The effect of pressure and shear on tissue viability of human skin in relation to the development of pressure ulcers: a systematic review.

Pressure ulcers are a significant problem in health care, due to high costs and large impact on patients' life. In general, pressure ulcers develop as tissue viability decreases due to prolonged mechanical loading. The relation between load and tissue viability is highly influenced by individual characteristics. It is proposed that measurements of skin blood flow regulation could provide good assessment of the risk for pressure ulcer development, as skin blood flow is essential for tissue viability. . Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to gain insight in the relation between mechanical load and the response of the skin and underlying tissue to this loading measured in-vivo with non-invasive techniques. A systematic literature search was performed to identify articles analysing the relation between mechanical load (pressure and/or shear) and tissue viability measured in-vivo. Two independent reviewers scored the methodological quality of the 22 included studies. Methodological information as well as tissue viability parameters during load application and after load removal were extracted from the included articles and used in a meta-analysis. Pressure results in a decrease in skin blood flow parameters, compared to baseline; showing a larger decrease with higher magnitudes of load. The steepness of the decrease is mostly dependent on the anatomical location. After load removal the magnitude of the post-reactive hyperaemic peak is related to the magnitude of pressure. Lastly, shear in addition to pressure, shows an additional negative effect, but the effect is less apparent than pressure on skin viability.

Wearable sensor systems measure differences in knee laxity between healthy and affected knees during dynamic exercise activities: A systematic review.

Purpose: Knee laxity can be experienced as knee instability which may lead to a limitation in the activity of patients. Current methods to determine knee instability are performed in a static setting, which does not always correlate with dynamic knee laxity during activities. Wearables might be able to measure knee laxity in a dynamic setting and could be of added value in the diagnosis and treatment of excessive knee laxity. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the wearables that have been developed and their ability to measure knee laxity during dynamic activities. Methods: The PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. A literature search was conducted in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. Included studies assessed patients with knee instability using a non-invasive wearable sensor system during dynamic activity, with comparison to a reference system or healthy knees. Data extraction was performed by two authors via a predefined format. The risk of bias was assessed by The Dutch checklist for diagnostic tests. Results: A total of 4734 articles were identified. Thirteen studies were included in the review. The studies showed a great variety of patients, sensor systems, reference tests, outcome measures and performed activities. Nine of the included studies were able to measure differences in patients with knee instability, all including a tri-axial accelerometer. Differences were not measurable in all parameters and activities in these studies. Conclusions: Wearables, including at least a tri-axial accelerometer, seem promising for measuring dynamic knee laxity in the anterior-posterior and mediolateral direction. At this stage, it remains unclear if the measured outcomes completely reflect the knee instability that patients experience in daily life. Level of Evidence: Level III.