Shade delays flowering in Medicago sativa.

Shade-intolerant plants respond to the decrease in the red (R) to far-red (FR) light ratio (R:FR) occurring under shade by elongating stems and petioles and by re-positioning leaves, in a race to outcompete neighbors for the sunlight resource. In some annual species, the shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) is accompanied by the early induction of flowering. Anticipated flowering is viewed as a strategy to set seeds before the resources become severely limiting. Little is known about the molecular mechanisms of SAS in perennial forage crops like alfalfa (Medicago sativa). To study SAS in alfalfa, we exposed alfalfa plants to simulated shade by supplementing with FR light. Low R:FR light produced a classical SAS, with increased internode and petiole lengths, but unexpectedly also with delayed flowering. To understand the molecular mechanisms involved in uncoupling SAS from early flowering, we used a transcriptomic approach. The SAS is likely to be mediated by increased expression of msPIF3 and msHB2 in low R:FR light. Constitutive expression of these genes in Arabidopsis led to SAS, including early flowering, strongly suggesting that their roles are conserved. Delayed flowering was likely to be mediated by the downregulation of msSPL3, which promotes flowering in both Arabidopsis and alfalfa. Shade-delayed flowering in alfalfa may be important to extend the vegetative phase under suboptimal light conditions, and thus assure the accumulation of reserves necessary to resume growth after the next season.

Genome wide comparative analysis of the effects of PRMT5 and PRMT4/CARM1 arginine methyltransferases on the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome.

BACKGROUND: Methylation at arginine residues (R) is an important post-translational modification that regulates a myriad of essential cellular processes in eukaryotes, such as transcriptional regulation, RNA processing, signal transduction and DNA repair. Arginine methylation is catalyzed by a family of enzymes known as protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs). PRMTs are classified as Type I or Type II, depending on the position of the methyl group on the guanidine of the methylated arginine. Previous reports have linked symmetric R methylation to transcriptional repression, while asymmetric R methylation is generally associated with transcriptional activation. However, global studies supporting this conclusion are not available. RESULTS: Here we compared side by side the physiological and molecular roles of the best characterized plant PRMTs, the Type II PRMT5 and the Type I PRMT4, also known as CARM1 in mammals. We found that prmt5 and prmt4a;4b mutants showed similar alterations in flowering time, photomorphogenic responses and salt stress tolerance, while only prmt5 mutants exhibited alterations in circadian rhythms. An RNA-seq analysis revealed that expression and splicing of many differentially regulated genes was similarly enhanced or repressed by PRMT5 and PRMT4s. Furthermore, PRMT5 and PRMT4s co-regulated the expression and splicing of key regulatory genes associated with transcription, RNA processing, responses to light, flowering, and abiotic stress tolerance, being candidates to mediate the physiological alterations observed in the mutants. CONCLUSIONS: Our global analysis indicates that two of the most important Type I and Type II arginine methyltransferases, PRTM4 and PRMT5, have mostly overlapping as well as specific, but not opposite, roles in the global regulation of gene expression in plants.

Casting Away the Shadows: Elucidating the Role of Light-mediated Posttranscriptional Control in Plants.

Light signals trigger precise changes in gene expression networks that activate distinctive developmental programs in plants. The transcriptome is shaped at different stages, both by the regulation of gene expression and also by posttranscriptional mechanisms that alter the sequence or abundance of the transcripts generated. Posttranscriptional mechanisms have attracted much interest in recent years with the advent of high-throughput technologies and bioinformatics tools. One such posttranscriptional process, alternative splicing, increases proteome diversity without increasing gene number by changing the function of individual proteins, while another, miRNA-mediated gene silencing, fine-tunes the amount of mRNA produced. The manner in which plants make use of these two crucial posttranscriptional mechanisms to respond to light and adapt to their environment is the focus of active research. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of light-mediated posttranscriptional control in Arabidopsis thaliana and focus on the biological impact of the various posttranscriptional processes. We also discuss a potential cross talk between the alternative splicing and miRNA pathways, highlighting the complexity of light responsiveness.

Rhythmic Behavior Is Controlled by the SRm160 Splicing Factor in Drosophila melanogaster.

Circadian clocks organize the metabolism, physiology, and behavior of organisms throughout the day-night cycle by controlling daily rhythms in gene expression at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. While many transcription factors underlying circadian oscillations are known, the splicing factors that modulate these rhythms remain largely unexplored. A genome-wide assessment of the alterations of gene expression in a null mutant of the alternative splicing regulator SR-related matrix protein of 160 kDa (SRm160) revealed the extent to which alternative splicing impacts on behavior-related genes. We show that SRm160 affects gene expression in pacemaker neurons of the Drosophila brain to ensure proper oscillations of the molecular clock. A reduced level of SRm160 in adult pacemaker neurons impairs circadian rhythms in locomotor behavior, and this phenotype is caused, at least in part, by a marked reduction in period (per) levels. Moreover, rhythmic accumulation of the neuropeptide PIGMENT DISPERSING FACTOR in the dorsal projections of these neurons is abolished after SRm160 depletion. The lack of rhythmicity in SRm160-downregulated flies is reversed by a fully spliced per construct, but not by an extra copy of the endogenous locus, showing that SRm160 positively regulates per levels in a splicing-dependent manner. Our findings highlight the significant effect of alternative splicing on the nervous system and particularly on brain function in an in vivo model.