Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 35(3): 168-175, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30121052

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma treatment has evolved from primarily amputation procedures toward limb salvage. This series assesses whether soft tissue sarcoma tissue defects, extensive enough to require microsurgical reconstruction, can reliably result in preservation of ambulation, as well as objectively evaluate functional outcomes utilizing a patient-reported validated scale. It will also look at whether immediate functional muscle reconstructions and tendon transfers can be successful at restoring ambulation, potentially expanding the indications for limb salvage procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of all microsurgical reconstructions for limb salvage in lower extremity sarcoma patients was completed at our institution (2009-2013). Patients were additionally asked to complete the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score(TESS) quality of life survey. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period, 23 patients (mean age: 53 years) underwent free flap reconstructions for 23 sarcomas (mean follow-up: 14 months). Seventy-eight percent of patients received neoadjuvant radiation. The thigh was the most common tumor site (61%) and three muscles were resected on average. Perforator flaps were most frequently used (61%), and functional muscle transfers or immediate tendon transfers were used in four patients. There were no flap take-backs or failures, and 22 patients achieved independent ambulation. Three patients in the series died, two from metastatic disease found postoperatively and one from local recurrence. A 74% response rate was achieved for the TESS survey, with a mean score of 83. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical reconstruction of lower extremity sarcoma defects enables preservation of independent ambulation. Restoration of function utilizing immediate functional microsurgical reconstructions and tendon transfers should be considered.


Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Salvamento de Membro/métodos , Extremidade Inferior/patologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Sarcoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amputação Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/patologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/patologia , Caminhada
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 137(3): 1018-1030, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26910687

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: All reconstructive microsurgeons realize the need to improve aesthetic and functional donor-site outcomes. A "kiss" flap design concept was developed to increase the surface area of skin flap coverage while minimizing donor-site morbidity. METHODS: The main goal of the kiss flap technique is to harvest multiple skin paddles that are smaller than those raised with traditional techniques, to minimize donor-site morbidity. These smaller flap components are then sutured to each other, or said to kiss each other side-by-side, to create a large, wide flap. The skin paddles in the kiss technique can be linked to one another by a variety of native intrinsic vascular connections, by additional microanastomosis, or both. This technique can be widely applied to both free and pedicle flaps, and essentially allows for the reconstruction of a large defect while providing the easy primary closure of a smaller donor-site defect. RESULTS: According to their origin of blood supply, kiss flaps are classified into three styles and five types. All of the different types of kiss flaps are unique in both flap design and harvest technique. Most kiss flaps are based on common flaps already familiar to the reconstructive surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: The basis of the kiss flap design concept is to convert multiple narrow flaps into a single unified flap of the desired greater width. This maximizes the size of the resulting flap and minimizes donor-site morbidity, as a direct linear closure is usually possible. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.


Assuntos
Estética , Retalho Miocutâneo/irrigação sanguínea , Transplante de Pele/métodos , Sítio Doador de Transplante/irrigação sanguínea , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirurgia/economia , Microcirurgia/métodos , Retalho Miocutâneo/transplante , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Medição de Risco , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos , Sítio Doador de Transplante/patologia , Transplante Autólogo , Cicatrização/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA