Specific and comprehensive genetic targeting reveals brain-wide distribution and synaptic input patterns of GABAergic axo-axonic interneurons.

Axo-axonic cells (AACs), also called chandelier cells (ChCs) in the cerebral cortex, are the most distinctive type of GABAergic interneurons described in the neocortex, hippocampus, and basolateral amygdala (BLA). AACs selectively innervate glutamatergic projection neurons (PNs) at their axon initial segment (AIS), thus may exert decisive control over PN spiking and regulate PN functional ensembles. However, the brain-wide distribution, synaptic connectivity, and circuit function of AACs remain poorly understood, largely due to the lack of specific and reliable experimental tools. Here, we have established an intersectional genetic strategy that achieves specific and comprehensive targeting of AACs throughout the mouse brain based on their lineage (Nkx2.1) and molecular (Unc5b, Pthlh) markers. We discovered that AACs are deployed across essentially all the pallium-derived brain structures, including not only the dorsal pallium-derived neocortex and medial pallium-derived hippocampal formation, but also the lateral pallium-derived claustrum-insular complex, and the ventral pallium-derived extended amygdaloid complex and olfactory centers. AACs are also abundant in anterior olfactory nucleus, taenia tecta, and lateral septum. AACs show characteristic variations in density across neocortical areas and layers and across subregions of the hippocampal formation. Neocortical AACs comprise multiple laminar subtypes with distinct dendritic and axonal arborization patterns. Retrograde monosynaptic tracing from AACs across neocortical, hippocampal, and BLA regions reveal shared as well as distinct patterns of synaptic input. Specific and comprehensive targeting of AACs facilitates the study of their developmental genetic program and circuit function across brain structures, providing a ground truth platform for understanding the conservation and variation of a bona fide cell type across brain regions and species.

Whether we are memorising facts or reacting to a loud noise, nerve cells in different brain areas must be able to communicate with one another through precise, meaningful signals. Specialized nerve cells known as interneurons act as "traffic lights" to precisely regulate when and where this information flows in neural circuits. Axo-axonic cells are a rare type of inhibitory interneuron that are thought to be particularly important for controlling the passage of information between different groups of excitatory neurons. This is because they only connect to one key part of their target cell ­ the axon-initial segment ­ where the electrical signals needed for brain communication (known as action potentials) are initiated. Since axo-axonic cells are inhibitory interneurons, this connection effectively allows them to 'veto' the generation of these signals at their source. Although axo-axonic cells have been identified in three brain regions using traditional anatomical methods, there were no 'tags' readily available that can reliably identify them. Therefore, much about these cells remained unknown, including how widespread they are in the mammalian brain. To solve this problem, Raudales et al. investigated which genes are switched on in axo-axonic cells but not in other cells, identifying a unique molecular signature that could be used to mark, record, and manipulate these cells. Microscopy imaging of brain tissue from mice in which axo-axonic cells had been identified revealed that they are present in many more brain areas than previously thought, including nearly all regions of the broadly defined cerebral cortex and even the hypothalamus, which controls many innate behaviors. Axo-axonic cells were also 'wired up' differently, depending on where they were located; for example, those in brain areas associated with memory and emotions had wider-ranging input connections than other areas. The finding of Raudales et al. provide, for the first time, a method to directly track and manipulate axo-axonic cells in the brain. Since dysfunction in axo-axonic cells is also associated with neurological disorders like epilepsy and schizophrenia, gaining an insight into their distribution and connectivity could help to develop better treatments for these conditions.

Axo-axonic synaptic input drives homeostatic plasticity by tuning the axon initial segment structurally and functionally.

Homeostatic plasticity maintains the stability of functional brain networks. The axon initial segment (AIS), where action potentials start, undergoes dynamic adjustment to exert powerful control over neuronal firing properties in response to network activity changes. However, it is poorly understood whether this plasticity involves direct synaptic input to the AIS. Here, we show that changes of GABAergic synaptic input from chandelier cells (ChCs) drive homeostatic tuning of the AIS of principal neurons (PNs) in the prelimbic (PL) region, while those from parvalbumin-positive basket cells do not. This tuning is evident in AIS morphology, voltage-gated sodium channel expression, and PN excitability. Moreover, the impact of this homeostatic plasticity can be reflected in animal behavior. Social behavior, inversely linked to PL PN activity, shows time-dependent alterations tightly coupled to changes in AIS plasticity and PN excitability. Thus, AIS-originated homeostatic plasticity in PNs may counteract deficits elicited by imbalanced ChC presynaptic input at cellular and behavioral levels.

Axo-axonic synaptic input drives homeostatic plasticity by tuning the axon initial segment structurally and functionally.

The stability of functional brain network is maintained by homeostatic plasticity, which restores equilibrium following perturbation. As the initiation site of action potentials, the axon initial segment (AIS) of glutamatergic projection neurons (PyNs) undergoes dynamic adjustment that exerts powerful control over neuronal firing properties in response to changes in network states. Although AIS plasticity has been reported to be coupled with the changes of network activity, it is poorly understood whether it involves direct synaptic input to the AIS. Here we show that changes of GABAergic synaptic input to the AIS of cortical PyNs, specifically from chandelier cells (ChCs), are sufficient to drive homeostatic tuning of the AIS within 1-2 weeks, while those from parvalbumin-positive basket cells do not. This tuning is reflected in the morphology of the AIS, the expression level of voltage-gated sodium channels, and the intrinsic neuronal excitability of PyNs. Interestingly, the timing of AIS tuning in PyNs of the prefrontal cortex corresponds to the recovery of changes in social behavior caused by alterations of ChC synaptic transmission. Thus, homeostatic plasticity of the AIS at postsynaptic PyNs may counteract deficits elicited by imbalanced ChC presynaptic input. Teaser: Axon initial segment dynamically responds to changes in local input from chandelier cells to prevent abnormal neuronal functions.