Impact of Postoperative COVID-19 Infection Status on Outcomes in Elective Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection causes major morbidity and mortality, it is unclear what the impact of postoperative COVID-19 infection is on 30-day outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: There were 2,340 patients who underwent TJA in 2021, identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, with 925 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients (39.5%) and 1,415 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients (60.5%), overall. Propensity score matching was implemented using patient demographics and preoperative medical conditions to compare outcomes for postoperative COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients who underwent TKA or THA. RESULTS: Postoperative COVID-19-positive THA patients were found to have a significantly increased risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] 42.57), sepsis (OR 12.77), readmission (OR 12.06), non-home discharge (OR 3.78), and longer length of stay (hazard ratio 1.62). Postoperative COVID-19-positive TKA patients had an increased risk of 30-day mortality (OR 14.17), superficial infection (OR 3.17), pneumonia (OR 34.68), unplanned intubation (OR 18.31), ventilator use for more than 48 hours (OR 18.31), pulmonary embolism (OR 11.98), urinary tract infection (OR 5.16), myocardial infarction (OR 16.02), deep vein thrombosis (OR 4.69), non-home discharge (OR 1.79), reoperation (OR 3.17), readmission (OR 9.61), and longer length of stay (hazard ratio 1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who contracted COVID-19 within 30 days after TJA were at increased risk of mortalities, medical complications, readmissions, reoperations, and non-home discharges. It is important for orthopedic surgeons to understand these adverse outcomes to better counsel patients and mitigate these risks, particularly in higher risk populations.

Over the Past Decade, Preoperative Anemia Has Become a Greater Predictor of Transfusions After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: With advancements in perioperative blood management and the use of tranexamic acid, the rate of transfusions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has substantially decreased. As these principles are refined, other modifiable risk factors, such as preoperative anemia, may play an increasingly important role in transfusion risk for patients undergoing TKA. METHODS: A multicenter, national database was utilized to identify patients undergoing TKA from 2010 to 2021. Anemia was defined by World Health Organization definitions as < 12 g/dL for women and < 13 g/dL for men. A predictive model was created using backwards elimination logistic regression to predict transfusion risk, controlling for demographic and medical covariates. The coefficient of anemia was then analyzed for each year. The trend over time was fitted with a best-fit linear regression equation. RESULTS: There were 509,117 patients who underwent TKA, and had a mean age of 67 years (range, 18 to 89). There were 57,716 (11%) patients who were anemic preoperatively, and 15,426 (3%) of patients required a transfusion. Rate of transfusion decreased from 10.6% in 2010 to 0.6% in 2021. The odds ratio associated with anemia as a predictor of transfusion increased from 3.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.1 to 4.6) in 2010 to 14.0 (95% confidence interval: 8.9 to 24) in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the importance of preoperative anemia as a predictor of transfusion has increased over the past decade as rates of transfusion have decreased. As perioperative blood management protocols improve, preoperative anemia should be considered an important focus of intervention to reduce the risk of transfusion prior to TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Decreased Risk of Readmission and Complications With Preoperative GLP-1 Analog Use in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There has been considerable interest in the use of GLP-1 receptor analogs (GLP-1 RAs) for weight optimization in patients undergoing elective arthroplasty. As there is limited data regarding the implications of their use, our study aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative GLP-1 RA use and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The TrinetX research network was queried to identify all patients undergoing primary THA or TKA between May 2005 and December 2023 across 84 health care organizations. Patients were stratified based on preoperative GLP-1 RA use. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to account for baseline differences in demographics, laboratory investigations, and comorbidities. Subsequently, risk ratios were evaluated for postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 268,504 and 386,356 patients underwent THA and TKA, of which 1,044 and 2,095 used preoperative GLP-1 RAs. After matching, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a decreased 90-day risk of periprosthetic joint infection (2.1 versus 3.6%, RR = 0.58, P = .042) and readmission (1.1 versus 2.0%, RR = 0.53, P = .017) following THA and TKA, respectively. There was no difference in the risk of all other outcomes between comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative GLP-1 RA use is associated with a 42% decreased risk of periprosthetic joint infection and 47% decreased risk of readmission in the 90-day postoperative period following THA and TKA, respectively, with no difference in other risks, including aspiration. Our findings indicate that GLP-1 RAs may be safe to use in patients undergoing elective arthroplasty; however, further studies are warranted to inform the routine use of GLP-1 RAs for weight management in THA and TKA patients.

The Definition of Anemia Matters When Using Preoperative Hemoglobin as a Screening Tool Prior to Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is common in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several definitions of anemia have been described, with no clear consensus on the optimal one for preoperative screening. We hypothesized that depending on the definition used preoperatively, the proportion of anemic patients identified who would require a postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion would vary significantly. METHODS: A total of 681,141 patients were identified in a national database who underwent either THA or TKA. Preoperative anemia was classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition, Cleveland Clinic (CC) definition, or race, age, and sex-specific definition described by Beutler et al in 2006. The optimal preoperative (OP) hemoglobin thresholds to predict perioperative transfusions were also calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: When using the WHO definition, 18% of anemic patients required a transfusion versus 14% (OP definition), 12% (CC definition), and 16% (Beutler definition). Similarly, 0.69% of anemic patients sustained a periprosthetic joint infection within 30 days using the WHO definition versus 0.59% (OP definition), 0.60% (CC definition), or 0.66% (Beutler definition). Using the WHO definition, 5.3% of patients would have sustained a major complication versus 4.5% (OP definition), 4.4% (CC definition), and 5.0% (Beutler definition). CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the definition of anemia for preoperative screening in THA and TKA results in substantial differences in discriminative ability to predict perioperative transfusions. The WHO definition identified the largest proportion of patients who ultimately received a perioperative transfusion.

Preoperative Anemia is an Independent Risk Factor for Increased Complications and Mortalities After Total Knee Arthroplasty Regardless of Postoperative Transfusions.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is associated with adverse events following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It remains unknown if this effect is due to comorbid conditions, adverse events associated with transfusions, or the anemia itself. We used propensity-score matching to isolate the effect of anemia on postoperative complications following TKA, regardless of blood transfusions. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary TKA from 2010 to 2020 without receiving a perioperative blood transfusion, were identified using a large national database. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create cohorts of anemic and nonanemic patients matched on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, age, sex, and prevalence of bleeding disorders. There were 43,370 patients were included in each group (mean age 68 [range, 29 to 99; 44% male]). The 1:1 matching yielded groups with similar CCI, ASA classification, age, sex, and prevalence of bleeding disorders (all, P > .9). RESULTS: Anemic patients had a higher incidence of major complications (4.1 versus 2.8%; P < .001), 30-day mortality rate (0.2 versus 0.1%; P < .001), and extended lengths of stay (LOS) (8.3 versus 6.6%; P < .001). Anemic patients also had increased 30-day rates of wound infection requiring hospital admission, renal failure, reintubation, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia (all, P < .001). CONCLUSION: In matched cohorts of anemic versus nonanemic patients undergoing TKA, all who had no postoperative blood transfusion, anemic patients had higher rates of complications, extended LOS, and mortalities. Thus, anemia should be considered an independent risk factor for complications following TKA.

The James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: Increased Revision Risk With Mobile Bearings in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry.

BACKGROUND: Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may reduce wear and improve patellar tracking but may increase revision risk due to tibial component design, balance complexity, and bearing dislocation. We utilized the American Joint Replacement Registry to examine risk of revision with MB compared to fixed-bearing (FB) designs. METHODS: An analysis of primary TKA in patients over 65 years was performed with American Joint Replacement Registry data linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2012 to 2019. Analyses compared MB to FB designs with a subanalysis of implants from a single company. We identified 485,024 TKAs, with 452,199 (93.2%) FB-TKAs and 32,825 (6.8%) MB-TKAs. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used for all-cause revision and revision for infection, adjusting for sex, age, and competing risk of mortality. Event-free survival curves evaluated time to all-cause revision and revision for infection. RESULTS: MB-TKAs were at an increased risk for all-cause revision: hazard ratio (HR) 1.36 ([95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-1.49], P < .0001) but not revision for infection: HR 1.06 ([95% CI 0.90-1.25], P = .52). When comparing implants within a single company, MB-TKAs were at an increased risk of all-cause revision: HR 1.55 ([95% CI 1.38-1.73], P < .0001). Event-free survival curves demonstrated increased risk for all-cause revision for MB-TKA across all time points, with a greater magnitude of risk up to 8 years. CONCLUSION: Although survivorship of both designs was outstanding, MB-TKA designs demonstrated increased risk for all-cause revision. Additional investigation is needed to determine if this is related to patient selection factors, surgical technique, bearing, or implant design.

Body Mass Index and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Cause for Revision Vary by Underweight or Obese Status?

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) impacts risk for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), but the relationship between BMI and cause for revision remains unclear. We hypothesized that patients in different BMI classes would have disparate risk for causes of rTKA. METHODS: There were 171,856 patients who underwent rTKA from 2006 to 2020 from a national database. Patients were classified as underweight (BMI < 19), normal-weight, overweight/obese (BMI 25 to 39.9), or morbidly obese (BMI > 40). Multivariable logistic regressions adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, payer status, hospital geographic setting, and comorbidities were used to examine the effect of BMI on risk for different rTKA causes. RESULTS: Compared to normal-weight controls, underweight patients were 62% less likely to undergo revision due to aseptic loosening, 40% less likely due to mechanical complications, 187% more likely due to periprosthetic fracture, 135% more likely due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Overweight/obese patients were 25% more likely to undergo revision due to aseptic loosening, 9% more likely due to mechanical complications, 17% less likely due to periprosthetic fracture, and 24% less likely due to PJI. Morbidly obese patients were 20% more likely to undergo revision due to aseptic loosening, 5% more likely due to mechanical complications, and 6% less likely due to PJI. CONCLUSION: Mechanical reasons were more likely to be the cause of rTKA in overweight/obese and morbidly obese patients, compared to underweight patients, for whom revision was more likely to be infection or fracture related. Increased awareness of these differences may promote patient-specific management to reduce complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Cannabis Use Does Not Affect Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis use in patients undergoing arthroplasty has increased with ongoing legalization throughout the United States. The purpose of this study was to report total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes in patients self-reporting cannabis use. METHODS: There were 74 patients who underwent primary THA from January 2014 to December 2019 at a single institution with minimum 1-year follow-up who had their self-reported cannabis use retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had a history of alcohol or illicit drug abuse were excluded. A match control was conducted based on age; body mass index; sex; Charlson Comorbidity Index; insurance status; and use of nicotine, narcotics, antidepressants, or benzodiazepines to patients undergoing THA who did not self-report cannabis use. Outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Reconstruction (HOOS JR), in hospital morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) consumed, outpatient MMEs prescribed, in hospital lengths of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and readmissions. RESULTS: There was no difference in the preoperative, postoperative, or change in Harris Hip Score or HOOS JR between cohorts. There was also no difference in hospital MMEs consumed (102.4 versus 101, P = .92), outpatient MMEs prescribed (119 versus 156, P = .11) or lengths of stay (1.4 versus 1.5 days, P = .32). Also, readmissions (4 versus 4, P = 1.0) and reoperations (2 versus 1, P = .56) were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: Self-reported cannabis use does not influence 1-year outcomes after THA. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of perioperative cannabis use after THA to help guide orthopaedic surgeons in counseling patients.

Tourniquet Use Improves Cement Penetration and Reduces Radiolucent Line Progression at 5 Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although the effect of tourniquet use during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on functional outcomes is controversial, there are little data examining cement penetration and implant stability. This study examines the effect of tourniquet use on cement penetration and radiolucent line (RLL) progression. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty with a single surgeon, implant, and cement with minimum 5-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Tourniquet use was defined as 30 minutes minimum, while no tourniquet was 0 minutes. Patients were 1:1 matched (n = 61 per group) by age (±5), gender, body mass index (±5), and follow-up (±2 years). Cement penetration and RLL were measured on the tibia at 6 weeks, and RLL at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System. RESULTS: Cement penetration was significantly increased in the tourniquet group in anterior-posterior zones 1 (2.16 vs 1.03 mm, P < .0005), 2 (2.23 vs 1.51 mm, P < .0005), and 5 (8.56 vs 6.3 mm, P = .009), and lateral zones 1 (2.89 vs 2.17 mm, P < .0005), 2 (2.86 vs 2.12 mm, P < .0005), 3P (3.99 vs 3.5 mm, P = .039), and 5 (8.18 vs 5.93 mm, P = .006). Cumulative cement penetration averaged 34.48 vs 43.33 mm in the tourniquet group (P < .005). Progression of RLL >2 mm was observed in 27.8% (17/61) vs 11.4% (7/61) of patients in the tourniquet group (P < .005). There were 2 failures for aseptic tibial loosening in the no tourniquet group. CONCLUSION: Tourniquet use improves cement penetration and reduces RLL progression. Dryer surfaces during cementation may improve penetration, resulting in superior initial fixation strength and potentially reducing the long-term risk of aseptic loosening.

A Prophylactic Tibial Stem Reduces Rates of Early Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Severe Preoperative Varus Deformity in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a preoperative varus deformity >8 degrees are at increased risk of aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty. This study analyzes the effect of a tibial stem on the rate of aseptic loosening in patients with a severe preoperative varus deformity. METHODS: Patients with a preoperative varus deformity of >8 degrees and 2-year minimum follow-up with a stemmed tibial component (n = 67) were matched 1:2 to patients with a similar preoperative varus deformity with a standard tibial component (n = 134). Radiolucent lines were measured on the tibia at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System. Failure was defined as revision due to aseptic loosening of the tibial component. Outcomes were evaluated using Student's t-tests and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Patients with tibial stems had greater preoperative deformity (12.9 vs 11.3 degrees, P = .004). There was no difference in postoperative alignment (1.7 vs 2.1 degrees varus, P = .25) or tibial component angle (1.8 vs 2.1 degrees varus, P = .33). Patients with stems were more likely to have more constraint (44.8% vs 1.5%, P < .001). Progression of radiolucent lines >2 mm was observed in 17.6% (23/134) vs 5.97% (4/67) of patients in the stem group (P = .03). Rates of aseptic loosening were lower in the stem group (0% vs 5.15%, P = .05). CONCLUSION: Despite worse preoperative deformity and higher utilization of constraint, tibial stem use in patients with severe preoperative varus deformity resulted in lower rates of aseptic loosening. Prophylactic use of stems in these patients may help increase implant survival.

Incidence and Predictive Risk Factors of Postoperative Urinary Retention After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may cause urologic injury and delay patient discharge. This study measures the incidence of POUR and identifies predictive risk factors. METHODS: Two-hundred seventy-one consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA were prospectively enrolled. Bladder scans were performed in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and every four hours thereafter. POUR was defined as >400cc with inability to void and was treated with catheterization. Patient demographics, urologic history, operative data, perioperative medications, and bladder scanner volumes were investigated with the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (20%) developed POUR. Compared with non-POUR patients, PACU bladder scan volumes were greater in patients who developed POUR (344cc vs 120cc, P < .001). POUR patients had lower BMI (27.8 vs 29.4, P = .03), longer operative duration (83.9 vs 76.0 minutes, P = .002), and lower ASA scores (2.2 vs 2.4, P = .02). Total intravenous fluid was equivalent between groups (1134cc vs 1185cc, P = .41). POUR patients received less narcotics measured by morphine milligram equivalents (16.1 vs 23.9, P < .001). Fifteen variables including spinal type (bupivacaine and ropivacaine) and paralytic use were not predictive of POUR. Potentially predictive variables included anesthetic types administered (spinal, general, regional, and combination) and perioperative administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glycopyrrolate, and muscle relaxants. The multivariate analysis showed that NSAIDs (P = .05) and glycopyrrolate (P = .04) were significant predictors. CONCLUSION: A significant percentage of patients develop POUR after TKA. Select patient demographics and PACU bladder scanning may identify those at risk. Appropriate pain control and judicious use of perioperative NSAIDs and glycopyrrolate may help minimize the risk of POUR.

Long-term outcomes of cement in cement technique for revision endoprosthesis surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of primary bone sarcomas has been a standard-of-care option for decades. With increased patient survival, the incidence of failed endoprostheses requiring revision surgery has increased. Revision of cemented endoprotheses by cementing into the existing cement mantle (CiC) is technically demanding. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of our endoprosthesis database of 512 consecutive cemented endoprosthetic reconstructions performed for oncologic diagnoses between 1980 and 2014. A total of 54 implants (mean patient age 32 years, range 13-81) were revised with a CiC technique. Outcomes evaluated were prosthesis survival, revision surgery categorized according to the Henderson Failure Mode Classification, complications, and functional scores. RESULTS: Fifteen-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 34% for initial revision and 39% for subsequent revision implants. Mean revised Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) Score was 27 at latest follow-up. Infection rate was 2%, 9%, and 13% for primary endoprostheses, initial revisions, and subsequent revisions, respectively. Limb salvage rate was 87%. CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow up, endoprostheses revised with the CiC technique showed consistent 15-year survival from initial (34%) to subsequent (39%) revision. Despite a relatively high failure rate, these results are encouraging and demonstrate that this is a conservative, repeatable technique.

Is Core Needle Biopsy Reliable in Differentiating Between Aggressive Benign and Malignant Radiolucent Bone Tumors?

BACKGROUND: Although there is widespread acceptance of core needle biopsy (CNB) for diagnosing solid tumors, there is reluctance by some clinicians to use CNB for aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) as a result of concerns of safety (bleeding, nerve injury, fracture, readmission, or infection) and reliability, particularly to rule out malignant diagnoses like telangiectatic osteosarcoma. This is especially true when CNB tissue is sent from an outside hospital, where the technique used to obtain the tissue may be spurious. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is CNB effective (provided adequate information to indicate appropriate surgical treatment without further open biopsy) as an initial diagnostic test for ABC? (2) Is CNB accurate (pathology consistent with the subsequent definitive surgical pathologic diagnosis) in differentiating between benign lesions such as primary or secondary ABCs and malignant radiolucent lesions such as telangiectatic osteosarcoma? (3) What are the complications of CNB? (4) Is there any difference in the effectiveness or accuracy of CNB performed at outside institutions when compared with a referral center? METHODS: A retrospective study of our musculoskeletal tumor board pathology database (1990-2016) was performed using search criteria "aneurysmal bone cyst" or "telangiectatic osteosarcoma." Only patients undergoing a CNB who proceeded to definitive surgical resection with final pathology were included. Excluding outside CNBs, CNB was performed after presentation at a musculoskeletal tumor board as a result of atypical features on imaging or history concerning for malignancy. Outside CNB tissue was reviewed by our pathologists. If there was sufficient tissue for diagnosis, the patient proceeded to definitive surgery. If not, the patient underwent open biopsy. CNB diagnosis, open biopsy results, and open surgical resection pathology were reviewed. Complications, including bleeding, infection, nerve injury, readmission, or fracture, between the CNB and definitive open surgical procedure (mean 1.6 months) were documented. CNBs were considered "effective" if they yielded pathology considered sufficient to proceed with appropriate definitive surgery without additional open biopsy. CNBs were considered "accurate" if they were effective and yielded a pathologic diagnosis that matched the subsequent definitive surgical pathology. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of obtaining a malignant diagnosis using CNB were also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 81% (59 of 73) of CNBs were effective. Ninety-three percent (55 of 59) of CNBs were classified as accurate. Diagnostic CNBs had a sensitivity and specificity of 89% (eight of nine) and 100% (51 of 51), respectively. The PPV was 1.00 and the NPV was 0.82. There were no complications. With the numbers available, there was no difference in efficacy (90% [37 of 41 versus 14 of 15]; odds ratio, 0.97 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.41-2.27], p = 0.94) or accuracy (92% [34 of 37 versus 13 of 14]; odds ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.08-9.16], p = 0.91) between CNBs performed in house and those referred from outside. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that CNBs are useful as an initial diagnostic test for ABC and telangiectatic osteosarcoma. Tissue from outside CNBs can be read reliably without repeat biopsy. If confirmed by other institutions, CNB may be considered a reasonable approach to the diagnosis of aggressive, radiolucent lesions of bone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

The Assessment of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Educational Resources for Platelet-Rich Plasma.

PURPOSE: To critically evaluate the quality, accuracy, and readability of readily available Internet patient resources for platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a treatment modality for musculoskeletal injuries. METHODS: Using the 3 most commonly used Internet search engines (Google, Bing, Yahoo), the search term "platelet rich plasma" was entered, and the first 50 websites from each search were reviewed. The website's affiliation was identified. Quality was evaluated using 25-point criteria based on guidelines published by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and accuracy was assessed with a previously described 12-point grading system by 3 reviewers independently. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) grade score. RESULTS: A total of 46 unique websites were identified and evaluated. The average quality and accuracy was 9.4 ± 3.4 (maximum 25) and 7.9 ± 2.3 (maximum 12), respectively. The average FK grade level was 12.6 ± 2.4, which is several grades higher than the recommended eighth-grade level for patient education material. Ninety-one percent (42/46) of websites were authored by physicians, and 9% (4/46) contained commercial bias. Mean quality was significantly greater in websites authored by health care providers (9.8 ± 3.1 vs 5.9 ± 4.7, P = .029) and in websites without commercial bias (9.9 ± 3.1 vs 4.5 ± 3.2, P = .002). Mean accuracy was significantly lower in websites authored by health care providers (7.6 ± 2.2 vs 11.0 ± 1.2, P = .004). Only 24% (11/46) reported that PRP remains an investigational treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and quality of online patient resources for PRP are poor, and the information overestimates the reading ability of the general population. Websites authored by health care providers had higher quality but lower accuracy. Additionally, the majority of websites do not identify PRP as an experimental treatment, which may fail to provide appropriate patient understanding and expectations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Physicians should educate patients that many online patient resources have poor quality and accuracy and can be difficult to read.

Cemented Stem Design in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Fixation Philosophies, Biomechanics, and an Updated Classification System.

There is renewed interest in cemented femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty in the United States, and to fully appreciate the evolution of cemented femoral stem designs, an understanding of their history and design rationale is essential. To adequately study the outcomes of modern-day designs, a comprehensive classification system is also necessary. The biomechanical principles, failure mechanisms, and clinical outcomes associated with various cemented femoral stems are described in this comprehensive review. In addition, an updated version of an existing classification system is described that incorporates the primary design characteristics which differentiate implants currently in use. In this classification, implants are categorized as taper-slip (Type I), which are subdivided by Anatomic (IA), Double-Taper (IB), and Triple-Taper (IC) with subclassification for Traditional and Line-to-Line implants. Composite beam (Type II) implants are similarly divided into Anatomic (IIA), Straight (IIB), and Wedge (IIC) with subclassification for Polished, Satin, or Roughened finish. This classification system provides a basis for comparing cemented femoral stems, thereby improving our understanding of the effect of design characteristics on survivorship to guide future advancements and improve clinical outcomes.

Preoperative COVID-19 infection status negatively impacts postoperative outcomes of geriatric hip fracture surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Compare outcomes for patients with recently diagnosed COVID-19 infection to those without COVID-19 infection undergoing operative treatment of hip fractures using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. DESIGN: Retrospective propensity score matched cohort. METHODS: Patients who received surgery for an acute hip fracture (intramedullary nail (IMN), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or hemiarthroplasty) in 2021 were identified from the NSQIP database. Propensity score matching was implemented using patient demographics and preoperative medical conditions to compare outcomes for COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative cohorts. RESULTS: After matching, COVID-19-positive patients exhibited a higher risk of 30-day mortality (Odds ratio (OR) 1.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01 - 2.04), pneumonia (OR 2.90, 95 % CI: 1.91 - 4.33), unplanned intubation (OR 2.53, 95 % CI: 1.39 - 4.39), and septic shock (OR 2.51, 95 % CI: 1.10 - 4.67). COVID-19-positive patients were also more likely to have a longer length of hospital stay (Hazard Ratio 1.3, 95 % CI: 1.20 - 1.41) and were more likely to be discharged to an acute care hospital (OR 1.90, 95 % CI: 1.03 - 3.06). CONCLUSIONS: Active COVID-19 infection is an independent risk factor for complications as well as increased resource utilization in patients undergoing surgical treatment of acute hip fracture. Using the results of this multicenter study, quantification of these risks can help inform practice and treatment protocols for this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Preoperative weight loss before total hip arthroplasty negatively impacts postoperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Obesity adversely impacts outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA), leading surgeons to impose body mass index cutoffs for patient eligibility and encourage preoperative weight loss. This study aimed to determine if preoperative weight loss impacts outcomes of THA in the general patient population and if it mitigates poor outcomes in obese patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent THA from 2013-2020 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified by weight loss of >10% of body weight over the preceding 6 months. We used multivariable linear and logistic regression models, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidities, to examine the effect of significant preoperative weight loss on 30-day outcomes after THA in the general and obese patient populations. RESULTS: In the overall population, patients who lost significant weight preoperatively had significantly increased length of stay, were more likely to have a non-home discharge, return to the operating room, or be readmitted, and were more likely to experience numerous medical complications. In the obese population, patients who lost significant weight preoperatively had significantly increased length of stay and were more likely to require a transfusion or experience any medical complication. DISCUSSION: Rapid significant preoperative weight loss is not associated with improved postoperative outcomes after THA in the obese population and is associated with worse outcomes in the general population. Arthroplasty surgeons should balance these risks with the risks of obesity when advising patients about preoperative weight loss prior to THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Selective Use of Modern Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty is Not Associated with Increased Risk of Revision in Patients Aged 65 or Greater: An Analysis from the American Joint Replacement Registry.

Modern highly porous surfaces have increased confidence and use of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the United States. As cementless TKA use increases, there remains a paucity of literature regarding associated risk of revision in patients aged ≥65 years. We analyzed the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) data from January 2012 to March 2020 identifying patients aged ≥65 years undergoing primary TKA with linked cases to supplemental centers for Medicare and Medicaid data. Patients with hybrid fixation, reverse hybrid fixation, missing component data, highly constrained implants, and stem extension/augmentation were excluded. We identified 442,745 cemented TKAs and 19,841 modern cementless TKAs with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Cumulative incident function (CIF) curves and cause-specific Cox models evaluated the risk of all-cause revision and revision for mechanical loosening, adjusting for body mass index (BMI), sex, age, cruciate retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilized (PS) femoral design, patellar resurfacing, and Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI). Patients with cementless compared with cemented TKA were younger (mean age: 71.9 vs. 73.2 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be male sex (48.8 vs. 39.0%, p < 0.001), more likely to have a CR femoral design (81.1 vs. 45.7%, p < 0.001), less likely to have patellar resurfacing (92.7 vs. 95.0%, p < 0.001), and had a lower CCI (mean: 2.9 vs. 3.1, p < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) showed no difference in associated risk for all-cause revision (HR: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.24; p = 0.382) or revision for mechanical loosening (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.9-2.12; p = 0.14) for cementless versus cemented TKA. Our results suggest that current selective use of cementless fixation for TKA in patients aged ≥65 years in the United States is not associated with an increased risk of revision. While encouraging, further study is necessary to establish indications for use in this age group prior to broader adoption in this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

The weight of complications: high and low BMI have disparate modes of failure in total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) has been shown to influence risk for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), but few studies have specifically examined which causes of rTHA are most likely in different BMI classes. We hypothesized that patients in different BMI classes would undergo rTHA for disparate reasons. METHODS: Ninety-eight thousand six hundred seventy patients undergoing rTHA over 2006-2020 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were classified as underweight, normal-weight, overweight/obese, or morbidly obese. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of BMI on rTHA for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation, periprosthetic fracture (PPF), aseptic loosening, or mechanical complications. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance, geographic region, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Compared to normal-weight patients, underweight patients were 131% more likely to have a revision due to dislocation and 63% more likely due to PPF. Overweight/obese patients were 19% less likely to have a revision due to dislocation and 10% more likely due to PJI. Cause for revision in morbidly obese patients was 4s1% less likely to be due to dislocation, 8% less likely due to mechanical complications, and 90% more likely due to PJI. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight/obese and morbidly obese patients were more likely to undergo rTHA for PJI and less likely for mechanical reasons compared to normal weight patients. Underweight patients were more likely to undergo rTHA for dislocation or PPF. Understanding the differences in cause for rTHA among the BMI classes can aid in patient-specific optimization and management to reduce postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.