Cognitive reappraisal moderates the effect of combat or other exposures on negative behavioral health symptoms.

Understanding the individual differences that can buffer the impact of combat and other adverse exposures on deleterious behavioral health outcomes could lead to more targeted prevention and intervention efforts. Cognitive reappraisal, an antecedent-focused emotion regulation strategy, is linked to positive health outcomes such as lower levels of post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression. This study examined the moderating effect of individual differences in cognitive reappraisal use on the association between combat exposure and behavioral health outcomes in active-duty U.S. Soldiers (N = 2,290). This study utilized survey data collected approximately 18 months following a combat deployment to Afghanistan in 2014. Results showed that individual differences in cognitive reappraisal use significantly moderated the effect of combat exposure on anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms but not depressive symptoms. Specifically, increasing combat exposures predicted a steeper increase in negative behavioral health symptoms for Soldiers reporting lesser (versus greater) cognitive reappraisal use. These findings highlight a role for cognitive reappraisal as a targetable factor that can mitigate the behavioral health consequences of exposure to combat stressors.

Sleep disturbance mediates the association of adverse childhood experiences with mental health symptoms and functional impairment in US soldiers.

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can have long-term impacts on a person's mental health, which extend into adulthood. There is a high prevalence of ACEs among service members. Further, service members also report frequently experiencing disrupted sleep. We hypothesized that disrupted sleep may serve a mechanistic function connecting ACEs to functional impairment and poorer mental health. In a cross-sectional sample (n = 759), we found evidence for an indirect effect of ACEs on mental health outcomes through disrupted sleep. In a different sample using two time-points (n = 410), we found evidence for an indirect effect of ACEs on changes in mental health outcomes and functional impairment during a reset period, through changes in disrupted sleep during the same period. Implications, limitations and future research directions are discussed.

Long-term neurobehavioural symptom reporting following mild, moderate, severe, and penetrating traumatic brain injury in U.S. military service members.

The purpose of this study was to examine long-term neurobehavioural symptom reporting following mild, moderate, severe, or penetrating TBI in U.S. military service members and veterans (SMV). Participants were 445 SMVs divided into four groups: 158 uncomplicated mild TBI ("unMTBI" group), 105 penetrating, severe, moderate, or complicated mild TBI ("smcTBI" group), 101 injured controls (IC), and 81 non-injured controls (NIC). Two independent cohorts were examined that included participants 5-years or 10-year post-injury. Participants completed the TBI-Quality of Life, Neurobehavioural Symptom Inventory, and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist. At 5-years and 10-years post-injury, there were significant main effects for the majority of measures (all p's < .005). At 10-years post-injury, the NIC group had consistently better scores compared to the IC, unMTBI, and smcTBI groups. At 5-years post-injury, either (a) the IC and NIC group had better scores compared to both TBI groups, or (b) the NIC group had better scores compared to the IC, unMTBI, and smcTBI groups. A high proportion of SMVs reported poor long-term neurobehavioural symptoms following TBI or bodily injury without TBI. Injured SMVs (regardless of injury type) can have long-term symptoms that impact mental health and overall quality of life requiring long-term follow-up and care.

Validation of an interpretation bias assessment for body dissatisfaction.

Currently, research on interpretation bias and body dissatisfaction is limited. The few experimental paradigms that have been used to explore this phenomenon utilized a method that may not accurately capture the nature of interpretation bias as explained by cognitive theory. The present study investigated the reliability and validity of a novel computerized assessment of interpretation bias (WSAP) for body dissatisfaction, which may more accurately reflect the cognitive processing involved in such bias by implementing the Word Sentence Association Paradigm (WSAP), a previously established method of measuring interpretation bias in other clinical populations. Undergraduate females (n=214) completed the WSAP and other measures. Results indicate initial support for the WSAP as a valid, reliable measure of interpretation bias for body dissatisfaction. Although preliminary, this study contributes to the minimal research in this area and serves as the first psychometric investigation of the WSAP to measure such interpretation bias for body dissatisfaction.