Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in patients with orthostatic intolerance.

The efficacy of current therapeutic measures in orthostatic intolerance (OI) varies among patients and is oftentimes unsatisfactory. New approaches to alleviate symptoms of OI are therefore clearly needed. Recent reports have demonstrated that acetylcholinesterase inhibition is effective in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension with the presumed mechanism of enhancing sympathetic ganglionic transmission. Based on the hypothesis that acetylcholinesterase inhibition, by improving the safety factor of cholinergic transmission, will result in enhanced vascular adrenergic tone and a vagal shift in cardiac sympathovagal balance, we evaluated the role of acetylcholinesterase inhibition in the treatment of patients with OI. We monitored heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and indexes for cardiac output, end-diastolic volume, and systemic resistance continuously in 18 patients with OI during supine rest and during 5 minutes of 70 degrees head-up tilt before and 1 hour after oral administration of 60 mg pyridostigmine. Plasma catecholamines and baroreflex sensitivity were determined for the supine and upright position before and after medication. Patients scored orthostatic symptoms for both tilt studies. The excessive HR response to orthostatic stress was significantly blunted after pyridostigmine administration. HR was significantly lower in the supine and more so in the upright position. Baroreflex sensitivity in the upright position was significantly higher after pyridostigmine. Norepinephrine was increased in both supine and upright position. These changes were associated with significant improvement of orthostatic symptoms. We conclude that pyridostigmine improves orthostatic tolerance in patients with OI. Our findings support the suggested mechanisms of enhanced sympathetic ganglionic neurotransmission and a vagal shift in cardiac sympathovagal balance. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition could be a new useful concept in the treatment of OI.

Evaluation of orthostatic hypotension: relationship of a new self-report instrument to laboratory-based measures.

OBJECTIVE: To compare measured autonomic deficits (composite autonomic severity score [CASS]) with a brief self-report scale we developed to measure severity of symptoms of orthostatic hypotension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were recruited in 2 phases: from August to October 2002 and in April 2004. All patients underwent full evaluation in the autonomic laboratory, from which a CASS of autonomic deficits was derived. Patients also completed the 5-item self-report Orthostatic Grading Scale, which inquires about symptoms of orthostatic intolerance due to orthostatic hypotension (eg, severity, frequency, and interference with daily activities). RESULTS: Of 145 patients, 97 (67%) had orthostatic hypotension. The 5-item scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (coefficient alpha=.91). Patients with orthostatic hypotension had significantly higher scores on each questionnaire item and CASS subscores than those without orthostatic hypotension. The scale items correlated significantly with each of the CASS subscores, maximally with the CASS adrenergic subscore. CONCLUSIONS: Orthostatic hypotension is not the only cause of reduced orthostatic tolerance, and some patients may have orthostatic hypotension but be asymptomatic. Results of this study indicate that this 5-item questionnaire is a reliable and valid measure of the severity of symptoms of orthostatic hypotension and that it can supplement laboratory-based measures to provide a rapid, more complete clinical assessment. This questionnaire would also be useful as a brief screening device for orthostatic intolerance to aid physicians in identifying patients who may have orthostatic hypotension.

Spectral analysis of slow modulation of EEG amplitude and cardiovascular variables in subjects with postural tachycardia syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have reported slow (<0.5 Hz) modulation of electroencephalographic (EEG) background amplitude and suggested that this reflects periodic neuronal activity in the brainstem, such as may be recorded from cardiovascular and respiratory centers in animals. We searched for a relationship between EEG amplitude modulation and modulation of simultaneously recorded cardiovascular variables and attempted to determine whether this relationship was altered in subjects with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). METHODS: We recorded EEG, blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA), heart rate, respirations, and blood pressure from subjects with POTS and controls during head-up tilt. Time-frequency analysis of 0.512-s epochs of EEG was performed to determine peak alpha amplitude. Spectra were divided into 3 bands: ultraslow, middle, and respiratory. RESULTS: EEG alpha amplitude modulation in all frequency bands was reduced in POTS subjects while supine. EEG modulation decreased in controls with head-up tilt but not in POTS subjects. Heart rate modulation in the respiratory frequency band decreased with head-up tilt and was significantly less (P<0.02) in ultraslow and respiratory frequency bands in POTS subjects after head-up tilt. Blood pressure and MCA flow velocity modulation in middle and respiratory bands increased with head-up tilt to a greater degree in POTS subjects. Blood pressure and MCA flow velocity modulation frequencies were moderately correlated, but correlations between EEG and cardiovascular variable modulation frequencies were generally low, being highest in the respiratory band but not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: There are subtle differences in EEG amplitude modulation in subjects with POTS. Altered EEG amplitude modulation in POTS may reflect altered brainstem physiology in this disorder.

What is the minimum duration of head-up tilt necessary to detect orthostatic hypotension?

OBJECTIVE: There is uncertainty as to the minimum duration of head-up tilt (HUT) needed to detect orthostatic hypotension (OH). The orthostatic duration has variably been recommended to be 1, 2, 3, and 5 minutes. The purpose of the current study was 1) to determine the minimum duration of HUT necessary to detect OH and 2) to identify different patterns of orthostatic blood pressure (BP) response in patients with OH. DESIGN/METHODS: We evaluated the medical records of 66 consecutive patients (mean age 70.0+/-10.1 years; 64% male) seen at Mayo Clinic-Rochester from 2000-2001 who fulfilled the criteria for OH (systolic blood pressure [SBP] reduction > or = 20 mmHg within 3 minutes of HUT) during routine clinical autonomic studies. All patients completed an autonomic reflex screen with continuous monitoring of heart rate and BP during supine rest and 5 minutes of 70 degree HUT. Severity of autonomic deficits was quantified with the Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS). RESULTS: Overall, BP was the lowest at 1 minute with gradual and partial recovery over the following 4 minutes. Eighty-eight percent of patients (N=58) developed OH by 1 minute of HUT, with an additional 11% (N=7) developing OH by 2 minutes and the remaining 1% (N=1) developing OH by 3 minutes. We identified two broad patterns of SBP response to HUT. Forty-eight percent (N=32) of patients demonstrated an initial drop in SBP (> or = 20 mm Hg),which remained stable until tilt-back. Thirty-six percent (N=24) demonstrated an initial drop (> or = 20 mmHg) followed by a progressive decline in SBP until tilt-back. Repeated measures analysis of variance confirmed that the SBP change in response to HUT differed significantly among patients with a stable vs. progressive pattern [F(3,32)=25.1, p<0.001). Patients with the progressive pattern also had more severe adrenergic impairment on the CASS (p=0.03) and were more likely to have their tilt test terminated early (prior to 5 minutes) due to presyncope (p<0.0001) than patients with the stable pattern. CONCLUSIONS: One minute of HUT will detect OH in the great majority (88%) of patients and three minutes will detect the balance. Orthostatic stress beyond 2 minutes is necessary to detect the pattern of progressive OH. Since this group has more severe adrenergic deficits than the group with stable OH, we suggest that the progressive pattern is due to greater impairment of compensatory reflexes. Recognition of the group with progressive fall in BP is important since this group may be at greater risk of orthostatic syncope.

Effects of linearly polarized 0.6-1.6 microM irradiation on stellate ganglion function in normal subjects and people with complex regional pain (CRPS I).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stellate ganglion blocks are an effective but invasive treatment of upper extremity pain. Linearly polarized red and near-infrared (IR) light is promoted as a safe alternative to this procedure, but its effects are poorly established. This study was designed to assess the physiological effects of this latter approach and to quantitate its benefits in people with upper extremity pain due to Complex Regional Pain Syndrome I (CRPS I, RSD). STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a two-part study. In the first phase, six adults (ages 18-60) with normal neurological examinations underwent transcutaneous irradiation of their right stellate ganglion with linearly polarized 0.6-1.6 microm light (0.92 W, 88.3 J). Phase two consisted of a double-blinded evaluation of active and placebo radiation in 12 subjects (ages 18-72) of which 6 had upper extremity CRPS I and 6 served as "normal" controls. Skin temperature, heart rate (HR), sudomotor function, and vasomotor tone were monitored before, during, and for 30 minutes following irradiation. Analgesic and sensory effects were assessed over the same period as well as 1 and 2 weeks later. RESULTS: Three of six subjects with CRPS I and no control subjects experienced a sensation of warmth following active irradiation (P = 0.025). Two of the CRPS I subjects reported a >50% pain reduction. However, four noted minimal or no change and improvement did not reach statistical significance for the group as a whole. No statistically significant changes in autonomic function were noted. There were no adverse consequences. CONCLUSIONS: Irradiation is well tolerated. There is a suggestion in this small study that treatment is beneficial and that its benefits are not dependent on changes in sympathetic tone. Further evaluation is warranted.