Effectiveness of adjunctive nebulized antibiotics in critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections.

The purpose of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of adding nebulized antibiotics to systemic antimicrobials in critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections (pneumonia or tracheobronchitis) and the effect on renal function. A retrospective observational cohort study including critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections during a 2-year period was conducted. Intervention group included patients that received nebulized and systemic antimicrobials. Patients in the control group received only systemic antimicrobials. Clinical resolution was the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included change in fever, inflammatory parameters, and creatinine clearance; length of hospital stay, systemic therapy, and mechanical ventilation; hospital readmission; and mortality. Regression models were performed to estimate the effect of nebulized antibiotics on outcome variables adjusted by potential confounders. A total of 136 patients were included (93 in control group and 43 in intervention group). The intervention group had higher odds of clinical resolution (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 7.1; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.2, 43.3). Nebulized antibiotic therapy was independently associated with reduction in procalcitonin (adjusted OR: 12.4; 95% CI: 1.4, 109.7). There were no significant differences in the rest of the secondary outcomes or in creatinine clearance reduction. Adding nebulized antibiotics for the management of respiratory tract infections has a positive impact on clinical resolution without increasing the risk of renal toxicity.

Allergic Adverse Drug Events After Alert Overrides in Hospitalized Patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess how often overridden drug allergy alerts (ODAAs) lead to allergic adverse drug events (All-ADEs) and to evaluate the frequency with which drug allergy alerts (DAAs) were overridden and the reasons, as well as appropriateness of these overrides. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of DAA generated between 2014 and 2016 was conducted. The corresponding DAA records were reviewed to determine the frequency of alert overrides. A chart review was performed on a subset of 194 ODAA (the first of every 3 chronologically ordered ODAA) to identify All-ADEs and to evaluate the override reasons and the appropriateness of these overrides. RESULTS: A total of 2044 DAAs were overridden (override rate of 44.8%). Most were triggered by a nonexact match (93.81%), when ordering nervous system (21.1%) and cardiovascular system (19.6%) drugs and were generated by physicians (72.7%). The main override reason was that the patient was already taking the drug or had previously tolerated the drug. Only 9.28% of ODAAs were inappropriately overridden. Six All-ADEs (3.09%) were identified and were due to anti-infective (1), antineoplastic (1), and iodinated-contrast (4) drug administration. Most All-ADEs were cutaneous and were mild. None was life-threatening or fatal. The All-ADEs rate was higher among inappropriately ODAA (15.79%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Alert overrides are not exempt from clinical consequences, although few are associated with All-ADEs. It is necessary to identify the drugs involved in those reactions and to update allergy lists to generate only specific and important DAA and to avoid the negative consequences of overrides.

A systematic review of drug allergy alert systems.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Drug allergy alert systems (DAAS), have been considered an effective strategy to reduce preventable adverse drug events (ADEs), improving patient's safety. To date, no review has been conducted analyzing characteristics of DAAS in the hospital setting. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify, describe and summarize the DAAS used in hospitals. The secondary objectives are to analyse drug allergy alerts (DAA) characteristics, the override rate (OvR) and the clinical consequences of alert overrides. METHODS: Searches were conducted in Medline and Cochrane Library to identify studies describing DAAS. Systems characteristics, generated alerts, DAA, OvR, and its clinical consequences were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles were included in the review. Seventeen different electronic DAAS were identified, of which 53% were commercially available. Systems differed in drug allergy information and rules for generating alerts. DAA were generally interruptive, triggered by non-exact match at drug prescribing and when ignored, an override reason was mandatory. The OvR ranged from 43.7% to 97%. The main override reason given by providers was that 'patient had previously tolerated or had taken the drug without allergic reaction'. Clinical consequences of overriding DAA were only analyzed in four studies, with an ADE incidence between 0% and 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Different DAAS are used in hospitals with some degree of heterogeneity. Accurate and updated drug allergy information is important to generate only high value alerts. A regular review of DAAS and a standardization of alert rules, alert information and override reasons are necessary to optimize systems. Future studies should evaluate the impact of the DAAS aspects on preventing ADEs.

Clinical and economic impact of clinical pharmacist interventions regarding antimicrobials on critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Incorporating in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) a clinical pharmacist who performs interventions on antimicrobials may be cost-effective. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pharmacist interventions on antimicrobials in an ICU. To identify drug related problems and medication errors detected by the pharmacist. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed to analyze drug related problems, medication errors and clinical pharmacist interventions related to antimicrobials in adults admitted to an ICU in a 5-month period. The economic impact of pharmacist interventions was estimated considering difference in cost derived from antimicrobial treatment, adverse drug events and clinical pharmacist time. RESULTS: A total of 212 drug related problems were detected in 114 patients, 18 being medication errors. Clinical pharmacist developed one intervention for each problem identified. 204 interventions (96.2%) were considered important with improved patient care and 7 (3.3%) very important. No negative impact of any intervention was identified. Physicians accepted 97.6% of the interventions. A potential saving of 10,905 € was estimated as a result of pharmacist interventions and 4.8 € were avoided per euro invested in a clinical pharmacist. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical pharmacist performing interventions on antimicrobials in the ICU has a positive impact on patient care and decreases costs.

Impact of a new palliative care consultation team on opioid prescription in a University Hospital.

BACKGROUND: There are no validated measuring tools to gauge the effectiveness of a Hospital Palliative Care Consultation Team (PCCT). One way would be to consider its effect on the consumption of opioids expressed in total amounts and different formulations administered. We perform this study to evaluate the impact of a hospital PCCT on the trends of opioid prescription in a University Hospital. METHODS: A seven year retrospective study on opioid prescription was carried out in the Clínica Universidad de Navarra. The period includes three years before and three years after the PCCT was implemented. Prescription was analysed calculating yearly the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) adjusted to 1000 hospital stays (DDD/1000HS). Indicators considered were the proportion of patients treated using opioids compared to the total estimated in need of treatment (rate of effectiveness) and the proportion of patients potentially requiring opioids but not treated who were incorporated into the treatment group (rate of improvement). RESULTS: From 2001 to 2007, total opioid prescription was low in non-oncology Departments (range: 69-110 DDD/1000HS) while parenteral morphine and fentanyl did not register any changes. In the same period of time, total opioid prescription increased in the Oncology Department from 240 to 558 DDD/1000HS. The rate of effectiveness in the three years prior to the implantation of the consultation team was 64% and in the three following years rose to 87%. The rate of improvement prior to the palliative care consultation team was 43% and in the three following years was 64%. A change in opioid prescription was registered after the implementation of the PCCT resulting in an increase in the prescription of parenteral morphine and methadone and a decrease in transdermal fentanyl. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a PCCT in a University Hospital is associated with a higher and more adequate use of opioids.