Medication adherence and rejection rates in older vs younger adult liver transplant recipients.

A growing number of older adults are undergoing liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. In some settings, it is thought that adherence declines with age. This retrospective study examined adherence and clinical outcomes in older vs younger adult LT recipients. Medical records of adult LT recipients from 2009 to 2012 from a single urban center were reviewed. The medication level variability index (MLVI) was the predefined primary outcome, with nonadherence defined as MLVI >2.5. The secondary outcome was incidence of rejection. Outcomes were evaluated starting 1 year post-LT until 2015. A total of 42 of 248 patients were ≥65 at transplant. Older adults had significantly better adherence than younger ones (65%≥65 were adherent vs 42% younger adults; chi-square two-tailed P=.02). Survival analyses of rejection between age groups censored by time since transplant showed no difference among the four age groups (χ2 =0.84, P=.84). Older age was not found to be a risk factor for reduced adherence or graft rejection in patients surviving at least 1 year post-LT.

An empirically based practice perspective on the transition to adulthood for solid organ transplant recipients.

Preparing patients for transitioning to self-managed care and subsequently transferring to the adult healthcare system has become a critical process for clinicians working with pediatric transplant recipients. This paper reviews several barriers to a successful transition. These include patient barriers, caregiver barriers, and considerations within pediatric and adult centers. To date, few approaches for improving the transition process have been empirically tested. This review details studies that have examined possible models including usage of a transition coordinator and transition clinics. Recommendations are offered to promote an optimal transition including the importance and content of preparation, assessing and addressing transition readiness, insuring the involvement of all stakeholders, and finally, at minimum providing services during the transfer period. Future directions are offered aiming to advance this important area of investigation.

Strategies for measuring quality of life among pediatric solid-organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Quality of life (QoL) has become a mainstay in the outcome assessment of pediatric solid-organ transplant recipients. Yet, how QoL is operationalized and measured varies drastically. It may be very difficult for clinicians and researchers to determine which methods of QoL assessment best meet the needs of their patients or study. The purpose of this literature review is to describe and evaluate the current status of QoL measurement in studies of pediatric solid-organ transplant recipients. DATA SOURCES: Searches of PubMed and PsycINFO from January 1985 to February 2012. STUDY SELECTION: English peer-reviewed publications that described a method for measuring QoL whether it was a standardized questionnaire, qualitative approach, or another way of operationalizing the construct. DATA EXTRACTION: QoL measurement strategies were extracted from 43 studies that met inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Each article was reviewed and summarized by 2 study team members. CONCLUSIONS: Many different strategies were used for measurement, and some were not consistent with established conceptualizations of QoL. Overall recommendations for best practices are offered. Detailed information about specific measures is included, and measures that seem to capture the construct well are recommended. Additionally, our review highlighted the importance of using a "battery approach," including child and parent report as well as considering other variables, such as patient's age, when selecting a QoL measurement strategy.

Pretransplant Psychosocial Risk Factors May Not Predict Late Nonadherence and Graft Rejection in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVE: A psychosocial evaluation before liver transplant aims to identify risk factors for nonadherence and poor outcomes posttransplant. Despite broad support for such evaluations, evidence justifying its components is thus far limited. We investigated whether variables assessed during the psychosocial evaluation before liver transplant predict immunosuppressant nonadherence and graft rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 248 adult liver recipients at least 1 year after transplant with at least 3 measured tacrolimus levels. Predictor variables from the pretransplant evaluation were defined a priori and included sociodemographic factors (age, race, time since transplant), psychiatric history, substance abuse history, education level, and social support. Nonadherence was determined using the medication level variability index, which is an objective measure of adherence reflective of high medication level fluctuation from nonadherence. Outcomes (medication level variability index and biopsy-confirmed rejection) were obtained 1-year posttransplant to the present. RESULTS: We found that 50% of patients were nonadherent to tacrolimus (medication level variability index > 2.5). The 41 patients with rejection (t = 2.71, P < .01) and black patients (F = 3.10, P = .02) had significantly higher index scores. Time since transplant was correlated with medical level variability index (r = 0.15, P = .02). However, in logistic regression, none of the predefined psychosocial variables predicted nonadherence (P = .40) or rejection (P = .19). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed a significant association between medication level variability index and rejection, validating it as an objective measure of clinically significant nonadherence. In a large sample with high rates of nonadherence, none of the pretransplant psychosocial variables commonly used in standard liver transplant evaluations predicted nonadherence or rejection. These findings call into question current selection criteria. Future prospective studies are needed to investigate more com-prehensive psychosocial variables and their ability to determine posttransplant outcomes.

The Current Status of Research on Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy.

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) evolved from the term dementia pugilistica describing the dementia found in many boxers to its current use in describing the dementia and depression sometimes found in athletes subjected to multiple concussions or subconcussive blows to the head. Concurrently, the neuropathology evolved to specify a unique type of tauopathy found in perivascular spaces at the depth of sulci and other features not typically seen in neurodegenerative tauopathies. Four stages of CTE have been proposed, with 4 corresponding clinical syndromes of traumatic encephalopathy syndrome. However, it remains unclear whether this is a syndrome unique to repetitive head trauma, especially in contact sports, because the epidemiology has been difficult to establish. In particular, research to date has had a denominator problem in not establishing the total number of potential cases at risk for developing CTE. The current review examines the evidence to date for these syndromes and contributing or complicating factors affecting the neuropathology, neuroimaging, and clinical presentations associated with them.

Monitoring drug adherence.

TOPIC: Medication nonadherence is prevalent in transplant recipients and is a major reason for graft loss. The present review discusses the measurement of adherence in transplant recipients and strategies to improve adherence. SOURCES REVIEWED: Since adherence research is not confined to transplant recipients, our literature review included studies relevant to transplant recipients as well as adherence to medical recommendations more generally. We reviewed manuscripts in the English language indexed in PubMed Central, as well as ancillary sources of information such as textbook chapters that are not indexed. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus in the literature about an optimal way to monitor adherence, nor is there agreement about a preferred management strategy. Until definitive studies demonstrate the effectiveness of intervention strategies, knowledge of the monitoring as well as intervention methods that are described in this review is expected to give practitioners the initial tools to deal with nonadherence as an important aspect of patient care.