COMBAT-C: COntrol of Major Bleeding by Application of Tourniquets over Clothing.

INTRODUCTION: External bleeding is the leading cause of preventable trauma-related death. In certain circumstances, tourniquet application over clothing may be necessary. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of tourniquets over different clothing setups. METHODS: Three windlass tourniquets (CAT, SAMXT, SOFTT-W) were applied over nine different clothing setups and without clothing on the Hapmed™ Tourniquet Trainer. We compared each tourniquet in each clothing setup to the tourniquet trainer that was not dressed, and we compared the three tourniquets within each clothing setup concerning blood loss, applied pressure and application time. Regression analysis of the effect of thickness, mean weight, mean deformation, application time, and applied pressure on blood loss was performed. RESULTS: Although blood loss was significantly greater in the CAT and SAMXT tourniquets when they were applied over leather motorcycle trousers, the overall findings showed that the clothing setups significantly reduced or did not affect blood loss. The mean blood loss was the lowest with CAT and the highest with SOFTT-W. The measured mean pressures were lower than 180 mmHg in four out of nine clothing setups with SOFTT-W, but CAT and SAMXT always exceeded this threshold. CAT had the fastest application time. Blood loss was significantly influenced by applied pressure and application time but was influenced to a far lesser degree by clothing parameters. CONCLUSION: The effects of the clothing setups were of little clinical relevance, except for leather motorcycle trousers. The effects of rugged protective equipment, e.g., hazard suits, are conceivable and need to be tested for specific garments with the tourniquet intended for use. No clothing parameter for predicting tourniquet effectiveness could be identified.

Massive transfusion in trauma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of currently recommended treatment approaches for traumatic hemorrhage shock, with a special focus on massive transfusion. RECENT FINDINGS: Severe trauma patients require massive transfusion, but consensual international definitions for traumatic hemorrhage shock and massive transfusion are missing. Current literature defines a massive transfusion as transfusion of a minimum of 3-4 packed red blood cells within 1 h. Using standard laboratory and/or viscoelastic tests, earliest diagnosis and treatment should focus on trauma-induced coagulopathy and substitution of substantiated deficiencies. SUMMARY: To initiate therapy immediately massive transfusion protocols are helpful focusing on early hemorrhage control using hemostatic dressing and tourniquets, correction of metabolic derangements to decrease coagulopathy and substitution according to viscoelastic assays and blood gases analysis with tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate, red blood cells, plasma and platelets are recommended. Alternatively, the use of whole blood is possible. If needed, further support using prothrombin complex, factor XIII or desmopressin is suggested.

Hemostatics in patients with inhibited coagulation-A viscoelastic in-vitro analysis.

BACKGROUND: The military has used topical hemostatic agents to successfully treat life-threatening external bleeding for years. In contrast to the military environment, the general population are increasingly prescribed anticoagulants. There are only few comparative evaluations of topical hemostatic agents with anticoagulated human blood. It is important to understand the impact of these agents on those who take anticoagulants. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Citrated blood of patients treated with enoxaparin, heparin, and acetylsalicylic acid, apixaban or phenprocoumon was incubated with different hemostatic agents (QuikClot Gauze, Celox Granules, Celox Gauze, Chito SAM 100, WoundClot Trauma Gauze, QuikClot Gauze Moulage Trainer and Kerlix) and rotational thromboelastometry was performed with non-activated thromboelastometry (NATEM reagent). RESULTS: All tested agents improved the onset of coagulation in all anticoagulants, mostly to a significant degree. Most significant improvements were produced by QuikClot Gauze and QuikClot Gauze Moulage Trainer, followed by the tested chitosans (Celox Granules, Celox Gauze, Chito SAM 100). Of the anticoagulant groups, the most significant improvements were seen in enoxaparin. This was followed in order by apixaban, heparin, and acetylsalicylic acid, and phenprocoumon. DISCUSSION: All the hemostatic agents tested were able to activate the clotting cascade earlier and initiate faster clot formation in anticoagulated blood. A definitive head-to-head comparison is not feasible, because of the limitations of an in-vitro analysis. However, the sometimes-presented hypothesis that kaolin-based hemostatic agents are ineffective in anticoagulated blood is inaccurate according to our data. Hemostasis with hemostatic agents appears most challenging with phenprocoumon.

Analysis of European Air Medical Evacuation Flights of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: As part of the humanitarian response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the German and French Armed Forces provided air transport for patients from overwhelmed regional hospitals in Italy and France. The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics of the missions and the medical conditions of COVID-19 patients transported during an air medical evacuation on fixed wing aircraft in March and April 2020. METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis of transport records as well as other documents for 58 COVID-19 patients requiring artificial ventilation. RESULTS: The median age of the transported patients was 61.5 years, and 61% of them had preexisting medical conditions. They had been ventilated for a median of 5 days and experienced the first symptoms 18 days before transport. The patients flown out of France had less days of ventilation before flight, a lower end-tidal carbon dioxide level at the beginning of the flight, and a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index. There were also some differences between the ventilation and the flight level flown by the 2 air forces. CONCLUSION: The intensive care transport of ventilated COVID-19 patients requires highly qualified personnel and appropriate equipment and should be planned appropriately.

[Prehospital Strategies to Stop the Bleeding]. / Prähospitale Strategien zur Minimierung des Blutverlustes.

Seriously injured patients represent only a small group of patients in the emergency medical service with 0.5% (ground based) to 5% (HEMS), but they are associated with a high mortality rate. Among people younger than 45, trauma is the most common cause of death, mostly as a result of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and/or extreme hemorrhage. As the outcome of severe TBI prehospitally can only be influenced to a very limited extent, a majority of preventable deaths in prehospital setting are caused by "critical" bleeding. The "critical" bleeding is defined by its life-threatening dimension. Anticoagulation medication can have a reinforcing effect. Adequate prehospital therapy strategies exist for external bleeding. In contrast, internal bleeding regularly evades a causal prehospital care, so that in such cases, transport prioritization and rapid definitive surgical intervention remain the only option. In the civilian environment the tested and evaluated "ABCDE" scheme must be preceded by the (for "critical bleeding") in order to react time-critically to compressible external bleeding, possibly even prior to airway management. These findings have found their way into the current version of the S3 guideline on treatment of multi system trauma by the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU). According to this "severely bleeding injuries that can impair vital functions should be treated with priority". Thus, this publication focuses on prehospital bleeding control.

Prehospital Blood Product Transfusion in Mountain Rescue Operations.

Severely injured patients with hemorrhage present major challenges for emergency medical services, especially during mountain rescue missions in which harsh environmental conditions and long out-of-hospital times are frequent. Because uncontrolled hemorrhage is the leading cause of death within the first 48 hours after severe trauma, initiating damage control resuscitation (DCR) as early as possible after severe trauma and exporting the concept of DCR to the out-of-hospital arena is pivotal for patient survival. Appropriate bleeding control, management of coagulopathy, and transfusion of blood products are core aspects of DCR. This review summarizes the available evidence on out-of-hospital blood product transfusion and the management of coagulopathy with a special focus on mountain rescue missions. An overview of upcoming trials and possible future trends in the management of coagulopathy during rescue operations is provided.

[Mass casualty incident - special features of "threatening situations"]. / Massenanfall von Verletzten ­ Besonderheiten von "bedrohlichen Lagen".

Terrorist attacks or amok runs may cause "threatening situations" for emergency medical services (EMS), fire fighters and physicians. Cooperation with the police is of paramount importance. In order to minimize the risk to rescue personnel and affected persons, emergency medical care has to follow tactical principles. So, the strategy in such "threatening situations" is "Stop the bleeding and clear the scene". The police define three areas of danger: unsafe, partly safe and secure. Medical care in these areas follows the concept of Tactical Combat Casualty Care. While only police should act in the unsafe area, the EMS can operate in the partly safe area after appropriate arrangements. Safety may only be achieved in emergency departments, which have to be made to secure areas by certain measures.The task force "Tactical Medicine" of the Scientific Working Group Emergency Medicine of the German Association for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care describes in this article essential criteria for a coordinated approach in "threatening situations".

[Prehospitale analgesia in adults]. / Prähospitale Analgesie beim Erwachsenen - Schmerzerfassung und Therapieoptionen.

After securing vital function, treatment of pain is an important aspect in emergency medical care. Irrespective of the underlying disease or injury, pain is an important warning symptom of the body and the most common reason for an emergency alert notification. A patient assesses quality of care and success of prehospital care using the criteria of the extent of pain relief he experiences. Since mild pain does not usually lead to an emergency alert, the criteria apply mainly to treatment of severe and very severe pain. Pain perception varies from individual to individual. Accordingly, assessment of pain intensity is the very first step in pain therapy. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) is suitable for pain assessment in adult emergency patients. Above a grade of 4, therapeutic intervention should be initiated with the goal of reducing pain to reach a value of <4, or at least to achieve a reduction by 3 points. The choice of analgesics that can be meaningfully used in pre-hospital emergency medicine is limited. The emergency physician should be aware of available drugs and administration routes.

Impact of "hypotension on arrival" on required surgical disciplines and usage of damage control protocols in severely injured patients.

BACKGROUND: For trauma patients with subsequent immediate surgery, it is unclear which surgical disciplines are most commonly required for treatment, and whether and to what extend this might depend on or change with "hypotension on arrival". It is also not known how frequently damage control protocols are used in daily practice and whether this might also be related to "hypotension on arrival". METHODS: A retrospective analysis of trauma patients from a German level 1 trauma centre and subsequent "immediate surgery" between 01/2017 and 09/2022 was performed. Patients with systolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg (group 1, no-shock) and < 90 mmHg (group 2, shock) on arrival were compared with regard to (a) most frequently required surgical disciplines, (b) usage of damage control protocols, and (c) outcome. A descriptive analysis was performed, and Fisher's exact test and the Mann‒Whitney U test were used to calculate differences between groups where appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 98 trauma patients with "immediate surgery" were included in our study. Of these, 61 (62%; group 1) were normotensive, and 37 (38%, group 2) were hypotensive on arrival. Hypotension on arrival was associated with a significant increase in the need for abdominal surgery procedures (group 1: 37.1 vs. group 2: 54.5%; p = 0.009), more frequent usage of damage control protocols (group 1: 59.0 vs. group 2: 75.6%; p = 0.019) and higher mortality (group 1: 5.5 vs. group 2: 24.3%; p 0.027). CONCLUSION: Our data from a German level 1 trauma centre proof that abdominal surgeons are most frequently required for the treatment of trauma patients with hypotension on arrival among all surgical disciplines (> thoracic surgery > vascular surgery > neurosurgery). Therefore, surgeons from these specialties must be available without delay to provide optimal trauma care.

[Airwaymangement in Emergencies]. / Atemwegsmanagement im Notfall.

Emergency airway management is a rare but essential emergency medical intervention directly impacting morbidity and mortality of emergency patients. The success of airway management depends on various factors such as patient anatomy, environmental aspects and the provider performing the procedure. Therefore, the use of a clearly structured algorithm for anticipating the difficult airway in emergency situations is strongly recommended. Our article explains different ways of securing the airway as part of a structured algorithm as well as pitfalls and helpful tips.

Emergency cricothyroidotomy performed by inexperienced clinicians--surgical technique versus indicator-guided puncture technique.

BACKGROUND: To improve the ease and safety of cricothyroidotomy especially in the hand of the inexperienced, new instruments have been developed. In this study, we compared a new indicator-guided puncture technique (PCK) with standard surgical technique (ST) regarding success rate, performance time and complications. METHODS: Cricothyroidotomy in 30 human cadavers performed by 30 first year anaesthesia residents. The set chosen for use was randomised: PCK-technique (n=15) and ST (n=15). Success rates, insertion times and complications were compared. Traumatic lesions were anatomically confirmed after dissection. RESULTS: The ST-group had a higher success rate (100% vs 67%; p=0.04). There was no difference in time taken to complete the procedure (PCK 82 s. vs ST 95 s.; p=0.89). There was a higher complication rate in the PCK-group (67% vs 13%; p=0.04). Most frequent complication in the PCK-group was injury to the posterior tracheal wall (n=8), penetration to the oesophageal lumen (n=4) and injury to the thyroid and/or cricoid cartilage (n=5). In the ST-group in only 2 cases minor complications were observed (small vessel injury). CONCLUSIONS: In this human cadaver study the PCK technique produced more major complications and more failures than the ST. In the hand of the inexperienced operator the standard surgical approach seems to be a safe procedure, which can successfully be performed within an adequate time. The PCK technique cannot be recommended for inexperienced operators.

[Explosion injuries - prehospital care and management]. / Explosionsverletzungen - Präklinische Versorgung und Management.

Explosion injuries are not restricted to war-like military conflicts or terrorist attacks. The emergency physician may also encounter such injuries in the private or industrial fields, injuries caused by fireworks or gas explosions. In such cases the injury patterns are especially complex and may consist of blunt and penetrating injuries as well as thermal damage. Emergency medical personnel must be prepared to cope with explosion trauma not only in individual cases but also in major casualty incidents (MCI). This necessitates a sound knowledge about the mechanisms and processes of an explosion as well as the particular pathophysiological relationships of explosion injuries in order to be able to initiate the best possible, guideline-conform trauma therapy.

Pre-Hospital Blood Products for the Care of Bleeding Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Controversy surrounds the administration of blood products to severely traumatized patients before they arrive in the hospital in order to compensate for early blood loss and/or to correct coagulation disturbances that arise shortly after the traumatic event. A number of terrestrial and air rescue services have begun to provide this kind of treatment. METHODS: This review is based on articles using the PICO framework, published from January 2001 to January 2021, that were retrieved by a selective search, with structured searching strategies and searching bundles in Medline (OVIDSP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Epistemonikos. A demand analysis was carried out on the basis of data from the trauma registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery (TR-DGU) and practical experience from program development and implementation was provided by the Bundeswehr Hospital Ulm. RESULTS: The currently available evidence on the pre-hospital administration of blood products in the early treatment of severely injured patients is based largely on retrospective, single-center case series. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the early use of fresh frozen plasma concentrates have yielded partly conflicting results. Three further RCTs on the use of lyophilized plasma (lyplas), lyplas plus erythrocyte concentrate, or whole blood likewise revealed non-uniform effects on short-term and intermediate-term mortality. Our demand analysis based on data from the TR-DGU showed that 300 to 1800 patients per year in Germany could benefit from the pre-hospital administration of blood products. This might be indicated in patients who have systolic hypotension (<100 mmHg) in combination with a suspected or confirmed hemorrhage, as well as pathological shock parameters in the point-of-care diagnostic testing performed on the scene (serum base excess ≤ -2.5 mmol/L and/or serum lactate concentration >4 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: The studies that have been published to date yield no clear evidence either for or against the early pre-hospital administration of blood products. Any treatment of this kind should be accompanied by scientific evaluation.

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate analgesia in prehospital trauma care: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the major prehospital symptoms in trauma patients and requires prompt management. Recent studies have reported insufficient analgesia after prehospital treatment in up to 43% of trauma patients, leaving significant room for improvement. Good evidence exists for prehospital use of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) in the military setting. We hypothesized that the use of OTFC for trauma patients in remote and challenging environment is feasible, efficient, safe, and might be an alternative to nasal and intravenous applications. METHODS: This observational cohort study examined 177 patients who were treated with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate by EMS providers in three ski and bike resorts in Switzerland. All EMS providers had previously been trained in administration of the drug and handling of potential adverse events. RESULTS: OTFC caused a statistically significant and clinically relevant decrease in the level of pain by a median of 3 (IQR 2 to 4) in NRS units (P < 0.0001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant absolute reduction in pain, with no differences in all age groups and between genders. No major adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital administration of OTFC is safe, easy, and efficient for extrication and transport across all age groups, gender, and types of injuries in alpine environments. Side effects were few and mild. This could provide a valuable alternative in trauma patients with severe pain, without the delay of inserting an intravenous line, especially in remote areas, where fast action and easy administration are important.

[Ethical aspects of mechanical resuscitation in a child : Results of an expert workshop within the BMBF project CLAIRE-Children's Automated Intelligent Resuscitation]. / Ethische Aspekte mechanischer Reanimationshilfen beim Kind : Ergebnisse eines Expertenworkshops im Rahmen des BMBF-Projekts CLAIRE ­ Children's Automated Intelligent Resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: While the use of mechanical resuscitation devices can be considered for adult resuscitation, the European Resuscitation Council guidelines do not yet mention their use for pediatric resuscitation. Only one device has been partially approved for use in children; further pediatric appliances are currently being used off-label. Ethical considerations arising from the use of mechanical resuscitation devices have not yet been presented in a structured way. OBJECTIVE: To elaborate ethical considerations in the development phase of mechanical resuscitation devices for children. METHODS: Based on several fictitious case reports, an interdisciplinary expert focus group discussion was conducted. This was followed by a moderated discussion, summarizing the results. Guiding principles and research desiderata were formulated using these results as well as existing literature. RESULTS: According to the group of experts, ethical considerations regarding mechanical resuscitation devices in pediatrics predominantly concern the subject of indication and discontinuation criteria. Ethical aspects concerning psychosocial impacts on affected families and intervention teams cannot be generalized and need to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSION: The considerations presented regarding the use of mechanical resuscitation devices in the pediatric context, which is still in its developmental stage, could also have practical implications for adult out-of-hospital resuscitation decisions. Concerning ethical aspects of out-of-hospital resuscitation decisions, especially using mechanical resuscitation devices, the need for accompanying empirical research is substantial.

[Ultrasound diagnostics in prehospital emergency care-do we need a standardized educational approach?] / Ultraschalldiagnostik in der prähospitalen Notfallmedizin ­ brauchen wir eine standardisierte Ausbildung?

BACKGROUND: Limited diagnostic capabilities represent an ongoing obstacle in out-of-hospital emergency settings. Prehospital deployment of ultrasound might reduce this particular diagnostic gap. So far, little is known about the availability and usage of ultrasound in emergency medical services (EMS) or about the level of education of EMS physicians regarding prehospital ultrasound (point-of-care ultrasound, POCUS). METHODS: A nationwide survey was conducted among emergency physicians in Germany focusing on POCUS education and experience. RESULTS: Between 02/2022 and 05/2022, 1079 responses were registered, of which 853 complete responses were analyzed. Of the emergency physicians, 71.9% consider POCUS beneficial for out-of-hospital diagnostics and 43.8% had participated in a certified POCUS training prior to the survey. The self-evaluation of POCUS skills among emergency physicians depended significantly on their participation in a certified training (p < 0.001) and frequent ultrasound routine (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The majority of participating emergency physicians in Germany consider POCUS to improve out-of-hospital diagnostic capabilities. Participation in a certified POCUS training and frequent use of ultrasound facilitated higher self-confidence in POCUS skills.

The Immo Traffic Light System as a Decision-Making Tool for Prehospital Spinal Immobilization­A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Spinal injuries are difficult injuries to assess yet can be associated with significant neurological damage. To avoid secondary damage, immobilization is considered state of the art trauma care. The indication for spinal immobilization must be assessed, however, for potential complications as well as its advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: This systematic review addressing the question of the correct indication for spinal immobilization in trauma patients was compiled on the basis of our previously published analysis of possible predictors from the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery. A Delphi procedure was then used to develop suggestions for action regarding immobilization based on the results of this review. RESULTS: The search of the literature yielded 576 publications. The 24 publications included in the qualitative analysis report of 2 228 076 patients. A decision tool for spinal immobilization in prehospital trauma care was developed (Immo traffic light system) based on the results of the Delphi procedure. According to this system, severely injured patients with blunt trauma, severe traumatic brain injury, peripheral neurological symptoms, or spinal pain requiring treatment should be immobilized. Patients with a statistically increased risk of spinal injury as a result of the four cardinal features (fall >3m, severe trunk injury, supra clavicular injury, seniority [age >65 years]) should only have their spinal motion restricted after weighing up the pros and cons. Isolated penetrating trunk injuries should not be immobilized. CONCLUSION: High-quality studies demonstrating the benefit of prehospital spinal immobilization are still lacking. Decision tools such as the Immo traffic light system can help weigh up the pros and cons of immobilization.

Comparison of manual statements from out-of-hospital trauma training programs and a national guideline on treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries.

PURPOSE: Training programs help establish evidence-based knowledge in prehospital emergency care. This study aimed to compare manual statements from prehospital trauma training programs and evidence-based guidelines on treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries. METHODS: A systematic comparison with the primary endpoint of the highest grades of recommendation (GoR A, "must") of the current version of the German guidelines and recent recommendations of the prehospital trauma training programs International Trauma Life Support (ITLS), Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS), and Traumamanagement® (TM) based on their official textbooks was done. The recommendations were categorized as agreement or minor or major variation. The comparison was made using a rating system by experts who were blinded to the training programs. If the consensus strength of the experts was < 75%, affected statements were finalized in a Delphi procedure. RESULTS: Overall, 92 statements were compared. Fleiss-kappa of the first rating was 0.385 (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.376-0.393). Finally, comparable recommendations of the guideline with the training programs in principle agree with the statement of the guidelines were > 90% for all programs. The agreement with GoR A recommendations and each course program were 33.9%, 30.6%, and 35.5% (ITLS, PHTLS, and TM, respectively), p = 0.715. CONCLUSIONS: Despite small differences, the training programs showed high degrees of compliance with the guidelines and international agreement with some minor differences. Furthermore, the results did not allow any conclusions regarding the quality of the courses, the didactic methodology, and local adaptability. The practical implementation of the courses is probably even higher and closer to the guidelines.