GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Promote Weight Loss Among People with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain and associated metabolic complications are increasingly prevalent among people with HIV (PWH). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are incretin-based therapies for diabetes and weight management that have been shown to result in substantial weight loss; however, studies of their effects in PWH are limited. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted among PWH who were taking GLP-1RAs at UC San Diego Owen Clinic between 2/1/2021 to 2/1/2023. Baseline clinical data were collected and changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), and hemoglobin A1C (A1C) before starting GLP-1RAs compared to the most recent clinic visit were calculated (with a minimum of 3 months follow-up time required). Logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with >5% of total body weight loss. RESULTS: A total of 225 patients received on average 13 months of GLP-1RA therapy, with 85 (37.8%) achieving the maximum GLP-1RA dose. GLP-1RA therapy resulted, on average, in a loss of 5.4 kg, decrease in BMI by 1.8 kg/m2, and decrease in A1C by 0.6%. In the multivariable analysis, higher baseline BMI [OR 1.10 (1.03-1.16)], treatment duration of GLP-1RA therapy greater than 6 months [OR 3.12 (1.49-6.49], and use of tirzepatide [OR 5.46 (1.44-20.76)] were significantly more likely to be associated with >5% weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Use of GLP-1RAs led to declines in weight, BMI, and hemoglobin A1C among PWH and offers an additional strategy to address weight gain and diabetes.

Effects of a hospital discharge clinic among people with HIV: Lack of early follow-up is associated with 30-day hospital readmission and decreased retention in care.

BACKGROUND: The transition between inpatient and outpatient care for hospitalized people with HIV represents an opportunity for linkage and re-engagement in care. We evaluated whether attendance at a post-hospitalization visit ('discharge clinic') within 1-2 weeks of discharge would reduce readmissions and improve retention in care (RIC) among people with HIV in San Diego, California, USA. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of people with HIV hospitalized between June 2020 and November 2021. Our primary outcome was 30-day readmissions among people with HIV who did or did not attend a discharge clinic visit. Secondary outcomes included the effect of discharge clinic attendance on RIC, along with the impact of attendance at any HIV clinic visit within 30 days of discharge on readmissions and RIC. RESULTS: We evaluated 114 people with HIV, of whom 77 (67.5%) and 90 (78.9%) attended a discharge clinic visit or any HIV clinic visit within 30 days of discharge, respectively. Active substance use disorder (SUD) was associated with failing to attend a discharge clinic visit (odds ratio 0.31; 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.77). We observed no significant differences in readmissions between people with HIV who did or did not attend a discharge clinic visit; however, the former had significantly higher 6-month RIC (79.2% vs. 35.1%, p < 0.001). People with HIV attending any HIV clinic visit within 30 days of discharge had significantly fewer 30-day readmissions (8.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.02) and better 6-month RIC (75.6% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) than those who did not attend. CONCLUSION: Early hospital follow-up care was associated with a reduction in readmissions among people with HIV. Active SUD was a significant barrier to linkage to outpatient follow-up and RIC.

Prescribing Syringes to People Who Inject Drugs: Advancing Harm Reduction in Primary Care.

Access to new syringes can reduce the risk of HIV and hepatitis C transmission, skin and soft tissue infections, and infectious endocarditis for people who inject drugs (PWID). Syringe service programs (SSPs) and other harm reduction programs are a good source of syringes. However, they are sometimes not accessible due to limited hours, geographic barriers, and other factors. In this perspective, we argue that when PWID faces barriers to syringes physicians and other providers should prescribe, and pharmacists should dispense, syringes to decrease health risks associated with syringe re-use. This strategy is endorsed by professional organizations and is legally permissible in most states. Such prescribing has numerous benefits, including insurance coverage of the cost of syringes and the sense of legitimacy conveyed by a prescription. We discuss these benefits as well as the legality of prescribing and dispensing syringes and address practical considerations such as type of syringe, quantity, and relevant diagnostic codes, if required. In the face of an unprecedented overdose crisis with many associated health harms, we also make the case for advocacy to change state and federal laws to make access to prescribed syringes uniform, smooth, and universal as part of a suite of harm reduction efforts.

Successful treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients on anti-epileptics or mood stabilizers using pharmacokinetic enhancers.

Co-administration of hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with anti-epileptics or mood stabilizers with cytochrome P450 (CYP) and/or drug transport-inducing properties is contraindicated due to concerns of subtherapeutic DAA levels that can lead to treatment failure and viral resistance. The recommended strategy is to change the interacting medication to a different agent that does not have inducing properties, but this is not always possible depending on the clinical scenario. We report on three patients who received DAAs for their HCV infection while remaining on the contraindicated anti-epileptic or mood stabilizer by utilizing CYP and drug transport inhibitors as pharmacokinetic enhancers to attempt to overcome the induction effects and maximize chances of achieving sustained virologic response (SVR). All patients achieved SVR despite the drug-drug interactions and there were no safety concerns. In patients facing this unique clinical quandary, the use of CYP and drug transport inhibitors appears to be a safe and possible strategy.

Reducing the harms of xylazine: clinical approaches, research deficits, and public health context.

OBJECTIVES: Xylazine has emerged as a consistent part of the unregulated drug supply in recent months. We discuss major domains of xylazine's harm, current knowledge deficits, clinical and harm reduction strategies for minimizing harm, and xylazine's public health and policy context. As an interdisciplinary team from across the USA, we have pooled our knowledge to provide an overview of xylazine's current and emerging contexts. METHODS: To inform this essay, the pertinent literature was reviewed, clinical knowledge and protocols were shared by multiple clinicians with direct expertise, and policy and public health context were added by expert authors. RESULTS: We describe xylazine's major harm domains-acute poisoning, extended sedation, and wounds, along with anemia and hyperglycemia, which have been reported anecdotally but lack as clear of a connection to xylazine. Current successful practices for xylazine wound care are detailed. Understanding xylazine's epidemiology will also require greater investment in drug checking and surveillance. Finally, approaches to community-based wound care are discussed, along with an orientation to the larger policy and public health context. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing the harms of xylazine requires interdisciplinary participation, investment in community-based harm reduction strategies, and improved drug supply surveillance. The relatively unique context of xylazine demands buy-in from public health professionals, harm reduction professionals, clinicians, basic science researchers, policymakers and more.

"We do it ourselves": strengths and opportunities for improving the practice of harm reduction.

BACKGROUND: Unprecedented increases in substance-related overdose fatalities have been observed in Texas and the U.S. since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and have made clear there is considerable need to reduce harms associated with drug use. At the federal level, initiatives have called for widespread dissemination and implementation of evidence-based harm reduction practices to reduce overdose deaths. Implementation of harm reduction strategies is challenging in Texas. There is a paucity of literature on understanding current harm reduction practices in Texas. As such, this qualitative study aims to understand harm reduction practices among people who use drugs (PWUD), harm reductionists, and emergency responders across four counties in Texas. This work would inform future efforts to scale and spread harm reduction in Texas. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with N = 69 key stakeholders (25 harm reductionists; 24 PWUD; 20 emergency responders). Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded for emergent themes, and analyzed using Applied Thematic Analysis with Nvivo 12. A community advisory board defined the research questions, reviewed the emergent themes, and assisted with interpretation of the data. RESULTS: Emergent themes highlighted barriers to harm reduction at micro and macro levels, from the individual experience of PWUD and harm reductionists to systemic issues in healthcare and the emergency medical response system. Specifically, (1) Texas has existing strengths in overdose prevention and response efforts on which to build, (2) PWUD are fearful of interacting with healthcare and 911 systems, (3) harm reductionists are in increasing need of support for reaching all PWUD communities, and (4) state-level policies may hinder widespread implementation and adoption of evidence-based harm reduction practices. CONCLUSIONS: Perspectives from harm reduction stakeholders highlighted existing strengths, avenues for improvement, and specific barriers that currently exist to harm reduction practices in Texas.

Research Priorities for Expansion of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in the Community Pharmacy.

In the last decade, the U.S. opioid overdose crisis has magnified, particularly since the introduction of synthetic opioids, including fentanyl. Despite the benefits of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), only about a fifth of people with opioid use disorder (OUD) in the U.S. receive MOUD. The ubiquity of pharmacists, along with their extensive education and training, represents great potential for expansion of MOUD services, particularly in community pharmacies. The National Institute on Drug Abuse's National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (NIDA CTN) convened a working group to develop a research agenda to expand OUD treatment in the community pharmacy sector to support improved access to MOUD and patient outcomes. Identified settings for research include independent and chain pharmacies and co-located pharmacies within primary care settings. Specific topics for research included adaptation of pharmacy infrastructure for clinical service provision, strategies for interprofessional collaboration including health service models, drug policy and regulation, pharmacist education about OUD and OUD treatment, including didactic, experiential, and interprofessional curricula, and educational interventions to reduce stigma towards this patient population. Together, expanding these research areas can bring effective MOUD to where it is most needed.

Addressing buprenorphine bottlenecks in the context of MAT Act implementation: A shared responsibility.

Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) such as buprenorphine reduce overdose mortality and other opioid related acute health events but have historically been highly regulated. The recent Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act ended the requirement clinicians complete a specified training and apply for a DATA 2000 ("X") waiver on their Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) number, to prescribe buprenorphine. With the MAT Act, any practitioner with Schedule III prescribing authority (a regular DEA number) can now prescribe buprenorphine for OUD. While this has potential to improve OUD treatment access, the impact will depend on implementation. Though the MAT Act may facilitate increased buprenorphine prescribing, ensuring adequate buprenorphine dispensing is also critical to improving Medications for opioid use disorder. Recognized buprenorphine bottlenecks arise from a complex convergence of factors in community pharmacies, threatening to undercut the benefits of the MAT Act. If prescribing increases but is not matched by increased dispensing, bottlenecks may worsen. Any worsening of buprenorphine bottlenecks could have a disproportionate impact in rural areas where residents may rely on fewer pharmacies to fill prescriptions for people in larger geographic area and where larger prescribing-dispensing gaps already exist such as in Southern states. Rigorous research will be needed to document the overall impact of the MAT Act on community pharmacists and their patients. At the federal level, pharmacists and their professional organizations should lobby the DEA to de-schedule or re-schedule buprenorphine. The DEA should announce a moratorium on enforcement actions against wholesalers and pharmacies related to buprenorphine distribution and dispensing. More supports should be offered to community pharmacies by state pharmacy boards and associations including continuing pharmacy education and technical assistance for advocating with wholesalers to increase buprenorphine order sizes, and to more effectively communicate with prescribers. Pharmacies should not have to face these challenges alone. Regulators, wholesalers, and researchers must join together with community pharmacies to further reduce regulatory barriers to dispensing, provide evidence-based interventions where needed to support pharmacy dispensing efforts, conduct rigorous implementation research, and be constantly vigilant in identifying and addressing multi-level buprenorphine bottlenecks in the wake of the MAT Act.

Independent community pharmacists' attitudes and intentions toward dispensing buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NX) for opioid use disorder (OUD) is associated with positive health outcomes; however, challenges accessing prescribed BUP/NX at community pharmacies have been identified. OBJECTIVE: The theory of planned behavior was applied to determine whether independent community pharmacists' attitudes toward dispensing BUP/NX for OUD predict intentions to dispense. METHODS: A 40-item survey was administered to 185 Texas Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network pharmacists. The survey assessed intentions to dispense BUP/NX (3 items), attitudes toward BUP/NX (24 items), current barriers to dispensing BUP/NX (2 items), and demographics (10 items). Inferential statistics determined associations among pharmacists' attitudes, practice setting characteristics, and intentions to dispense BUP/NX. Regression analysis determined whether attitude predicted intention to dispense BUP/NX, controlling for practice setting and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 82 community independent pharmacists (response rate = 44%). Respondents were predominantly non-Hispanic white (45.8%) and women (56.6%) and practiced in pharmacies with an average 1129.1 (± 1034.5) dispensed prescriptions/week. Pharmacists had positive intentions (6.2 ± 3.5) and attitudes (14.4 ± 24.9) toward dispensing BUP/NX and attitudes did not predict intentions to dispense (P = 0.330). Positive drivers of attitude were related to improving patient outcomes, fulfilling a community need, and absence of conflicts with pharmacists' personal and religious beliefs. A negative driver of attitude was financial reimbursement/loss. Pharmacists dispensing 2000 or more prescriptions/week had higher intentions (b = 3.22, P = 0.014) to dispense than those dispensing less than 500 prescriptions/week. The most common barrier to dispense BUP/NX was "refill was too soon" (54.8%). CONCLUSION: Community independent pharmacists had positive attitudes toward and intentions of dispensing BUP/NX for OUD. However, attitudes did not predict intentions to dispense. Negative drivers of attitudes were related to factors not within pharmacists' control, such as time to refill or financial reimbursement.Future studies focused on community pharmacy-based access to BUP/NX are warranted to elucidate issues that are impactful in improving pharmacists' dispensing intentions and behavior.

The impact of the mainstreaming addiction treatment act and associated legislative action on pharmacy practice.

The recent passage of the Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act will expand access to treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) by eliminating prescriber registration requirements introduced as part of the Drug Abuse Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000. Without the X-Waiver, and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) registered prescriber can now prescribe buprenorphine. Eliminating DATA-2000 registration is the first step in improving access to buprenorphine, but additional barriers, including unclear restrictions on wholesale buprenorphine supply and insurance coverage, remain. Recently, the DEA formally clarified that suspicious order monitoring programs were managed entirely by wholesalers and manufacturers and that DEA does not set suspicious order monitoring limits. In this commentary, we address the somewhat conflicting implications of the MAT Act and recent DEA guidance on buprenorphine dispensing in community pharmacies. We also discuss innovative practice models that leverage pharmacists' cognitive skills to manage pharmacotherapy for persons with OUD. Recent policy changes and emerging evidence suggest that pharmacists are better positioned than ever to provide low-barrier access to treatment for OUD and to show their value in this practice area by actively engaging patients with prescribed buprenorphine.

A wound care and immunization needs assessment for participants of a mobile syringe services program in Austin, TX.

BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs (PWID) are subject to injection-related harm, including skin and soft tissue infections. Syringe services programs (SSPs) provide sterile syringes, disposal of used syringes, and other supportive services. Given their contact and credibility with PWID, SSPs could facilitate triage and treatment of wounds and access to immunizations for communicable diseases. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to assess wound care and immunization needs among participants accessing mobile SSP services in Austin, TX. METHODS: A 21-item mixed-methods survey was created to assess frequency and severity of wounds, wound care approaches, and vaccination status. Participants were included if they reported injection drug use and experienced a related wound in the previous 6 months. Interview sections included screening, demographics, wound care, and immunization status. RESULTS: A total of 21 participants completed the semistructured interview. A majority identified as male (n = 13, 61.9%), white (n = 12, 57.1%), and were unhoused (n = 12, 57.1%). The primary drug of injection was heroin alone (n = 14, 66.7%). Many avoided seeking wound care from health care providers (n = 16, 76.2%) owing to stigmatization (n = 13, 61.9%) and previous negative experiences (n = 7, 33.3%). Self-treatment of wounds included over-the-counter medications (n = 10, 47.6%), over-the-counter supplies (n = 10, 47.6%), and antibiotics (n = 9, 42.8%). In the past 5 years, few had received vaccination for hepatitis A and B (n = 3, 14.3%) or tetanus (n = 7, 33.3%), and many expressed interest in receiving vaccinations through the SSP. Interest for other expanded services included access to antibiotics, an on-site provider, wound care supplies, and education. CONCLUSIONS: PWID may avoid professional health care for wound care or immunizations owing to perceived stigma. Expanding availability of wound care services and immunizations directly through mobile SSPs is desired by participants and could positively affect public health.

A qualitative exploration of unintentional versus intentional exposure to fentanyl among people who use drugs in Austin, TX.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of deaths involving synthetic opioids has historically been lower in Texas than most U.S. states but more than quadrupled from January 2020 to January 2022. This paper explores the emergence of fentanyl in a drug supply where black tar heroin predominates, a factor considered protective against fentanyl adulteration, through the perspectives of people who use drugs (PWUD). OBJECTIVES: We describe experiences of unintentional exposure to fentanyl, illustrate how some people identify fentanyl in their supply, and present harm reduction strategies that PWUD use to avoid overdose. METHODS: Thirty rapid assessment interviews were conducted in July 2021 at 2 mobile outreach sites of a harm reduction organization in Austin, Texas. The brief semistructured interviews were designed to assess participant fentanyl exposure experiences. RESULTS: Participants were clients who reported using heroin or fentanyl in the past week and had lived in Texas for at least 6 months. Seventeen participants identified as male, 10 as female, and 3 as nonbinary. Half identified as white; other participants were Latinx (6), black (2), American Indian (1), and mixed race (6). Two-thirds were unhoused or in transitional housing. The drug supply in Texas has evolved; most participants reported that the heroin and other drugs they obtained contain fentanyl. Participants detected differences by observing changes in the physical characteristics of the drug, experiencing unexpected effects, and using fentanyl test strips. Many had been unintentionally exposed to fentanyl and expressed concerns about fentanyl's presence. The presence of fentanyl had negative unintended consequences for participants, including adverse effects and developing a dependence on opioids. CONCLUSION: PWUD in Austin, Texas, report increasing prevalence of unintentional fentanyl exposure, despite the predominance of black tar heroin. Pharmacists can provide crucial supplies and education to safeguard the health of this vulnerable population.

Perceptions, policies, and practices related to dispensing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: A national survey of community-based pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Increasing buprenorphine prescribing for opioid use disorder (OUD) has been a major focus of U.S. opioid response efforts. However, concerns related to dispensing buprenorphine have been identified among pharmacists. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe perceptions, policies, and practices reported by community-based pharmacists in relation to dispensing buprenorphine for OUD and to compare these responses by practice setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was administered to a random sample of 6376 pharmacists. Responses were collected anonymously from October 16, 2021, to November 7, 2021. RESULTS: A response rate of 5.1% was achieved with 325 responders, and 281 were eligible to complete the survey. Most reported practicing in a chain (50.9%) or independent pharmacy (34.7%) as a staff pharmacist (39.7%) or pharmacist-in-charge (37.0%). Most (68.1%) indicated they could usually or always fill a buprenorphine prescription promptly. The most common pharmacy policies related to buprenorphine dispensing were checking the prescription drug monitoring program (71.3%), validating the prescriber's X-waiver (44.9%), accepting only local prescribers (37.4%), and prohibiting refills more than one day early (35.8%). Policies limiting buprenorphine access to local prescribers, local patients, and established patients varied by practice setting and were most common in independent pharmacies. The strongest barriers to buprenorphine dispensing were insurance prior authorization, difficulty reaching prescribers with questions, and concerns about buprenorphine diversion. The strongest facilitators of buprenorphine dispensing were increased communication with prescribers, increased trust with prescribers, increased trust with patients, and increased education for pharmacists. CONCLUSION: Most respondents indicated they were willing and able to dispense buprenorphine products for OUD promptly. However, they also reported discomfort dispensing when factors representing potential risk of diversion are present. Mitigating this hypersensitivity to diversion risk among pharmacists should be a focus of regulatory agencies and professional organizations. Efforts to address the unique concerns of independent pharmacists will also be essential to improve access.

Opioid harm reduction: A scoping review of physician and system-level gaps in knowledge, education, and practice.

Background: Harm reduction includes treatment and prevention approaches rather than abstinence, as a public health strategy for mitigating the opioid epidemic. Harm reduction is a new strategy for many healthcare professionals, and gaps in knowledge and practices may lead to barriers to optimal treatment. Our objective was to identify and describe gaps in physicians' knowledge, education, and practice in harm reduction strategies related to opioid overdose. Methods: We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases for articles published between 2015 and 2021, published in English, containing empirical evidence, addressing opioid harm reduction, and identifying gaps in physicians' knowledge, education, or practice. Results: Thirty-seven studies were included. Studies examined how physicians' perceptions or stigma influenced harm reduction efforts and addressed clinical knowledge gaps in overdose treatment and prevention and OUD treatment. Less than half of the studies addressed access issues at the system level, above the individual healthcare professional. Conclusion: Individual-level interventions should be addressed with professional continuing education and curricular-based changes through experiential and interprofessional education. System-level gaps can be remedied by increasing patient access to care, creating policies favorable to harm reduction, and extending resources to provide harm reduction strategies.

Policies regarding use of medications for opioid use disorder in professional recovery programs: A scoping review.

Background: In the U.S., medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) include methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Despite substantial evidence of efficacy, the use of MOUD by health professionals remains controversial. This scoping review sought to identify and describe policies related to the use of MOUD by physicians, pharmacists, and nurses in professional health programs (PHP). Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed in August 2020 to identify pertinent articles from the U.S. which were then evaluated for inclusion by a team of trained reviewers. Results: Nine articles were ultimately identified for inclusion, and their years of publication ranged from 1984 to 2012. The treatment of physicians was addressed in seven articles, nurses in four, and pharmacists in two. Data from one veterinarian and several dentists could not be disaggregated from three studies. Naltrexone was the most commonly accepted form of MOUD within PHPs. A 2011 survey of physician and nurse PHP administrators found that 11/22 (50%) physician programs and 15/33 (45%) nursing programs forbade practice reentry while taking buprenorphine with the remainder indicating it could be allowed under some circumstances. The use of methadone within PHPs was extremely rare, and no specific details regarding PHP policies related to its use or practice reentry could be identified. No articles reported specifically on practice reentry policies for pharmacists. Conclusions: This scoping review identified one article detailing explicit policies concerning MOUD use in the target professions. Implicit policies extrapolated from other articles found that naltrexone was the most commonly accepted form of MOUD, with methadone and buprenorphine being avoided due to dubious concerns of impairment. A unified, contemporary, comprehensive survey of current PHP policies and evaluation of actual treatment data to ascertain real-world practices is needed.

Naloxone accessibility without an outside prescription from U.S. community pharmacies: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has identified limited naloxone accessibility in community pharmacies. OBJECTIVES: To summarize current literature regarding naloxone accessibility without an outside prescription from U.S. community pharmacies and discuss implications on community pharmacists' ability to mitigate the opioid overdose epidemic. METHODS: A systematic review was developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed was searched up to May 12, 2022. References from articles chosen for inclusion were subsequently reviewed to identify additional relevant studies. Peer-reviewed publications reporting new data regarding the accessibility of naloxone from U.S. community pharmacies without an outside prescription (e.g., standing order, protocol) were included. Review articles and articles written in a non-English language were excluded. Individual study data were reported, along with a qualitative discussion of limitations of individual studies and in aggregate. When possible, naloxone accessibility data were also pooled and reported as overall accessibility and further stratified by chain versus independent pharmacies and urban versus rural settings. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included. Naloxone was in stock in 6867 of 10,934 (62.8%) pharmacies, though this varied greatly between studies (range, 26.4%-96.1%). Chain pharmacies were more likely to stock naloxone than independents (69.7% [range, 35.4%-89.1%] vs. 36.4% [range, 19.1%-89.7%], P < 0.0001). Stocking did not significantly differ between urban and rural locations. A total of 5660 of 8999 (62.9%; range, 23.5%-97%) pharmacies audited were willing to dispense without a prescription, with chain (67.4% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.0001) and rural (69.3% vs. 40.7%, P < 0.0001) pharmacies more likely than independent and urban, respectively. Key access barriers identified included naloxone not stocked, high naloxone cost, and pharmacist misinformation or stigma. CONCLUSION: Though limited by study heterogeneity, analysis of thirty U.S. studies revealed naloxone was available without a prescription in less than two-thirds of community pharmacies. Availability varied significantly by study and pharmacy type.

Impact of student pharmacist-led naloxone academic detailing at community pharmacies in Texas.

OBJECTIVE: Each U.S. state and the District of Columbia has passed legislation expanding access to naloxone, the opioid overdose antidote. Most naloxone access laws allow for standing orders, whereby prescribers may authorize pharmacists to dispense naloxone without an outside prescription. A recent study from our group assessing naloxone accessibility via standing order identified continued access barriers. The present study assessed whether brief, in-person, student-led academic detailing of community pharmacists improved naloxone accessibility. METHODS: A telephone audit of all 2317 CVS, Walgreens, H-E-B, and Walmart pharmacies in Texas was conducted to determine naloxone accessibility under standing orders. Within 2 months following the initial audit, student pharmacists visited the Austin and San Antonio, Texas area pharmacies that indicated they would not dispense naloxone without a prescription, to provide brief (< 5 minutes) academic detailing to the pharmacist on duty. Students followed a scripted outline designed to inform pharmacists about naloxone standing orders and naloxone use for opioid overdose response. Then they provided a flyer and requested that it be displayed in the pharmacy to inform patients about naloxone. An identical telephone audit was conducted 1-2 weeks following the education. RESULTS: Of the 49 pharmacies receiving education, 37 (76%) responded that they would dispense naloxone without an outside prescription appropriately. When comparing each pharmacy before and after detailing, respectively, it was observed that 51% versus 71% (P = 0.008) stocked naloxone; 43% versus 71% (P = 0.002) would dispense naloxone to a third-party customer; and 12% versus 37% (P = 0.005) would submit a claim to the insurance of a third-party customer. CONCLUSION: Student-led academic detailing was effective in improving pharmacists' willingness to dispense naloxone under standing orders and increasing naloxone accessibility from community pharmacies. Studies beyond Texas chain pharmacies are warranted to validate the effectiveness of this technique on a larger scale.

Development of a health communication campaign to promote the Texas prescription monitoring program.

Given the role opioid overprescribing has played in the current overdose crisis, reducing the supply of prescription opioids available for misuse has gained widespread support. Prescription monitoring programs (PMPs) have been identified as a tool for achieving this goal, but little is known about how to promote PMP use to prescribers. This paper describes the process of developing a health communication campaign to support the adoption of the Texas PMP. After formative research, message development and concept testing, a range of campaign concepts and messages were tested and final recommendations determined. The messages and lessons learned have utility beyond Texas.

Successful optimization of antiretroviral regimens in treatment-experienced people living with HIV undergoing liver transplantation.

Modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) extends life expectancy for people living with HIV (PLWH). However, most older PLWH (≥50 years) "aged" with HIV and were exposed to historical HIV care practices and older, more toxic ART. In PLWH with exposure to older and multiple ART regimens, the drug interactions between ART frequently used in treatment-experienced persons and commonly used immunosuppressants remain a significant challenge. However, the advent of newer ART classes (eg, integrase non-strand transfer inhibitors) and more advanced HIV genetic resistance testing may allow optimization of ART regimens with minimal drug interactions. Here, we present a case series of three PLWH whose complicated ART interacted (or was at risk for interacting) with their post-liver transplant immunosuppression. After a review of their proviral DNA resistance testing, they successfully transitioned onto safer integrase non-strand transfer inhibitor-containing ART regimens without viral blips or evidence of organ rejection.

Pharmacists are missing an opportunity to save lives and advance the profession by embracing opioid harm reduction.

More than 70,000 Americans died as a result of a drug overdose in 2017, and a substantial majority of those deaths involved an opioid. Supply-reduction interventions, such as prescription monitoring programs, tamper-resistant formulations, and prescribing limits have failed to reverse rising rates of opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Instead, they may be contributing to this trend by forcing people with opioid use disorder to an increasingly potent illicit market with scant resources for sterile injection. Pharmacists are recognized by governmental authorities, public health experts, and other health professionals as key partners in opioid harm reduction. This is reflected by the proliferation of state laws supporting pharmacy-based access to naloxone, an opioid antagonist that can rapidly reverse the effects of an opioid overdose. Expanded authority to distribute naloxone without an outside prescription, coupled with the provision of sterile syringes and evidence-based medications for opioid use disorder, represents a powerful opportunity for pharmacists to save lives while advancing the role of the profession. However, numerous studies have documented a lack of readiness among pharmacists to dispense naloxone and little willingness to provide sterile syringes. As a profession, it is imperative that we ensure all pharmacists receive adequate education regarding opioid harm reduction interventions and ongoing support to implement these interventions within their practices.