Local Infiltration of Tranexamic Acid in Breast Reduction for Symptomatic Macromastia.

BACKGROUND: With a surge of tranexamic acid (TXA) use in the plastic surgery community and a constant demand for breast reduction for symptomatic macromastia, questions about the benefits and risks emerge. The aims of this study are to evaluate and compare outcomes of patients undergoing breast reduction while receiving local TXA as opposed to standard procedure without TXA and to assess intraoperative bleeding and operative time. METHODS: A retrospective review of breast reductions at a single institution from June 2020 to December 2021 was performed. The breast was infiltrated with tumescent solution at the time of surgery, with or without TXA. The population was divided into 2 groups: the TXA receiving group and tumescent only group. Demographics, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, complications, and drain duration were compared between groups. T test and χ 2 test analyses were performed on IBM SPSS.TM. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients and 162 breasts were included. Mean age among patients was 30 ± 13.44 years. Mean SN-N distance was 32.80 ± 3.62 cm. Average resected breast specimen weight was 903.21 ± 336.50 g. Mean operating room time was 159 minutes. Intraoperative blood loss and operative time were not statistically different between groups ( P = 0.583 and P = 0.549, respectively). T-junction dehiscence was lower in the TXA group ( P = 0.016). Incidence of suture granulomas was lower in the TXA group ( P = 0.05). Drain duration was statistically significantly higher in the TXA group ( P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: No decreases in intraoperative blood loss, operative time, or hematoma were seen after local administration of TXA during breast reduction. The rate of overall complications was not increased by using TXA, and incidence of T-junction dehiscence was lower in the TXA group lending to TXA's relatively safe profile. More research is necessary to further elucidate the TXA-related benefits in standard breast reductions.

Same Day Discharge After Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, overnight admission after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the standard of care. Our study aims to analyze the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of immediate IBR with same-day discharge as compared with the standard overnight stay. METHODS: The 2015-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was reviewed to identify all patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate IBR for malignant breast disease. Patients were stratified into study (patients discharged day of surgery) and control (patients admitted after surgery) groups. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, implant type, wound complications, readmission, and reoperation rates were collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of same-day discharge versus admission. In addition, Pearson χ2 test was used for comparison of proportions and t test was used for continuous variables unless distributions required subsequent nonparametric analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a P value less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 21,923 cases were identified. The study group included 1361 patients discharged same day and the control group included 20,562 patient s admitted for average of 1.4 days (range, 1-86). Average age was 51 years for both groups. Average body mass index for the study group 27 and 28 kg/m2 for the control group, respectively. Total wound complication rates were similar (4.5% study, 4.3% control, P = 0.72). Reoperation rates were lower with same-day discharge (5.7% study, 6.8% control, P = 0.105), though not statistically significant. However, same-day discharge patients had a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the control (2.3% study, 4.2% control, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data analysis over a 6-year period reveals that immediate IBR with same-day discharge is associated with a significantly lower readmission rate when compared with the standard overnight stay. The comparable complication profiles show that immediate IBR with same-day discharge is safe, potentially benefiting both patients and hospitals.

Risk factors associated with 30-day complications following lower extremity sarcoma surgery: A national surgical quality improvement project analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our study aims to identify risk factors associated with complications in lower extremity (LE) sarcoma surgery, as well as the prevalence and complications associated with concurrent plastic surgery procedures (CPSP). METHODS: ACS-NSQIP database was accessed to identify patients treated for LE sarcoma (2010-2019). Patient demographics, preoperative lab, comorbidities, tumor type, location, principle procedure, and presence/characteristics of CPSPs were recorded. Thirty-day soft tissue complications were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed on IBM SPSS.™ RESULTS: Nine hundred eighteen patients were included (483 males and 435 females), average age and body mass index (BMI) of 57 and 27.4 kg/m,2 respectively. Comorbidities included smoking (13.9%, 128), hypertension (37.3%, 342), and insulin-dependent diabetes (3.7%, 34). Preoperative lab values included albumin <3.5 (6.8%, 63), hematocrit <30% (8.2%, 75), and platelet count <150 000 (5.9%, 54). Thirty-day soft tissue complication rate was 5.7% (52 of 918). On multivariate logistic regression, increased age (p = 0.039), higher BMI (p = 0.017), and longer operative times (p = 0.002) were significant risk factors independently associated with soft tissue complications. CONCLUSIONS: Soft tissue complications within 30 days occur in 6% of patients. Graft procedures carry a 20% risk of complications. Risk factors independently associated with complications include increased age, increased BMI, and longer operative times.

A Comparison of Applicant and Resident Physician Demographics Among Surgical Subspecialties From 2009 to 2019: Trends in Gender and Underrepresented Minorities in Medicine.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to compare applicant statistics to resident physician demographics among several surgical subspecialties (SSSs), to identify trends of gender and underrepresented minorities in medicine (UIM), and to evaluate current diversity among these specialties. METHODS: Graduate medical education reports from 2009 to 2019 were queried to determine trends among programs. Further identification of gender and UIM statistics was obtained in 4 several SSSs: integrated plastic surgery, orthopedic surgery (OS), otolaryngology surgery (ENT), and neurosurgery (NS). These were compared with Association of American Medical Colleges data of residency applicants for the respective years. RESULTS: Significant differences were seen among gender and UIM(s) of the applicant pool when compared with resident data. All specialties had significantly fewer American Indian and African American residents compared with applicants. Significant differences between applicants and residents were also found among Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and female demographics. All SSSs had a significant positive trend for the percentage of female residents. Significant differences between specialties were identified among African American, Hispanic, and female residents. Orthopedic surgery and NS had significantly higher percentage of African American residents compared with ENT and integrated plastic surgery. Neurosurgery had significantly higher percentage of Hispanic residents compared with OS and ENT. Integrated plastic surgery and ENT had significantly higher percentage of female residents compared with OS and NS. CONCLUSIONS: There has been significant increase in number of residency programs and resident positions since 2009. However, increase in female residents and UIM(s) among SSSs has not matched the pace of growth.

Outcomes analysis of microsurgical physiologic lymphatic procedures for the upper extremity from the United States National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

INTRODUCTION: Physiologic microsurgical procedures to treat lymphedema include vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) and lymphovenous bypass (LVB). The purpose of this study was to assess 30-day outcomes of VLNT and LVB using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS: NSQIP was queried (2012-2018) for lymphatic procedures for upper extremity lymphedema after mastectomy. Prophylactic lymphatic procedures and those for lower extremity lymphedema were excluded. Outcomes were assessed for three groups: LVB, VLNT, and patients who had procedures simultaneously (VLNA+LVB). Primary outcomes measured were operative time, 30-day morbidities, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The study included 199 patients who had LVB (n = 43), VLNT (n = 145), or VLNT+LVB (n = 11). There was no difference in co-morbidities between the groups (p = 0.26). 30-day complication rates including unplanned reoperation (6.9% VLNT vs. 2.3% LVB) and readmission (0.69% VLNT vs. none in LVB) were not statistically significant (p = 0.54). Surgical site infection, wound complications, deep vein thromboembolism, and cardiac arrest was also similar among the three groups. Postoperative length of stay for VLNT (2.5 days± 2.3), LVB (1.9 days± 1.9), and VLNT+LVB (2.8 days± 0.3) did not differ significantly (p = 0.20). Operative time for LVB (305.4 min ± 186.7), VLNT (254 min ± 164.4), and VLNT+LVB (295.3 min ± 43.2) was not significantly different (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of the NSQIP data revealed that VLNT and LVB are procedures with no significant difference in perioperative morbidity. Our results support that choice of VLNT versus LVB can be justifiably made per the surgeon's preference and experience as the operations have similar complication rates.

Cost Analysis and National Trends in the Treatment of Thumb Basal Arthritis: Comparing Ligament Reconstruction/Tendon Interposition and Trapeziectomy/Hematoma Distraction Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Thumb basal arthritis (TBA) is a common form of arthritis characterized by wearing away of cartilage in the crarpometacarpal joint at the base of the thumb. The purpose of the study was to analyze cost trends of the 2 common surgical treatments options: ligament reconstruction/tendon interposition (LRTI) and trapeziectomy/hematoma distraction arthroplasty (THDA). METHODS: The Vizient Clinical Data/Resource Manager electronic database was reviewed for the 3 treatment procedures of TBA from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Cases were placed into 1 of 2 categories: LRTI or THDA. Total and direct costs were averaged and compared nationally and regionally. One-tailed t test and Pearson correlation analyses were performed (P < 0.05 and r > 0.9 or r < -0.9 was considered significant). RESULTS: A total of 28,887 total cases (26,405 LRTI, 2482 THDA) were analyzed. There was a 49% increase in number of surgical procedures to treat TBA between 2015 and 2018. Ligament reconstruction/tendon interposition (91%) had larger market share than THDA (9%). However, market share percentage of each procedure stayed the same over time. Trapeziectomy/hematoma distraction arthroplasty had lower average cost (US $4157) compared with that of LRTI (US $4446, P = 0.06) However, THDA had a significant positive trend in cost, increasing 14% in 4 years. In 2019, 30% of procedures performed were in the Midwestern United States, 27% Northeastern United States, 24% Southern United States, and 19% Western United States. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with TBA seem to be treated with LRTI. The market share seems to be greatest for LRTI and lowest for THDA nationally and regionally. Although the average cost for THDA was less than that of LRTI, this difference was not significant.

Epidemiology of Upper-Extremity Amputations Using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System.

BACKGROUND: Upper-extremity amputations can be devastating injuries that lead to lifelong disabilities. The purpose of our study was to review national data and identify populations at risk and injury patterns that could be targeted with prevention strategies. METHODS: Data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System between years 2012 and 2018 were reviewed. Injuries affecting the upper extremity resulting in amputation were included. Patient demographics, anatomical location, mechanism of injury, level of care provided, and setting of injury were recorded. Descriptive was recorded and tabulated for each category. RESULTS: There were 4,766 patients identified with amputations to the upper extremity from 2012 to 2018. The following categories are listed below: age in years, sex, race, anatomical location of injury, most common mechanisms of injury, disposition of patient, environmental location. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that male children younger than 10 years are at the high risk for finger amputations. In addition, the majority of these injuries occur in the home. This suggests that safety prevention in the home is a significant area in need of improvement. We recommend further research in areas of home safety and injury prevention to decrease the risk of the devastating injuries.

Comparative Analysis of Open Reduction Internal Fixation and Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning of Hand Fractures: Single Academic Center Retrospective Review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to compare postoperative outcomes between patients receiving closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) following metacarpal and phalanx fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at a single academic center for all patients suffering a metacarpal or phalanx fracture and receiving either CRPP or ORIF between 2012 and 2018. Patients were divided into fracture mechanism, high-energy mechanism of injury, low-energy mechanism of injury, or unknown, and treatment of fracture with either ORIF or CRPP. High-energy mechanism of injury included gunshot wounds, motor vehicle crash, and blast injuries, whereas low-energy mechanism of injury included all other causes. Patient demographics, postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, and return to the operating room were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients, with 524 fractures, were included in the study. There were 127 fractures that resulted from high-energy mechanisms and 394 fractures that resulted from low-energy mechanisms. Open reduction internal fixation was used to treat 299 fractures, whereas CRPP was used for 225 fractures. Among fracture fixation, there was a total of 8.4% complication rate with ORIF, accounting for 10.4% of complications, and CRPP accounting for 5.8%. Among the fracture mechanism, the high-energy mechanism of injury had a 21.3% complication rate, whereas the low-energy mechanism of energy was 4.3%. When comparing the above variables, only high-energy mechanism of injury was a statistically significant predictor of complications (odds ratio, 3.2; confidence interval, 1.5-7.0; P = 0.002). The average operating room time for the ORIF group was 124.82 minutes compared with 97.6 minutes for the CRPP group. CONCLUSION: Patients with hand fractures corrected by ORIF appeared to have a higher postoperative complication rate. When the 2 procedures, ORIF and CRPP, were controlled for mechanism of injury, there was not a statistically significant difference in postoperative complication rate (P = 0.14). However, a fracture sustained by a high-energy mechanism was a statistically significant predictor of postoperative complications (P = 0.002).

Cost Analysis and National Trends in the Treatment of Dupuytren Contracture Comparing Collagenase Injection, Needle Fasciotomy, and Open Fasciectomy Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Dupuytren contracture (DC) is a common disorder characterized by progressive fibrosis of palmar fascia. This study analyzed cost trends of 3 common treatments for DC: fasciotomy, fasciectomy, and collagenase injection (CI)/cord manipulation. METHODS: The Vizient Clinical Data/Resource Manager electronic database was reviewed for all procedures for the treatment of DC at participating hospitals in the United States (US) from October 1, 2015, to September 1, 2019. Cases were placed into 1 of 3 categories: (1) CI, (2) needle fasciotomy (NF), and (3) open fasciectomy (OF). Total and direct costs were averaged for each procedure and compared nationally and regionally. Temporal trends and specific market share were analyzed. One-tailed t test and Pearson correlation analysis was performed (P < 0.05 and r > 0.9 or r < -0.9 was considered significant). RESULTS: A total of 22,974 total cases were identified. A total of 16,966 OF, 3962 NF, and 2046 CI were performed. There was a nearly a 4-fold increase in number of procedures to treat DC from 2015 to 2018. Market share percentage of each procedure stayed relatively similar over time. However, market share percentage differed between procedures. Needle fasciotomy had the lowest market share percentage approximately 7%. Collagenase injection had the highest average cost at US $4453.66 and was significantly higher than OF at US $3394.90 and NF at US $2010.75. Cost and distribution of procedures were further analyzed by geographic regions. In 2018, 32% of procedures performed were in the Northeastern US, 29% in the Midwestern US, 23% in the Southern US, and 16% in the Western US. Total number of Dupuytren procedures increased more than 300% in all regions across the US from 2015 to 2018. In every region, NF was the lowest cost intervention. Cost of OF and CI varied between regions and was often the most expensive intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of DCs with NF seems to be the least costly treatment option. Needle fasciotomy seems to be the least commonly performed procedure. Regional data show variations in the cost of OF and CI. However, OF has the majority market share nationally and regionally. Although the cost of these procedures seems to vary regionally, the type of procedures being performed seem to be similar across regions.

Practice Patterns Among Hand Surgeons According to Primary Residency Training: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hand surgery fellowships accept applicants from 3 different residencies: general surgery, orthopedic surgery, and plastic surgery. Although all of these specialties culminate into a board-certified hand surgeon, each specialty receives drastically different training in residency, which can have effects on which procedures these surgeons feel comfortable performing in their own practices. This study aims to compare practice patterns and complication rates among hand surgeons by residency training. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried between the years of 2014 and 2018 for all Current Procedural Terminology codes pertaining to upper-extremity surgical procedures performed below the elbow. Procedures not performed by a general, orthopedic, or plastic surgeon were excluded, as well as polytraumas. Procedures were then stratified by anatomic region, tissue type, and primary specialty of the attending surgeon. Data collected included the number of each procedure, patient complexity, and complications. Statistical analysis consisted of a t test for continuous variables, χ2 analysis for categorical variables, and linear regression analysis to compare complications rates between specialties. RESULTS: A total of 76,980 unique cases were included in our analysis: 4979 (6.4%) at the elbow, 43,680 (56.7%) at the forearm/wrist, 23,284 (30.2%) at the hand, 1421 (1.8%) flaps/grafts, 285 (0.4%) vascular, and 3331 (4.3%) neurological. Orthopedics performed most (79.5%) of the procedures, whereas plastic surgeons and general surgeons performed 17.3% and 3.1%, respectively. There were also significant differences by anatomic location/type of procedure, with orthopedic surgeons performing 99.2% of procedures at the elbow but only 67.7% of procedures at the hand. Linear regression analysis showed general surgeons had the lowest complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show significant differences in the number of upper-extremity surgeries performed by surgeons from each specialty at different anatomic locations.This could be due to differences in training during residency or proportionately more orthopedic surgeons being "full-time" hand surgeons. These data could affect hiring patterns in hospitals seeking hand surgeons depending on the variety of pathology encountered at that particular institution.

Use of a 5-Item Modified Frailty Index for Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty can be quantified using an index score to effectively predict surgical outcomes and complications. The modified frailty index (mFI) score includes 5 patient-specific medical history comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/pneumonia, and nonindependent functional status. The purpose of our study was to apply the 5-item mFI score to predict and minimize complications in patients undergoing breast reconstruction. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried for all patients undergoing primary breast reconstruction from 2016 to 2018. Patients were divided based on timing of reconstruction and type of reconstruction: immediate or delayed, and implant based or autologous based. A validated modified fragility score was applied to all patients. Patients were stratified by mFI scores of 0 (no comorbidities), 1 (1 comorbidity), and 2+ (2 or more comorbidities). Patient demographics and 30-day complications rates were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 22,700 patients were identified. There were 10,673 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction, and 12,027 patients who underwent delayed breast reconstruction. A total of 14,159 patients underwent implant-based, and 8541 underwent autologous-based reconstruction. A total of 16,627 patients had an mFI score of 0, 4923 had a mFI score of 1, and 1150 had a mFI score of 2+. Compared with patients with an mFI score of 0, patients with an mFI score of 2 or greater were more likely to develop a postoperative complication (7.2 vs 12.3; P < 0.0001). Patients undergoing immediate reconstruction were more likely to develop a postoperative complications for every mFI category. The most common complications were wound and hematologic related. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher mFI scores are likely to have an increase in postoperative complications after breast reconstruction. Increasing body mass index increases postoperative complications independent of frailty index scores. Patients with increasing frailty index scores undergoing immediate breast reconstruction have a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications compared with delayed reconstruction.Patients with increasing frailty index scores undergoing autologous breast reconstruction have a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications compared with implant-based reconstruction. High frailty index scores are associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications, reoperation rates, and readmission rates. Patients with higher mFI scores may benefit from a delayed implant-based reconstruction.

High-Pressure Injection Injuries of the Hand: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis at a Single Academic Center.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of high-pressure injection injuries of the hand is low. Although the occurrence is rare, the precarious progression of the injury exacts prompt surgical evaluation in order to avoid complications and amputation. The current study was devised in order to make comparisons to the current data, in addition to supplementing the literature with observations regarding clinical course and management. METHODS: A multisurgeon, retrospective chart review from a single institution was performed. Inclusion criteria included cases involving a high-pressure injection injury to the hand that underwent surgical management. Patient demographics, injury details, and hospital course were all reviewed and recorded. RESULTS: This retrospective review identified 20 cases meeting criteria, all of which involved males. The average age at time of injury was 39.7 years (range, 21-71 years). The incidence of injection injuries over a 10-year time period was 2.1 cases per year. The nondominant hand was injured in 11 cases (63%). The most common site of injury was the index finger with 11 recorded incidents (55%). Other reported locations included the metacarpal (40%) and small finger (5%). Occupational data included 10 construction workers, 5 painters, and 2 cleaning crew members, and 3 had nonmanual occupations. Paint was the most commonly injected substance with 17 reported cases (85%). On average, the delay until surgery was observed to be 21.9 hours (n = 16). Only 1 patient underwent surgery at 6 hours after surgery. The average number of procedures performed was 1.8 (range, 1-4). Hospitalization duration was on average 3.9 days (range, 1-9 days), and the average follow-up length was 69 days (range, 7-112 days). There were no identified cases that necessitated amputation. CONCLUSIONS: This form of injury most commonly affects male, middle-aged laborers. Our study found very low amputation rates when compared with the current literature, despite observing longer delays to surgery according to current recommendations. Limited comparisons can be made from data regarding clinical course and management because of the small sample size of the current study and the limited published data. This indicates a need for further exploration and collection of data involving parameters such as clinical course and management.

Impact of Radiation on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Planes.

BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) in the setting of radiation (XRT) comes with a high risk of perioperative complications regardless of reconstruction method. The aim of study was to identify the effects of XRT on IBR using a prepectoral versus submuscular approach. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed after institutional review board approval was obtained. Patients at a single institution who had 2-stage IBR from June 2012 to August 2019 were included. Patients were separated into 4 groups: prepectoral with XRT (group 1), prepectoral without XRT (group 2), submuscular with XRT (group 3), and submuscular without XRT (group 4). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-seven breasts among 213 patients underwent 2-stage IBR. The average age and body mass index were 50.10 years and 29.10 kg/m2, respectively. One hundred nine breasts underwent prepectoral reconstruction (44 in group 1, 65 in group 2), and 278 breasts underwent submuscular reconstruction (141 in group 3, 137 in group 4). Prepectoral tissue expander placement was associated with higher complication rates in the radiated group (38.6% compared with 34.0% submuscular) and lower complication rates in the nonradiated group (26.2% compared with 29.2% submuscular), although significantly less explants were performed in prepectoral group, regardless of XRT status. The 3 most common complications overall were contracture (15.1% radiated, 10.4% nonradiated), infection (18.4% radiated, 11.9% nonradiated), and seroma (15.7% radiated, 10.9% nonradiated). CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage, prepectoral tissue expander placement performs clinically better than submuscular in nonradiated patients compared with radiated patients; however, no statistical significance was identified. Prepectoral had a significantly less incidence of reconstructive failure than submuscular placement regardless of XRT status. Future larger-scale studies are needed to determine statistically significant difference in surgical approach.

Evaluation of National Resident Matching Program and Electronic Residency Application Service Data in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.

INTRODUCTION: The National Resident Matching Program and Electronic Residency Application Service provide data for tracking trends among applicants in each specialty over the past 5 years. The purpose of this study was to examine this information and determine sex and race/ethnicity distribution over the past 5 years. METHODS: The National Resident Matching Program and Electronic Residency Application Service databases were surveyed for trends in the following categories: number of positions, number of applicants, percent of applicants per position, and number of applicants by sex and self-identified race/ethnicity. This information was analyzed graphically for visual representation of the changes in the field. RESULTS: While there has been a steady increase in number of positions offered, there has also been a significant decrease in number of applicants, resulting in an increase in number of positions offered per applicant. While female and Asian applicants have increased in number, rates of applications from other diverse groups have remained stagnant. CONCLUSIONS: The number of plastic surgery positions offered has increased, whereas the number of applicants has decreased, resulting in a reduction in the number of applicants per position. Lack of racial diversity remains a significant issue in the applicant pool.

Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Intractable Raynaud Phenomenon.

Raynaud phenomenon (RP) is a condition causing vasospasm in the fingers and toes of patients that can have a significant negative impact on quality of life. This can lead to pain, ulceration, and possible loss of digits. Several pharmacological options are available for treatment. However, RP can often be refractory to traditional modalities, leaving surgery or injections as the next available options. This article provides a review and update on the use of botulinum toxin as an effective therapy for the treatment of RP refractory to medical management.

Hand Surgery Referral Pattern Preferences Among Primary Care Physicians in Academic Centers in the Southeastern United States.

BACKGROUND: Board-certified hand surgeons undergo an additional 1 year of fellowship training after completing 1 of 3 residencies, either orthopedic surgery (OS), plastic surgery (PS), or general surgery (GS). The purpose of our study was to examine primary care physician's referral patterns for hand surgery in the Southeastern United States. METHODS: Primary care physicians across 38 academic medical institutions in the Southeastern United States were queried. A survey questionnaire was sent to their corresponding email address. The Questionnaire allowed the surveyor to enter demographic information and their choice in referral, either to OS, PS, or GS, for each particular hand pathology. RESULTS: Two-hundred twenty-eight of 1526 surveys were completed (15% response rate). One-hundred twenty-four were male respondents, and 105 were female. For treatment of arthritis, 94.7% selected OS; 5.3%, PS; and 0%, GS. For treatment of nerve decompression, 84.0% selected OS; 14.4%, PS; and 1.6%, GS. For treatment of nerve injuries, 64.2% selected OS; 34.6%, PS; and 1.2%, GS. For treatment of tendon injuries, 84.4% selected OS; 15.6%, PS; and 0%, GS. For treatment of congenital deformities, 55.1% selected OS; 44.9%, PS; and 0%, GS. For treatment of fractures, 98.8% selected OS; 1.2%, PS; and 0%, GS. For treatment of sports-related injuries, 99.2% selected OS; 0.4%, PS; and 0.4%, GS. For treatment of soft tissue masses, 65.5% selected OS; 23.0%, PS; and 11.5%, GS. For treatment of soft tissue coverage, 8.6% selected OS; 87.7%, PS; and 3.7%, GS. For treatment of skin cancer-related problems, 8.2% selected OS; 72.4%, PS; and 19.4%, GS. CONCLUSIONS: Referrals for arthritis, nerve decompressions, tendon injuries, fractures, and sports injuries are more likely to be referred to OS. Referrals for soft tissue coverage and skin cancers are more likely to be referred to PS. Nerve injuries and congenital deformities referrals were similar between orthopedic and PS. Further research should be conducted to determine why referral patterns vary among specialties with similarly trained hand surgeons.

Thrombocytosis is associated with complications after microvascular surgery: An NSQIP data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Complications after microvascular surgery, such as partial flap loss, and arterial/venous compromise cannot only increase morbidity for the patient but also tax the healthcare system. Thrombocytosis, both essential and reactive, can predispose patients to thrombosis and hemorrhage and thus should intuitively have an effect on the outcome of microvascular free tissue transfers. We sought to evaluate the effect of preoperative thrombocytosis on outcomes after microvascular free flap surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of the 2013-2016 American Collges of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database identified 4,299 patients who had microsurgical flaps. Of these 3,744 had preoperative platelet levels recorded. Fifty-four patients had preoperative thrombocytosis, defined as a platelet count >450 K/CUMM, while 3,690 did not. The groups were compared; demographics, comorbidities, and smoking status were recorded. We then examined outcomes between groups including average operative time, length of hospital stay, need for transfusion, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) postoperatively, and need for reoperation. RESULTS: When comparing the two cohorts, there was no statistical difference in comorbidities. We found a significant difference between the thrombocytosis and control cohort in need for transfusion (29.6 vs. 12.8%, p = .0002), average days till discharge (8.36 vs. 5.75, p = .009), and need for reoperation (27.8 vs. 13.8%, p = .003). There was no difference in DVT occurrence (0 vs. 0.1%, p = .46) or average operation time (535 m vs. 482 min, p = .088). CONCLUSION: Patients with thrombocytosis undergoing microvascular free flaps are at increased risk for complications, including the need for a blood transfusion, prolonged hospital stays, and reoperation.

Detailed analysis of the impact of surgeon and hospital volume in microsurgical breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Prior investigations of microsurgical breast reconstruction have not distinguished the effects of surgeon versus hospital volume and failed to address the effect of patient clustering. Our data-driven analysis aims to determine the impacts of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of microsurgical breast reconstruction. METHODS: Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2008 to 2011 was analyzed for patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction. Volume-outcome relationships were analyzed with restricted cubic spline analysis. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression was used to account for patient clustering effect. RESULTS: A total of 5,404 NIS patients met inclusion criteria. High-volume (HV) surgeons had a 59% decrease in the risk of inpatient complications, which became non-significant after clustering correction. For HV hospitals, there was a 47% decrease in the risk of inpatient complications (odds ratio = 0.53; 95% confidence intervals 0.30, 0.91; p = 0.021) that was statistically significant with the clustering adjustment. Neither the volume-cost relationship for surgeons nor hospitals remained statistically significant after accounting for clustering. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volume plays a significant impact on outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction, while surgeon volume has comparatively not shown to be similarly impactful. The complexity of care related to microsurgical breast reconstruction warrants equally complex and engineered health systems.

The Epidemiology of Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries and Associated Cost in the US Emergency Departments.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to determine the incidence and average cost of nerve injuries in patients presenting with upper extremity trauma. METHODS: The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes specific to peripheral nerve injuries of the upper extremity. Data on the incidence, patient demographics, average number of associated diagnoses, Injury Severity Scale (ISS) score, mechanism of injury, and average cost of care were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 1.58 million upper extremity traumatic injuries, there were 5244 nerve injuries, resulting in an annual incidence of 16.9 per 100,000 persons with an average age of 38.42 years. Ulnar nerve injuries were the most common (3.86 per 100,000) followed by digital nerve (2.96 per 100,000), radial nerve (2.90 per 100,000), and median nerve (2.01 per 100,000). Injuries to the brachial plexus had the highest average ISS score (9.79 ± 0.71) and number of presenting diagnoses (8.85 ± 0.61) while having a lower than average emergency department (ED) cost. Patients with digital nerve injuries had the highest average ED cost ($8931.01 ± $847.03), whereas their ISS score (2.82 ± 0.19) and number of presenting diagnoses (4.92 ± 0.22) were the lowest. The most commonly reported mechanism of injury in this study population was from a laceration (29.2%) followed by blunt injury, fall (14.8%), and being struck (7.20%). Males were 2.14 (2.01-2.28) times more likely to have an injury to an upper extremity nerve and 3.25 (2.79-3.79) times more likely to injure a digital nerve. CONCLUSIONS: While there was a low incidence of upper extremity nerve injuries associated with upper extremity trauma, the ulnar nerve was most frequently injured. Males were twice as likely to sustain a traumatic upper extremity nerve injury, with laceration being the most common mechanism of injury. The average ED cost associated with upper extremity nerve injuries in the United States was determined to be approximately $5779.

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis of 9110 Reduction Mammaplasty Patients: Identifying Risk Factors Associated With Complications in Patients Older Than 60 Years.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative risk factors in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty as well as identify any increased complication risk in patients older than 60 years undergoing reduction mammoplasty. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from years 2013-2015 was reviewed. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology code 19318 specific for reduction mammoplasty. Only patients undergoing bilateral procedures were included, and no reconstructive procedures were included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day complications were analyzed. Comparative analysis was performed between patients younger than 60 years and patients 60 years and older, identifying risk factors associated with complications in the geriatric population. RESULTS: A total of 9110 patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty were identified. Of these 1442 (15.83%) were patients older than 60 years. Mean age of all patients was 42 years (range, 18-85 years). Eighty hundred fifty-nine patients were active smokers. Four hundred eighty-two patients were diabetic. Overall, 798 complications occurred with an incidence of 8.7%. Group 1 (<60 years) mean age was 39 years (range, 18-59). Group 2 (>60 years) mean age was 66 years (range, 60-85 years). The geriatric population showed a higher risk of cerebral vascular accidents (P < 0.00006), myocardial infarction (P < 0.02), and readmission (P < 0.03). Smoking was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for superficial surgical site infection, and deep space infection. Diabetes was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction mammoplasty is a common surgical procedure. It is not uncommon for patients older than 60 years to undergo elective reduction mammoplasty (15.83% incidence), resulting in a cumulative complication rate of 11.65% in the geriatric population compared with 8.89% in the group of patients younger than 60 years. Smoking and diabetes were found to be independent risk factors for complications, regardless of age.