Nurse-led remote digital support for adults with chronic conditions: A systematic synthesis without meta-analysis.

AIM: The systematic review aims to synthesize the literature examining the effectiveness of nurse-led remote digital support on health outcomes in adults with chronic conditions. BACKGROUND: Adults with chronic diseases have increased rates of mortality and morbidity and use health care resources at a higher intensity than those without chronic conditions-placing strain on the patient, their caregivers and health systems. Nurse-led digital health disease self-management interventions have potential to improve outcomes for patients with chronic conditions by facilitating care in environments other that the hospital setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central databases from inception to 7 December 2022. We included randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of nurse-led remote digital support interventions compared to usual care on health-related outcomes in adults with chronic illness. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess bias in studies. Outcomes were organized into four categories: self-management, clinical outcomes, health care resource use and satisfaction with care. Results are presented narratively based on statistical significance. RESULTS: Forty-four papers pertaining to 40 unique studies were included. Interventions most targeted diabetes (n = 11) and cardiovascular disease (n = 8). Websites (n = 10) and mobile applications (n = 10) were the most used digital modalities. Nurses supported patients either in response to incoming patient health data (n = 14), virtual appointment (n = 8), virtual health education (n = 5) or through a combination of these approaches (n = 13). Positive impacts of nurse-led digital chronic disease support were identified in each outcome category. Mobile applications were the most effective digital modality. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Results show that nurse-led remote digital support interventions significantly improve self-management capacity, clinical health outcomes, health care resource use and satisfaction with care. Such interventions have potential to support overall health for adults with chronic conditions in their home environments.

Using Social Media to Engage Knowledge Users in Health Research Priority Setting: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: The need to include individuals with lived experience (ie, patients, family members, caregivers, researchers, and clinicians) in health research priority setting is becoming increasingly recognized. Social media-based methods represent a means to elicit and prioritize the research interests of such individuals, but there remains sparse methodological guidance on how best to conduct these social media efforts and assess their effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify social media strategies that enhance participation in priority-setting research, collate metrics assessing the effectiveness of social media campaigns, and summarize the benefits and limitations of social media-based research approaches, as well as recommendations for prospective campaigns. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception until September 2021. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts, as well as full texts for studies that implemented and evaluated social media strategies aimed at engaging knowledge users in research priority setting. We subsequently conducted a thematic analysis to aggregate study data by related codes and themes. RESULTS: A total of 23 papers reporting on 22 unique studies were included. These studies used Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, websites, video-calling platforms, emails, blogs, e-newsletters, and web-based forums to engage with health research stakeholders. Priority-setting engagement strategies included paid platform-based advertisements, email-embedded survey links, and question-and-answer forums. Dissemination techniques for priority-setting surveys included snowball sampling and the circulation of participation opportunities via internal members' and external organizations' social media platforms. Social media campaign effectiveness was directly assessed as number of clicks and impressions on posts, frequency of viewed posts, volume of comments and replies, number of times individuals searched for a campaign page, and number of times a hashtag was used. Campaign effectiveness was indirectly assessed as numbers of priority-setting survey responses and visits to external survey administration sites. Recommendations to enhance engagement included the use of social media group moderators, opportunities for peer-to-peer interaction, and the establishment of a consistent tone and brand. CONCLUSIONS: Social media may increase the speed and reach of priority-setting participation opportunities leading to the development of research agendas informed by patients, family caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Perceived limitations of the approach include underrepresentation of certain demographic groups and addressing such limitations will enhance the inclusion of diverse research priority opinions in future research agendas.

Exploring the use of social media and online methods to engage persons with lived experience and healthcare professionals in creating research agendas: Lessons from a pediatric cancer research priority-setting partnership.

Social media is increasingly used to engage persons with lived experience and healthcare professionals in research, however, there remains sparse guidance on how to effectively use social media to engage these groups in research agenda-setting. Here we report our process and experience utilizing a social media campaign to engage Canadians within the pediatric cancer community in a research priority-setting exercise. Following the James Lind Alliance method, we launched a priority-setting partnership (PSP) to develop a child with cancer-, survivor-, family member-, and healthcare professional-based Canadian pediatric cancer research agenda. Social media-based strategies were implemented to recruit participants for two PSP surveys, including preparatory activities, developing a website, launching graphics and advertisements, and engaging internal and external networks. Descriptive statistics of our data and analytics provided by the platforms are used presently to report our process. The framework we implemented involved preparing for social media use, identifying a target audience, developing campaign content, conducting the campaign, refining the campaign as needed, and evaluating its success. Our process resulted in a substantial social media-based reach, good survey completion rates, and a successfully developed pediatric cancer community-specified research agenda. Social media may represent a useful approach to engage persons with lived experience and healthcare professionals in research agenda development. Based on our experience, we present strategies to increase social media campaign engagement that may be useful to those seeking to conduct health research priority-setting exercises.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Cardiovascular Health of Emerging Adults Aged 18-25: Findings From a Scoping Review.

There is limited knowledge regarding the cardiovascular impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on emerging adults aged 18-25, a group that disproportionately contracts COVID-19. To guide future cardiovascular disease (CVD) research, policy, and practice, a scoping review was conducted to: (i) examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the cardiovascular health of emerging adults; and (ii) identify strategies to screen for and manage COVID-19-related cardiovascular complications in this age group. A comprehensive search strategy was applied to several academic databases and grey literature sources. An updated search yielded 6738 articles, 147 of which were extracted and synthesized. Reports identified COVID-19-associated cardiac abnormalities, vascular alterations, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in emerging adults; based on data from student-athlete samples, prevalence estimates of myocarditis and cardiac abnormalities were 0.5%-3% and 0%-7%, respectively. Obesity, hypertension, CVD, congenital heart disease, and marginalization are potential risk factors for severe COVID-19, related cardiovascular complications, and mortality in this age group. As a screening modality for COVID-19-associated cardiac involvement, it is recommended that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging be indicated by a positive cardiac history and/or abnormal "triad" testing (cardiac troponin, electrocardiogram, and transthoracic echocardiogram) to improve diagnostic utility. To foster long-term cardiovascular health among emerging adults, cardiorespiratory fitness, health literacy and education, and telehealth accessibility should be priorities of health policy and clinical practice. Ultimately, surveillance data from the broader emerging adult population will be crucial to assess the long-term cardiovascular impact of both COVID-19 infection and vaccination, guide screening and management protocols, and inform CVD prevention efforts.

Il existe peu de données portant sur les répercussions de la maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) sur le plan cardiovasculaire chez les jeunes adultes âgés de 18 à 25 ans, un groupe contractant la COVID-19 de façon disproportionnée. Afin d'orienter la recherche, les poli-tiques et les pratiques en matière de maladies cardiovasculaires (MCV), un examen exploratoire a été réalisé dans le but i) d'examiner les conséquences de la pandémie de la COVID-19 sur la santé cardiovasculaire des jeunes adultes, et ii) de proposer des stratégies de dépistage et de prise en charge des complications cardiovasculaires associées à la COVID-19 chez les personnes de cette tranche d'âge. Une recherche initiale exhaustive a été réalisée dans plusieurs bases de données universitaires et sources de littérature grise. Les résultats actualisés de cette recherche ont permis de recenser 6 738 articles, dont 147 ont été extraits et synthétisés. Les rapports faisaient état d'anomalies cardiaques, d'altérations vasculaires et de cas du syndrome inflammatoire multisystémique, tous associés à la COVID-19 chez les jeunes adultes. À la lumière des données sur les échantillons d'étudiants-athlètes, la prévalence des myocardites et des anomalies cardiaques se situait respectivement entre 0,5 et 3 %, et entre 0 et 7 % environ. Chez ce même groupe d'âge, l'obésité, l'hypertension, les MCV, les cardiopathies congénitales et la marginalisation constituent des facteurs de risque de COVID-19 sévère, de complications cardiovasculaires associées à la COVID-19 et de mortalité. Dans le cadre du dépistage des atteintes cardiaques associées à la COVID-19, il est recommandé, pour améliorer l'utilité diagnostique, d'indiquer l'imagerie par résonance magnétique cardiaque lors de l'existence d'antécédents cardiaques ou à la suite d'une « triade ¼ de dépistages anormaux (la troponine cardiaque, l'électrocardiogramme et l'échocardiographie transthoracique). Afin de favoriser une bonne santé cardiovasculaire à long terme chez les jeunes adultes, il est recommandé que la capacité cardiorespiratoire, la littératie dans le domaine de la santé, l'éducation et l'accès à la télésanté soient intégrés à titre de priorités dans les politiques de santé et la pratique clinique. En définitive, les données de surveillance portant sur cette large tranche d'âge seront essentielles pour évaluer les répercussions cardiovasculaires à long terme (autant celles d'infections à la COVID-19 que celles de la vaccination), pour orienter les protocoles de dépistage et de prise en charge, ainsi que pour éclairer les efforts de prévention des MCV.