A diffusion tensor imaging comparison of white matter development in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis to neurotypical infants.

PURPOSE: Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) is associated with neurocognitive deficits, and intervention at infancy is standard of care to limit the negative effects of NSC on brain development. In this study, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was implemented to investigate white matter microstructure in infants with NSC undergoing cranial vault remodeling, and a comparison was made with white matter development in neurotypical controls. METHODS: Infants presenting with NSC (n = 12) underwent DTI scans before and after cranial vault remodeling. Neurotypical infants (n = 5), age matched to NSC patients at preoperative scans, were compared to preoperative DTI scans. Pre- and postoperative NSC scans were compared in aggregate, and the sagittal synostosis (n = 8) patients were evaluated separately. Finally, neurotypical infants from the University of North Carolina/University of New Mexico Baby Connectome Project (BCP), who underwent DTI scans at timepoints matching the NSC pre- and postoperative DTI scans, were analyzed (n = 9). Trends over the same time period were compared between NSC and BCP scans. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between preoperative NSC scans and controls. White matter development was more limited in NSC patients than in BCP patients, with microstructural parameters of the corpus body and genu and inferior and superior longitudinal fasciculi consistently lagging behind developmental changes observed in healthy patients. CONCLUSION: Infant white matter development appears more limited in NSC patients undergoing cranial vault remodeling relative to that in neurotypical controls. Further investigation is needed to explore these differences and the specific effects of early surgical intervention.

Safety Profile Comparison of 2 Smooth Tissue Expander Types: Artoura and CPX4.

INTRODUCTION: With the recent transition to smooth tissue expanders (TEs), functional differences between TE subtypes have not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the differences in TE characteristics and complications between 2 commonly used Mentor smooth TE models, Artoura and CPX4. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who received either smooth Mentor Artoura or CPX4 TE from 2012 to 2022 was conducted. Demographic data, perioperative information, pain scores, TE variables, cancer characteristics, and complications were collected. A multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between TE subtype and complications while controlling for demographic, TE characteristics, radiation, and chemotherapy exposure. RESULTS: During the study period, 62 smooth Artoura TEs and 79 smooth CPX4 TEs were used. Patients who received CPX4 smooth implants tended to be older (51.09 vs 46.18 years old, P = 0.02) and have a higher body mass index (28.66 vs 23.50 kg/m 2 , P < 0.001). There were no differences among patient comorbidities. CPX4 required on average a greater total fill volume (422.23 vs 348.07 mL, P = 0.01) and had a greater drain duration (16.91 vs 14.33 days, P = 0.05). There were no differences in TE plane placement between Artoura and CPX4. Additionally, there were no differences in complication rates, including infection, hematomas, seromas, wound breakdown, TE replacement, and capsular contracture. When controlling for body mass index, diabetes, TE plane placement, acellular dermal matrix use, radiation exposure, and chemotherapy, there was no association between TE subtype and any individual complication. DISCUSSION: Differences in total fill volume and drain duration were significantly different between Mentor Artoura and CPX4 implants, which may influence TE subtype selection. However, Artoura and CPX4 have excellent and equivalent safety profiles with similar complication rates, even when controlling for demographic and TE characteristics.

Perceived Age and Gender Perception Using Facial Recognition Software Following Facial Feminization Surgery.

Measures of success for facial feminization surgery (FFS) have previously included improved rates of external gender perception as female and patient-reported outcome measures. In this study, we used artificial intelligence facial recognition software to objectively evaluate the effects of FFS on both perceived gender and age among male-to-female transgender patients, as well as their relationship with patient facial satisfaction. Standardized frontal preoperative and postoperative images of 27 transgender women undergoing FFS were analyzed by Amazon's AI facial recognition software to determine gender, femininity confidence score, and perceived age. Female gender-typing, improvement in gender-typing (preoperatively to postoperatively), and femininity confidence scores were analyzed. To assess patient satisfaction, FACE-Q modules were completed postoperatively. Preoperatively, FFS images were perceived as female 48.1% of the time, and postoperatively, this improved to 74.1% ( P =0.05). Femininity confidence scores improved from a mean score of 0.04 preoperatively to 0.39 postoperatively ( P =0.003). FFS was associated with a decrease in perceived age relative to the patient's true age (-2.4 y, P <0.001), with older patients experiencing greater reductions. Pearson correlation matrix found no significant relationship between improved female gender typing and patient facial satisfaction. Undergoing surgery at a younger age was associated with higher overall facial satisfaction ( r =-0.6, P =0.01). Transfeminine patients experienced improvements in satisfaction with facial appearance, perceived gender, and decreases in perceived age following FFS. Notably, patient satisfaction was not directly associated with improved AI-gender typing, suggesting that other factors may influence patient satisfaction.

Evolution of Virtual Surgical Planning Use Among Craniofacial Surgeons.

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) has benefits in craniofacial surgery with growing popularity. However, while specific use cases are highlighted in the literature, no studies exist providing an overview of VSP use among craniofacial surgeons, and little is known about the extent of exposure to VSP during plastic surgery training. This study surveyed members of The American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons (ASMS) to better characterize both the landscape of VSP use among practicing craniofacial surgeons and the extent of exposure to VSP throughout surgical training. An electronic survey was administered in the fall of 2023. Response data included surgeon demographics, VSP usage, including the use in residency/fellowship, procedures for which VSP is used, and assessment of VSP's impact on the surgeon's practice. Demographics and VSP use were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using χ2 tests and t-tests, respectively. Of the 44 respondents, 40 (90.9%) completed a craniofacial surgery fellowship, and 18 (40.9%) utilized VSP in either residency or fellowship. In respondents' current practice, VSP is utilized most commonly for orthognathic surgery (n=32, 91.4%), postablative reconstruction (n=23, 82.1%), and facial feminization (n=11, 73.3%). Shorter operative time and improved esthetic outcomes were frequently reported as benefits derived from VSP use. Finally, surgeons in practice for less than 10 years were significantly more likely to have used VSP in both residency (OR=20.3, P<0.01) and in fellowship (OR=40.6, P<0.01) than those practicing for more than 10 years. These findings suggest that craniofacial surgeons apply VSP more commonly for certain procedure types. Our results additionally suggest that incorporation of VSP into residency and fellowship training has become significantly more common over time, with a pivot towards integration in the last decade.

Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniosynostosis Reduces Operative Time and Length of Stay for Cranial Vault Remodeling.

Cranial vault remodeling (CVR) with and without frontal orbital advancement remodels the skull in craniosynostosis. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) for preoperative planning has been previously shown to be effective in CVR. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the impact of VSP on operative and perioperative efficiency for craniosynostosis surgery. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with craniosynostosis who underwent CVR. Patient demographics, perioperative variables, use of VSP, and complications were obtained. Perioperative variables collected include operative time and length of stay. An independent t test was used to compare variables from patients who had surgery with VSP and patients who did not. Records were available for 126 patients with craniosynostosis who underwent CVR of whom 79 (62.7%) utilized VSP. There was no difference in average age at surgery (9.3±5.7 mo versus 13.2±31.1 mo, P =0.39). Surgeries planned using VSP demonstrated a decreased operative time of 1.3 hours (3.7±1.1 versus 5.0±1.1 h, P <0.001) and a shorter length of stay (3.9±1.3 versus 4.6±1.7 d, P =0.01). There were no differences in complication rates of dehiscence, infection, returns to the operating room, or 30-day readmission. These trends were similar among patients who underwent fronto-orbital advancement in addition to CVR. Virtual surgical planning was associated with decreased operative time and length of stay for patients with craniosynostosis and comparable complication rates. Virtual surgical planning is an effective tool for reducing anesthetic exposure time.

New Kid on the Block: A Systematic Review of the Quadratus Lumborum Block in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Background: Although the transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block is commonly used in abdominal surgery as part of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways, the quadratus lumborum (QL) block has been hypothesized as an effective alternative to the TAP block in some areas. This review evaluates the current literature, as it relates to the QL block in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Methods: A systematic review using PubMed searched for all original, peer-reviewed articles, including the term "quadratus lumborum block." In total, 509 articles were identified for review by two independent reviewers. Original articles evaluating the use of a QL block in any plastic surgery operation were included. Articles evaluating pediatric patients, animal trials, and the use of a QL block in any nonplastic surgery operation were excluded. Results: Three articles met inclusion criteria. One trial demonstrated decreased subjective pain scores and total opioid use, whereas the second found no statistically significant difference. A case study described the use of a QL block for unilateral breast reconstruction with minimal opiate use and reduced pain scores postoperatively. Limitations include the limited number of studies and the heterogeneity in study type and design, making analysis difficult. Conclusions: Despite its demonstrated efficacy in other surgical subspecialties, there are limited data evaluating the use of the QL block in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Additional research is needed to evaluate the role of the QL block in plastic surgery and how it compares to the more widely utilized TAP block.

Meta-analysis: The utility of the anterior quadratus lumborum block in abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia is routinely used in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways to improve post-operative recovery times. No consensus has been reached on optimal block type. This study reviews the current literature as it pertains to the anterior quadratus lumborum (aQL) block in all abdominal surgeries, as well as its efficacy compared to the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. METHODS: PubMed was searched for original, peer-reviewed articles that include "(anterior) quadratus lumborum block." 89 articles were included. Data was extracted according to PRISMA guidelines, with articles manually reviewed by two independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was then conducted on a subset of 14 randomized control trials (RCT) evaluating total oral morphine equivalent consumed at 12 and 24 â€‹h post-operatively in patients who received an aQL block compared to control. RESULTS: 28 articles were included with 14 RCT used in a random-effects meta-analysis. There was a significant reduction in post-operative pain scores and opioid use in patients who receive an aQL block for abdominal surgeries. Meta-analysis determined a decrease in total oral morphine equivalent consumed at both 12 and 24 â€‹h post-operatively compared to controls. Compared to no region block, both the aQL and TAP block show a significant reduction in pain and post-operative opioid consumption. CONCLUSION: The literature demonstrates non-inferiority of the aQL block compared to the TAP block in abdominal surgery, with some studies suggesting its superiority. Limitations include heterogeneity in study type and design, as well as the presence of confounding variables when comparing across surgery types.

Limited Access to Facial Feminization Geographically Despite Nationwide Expansion of Other Gender-Affirming Surgeries.

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is an integral aspect of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) for individuals seeking to align secondary sex characteristics and gender identity. Despite the importance of FFS in treating gender dysphoria, current trends and prevalence remain unknown. We sought to examine trends in GAS and FFS and investigate the payer status of facial feminization procedures in the United States. Methods: Data was extracted from the National Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2017 by using International Classification of Diseases Ninth or Tenth diagnosis codes for gender identity disorder and procedure codes for FFS. Results: From 2008 to 2017, 3015 patients underwent GAS. The yearly number of cases increased as did the average cost of GAS, which rose from $13,657 in 2008 to $50,789 in 2017. From 2015 to 2017, when FFS data was available, 110 of 1215 (9.1%) GAS patients had FFS. Most were non-Hispanic White (66.7%) or Black (23.8%). Fifty percent of FFS cases occurred in the West, followed by the Northeast (31.8%), South (13.6%), and Midwest (4.8%) (P = 0.015). By payer the cases were, 36.4% self-pay, 31.8% Medicaid, and 27.3% private insurance (P < 0.0001). Approximately, 18% of patients undergoing male-to-female transition received FFS. Conclusions: From 2008 to 2017, GAS cases increased nationwide while the average cost of surgery rose steeply. FFS cases were primarily in the Western and Northeast United States. Despite high cost, roughly 18% of transgender women in our sample received FFS, highlighting the importance of FFS in gender transition.

Racial and geographic disparities in reconstructive procedures following melanoma resection.

INTRODUCTION: Melanoma occurs most commonly in non-Hispanic White patients; however, Black and Hispanic patients experience greater morbidity and mortality. This study assesses how race and socioeconomic factors influence rates of reconstructive procedures and hospital-based outcomes in melanoma patients. METHODS: Data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2010-2015. Patients with melanoma who underwent a reconstructive procedure were identified. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the relationship between dependent variables and various patient/hospital components for patients undergoing reconstructive procedures. RESULTS: Black and Hispanic patients had a greater length of stay (LOS) than non-Hispanic White patients (OR: 2.252, p = 0.0307, and OR: 2.592, p = 0.0014), and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive more complex reconstructive procedures (OR: 0.449, p = 0.0487). Patients living in rural areas were less likely to receive complex reconstructive procedures than those in both urban teaching and non-teaching hospitals (OR: 3.313, p = 0.0135, and OR: 3.505, p = 0.0074). Pedicled or rotational flaps were less likely to be performed at medium- or large-sized hospitals (OR: 0.610, p = 0.0296, and OR: 0.496, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Race and socioeconomic factors are important predictors of access to complex reconstructive procedures and hospital-based outcomes following extirpation in melanoma patients.