Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
1.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 100(8): 1520-1525, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33811323

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The risk of contralateral lymph node metastases following unilateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases in patients with vulvar cancer(s) remains to be systematically assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective registry-based study of 476 patients with vulvar cancer. The primary outcome measure was the rate of contralateral non-SLN metastases in the case of positive unilateral SLN. RESULTS: Out of 476 patients with primary vulvar cancer, 202 received SLN biopsy: 58 unilateral and 144 bilateral. Out of 66 patients with unilateral metastatic SLN, 62 (93.9%) received contralateral lymphadenectomy-18 after unilateral and 44 after bilateral SLN biopsy. In the study group, 132 SLN were assessed with a median number of 2 (range 1-4) per patient and 76 of these were positive. Lymph node-positivity was associated with advanced tumor stage, as well as lymph and vascular space invasion. In the group of patients with bilateral inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy, 1004 lymph nodes were resected with a median number of 15 (range 10-29) per patient. After full dissection of the inguino-femoral lymph nodes, no contralateral non-SLN metastases were found. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of contralateral non-SLN metastases in patients with unilateral SLN metastases was low. Therefore, the impact of contralateral lymphadenectomy on patient survival should be investigated in further studies.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/secundário , Metástase Linfática , Neoplasias de Células Escamosas/secundário , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 302(4): 995-1000, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32666131

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently, sentinel lymph node mapping was introduced in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer as alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy. However, the survival impact of sentinel node mapping is not well characterized yet. METHODS: We performed retrospective study of 104 patients with endometrial cancer treated with sentinel lymph node alone (n = 52) or with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n = 52). For sentinel node mapping, indocyanine green was used. The outcome measure was disease-free survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 42 months. Fifty-two patients staged by sentinel lymph node mapping were matched in 1:1 ratio with 52 patients staged by lymphadenectomy using patient age, histological type, tumor stage, tumor grade and lymph and vascular space invasion as matching criteria. The median number of removed lymph node was 3 (range 1-6) and 36 (13-63) in the sentinel and lymphadenectomy group, respectively. The rate of lymph node metastases was not significantly higher in the sentinel group (19.2%) in comparison with the lymphadenectomy group (14.3%). The overall detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 100% with a bilateral mapping of 98.1%. Most of the 152 lymph nodes identified and removed were localized in upper paracervical pathway (n = 143, 94.1%). During the follow-up period, overall 21 (20.2%) events were observed, 8 (15.4%) in the sentinel group and 13 (25.0%) in the lymphadenectomy group. The estimated disease-free survival was 84.6% and 75.0% for patients in the sentinel and lymphadenectomy groups, respectively. The survival curves demonstrated similar disease-free survival in two groups (p = 0.774). CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node mapping did not compromise the outcome of patients with endometrial cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/secundário , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias do Endométrio/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida
3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 301(2): 565-571, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31900584

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Endocrine therapies using tamoxifen and/or aromatase inhibitors are important therapeutic options for the targeted treatment of hormone-responsive breast cancer. In addition to nuclear estrogen receptors ERα and ß, G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER-1 is a third receptor-mediating estrogen effects in breast cancer cells. The aim of this study was to examine to what extent GPER-1 expression might affect the efficacy of primary endocrine treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: GPER-1 expression was determined in tissue samples from patients with early breast cancer by means of immunohistochemistry and a GPER-1 score of ≥ 3 was considered to be positive. In a total of 165 patients, the response to a primary therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors (AI) was assessed by ultrasound imaging for up to 6 months. The primary endpoint of this study was the response to treatment evaluated by RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: GPER-1 expression was observed in 127 (77.0%) out of 165 cases. Based on GPER-1 expression and the type of endocrine treatment, the patients were divided into 4 groups: GPER-1 negative/TAM (12.1%), GPER-1 negative/AI (10.9%), GPER-1 positive/TAM (44.8%), and GPER-1 positive/AI (32.1%). The groups were well balanced regarding different clinical and pathological factors. After 4 and 6 months of treatment, a high level of stable disease or progressive disease was observed in the GPER-1 positive/TAM group only (p < 0.0001), whereas in the other three groups of patients, the most common objective response was classified as partial response. We observed a continuous reduction of mean tumor size in patients treated with aromatase inhibitors irrespective of the GPER-1 status and in GPER-1 negative patients treated with TAM. In contrast, in GPER-1 positive patients treated with TAM, a reduction of mean tumor size was observed only in the first 2 months after beginning of treatment. Four and six months after start of treatment, no reduction, but even a slight increase of tumor size was observed in this patients group. CONCLUSIONS: GPER-1 expression is significantly associated with a reduced effect of primary treatment with tamoxifen in breast cancer patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 175(2): 401-408, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30806922

RESUMO

PURPOSE: HER2 expression has been reported to be discordant between primary tumor and metastatic tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HER2 discordance and relation to HER2-targeted treatment was investigated in 227 patients with primary breast cancer. RESULTS: HER2 discordance between primary biopsy and second biopsy after neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment was observed in 20.7%. This discordance was related only to the use of HER2-targeted treatment: 30 of 33 (90.9%) women with downgraded HER2 expression underwent a HER2-targeted therapy, whereas in the group of patients with concordant HER2 expression, only 32 of 180 (17.8%) received HER2-targeted treatment (p < 0.0001). HER2 discordance was associated with reduced disease-free survival but not overall survival. In a second cohort, including patients with HER2 overexpressing tumors, trastuzumab treatment was associated with change of HER2 expression from positive to negative in 47.3% of cases. Addition of pertuzumab increased the rate of HER2 loss up to 63.2%. Notably, the interval between last HER2-targeted treatment and the time of surgical excision of the tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or the biopsy of the metachronous metastasis was associated with a significant change in HER2 expression. The median time between NACT and the time of surgical excision was 23 days (range 5-81 days) for tumors with decreased HER2 expression and 51 days (range 10-179 days) for tumors with concordant HER2 expression. Furthermore, median time between the end of adjuvant treatment and second histology of the metachronous metastases accounted for 15 days (range 2-165 days) and 478 days (range 7-2739 days) was observed in the group of patients with decreased or unchanged HER2 expression, respectively. CONCLUSION: The interval between anti-HER2 treatment and the determination of HER2 in second histology is strongly associated with HER2 expression.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Trastuzumab/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inibidores , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 174(1): 121-127, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30478785

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER-1) in the development of tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer is a highly controversial issue. The aim of this study was to determine the expression of GPER-1 in the clinical routine under conditions of endocrine treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: GPER-1 expression was analyzed in 442 patients with primary invasive breast cancer. GPER-1 score of > 3 was determined as positive. Expression data were correlated with clinical and pathological characteristics and patient survival. RESULTS: GPER-1 expression was observed in 352 (80.9%) cases, and positively correlated with estrogen and progesterone receptor status (p = 0.0001). GPER-1 positivity was associated with an increased grade of differentiation (p = 0.0001) and with a low level of Ki-67 expression (p = 0.0001). High GPER-1 expression was associated with a decreased level upon systemic treatment (p = 0.011). In the whole cohort, GPER-1 expression was associated with prolonged disease-free survival (DFS). DFS between tamoxifen- and aromatase inhibitor-treated GPER-1-positive patients was similar (p = 0.090). Notably, after matching the analysis for the most important prognostic factors, DFS for tamoxifen-treated GPER-1-positive patients was 69.1%, which is a percentage that is significantly lower compared to DFS for GPER-1-positive patients treated with aromatase inhibitors (92.7%) (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: GPER-1 expression is a favorable prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. Its predictive role for poor benefit form tamoxifen treatment should be investigated in further studies.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Receptores de Estrogênio/biossíntese , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/biossíntese , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/uso terapêutico , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/análise
6.
Gynecol Oncol ; 154(3): 475-479, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31345606

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The relationship between nodal micrometastases and clinical outcome of endometrial cancer is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective registry-based study of 2392 patients with endometrial cancer with and without nodal micrometastases. The primary outcome measure was disease-free survival. RESULTS: After exclusions, the final study involved 428 patients: 302 (70.6%) with node-negative endometrial cancer, who did not receive adjuvant treatment, 95 (22.2%) with nodal micrometastases who received adjuvant treatment, and 31 (7.2%) with nodal micrometastases who did not receive adjuvant treatment. The median follow-up was 84.8 months. Without adjuvant therapy the disease-free survival in the cohort of patients with micrometastases was significantly reduced as compared with disease-free survival in the node-negative cohort (p = 0.0001). With adjuvant therapy the median disease-free survival of patients with nodal micrometastases was similar with those of node-negative patients (p = 0.648). The adjusted hazard ratio for disease events among patients with micrometastases and no adjuvant therapy, as compared with node-negative patients, was 2.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-3.95). In the cohort with micrometastases the relative risk of events was significantly decreased by adjuvant therapy (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.13-0.65) even after adjustment for age at diagnosis, myometrial invasion, histological grade and type, and performance status. CONCLUSIONS: Nodal micrometastases are associated with decreased disease-free survival of patients with endometrial cancer. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved disease-free survival of patients with micrometastases.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Endometrial/mortalidade , Hiperplasia Endometrial/patologia , Linfonodos/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Hiperplasia Endometrial/terapia , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Micrometástase de Neoplasia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 163(1): 111-118, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28233107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with small (T1a/b) breast cancer is based on retrospective analysis. The influence of intrinsic tumor subtypes on patients' outcome and treatment decision remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort register study including 1008 patients with small T1a/b breast cancer treated between 2003 and 2011. Tumors were grouped by biological characteristics into four different subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 6.5 years. From 919 eligible patients, 408 (44.4%) were classified as luminal A, 246 (26.8%) as luminal B, 183 (19.9%) as HER2 enriched, and 82 (8.9%) as TNBC. A total of 305 (34.2%) patients were treated with systemic therapy. Patients receiving systemic therapy were significantly younger and had lymph node metastasis, higher tumor grade, negative HR, and positive HER2 status. Patients with luminal A tumors demonstrated the best survival rate which improved with systemic therapy. The survival rate of patients with luminal B cancer, HER2-enriched tumors, and TNBC improved by addition of systemic treatment. The effect of systemic treatment was significant in luminal B (p = 0.040) and HER2 overexpressing tumors (p = 0.016). The treatment effect of systemic therapy in HER2-enriched tumors remained significant even after adjustment of other prognostic factors (HR 0.43, CI 0.19-0.98; p = 0.047). Notably, tumor size was not associated with patients' survival and treatment decision. CONCLUSION: The treatment decision of small breast cancer should be made by biological subtype and not by tumor size or lymph node status.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/classificação , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Carga Tumoral
8.
Cancer Invest ; 35(2): 100-107, 2017 Feb 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28118074

RESUMO

Recently, we found that G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) protein expression decreased during breast carcinogenesis, and that GPER promoter is methylated. Here we analyzed GPER promoter methylation in 260 primary breast cancer specimens by methylation-specific polymerized chain reaction. The results demonstrated that GPER protein down-regulation significantly correlated with GPER promoter hypermethylation (p < .001). Comparison of 108 tumors and matched normal breast tissues indicated a significant GPER down-regulation in cancer tissues correlating with GPER promoter hypermethylation (p < .001). The latter was an unfavorable factor for overall survival of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (p = .025). Thus GPER promoter hypermethylation might be used as a prognostic factor.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Metilação de DNA , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Receptores de Estrogênio/genética , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/genética , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Regulação para Baixo , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , Receptores de Estrogênio/biossíntese , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/biossíntese , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/metabolismo , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia
9.
Gynecol Oncol ; 146(3): 519-524, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28666541

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Elderly women with endometrial cancer receive less therapy in comparison with their younger counterparts. The exact reason(s) for this treatment strategy remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective registry-based study of 1550 patients with endometrial cancer. The outcome measure was the reason for not performing the indicated treatment. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 76.8months. A total of 1550 women were eligible for analysis: 353 (22.7%) were younger than 60years, 521 (33.6%) 61-70years, 515 (33.2%) 71-80years, and 161 (10.4%) were aged 81years old and older. Elderly women were more likely to have non-endometrioid, undifferentiated endometrial cancer at an advanced stage. Patients younger than 60years were more likely to receive lymphadenectomy, brachytherapy, external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and systemic therapy compared with the group of patients aged older than 70years. We investigated the reason why elderly women were undertreated. The rate of indicated therapies that were not recommended by the physicians proportionally increased with an increase in patient age. Interestingly, the rate of contraindications because of performance status and/or medical disease also increased proportionally with increasing patient age. Notably, in the groups of patients older than 70years, patient refusal was a very uncommon reason for failure to perform the indicated therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly women with EC are more likely undertreated because the therapy was not recommended by the physicians based on performance status and medical diseases rather than patient refusal.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/terapia , Nível de Saúde , Excisão de Linfonodo , Padrões de Prática Médica , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos , Braquiterapia , Comorbidade , Contraindicações , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento
10.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 296(2): 223-229, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28616828

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perinatal and maternal outcomes at term at a single tertiary, university hospital in women with low-risk pregnancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with low-risk pregnancies, who delivered at University Women's Hospital Magdeburg between January 2010 and December 2014. Data were compared with data published by Brocklehurst et al. 2011. RESULTS: Of the 6052 women investigated, 2014 were classified as low risk according to the NICE criteria and were eligible for analysis. In 94.8%, a spontaneous vertex birth was observed. There were only 2 (0.1%) perinatal complications and 52 (2.5%) maternal complications. Ventouse delivery, forceps delivery, and caesarean sections were performed in 2.5, 1, and 3.1% of the cases, respectively. Episiotomy was performed in 37.7% of women. The third and fourth degree perineal trauma were observed in 0.3% of births investigated. Complications during the third stage of labour and blood transfusions were observed in 0.25 and 0.2%, respectively. In comparison with the births at home, we had lower rate of fetal complications for nulliparous women, but not for multiparous women, lower rate for blood transfusions, third and fourth degree perineal trauma and forceps delivery, and higher rate of spontaneous vertex birth, epidural analgesia, and episiotomy. The rate of vacuum extractions and caesarean sections were similar between both the places of birth. CONCLUSIONS: The tertiary-level obstetric unit is safe place of birth for women with low-risk pregnancies.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico , Tocologia/métodos , Unidade Hospitalar de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia , Resultado da Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Episiotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nascimento a Termo , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto Jovem
11.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 151(2): 357-64, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25926338

RESUMO

Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an important prognostic and predictive marker of response to anti-HER2 therapy in breast cancer. Our goal was to analyze the prognostic significance of moderate expression of HER2 in breast cancer with intermediate differentiation grade. We performed a multicenter retrospective register study of 8494 patients with primary non-metastatic breast cancer admitted between 2000 and 2011 to eight Clinics in Saxony-Anhalt, federal state of Germany. Patients were divided into three groups according to their HER2 score: 4073 were classified as HER2 negative (HER2 0 and 1+), 822 HER2 moderate (HER2 2+/HER2), and 1238 HER2 positive (HER2 3+ or HER2 2+/HER2+). HER2-positive cases were excluded from analysis. Tumors with moderate HER2 (HER2 2+) expression demonstrated an aggressive behavior and worse patient survival compared with HER2 0 and 1+ status. HER2 2+ status was associated with shorter median overall survival (OS) (P < 0.0001) in breast cancer patients with an intermediate grade of differentiation. Comparing low-grade and high-grade tumors, HER2 moderate expression did not significantly influence patient survival. In multivariate analysis after adjustment for other prognostic factors HER2 2+ status remained an unfavorable prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.224, 95 % CI 1.059-1.415, P = 0.006) in breast cancer patients with an intermediate grade of differentiation. HER2 2+ status is an unfavorable prognostic factor regarding the OS of breast cancer patients with intermediate grade of differentiation and could be used to identify patients, who may benefit from adjuvant therapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Expressão Gênica , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Prognóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Fatores de Risco , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Jovem
12.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 145(1): 129-36, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24682656

RESUMO

The goal of this study was to assess the size of the ultrasound-measured margin associated with an adequate surgical margin during breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The study was designed as a prospective cohort study. Patients with primary invasive breast cancer undergoing BCS were included. The ultrasound-measured surgical margins were compared with the pathological margins. 147 patients were eligible for analysis. 21 (14.3 %) patients had close or positive resection margins and 13 (8.8 %) underwent a second operation. Small excision volume, multifocality, postmenopausal status, high grade tumor-associated intraductal component, and invasion of lymph vessels and lymph nodes were associated with increased risk of positive excision margins. In the study cohort, 882 Ultrasonography (US) margins were measured and a good correlation to the pathological margins was observed. Overestimation of the US-measured margins relative to the pathological margins was increased with younger age, premenopausal status, and intraductal component. The estimated positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity were 81.0, 96.2, 48.4, and 99.1 %, respectively. We found that a sonographically estimated margin of ≥ 4 mm was associated with an adequate pathological margin of ≥ 1 mm in 100 % of tumors that did not have a high grade intraductal component. However, this was not applicable for tumor-associated high grade intraductal component where a US margin of 14 mm was associated with clear pathological margins in 100 % of cases. Intraoperative ultrasonography is a safe and feasible method to obtain clear surgical margins by BCS.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
13.
Cancer Invest ; 31(5): 309-15, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23688258

RESUMO

GPER-1 protein expression was immunohistochemically examined in 164 primary breast cancer specimens and their matched normal breast epithelium. GPER-1 down-regulation correlated significantly with increased histological grading (p = .015), lymph node metastases (p = .032), and negative estrogen receptor status (p = .018). The decrease of GPER-1 expression in breast cancer tissue, relative to normal tissue, was associated with poor overall survival (p = .043) and disease-free survival (p = .037) and remained a significant unfavorable factor in multivariate analysis for DFS (HR = 1.569; 95% CI, 1.024-2.797; p = .041) and OS (HR = 2.082; 95% CI, 1.248-4.773; p = .039). Thus aberrant GPER-1 expression seems to be an important factor in breast cancer progression.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/metabolismo , Transformação Celular Neoplásica/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio/genética , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/secundário , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/mortalidade , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/secundário , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Fatores de Risco
14.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(24)2023 Dec 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38136438

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer as an alternative to systematic lymph node dissection (LND). However, the survival impact of SLNB is not yet well characterised. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 419 patients with endometrial cancer treated with SLNB alone or with pelvic and para-aortic LND. For SLNB mapping, indocyanine green was used. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 66 months. After exclusions, 337 patients were eligible for analysis. Of them, 150 underwent SLNB and 187 LND. During the follow-up time, 27 (24.7%) of the 150 who underwent SLNB and 54 (28.9%) of the 187 who underwent LND were diagnosed with recurrent disease (p = 0.459). The estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 76.7% and 72.2% for patients in the SLNB and LND group, respectively (p = 0.419). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 80.7% and 77.0% in the SLNB and LND group, respectively (p = 0.895). Survival rates were similar in both groups independent of lymph node status. Multivariable analysis confirmed that the staging approach was not associated with oncological outcome. For patients without lymph node metastases, patient outcome was worsened by advanced tumour stage and non-endometrioid tumour histology. In the group of patients with confirmed lymph node metastases, advanced tumour stage and inadequate adjuvant treatment significantly reduced DFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that SLNB did not compromise the oncological outcome of patients with endometrial cancer compared to LND.

15.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 128(2): 457-66, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21607586

RESUMO

Recently, we have shown that the new G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPR30 plays an important role in the development of tamoxifen resistance in vitro. This study was undertaken to evaluate the correlation between GPR30 and tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer patients. GPR30 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis in 323 patients with primary operable breast cancer. The association between GPR30 expression and tamoxifen resistance was confirmed in a second cohort of 103 patients treated only with tamoxifen. Additionally, we evaluated GPR30 expression in 33 primary tumors and in recurrent tumors from the same patients. GPR30 expression was detected in 56.7% of the breast cancer specimens investigated and it correlated with overexpression of HER-2 (P = 0.021), EGFR (P = 0.024) and lymph node status (P = 0.047). In a first cohort, survival analysis showed that GPR30 was negatively correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) only in patients treated with tamoxifen (tamoxifen with or without chemotherapy). GPR30 expression was associated with shorter RFS (HR = 1.768; 95% CI, 1.156-2.703; P = 0.009). In a subset of patients treated only with tamoxifen, multivariate analysis revealed that GPR30 expression is an independent unfavorable factor for RFS (HR = 4.440; 95% CI, 1.408-13.997; P = 0.011). In contrast, GPR30 tended to be a favorable factor regarding RFS in patients who did not receive tamoxifen. In 33 paired biopsies obtained before and after adjuvant therapy, GPR30 expression significantly increased only under tamoxifen treatment (P = 0.001). GPR30 expression in breast cancer independently predicts a poor RFS in patients treated with tamoxifen.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Lobular/metabolismo , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Receptores de Estrogênio , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Cancer Sci ; 101(2): 321-7, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19900189

RESUMO

The aim of the current study was to investigate the role of promoter methylation of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) genes in endometrial tumorigenesis. The methylation status of both genes was investigated in 43 cases of normal endometrium, 21 simple hyperplasia, 17 atypical hyperplasia, and 86 endometrial carcinoma (EC). Additionally, the methylation pattern of both genes was analyzed in 24 primary ECs and their corresponding metastases. DNA methylation of the APC gene increased from atypical hyperplasia (23.5%) to endometrial carcinoma, reaching its highest level of 77.4% in early stage cancer (FIGO I and II) and decreasing stepwise to 24.2% in advanced stage carcinomas (FIGO III and IV). No methylation of APC was found in normal endometrium or simple hyperplasia. Methylation of E-cadherin was found only in EC (22.1%). The mean age of the patients with aberrant APC methylation was 68.8 years and was significantly higher compared to the mean age (60.9 years) of the patients without methylation of APC promoter (P = 0.02). APC promoter methylation significantly correlated with decreased protein expression of APC (P = 0.039), with increased expression of the Ki-67 proliferative marker (P = 0.006) and decreased metastatic potential (P = 0.002). There was no correlation between APC and E-cadherin methylation patterns and the other clinicopathologic features, nor with patient outcome. Our results suggest that hypermethylation of APC promoter region is an early event in endometrial tumorigenesis.


Assuntos
Metilação de DNA , Neoplasias do Endométrio/genética , Genes APC , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Caderinas/genética , Neoplasias do Endométrio/etiologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-67/análise , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
17.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 123(1): 87-96, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19911269

RESUMO

Tamoxifen is the most frequently used anti-hormonal drug for treatment of women with hormone-dependent breast cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the mechanism of tamoxifen resistance and the impact of the new estrogen G-protein coupled receptor (GPR30). MCF-7 cells were continuously exposed to tamoxifen for 6 months to induce resistance to the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen. These tamoxifen-resistant cells (TAM-R) exhibited enhanced sensitivity to 17-ss-estradiol and GPR30 agonist, G1, when compared to the parental cells. In TAM-R cells, tamoxifen was able to stimulate the cell growth and MAPK phosphorylation. These effects were abolished by EGFR inhibitor AG1478, GPR30 anti-sense oligonucleotide, and the selective c-Src inhibitor PP2. Only EGFR basal expression was slightly elevated in the TAM-R cells, whereas GPR30 expression and the basal phosphorylation of Akt and MAPK remained unchanged when compared to the parental cells. Interestingly, estrogen treatment significantly increased GPR30 translocation to the cell surface, which was stronger in TAM-R cells. Continuous treatment of MCF-7 cells with GPR30 agonist G1 mimics the long-term treatment with tamoxifen and increases drastically its agonistic activity. This data suggests the important role of GPR30/EGFR receptor signaling in the development of tamoxifen resistance. The inhibition of this pathway is a valid option to improve anti-hormone response in breast cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/farmacologia , Tamoxifeno/farmacologia , Western Blotting , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores ErbB/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores ErbB/genética , Feminino , Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Fosforilação/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores de Estrogênio , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/genética , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Transdução de Sinais/fisiologia
18.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 203(6): 595.e9-16, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20965484

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the potential role of G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor in endometrial pathology associated with tamoxifen treatment of breast cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: We investigated whether G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor plays a role in mediating proliferating effect of tamoxifen in endometrial carcinoma cells. These results were compared with the G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor expression pattern in endometrial tissue from a cohort of 95 breast cancer patients, who received tamoxifen or another adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: In vitro tamoxifen significantly stimulated the mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation and cell proliferation of endometrial cell lines via G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor. In vivo, there was a significant correlation between G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor expression and the tamoxifen-induced endometrial pathology (P = .006). Moreover, G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor positivity was predictive of an earlier development of symptoms, such as bleeding or suspect endometrial thickness, induced by tamoxifen therapy (P = .019). CONCLUSION: G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor plays an important role in tamoxifen-induced endometrial abnormalities.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Tamoxifeno/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Técnicas In Vitro , Valores de Referência , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tamoxifeno/farmacologia , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Células Tumorais Cultivadas/efeitos dos fármacos
19.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 70(2): 91-4, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20224280

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about proper interval periods between the flushings of totally implantable access ports after completion of chemotherapy. Manufacturer guidelines recommend flushing catheters every 4 weeks. METHODS: This retrospective study examined whether flushing less than every 4 weeks conferred any benefit. RESULTS: 349 totally implanted access ports were divided into four groups based on the different durations of the intervals between flushings. Sixteen (4.6%) complications were observed in the study population. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that extending the flushing interval to up to 4 months remains medically safe and drastically reduces the costs.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 146(12): 3175-3188, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32813115

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The present study intended to further elucidate the role of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER-1) in ovarian cancer by comparing the effects of a GPER-1 knockdown and treatment with its agonist G-1 on cell growth, apoptosis, and the transcriptome of two ovarian cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the role of GPER-1 in ovarian cancer survival was examined. METHODS: GPER-1 expression in OVCAR-3 and OAW-42 ovarian cancer cells was knocked down by RNAi. The effects on cell growth were measured by means of the fluorimetric cell titer blue assay and on the transcriptome by Affymetrix GeneChip analysis. The effect of GPER-1 on patient's survival was examined using open source mRNA and clinical data of 1657 ovarian cancer patients. RESULTS: GPER-1 knockdown resulted in a significant growth stimulation of both cell lines, whereas treatment with agonist G-1 decreased growth of both cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. Transcriptome analyses revealed a set of 18 genes being conversely regulated after GPER-1 knockdown and G-1 treatment. Generally, treatment with G-1 led to a transcriptome response associated with growth inhibition. In contrast, knockdown of GPER-1 exerted opposite effects, stimulating pathways activating mitosis, but inhibiting pathways associated with apoptosis or interferon signaling. Further analyses using open-access mRNA and clinical data by bioinformatical online tools revealed a longer OS (HR = 0.86, p = 0.057) and PFS (HR = 0.81, p = 0.0035) of ovarian cancer patients with high GPER-1 mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study clearly support the hypothesis that GPER-1 acts as a tumor suppressor in ovarian cancer.


Assuntos
Proliferação de Células/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Estrogênio/genética , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/genética , Transcriptoma/genética , Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Ciclopentanos/farmacologia , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Quinolinas/farmacologia , RNA Mensageiro/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA