Rosiglitazone improves insulin resistance but does not improve exercise capacity in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance: A randomized clinical study.

Dysmetabolic states, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D), characterized by insulin resistance (IR), are associated with fatty liver, increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and decreased functional exercise capacity (FEC). Rosiglitazone (RO) improves exercise capacity and IR in T2D. However, the effects of RO on FEC and other markers of CVD risk in prediabetes are unknown. We hypothesized that insulin sensitization with RO would improve exercise capacity and markers of CVD risk in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Exercise performance (peak oxygen consumption and oxygen uptake kinetics), IR (homeostasis model assessment of IR and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index), and surrogate cardiovascular endpoints (coronary artery calcium (CAC) volume and density and C-reactive protein (CRP)) were measured in participants with IGT after 12 and 18 months of RO or placebo (PL). RO did not significantly improve exercise capacity. Glycemic measures and IR were significantly lower in people on RO compared to PL at 18 months. CAC volume progression was not different between PL and RO groups. RO did not improve exercise capacity during an 18-month intervention despite improved IR and glycemia in people with IGT. Future studies should explore why effects on FEC with RO occur in T2D but not IGT. Understanding these questions may help in targeting therapeutic approaches in T2D and IGT.

Acute vitamin C improves cardiac function, not exercise capacity, in adults with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have impaired exercise capacity, even in the absence of complications, which is predictive of their increased cardiovascular mortality. Cardiovascular dysfunction is one potential cause of this exercise defect. Acute infusion of vitamin C has been separately shown to improve diastolic and endothelial function in prior studies. We hypothesized that acute vitamin C infusion would improve exercise capacity and that these improvements would be associated with improved cardiovascular function. METHODS: Adults with T2D (n = 31, 7 female, 24 male, body mass index (BMI): 31.5 ± 0.8 kg/m2) and BMI-similar healthy adults (n = 21, 11 female, 10 male, BMI: 30.4 ± 0.7 kg/m2) completed two randomly ordered visits: IV infusion of vitamin C (7.5 g) and a volume-matched saline infusion. During each visit peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD), reactive hyperemia (RH; plethysmography), and cardiac echocardiography were measured. General linear mixed models were utilized to assess the differences in all study variables. RESULTS: Acute vitamin C infusion improved diastolic function, assessed by lateral and septal E:E' (P < 0.01), but did not change RH (P = 0.92), or VO2peak (P = 0.33) in any participants. CONCLUSION: Acute vitamin C infusion improved diastolic function but did not change FMD, forearm reactive hyperemia, or peak exercise capacity. Future studies should further clarify the role of endothelial function as well as other possible physiological causes of exercise impairment in order to provide potential therapeutic targets.Trial registration NCT00786019. Prospectively registered May 2008.

Exenatide improves diastolic function and attenuates arterial stiffness but does not alter exercise capacity in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Exercise is recommended as a cornerstone of treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), however, it is often poorly adopted by patients. Even in the absence of apparent cardiovascular disease, persons with T2DM have an impaired ability to carry out maximal and submaximal exercise and these impairments are correlated with cardiac and endothelial dysfunction. Glucagon-like pepetide-1 (GLP-1) augments endothelial and cardiac function in T2DM. We hypothesized that administration of a GLP-1 agonist (exenatide) would improve exercise capacity in T2DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-three participants (64±4years; mean±SE) with uncomplicated T2DM were randomized in a double-blinded manner to receive either 10µg BID of exenatide or matching placebo after baseline measurements. Treatment with exenatide did not improve VO2peak (P=0.1464) or VO2 kinetics (P=0.2775). Diastolic function, assessed via resting lateral E:E', was improved with administration of exenatide compared with placebo (Placebo Pre: 7.6±1.0 vs. Post: 8.4±1.2 vs. Exenatide Pre: 8.1±0.7 vs. Post: 6.7±0.6; P=0.0127). Additionally, arterial stiffness measured by pulse wave velocity, was reduced with exenatide treatment compared with placebo (Placebo Pre: 10.5±0.8 vs. Post: 11.5±1.1s vs. Exenatide Pre: 11.4±1.8 vs. Post: 10.2±1.4s; P=0.0373). Exenatide treatment did not improve endothelial function (P=0.1793). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of exenatide improved cardiac function and reduced arterial stiffness, however, these changes were not accompanied by improved functional exercise capacity. In order to realize the benefits of this drug on exercise capacity, combining exenatide with aerobic exercise training in participants with T2DM may be warranted.

Sex differences in the effects of type 2 diabetes on exercise performance.

PURPOSE: People with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes (T2D) have impaired peak exercise performance compared with that of their nondiabetic counterparts. This impairment may represent the earliest indication of cardiovascular (CV) abnormalities in T2D. Women with T2D are known to have worse CV outcomes than those in men with T2D. We hypothesized that women with diabetes have a greater exercise impairment than that in men with diabetes compared with that in their nondiabetic counterparts. METHODS: We studied 15 women (premenopausal) and 14 men with T2D as well as their nondiabetic counterparts (22 women and 13 men). Exercise testing was performed. Additional outcomes included measurements of insulin sensitivity, endothelial function, blood flow, and resting cardiac function. RESULTS: Men and women with T2D but not controls had impaired insulin sensitivity. Women with T2D had a lower peak oxygen consumption (V˙O2peak) compared with that of nondiabetic women (24%, P < 0.05) than men with diabetes compared with that in nondiabetic men (16%, P < 0.05) (P value between groups < 0.05). The time constants (phase 2) of the V˙O2 kinetic response tended to be slower in men and women with T2D than those in nondiabetic controls (P = 0.08). There were no differences in resting ventricular function by Doppler echocardiography techniques between groups. Women with T2D had significantly lower flow-mediated dilation and blood flow responses to hyperemia than those in nondiabetic women (both P < 0.05), whereas men with T2D had lower flow-mediated dilation but not lower blood flow than those in nondiabetic men. CONCLUSIONS: Although both men and women with uncomplicated T2D had a lower V˙O2peak, the abnormality in women with T2D compared with that in nondiabetic women was greater than that seen in men. Because V˙O2peak has a strong inverse correlation with mortality, sex disparities observed in exercise capacity among people with T2D suggest a possible rationale for the increased CV morbidity and mortality observed in women compared with those observed in men with uncomplicated T2D.

Sex differences in cardiovascular disease risk and exercise in type 2 diabetes.

Diabetes currently affects approximately 14% of the US population, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in those with diabetes. Although in the general population women are at lower risk than men for CVD, women have a disproportionately greater increase in risk for CVD than do men in the context of diabetes. Physical activity is considered a cornerstone in the prevention and treatment of CVD and its risk factors, but greater barriers to physical activity may exist for women with diabetes compared to their male counterparts. In this article, we review sex differences in CVD incidence and risk among diabetics, sex differences in physical activity behaviors, cardiovascular abnormalities and impaired exercise capacity in women living with diabetes, and the effects of exercise on prevention and treatment of CVD in diabetic women. Finally, we discuss future research needed to clarify potential sex differences in the cardiovascular effects of diabetes and to establish ways to reduce the barriers to exercise in women with diabetes.