topography, obstructions, number of stones, and evaluation of HUs) of 9.6 points. Effective SWL was achieved in 80% of cases, 65% of them were stone free with effective single SWL session in 56% of cases. Hematuria, infection, and obstruction occurred in 50%, 20%, and 15% cases, respectively. One case required ureteral stent insertion. Conclusions: SWL applied through contralateral coupling is feasible, with comparable safety profile to the standard ipsilateral approach. Better SFR was achieved with the contralateral approach, in fewer sessions. However, the recruitment of more cases is necessary.

Buccal mucosal graft versus penile skin flap urethroplasty for long segment penile urethral stricture: a prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of dorsolateral onlay buccal mucosal graft (BMG) and ventral onlay local penile skin flap (LPF) urethroplasty in the management of long segment penile urethral stricture (PUS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Through a prospective study conducted between October 2014 and May 2018, 84 patients with long segment PUS were randomly assigned to receive either dorsolateral onlay BMG (Group 1 which included 42 patients) or ventral onlay PSF urethroplasty (Group 2 which included 42 patients). The success rate and surgical outcomes were compared in both groups. RESULTS: The success rate was 92.9% in Group 1 and 85.7% in Group 2 (p = 0.5). Postoperative short segment urethral stricture at the site of proximal anastomosis was reported in 3 patients in Group 1. Six patients in Group 2 were considered as a treatment failure, 3 of them due to recurrence of long segment urethral stricture after 6 months, and 3 patients developed ring urethral stricture at the site of proximal anastomosis managed by direct vision internal urethrotomy. CONCLUSIONS: On an intermediate term follow-up, dorsolateral onlay BMG and ventral onlay LPF provide similar success rates in penile urethroplasty, with essentially comparable postoperative morbidity. However, further studies with bigger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods may be required to determine subtle differences between both techniques.