Early Application of Bevacizumab After Sclerocorneal Grafting for Patients With Severe Late-Stage Ocular Chemical Burns.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether subconjunctival bevacizumab help prevent corneal graft neovascularization and prolong the graft survival of patients with chemical burns. METHODS: We performed a prospective nonrandomized comparative case series study. Twenty-six eyes received subconjunctival bevacizumab (10 mg/0.4 mL) once and topical immunosuppressive agents after sclerocorneal lamellar keratoplasty as the treatment, and 13 eyes received a topical immunosuppressant alone and served as the control group. The main outcomes were a cumulative probability of graft survival, development of corneal neovascularization, and complications. RESULTS: The postoperative follow-up time was 14.3 months (range, 2-62 mo). The cumulative graft survival time was significantly longer in the treatment group than that in the control group (42.9 ± 5.9 vs. 4.8 ± 0.7 mo; log rank < 0.001). In the treatment group, 19 of the 26 grafts (73.1%) survived as transparent with a mean follow-up of 18.7 ± 3.0 months. At the end of the follow-up, 4 grafts remained free of neovascularization, 2 developed edema without neovascularization, and 15 remained transparent with a stable ocular surface and some neovascular vessels in the peripheral transplant interface. The other 5 grafts became opaque and neovascularized. In the control group, all grafts became opaque and neovascularized within the follow-up period (5.5 ± 0.7 mo). During the follow-up, a corneal epithelial defect developed in 9 eyes in the treatment group and 7 in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Early application of subconjunctival bevacizumab after sclerocorneal lamellar keratoplasty can significantly prevent corneal neovascularization and promote graft survival for severe late-stage ocular chemical burns.

Safety of antivascular endothelial growth factor administration in the ocular anterior segment in pterygium and neovascular glaucoma treatment: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-VEGF agents has been widely used in ocular diseases, but its safety for treating anterior segment disorders, the conclusions are controversial. METHODS: Several major databases, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, were searched. Safety data from 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were used to compare anti-VEGF treatment in the ocular anterior segment in pterygium and neovascular glaucoma treatment with placebo/sham treatment for eye diseases. A meta-analysis for adverse events was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen RCT studies with 955 eyes were included in the meta-analysis. Significant difference in conjunctival disorders (OR: 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01-2.59; P = .05) was noted among the included studies, but not in ocular intolerance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.34-1.62; P = .46), corneal disorders (OR: 0.71; 95% CI, 0.37-1.37; P = .31), or the subgroup analysis of conjunctival disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of anti-VEGF agents in the ocular anterior segment for patients with pterygium and glaucoma was tolerable in tolerance and cornea, but was the risk factor of conjunctival disorders. The healing of corneal epithelium may be delayed in patients with primary corneal epithelial defects after anti-VEGF application. However, due to the limited evidence, further research should be performed on the safety of anti-VEGF administration in patients with different corneal disorders.