RESUMO
Staphylococcus aureus is a predominant cause of fatal pneumonia following influenza A virus (IAV) infection. Herein we investigate the influence of antecedent IAV infection on S. aureus virulence gene expression. Using a murine model, comparing the USA300 and USA300ΔsaeR/S strains, we demonstrate that S. aureus pathogenesis following IAV infection is SaeR/S dependent. Furthermore, we show that IAV modulates the lung environment to rapidly up-regulate S. aureus virulence factors containing the SaeR-binding domain. Data demonstrate that the pathogen response to IAV infection impacts host outcome and provides evidence that the ability of S. aureus to sense and respond to the lung environment determines severity of pneumonia.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/complicações , Pneumonia Estafilocócica/imunologia , Proteínas Quinases/metabolismo , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Fatores de Transcrição/metabolismo , Animais , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Deleção de Genes , Masculino , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/patologia , Pneumonia Estafilocócica/genética , Proteínas Quinases/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/genéticaRESUMO
Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis is a highly pathogenic intracellular bacterium that suppresses host inflammation by impairing the metabolic shift from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis. Decreased mitochondrial metabolism is central to initiating a metabolic shift to glycolysis and regulating inflammation, but F. tularensis subsp. tularensis manipulation of host mitochondrial function has not been explored. We demonstrate, using extracellular flux analysis, that F. tularensis subsp. tularensis infection initially improves host macrophage mitochondrial bioenergetics in a capsule-dependent manner. Enhancement of mitochondrial function by F. tularensis subsp. tularensis allowed for modest replication and inhibition of apoptosis early after infection. However, using live cell imaging, we found that F. tularensis subsp. tularensis facilitated the loss of mitochondrial function at later time points during infection in a capsule-independent fashion. This loss of function was paired with oncosis and rapid bacterial replication. Inhibition of oncosis reduced intracellular bacterial numbers, underscoring the requirement for this process during F. tularensis subsp. tularensis infection. These findings establish that temporal mitochondrial manipulation by F. tularensis subsp. tularensis is critical for maintenance of a noninflammatory environment and subsequently aids in optimal replication and dissemination of this pathogenic organism.
Assuntos
Cápsulas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Morte Celular , Metabolismo Energético , Francisella tularensis/patogenicidade , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Mitocôndrias/metabolismo , Mitocôndrias/microbiologia , Animais , Carga Bacteriana , Células Cultivadas , Citoplasma/microbiologia , Feminino , Francisella tularensis/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Evasão da Resposta Imune , Inflamação/patologia , Microscopia Intravital , Macrófagos/microbiologia , Macrófagos/fisiologia , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BLRESUMO
Introduction: African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a pathogen of great economic importance given that continues to threaten the pork industry worldwide, but there is no safe vaccine or treatment available. Development of a vaccine is feasible as immunization of pigs with some live attenuated ASFV vaccine candidates can confer protection, but safety concerns and virus scalability are challenges that must to be addressed. Identification of protective ASFV antigens is needed to inform the development of efficacious subunit vaccines. Methods: In this study, replication-incompetent adenovirus-vectored multicistronic ASFV antigen expression constructs that covered nearly 100% of the ASFV proteome were generated and validated using ASFV convalescent serum. Swine were immunized with a cocktail of the expression constructs, designated Ad5-ASFV, alone or formulated with either Montanide ISA-201™ (ASFV-ISA-201) or BioMize® adjuvant (ASFV-BioMize). Results: These constructs primed strong B cell responses as judged by anti-pp62-specific IgG responses. Notably, the Ad5-ASFV and the Ad5-ASFV ISA-201, but not the Ad5-ASFV BioMize®, immunogens primed significantly (p < 0.0001) higher anti-pp62-specific IgG responses compared with Ad5-Luciferase formulated with Montanide ISA-201™ adjuvant (Luc-ISA-201). The anti-pp62-specific IgG responses underwent significant (p < 0.0001) recall in all the vaccinees after boosting and the induced antibodies strongly recognized ASFV (Georgia 2007/1)-infected primary swine cells. However, following challenge by contact spreaders, only one pig nearly immunized with the Ad5-ASFV cocktail survived. The survivor had no typical clinical symptoms, but had viral loads and lesions consistent with chronic ASF. Discussion: Besides the limited sample size used, the outcome suggests that in vivo antigen expression, but not the antigen content, might be the limitation of this immunization approach as the replication-incompetent adenovirus does not amplify in vivo to effectively prime and expand protective immunity or directly mimic the gene transcription mechanisms of attenuated ASFV. Addressing the in vivo antigen delivery limitations may yield promising outcomes.