Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 99(3): 804-811, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236756

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the differences in coronary artery disease (CAD) burden between patients with ischemic resuscitated, ischemic refractory VT/VF OHCA events and N/STEMI. BACKGROUND: Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting with initial shockable rhythms (VT/VF OHCA) have the highest mortality among patients with acute cardiac events. No predictors of VT/VF OHCA refractoriness have been identified. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design was used to assess baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and the angiographic severity of disease among patients with VT/VF OHCA undergoing emergent coronary angiography at the University of Minnesota Medical Center. The Gensini score was calculated for all patients to assess the angiographic burden of CAD. For patients with ischemia-related cardiac arrest, outcomes were further compared to an independent non-OHCA population presenting with N/STEMI. RESULTS: During the study period, 538 patients were admitted after VT/VF OHCA. Among them, 305 presented with resuscitated, and 233 with refractory VT/VF. 66% of resuscitated and 70% of refractory VT/VF had an underlying, angiographically documented, ischemic etiology. Ischemic resuscitated and refractory VT/VF had significant differences in Gensini score, (80.7 ± 3.6 and 127.6 ± 7.1, respectively, p < 0.001) and survival (77.3% and 30.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). Both groups had a higher CAD burden and worse survival than the non-OHCA N/STEMI population (360 patients). Ischemic refractory VT/VF was significantly more likely to present with chronic total occlusion in comparison to both N/STEMI and ischemic resuscitated VT/VF. CONCLUSION: Ischemia-related, refractory VT/VF OHCA has a higher burden of CAD and the presence of CTOs compared to resuscitated VT/VF OHCA and N/STEMI.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Humanos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/etiologia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fibrilação Ventricular
2.
Fed Pract ; 41(3): 80-83, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835677

RESUMO

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory disorder associated with chronic and slowly progressive systemic inflammation. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease recommends a combination inhaler of a long-acting ß-2 agonist and inhaled corticosteroid for patients with a history of frequent exacerbations. In 2021, the US Department of Veterans Affairs transitioned patients who were prescribed budesonide/formoterol inhaler to a fluticasone/salmeterol inhaler. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes including COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations 6 months before vs 6 months after the inhaler transition. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects, treatment failure, tobacco use, and antimicrobial/systemic corticosteroid use. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with a prescription for a budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol inhalers between February 1, 2021, and May 30, 2022, at the Hershel "Woody" Williams Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Huntington, West Virginia. Results: In a convenience sample of 100 patients who transitioned from the budesonide/formoterol inhaler to the fluticasone/salmeterol inhaler, exacerbations increased from 24 before the transition to 29 after the transition, which was not a statistically significant change (P = .56). There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary endpoints including active tobacco use. Three patients had adverse reactions to fluticasone/salmeterol, while 18 patients experienced a therapeutic failure to fluticasone/salmeterol. Conclusions: Patients with COPD that transitioned from budesonide/formoterol to fluticasone/salmeterol during the formulary conversion yield no clinical or statistically significant change in their clinical outcomes. Switching between these inhalers in the same therapeutic class may not impact clinical efficacy of the therapy for veterans with COPD but some intolerances and treatment failures should be expected.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA