Visual Function and Brief Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis in Optic Neuritis Clinically Isolated Syndrome Patients.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we hypothesized that clinically isolated syndrome-optic neuritis patients may have disturbances in neuropsychological functions related to visual processes. METHODS: Forty-two patients with optic neuritis within 3 months from onset and 13 healthy controls were assessed at baseline and 6 months with MRI (brain volumes, lesion load, and optic radiation lesion volume) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) (peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers [GCIPLs], and inner nuclear layer). Patients underwent the brief cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis, high-contrast and low-contrast letter acuity, and color vision. RESULTS: At baseline, patients had impaired visual function, had GCIPL thinning in both eyes, and performed below the normative average in the visual-related tests: Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R). Over time, improvement in visual function in the affected eye was predicted by baseline GCIPL (P = 0.015), RNFL decreased, and the BVMT-R improved (P = 0.001). Improvement in BVMT-R was associated with improvement in the high-contrast letter acuity of the affected eye (P = 0.03), independently of OCT and MRI metrics. CONCLUSION: Cognitive testing, assessed binocularly, of visuospatial processing is affected after unilateral optic neuritis and improves over time with visual recovery. This is not related to structural markers of the visual or central nervous system.

Opportunities and counterintuitive challenges for decentralized clinical trials to broaden participant inclusion.

Traditional clinical trials have often failed to recruit representative participant populations. Just 5% of eligible patients participate in clinical research. Participants, particularly those from minority groups, cite geographical constraints, mistrust, miscommunication, and discrimination as barriers. Here, an intersectional view of inclusion in clinical trials provides significant insights into the complex and counterintuitive challenges of trial design and participant recruitment. The US FDA have recently proposed that decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) might reduce barriers and appeal to a wider range of participants by reducing the costs and commitments required for patients to participate. While common sense and early evidence suggests that allowing participants to take part in trials at or near home has advantages in terms of convenience, travel, and perhaps even infection control, it remains to be seen if DCT approaches will yield significant improvements on participant inclusivity. Some digital studies aiming to be more inclusive on a single element of inclusion, such as race, have experienced unintended consequences in other elements, like education or gender. Implementing DCTs presents new challenges including the digital divide, the exclusion of certain tests and procedures, complexities of at-home medication delivery, and the need to build new infrastructure. We present a range of challenges and opportunities for researchers to adopt and adapt DCT approaches to create reliable evidence that applies to all of us.