The Effect of Myopenia on the Inflammatory Response Early after Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Myopenia (low skeletal muscle mass) is associated with an increased risk of complications following colorectal surgery, however, the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. This study investigates the effect of myopenia on the early postoperative systemic inflammatory response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 78 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, the presence of myopenia was preoperatively assessed using computed tomography images of the third lumbar vertebra. Interleukin-8 (IL-8) and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (TNFRSF1A) were measured in plasma before and 4 h after start of surgery as part of a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of perioperative gum chewing on the inflammatory response. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of myopenia on inflammatory markers while correcting for possible confounders. RESULTS: Four hours after start of surgery, IL-8 was higher in patients with myopenia than in patients without myopenia (352 ± 268 vs. 239 ± 211 pg/ml, P = 0.048), while TNFRSF1A was similar between groups. After adjusting for sex and the intervention with perioperative gum chewing, myopenia remained associated with higher postoperative IL-8 concentrations (P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Myopenia may affect IL-8 early after colorectal surgery. However, more studies are needed to validate these findings.

Effect of Early vs Late Start of Oral Intake on Anastomotic Leakage Following Elective Lower Intestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of early enteral nutrition (EN) on anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. Early oral intake is a common form of early EN with various clinical benefits, but the effect on anastomotic leakage is unclear. This systematic review investigates the effect of early vs late start of oral intake on anastomotic leakage following lower intestinal surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases. Randomized controlled trials were included that compared early (within 24 hours) vs late start of oral intake following elective surgery of the small bowel, colon, or rectum. Meta-analysis was performed for anastomotic leakage, overall complications, length of stay, and mortality. Sensitivity analysis was performed in which studies of inferior methodological quality were excluded. RESULTS: Nine studies including 879 patients met eligibility criteria. Early start of oral intake significantly reduced overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.93; P = .02), length of stay (mean difference, -0.89; 95% CI, -1.22 to -0.57; P < .001), and anastomotic leakage (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.95; P = .04) compared with late start of oral intake. However, in the sensitivity analysis only the overall reduction of length of stay remained significant. CONCLUSION: The effect of early oral intake on anastomotic leakage is unclear as existing studies are heterogeneous and at risk of bias. High-quality studies are needed to study the potential benefit of EN on anastomotic healing.