Intradermal recombinant human nerve growth factor induces pressure allodynia and lowered heat-pain threshold in humans.

Nerve growth factor (NGF) plays a biologic role in the development and maintenance of sympathetic and small sensory neurons. Because it facilitates nerve fiber regeneration, lowers heat-pain threshold (hyperalgesia), and prevents or improves nerve dysfunction in experimental neuropathy, it is being considered as a putative treatment for certain human polyneuropathies. In 16 healthy subjects, we tested whether intradermal injection of minute doses of recombinant human NGF (1 or 3 micrograms) compared with saline induces hyperalgesia or alters cutaneous sensation (at the site of injection) as measured by symptom scores, clinical examination, or quantitative sensory testing with Computer Assisted Sensory Examination (CASE IV). Most subjects had, as their only symptom, localized tenderness of the NGF-injected site and only when the site was bumped or compressed. Slight discomfort developed in volar wrist structures (with flexion of fingers) or tenderness of deep structures to palpation over the bicipital groove or supraclavicular region. The Neuropathy Symptoms and Change questionnaire indicated that pressure allodynia was significantly localized to the NGF-injected side from 3 hours to 21 days after injections. Light stroking of the skin did not induce tactile allodynia. Compression of injected sites induced pressure allodynia that occurred more frequently and significantly on the NGF-injected side after 3 hours and was maintained for several weeks. No abnormality of vibratory or cooling detection threshold developed from NGF injection. By contrast, heat-pain threshold (HP 0.5, p = 0.003) and an intermediate level of heat-pain (HP 5.0, p < 0.001) were significantly lowered 1, 3, and 7 days (and in some cases at 3 hours and 14 and 21 days) after NGF injection. The time course of pressure allodynia and heat-pain hyperalgesia is too rapid to be explained by uptake of NGF by nociception terminals, retrograde transport, and upregulation of pain modulators. Local tissue mechanisms appear to be implicated. It remains to be tested whether recombinant human NGF prevents, stabilizes, or ameliorates small fiber human neuropathies.

Variables influencing neuropathic endpoints: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study of Healthy Subjects.

We determined the normal limits for various neuropathic tests in healthy subjects. The study, the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study (RDNS), is noteworthy because of its size (more than 400 subjects), random selection of subjects, and selection of at least 15 men and 15 women without neuropathy, neurologic disease, or diseases predisposing to neuropathy from each hemidecade between 18 and 74 years of age from the population of a defined region (Rochester, MN). Subjects were classified into those with (nonhealthy subjects, RDNS-NS) and without (healthy subjects, RDNS-HS) neuropathy, neurologic or psychiatric disease, or diseases known to predispose to neuropathy. The study provides normal limits for tests used in the RDNS but it has broader uses as well. We found that (1) less than 10% of subjects in the third decade, approximately 20% in the fourth decade, and approximately 30% in the fifth or older decades were placed into the RDNS-NS category; (2) healthy subjects (RDNS-HS) retain their ability to walk on toes and heels regardless of age, excessive weight, or lack of physical fitness, but not their ability to arise from a kneeled position--lost in more than 5% of persons 60 years and older; (3) the frequency of decreased or absent ankle reflexes exceeds 5% in healthy subjects older than 50 years--limiting their value as a sign of diabetic polyneuropathy and necessitating a grading change with age in the neuropathy impairment score.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A standard test of heat-pain responses using CASE IV.

Heat-pain threshold and stimulus response characteristics can be evaluated with graduated heating pulses from a radiant heat source or a contact thermode. Results may be used to: (1) evaluate differences in sensation among anatomical sites, sides of the body, and with development and aging; and (2) provide an end-point for the study of the efficacy of drugs; or to follow the course of sensory alteration in disease (medical practice, epidemiologic studies, and controlled clinical trials). Because there is great variability in how tests of this kind are performed and scored, comparisons of results among medical centers are difficult. To meet this need, we have developed, and here describe, a standardized and validated test of heat-pain. We use both pyramidal and trapezoid-shaped stimuli. The range of stimulus magnitudes we recommend is sufficient to test heat-pain at a sensitive region (the face) of young people and an insensitive region (the foot) of healthy old people. From tests on healthy subjects and patients, we find that neither our previously published forced-choice or 4, 2, and 1 stepping algorithms are suitable for testing heat-pain sensation. We, therefore, introduce the Non-Repeating Ascending with Null Stimuli (NRA-NS) algorithm which performs satisfactorily. The graphed data points of responses to increasingly stronger heat pulses were made up of two components-the no pain (0) response line and the heat-pain response line (> or = 1 numerical scaling of the pain responses graded from 1 [least] to 10 [greatest]). For the pain responses, we found that usually a curve could be fit using a quadratic equation. Using this equation, or interpolation where necessary, it is possible to compute the heat-pain detection threshold (HPDT or HP:0.5), an intermediate heat-pain response (HP:5.0), and the difference between the two (HP:5.0-0.5). Our studies show that a certain time is needed between successive stimuli and tests to minimize changing basal skin temperature or threshold. We also demonstrated that low or high baseline skin temperatures can affect heat-pain responses, therefore, we advocate specific testing conditions. Based on a study of 25 healthy subjects, the reproducibility of the test falls within +/-1 stimulus steps 88% of the time for HP:5.0 and 76% of the time for HP:0.5. The precise approaches employed to make the test standard and reproducible are described. We illustrate that the algorithm and testing system is able to document altered pain threshold with skin abrasion, with intradermal injection of nerve growth factor, and with diabetic polyneuropathy.