The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and chemotherapy (CT) versus CT alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Databases (PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library) were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Clinical outcome measures including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by Stata 15.0 software; significance level was 0.05. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 4227 patients were included. The results showed ICI + CT significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.85, p < 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.57 - 0.75, p < 0.001) and ORR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.43-2.49, p < 0.001) compared with CT alone. Subgroup analysis indicated that significantly longer OS was also observed in subgroups including combination regimens (pembrolizumab + CT, atezolizumab + CT, ipilimumab + CT, and nivolumab + ipilimumab + CT) and PD-L1 status [negative (< 1%), positive (≥ 1%), low (1-49%) and high (≥ 50%)]. However, ICI + CT showed signifcantly higher grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs than CT (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.19 - 1.79, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ICI + CT showed better clinical efficacy than CT alone in patients with advanced NSCLC, with increased treatment-related AEs.

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We searched PubMed/Embase/Cochrane Library for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Clinical outcome measures including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by Stata 15.1 software. RESULTS: Seven RCTs involving 3461 patients were included. The pooled hazard ratios of OS and PFS for combination therapy were 0.67 (0.53-0.82, p < 0.001) and 0.68 (0.52-0.83, p < 0.001), respectively. Longer OS and PFS for combination therapy was also observed in the PD-L1 expression leve ≥1% group. The pooled odds ratios of ORRs and grade 3 or higher AEs were 2.31 (1.61-3.32, p < 0.001) and 0.94 (0.65-1.37, p = 0.753), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy showed more clinical benefit in the first-line treatment for advanced RCC, with a safety profile.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor as maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic cancers: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic cancers. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis of eligible studies investigating the outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) with a significance level set to 0.05 was performed. RESULTS: Five RCTs (n = 2828) were identified in this analysis. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of PFS and OS for ICI maintenance therapy were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.68-1.13, P = .31) and 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.92, P = .0005), respectively; the pooled odds ratio (OR) of ORR was 2.24 (95% CI: 1.23-4.09, P = .0008). Subgroup analysis indicated that anti-PD-L1 antibody significantly improved the OS (P = .0008), while anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 plus anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 antibodies significantly prolonged the PFS of patients. CONCLUSION: ICI maintenance therapy enhanced the survival of patients with advanced or metastatic cancers.

The efficacy and safety of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Combination therapies with immune checkpoint blockade demonstrate promising antitumor activity and safety in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, whether the combination therapy is superior to their monotherapies, and which combination regimen is most efficacious remain unknown. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the current available evidences on the efficacy and safety of combination immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC were included. RESULTS: We identified nine RCTs including a total of 5,142 patients. The study showed that the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for combination therapy were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.86, p = 0.001) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.73, p = 0.004); the pooled odds ratios (ORs) of objective response rates (ORRs) and grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were 1.51 (95% CI: 1.02-1.99, p < 0.001) and 1.30 (95% CI: 1.03-1.57, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that the OR of grade 3 or higher AEs for immunotherapy plus chemotherapy was higher than that of chemotherapy alone, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.061) , and there was PFS and OS benefit for either immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, double agent immunotherapy or immunotherapy plus targeted plus chemotherapy combination regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed more clinical benefit for patients with NSCLC, with increased grade 3 or higher AEs, but toxicities were manageable.

Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib versus pembrolizumab and lenvatinib monotherapies in cancers: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Both pembrolizumab and lenvatinib demonstrate antitumor activity and safety in cancers. However, whether their combination is safer and more effective than monotherapies remains unknown. A systematic review was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib versus their respective monotherapies in solid cancers. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Forty-two clinical trials with 8155 patients were included. RESULTS: The total ≥grade 3 adverse events (AEs) and objective response rates (ORRs) among pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib and pembrolizumab or lenvatinib monotherapies in solid cancers were 68.0% vs 17.7% vs 68.5% and 40.6% vs 20.8% vs 43.3%, respectively. The most common AEs of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib were hypertension (20-61.1%), fatigue (12-59.1%), diarrhea (9-51.9%), hypothyroidism (25-47%), and proteinuria (8-17%). Good ORRs for combination therapy were observed in renal cell carcinoma (70%), gastric cancer (69%), melanoma (48%), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (46%), and endometrial cancer (38-53%), while these rates were reported as 27%, 11.6-22%, 26-37%, 14.6-23%, and 11-14.3% for monotherapies, respectively. Longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were observed for hepatocellular carcinoma (mPFS 9.3 months, mOS 22.0 months), renal cell carcinoma (mPFS 19.8 months), gastric cancer (mPFS 7.1 months, mOS not reached), and endometrial cancer (mPFS 7.4 months, mOS 16.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with their monotherapies, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed more promising antitumor activity and resulted in higher ORRs and significant survival benefits in the above cancers. Toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety issues.

Effect of CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma on hepatic toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and identify the treatment-related risk factors of hepatic toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and four HCC patients treated with CyberKnife SBRT were included in this study between August 2009 and December 2012. The average dose of prescribed radiation was 42.81±4.78 Gy (28-55 Gy) with the average fraction size of 8-16 Gy to the planning target volume. The average fractions were 3.31±0.81 (2-6 fractions). Response rates were determined, and the Child-Pugh (CP) score and class following CyberKnife SBRT were obtained to evaluate hepatic toxicity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients experienced progression in CP class and 24 patients experienced CTCAE V. 4.0 grade 2-3 hepatic toxicity during the five-month follow-up period, while no patient experienced grade 4 liver toxicity. Multivariate analysis indicated that only V25 was an independent factor in grade 2-3 hepatic toxicity (P=0.029, <0.05). Radiation-induced hepatic toxicity (RIHT), defined as an increase of at least two points within three months following CyberKnife SBRT, occurred in 13 of the 104 patients (13/104, 12.5%), and only the normal liver tissue was found to be associated with RIHT (P=0.008, <0.05). CONCLUSION: CyberKnife SBRT is a feasible and safe treatment for HCC with regard to hepatic toxicity, while V25 and normal liver volume may be an independent factor of grade 2-3 hepatic toxicity and RIHT, respectively.