Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Bone Miner Res ; 34(6): 1014-1024, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30690785

RESUMO

Mineral and bone disorders including osteoporosis are common in dialysis patients and contribute to increased morbimortality. However, whether denosumab and alendronate are effective and safe treatments in hemodialysis patients is not known. Thus, we conducted a prospective, three-center study of 48 hemodialysis patients who were diagnosed as having osteoporosis and had not received anti-osteoporotic agents previously. Participants were randomized to either denosumab or intravenous alendronate, and all subjects received elemental calcium and calcitriol during the initial 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD) at 12 months of treatment. The secondary endpoints included the following: change in BMD at other sites; change of serum bone turnover markers (BTM), coronary artery calcium score (CACS), ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), flow mediated dilation (FMD), and intima-media thickness at the carotid artery (CA-IMT); change from day 0 to day 14 in serum levels of Ca and P; time course of serum calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and intact parathyroid hormone (i-PTH); new fractures; and adverse events. Initial supplementation with elemental calcium and calcitriol markedly ameliorated the decrease of serum corrected calcium (cCa) levels induced by denosumab during the first 2 weeks, whereas serum cCa levels in the alendronate group were increased. Denosumab and alendronate markedly decreased serum levels of BTM and increased LSBMD at 12 months compared with baseline. However, no significant differences were found in the changes in LSBMD between the two groups. The serum cCa, P, and i-PTH levels in the two groups were maintained within the appropriate range. In contrast to the anti-osteoporotic effects, no significant differences after 12 months of treatment were found in the CACS, CA-IMT, ABI, baPWV, and FMD compared with pretreatment in both groups. Denosumab and alendronate treatment improved LSBMD, reduced BTM, and appeared to be safe in hemodialysis patients with osteoporosis. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.


Assuntos
Alendronato/farmacologia , Vasos Sanguíneos/fisiologia , Osso e Ossos/fisiologia , Denosumab/farmacologia , Diálise Renal , Idoso , Alendronato/efeitos adversos , Arteriosclerose/fisiopatologia , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Vasos Sanguíneos/efeitos dos fármacos , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Remodelação Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Osso e Ossos/efeitos dos fármacos , Calcinose/fisiopatologia , Denosumab/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Minerais/metabolismo
3.
CEN Case Rep ; 8(4): 233-238, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31037495

RESUMO

Membranous nephropathy (MN) caused by disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is relatively common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, MN rarely occurs due to RA itself. We describe a 61-year-old woman with RA who showed nephrotic syndrome. She was admitted because of systemic edema and severe arthritis. She had a long history of RA successfully treated with methotrexate (MTX), but discontinued all treatments 4 years before hospitalization. She had never been treated with bucillamine or gold. Laboratory test results were positive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and negative for anti-nuclear antibody. Renal pathologic findings were compatible with MN. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed IgG, IgA, κ, λ, and C3 along the glomerular capillary wall, whereas deposition of IgM or C1q was not detected. In terms of the IgG subclasses, only IgG2 findings were positive. Results for glomerular antigen and serum antibody for M-type phospholipase A2 receptor and thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing 7A were negative. HLA type did not include the HLA-DQA1 gene that is a concern in primary MN (PMN). She responded to intensive immunosuppressive therapy consisting of prednisolone, tacrolimus, and MTX with a parallel reduction of proteinuria. Based on assessments for differentiating PMN from secondary MN (SMN), the diagnosis of the present case was incompatible with PMN. Taken together, we consider that SMN in the present case was due to RA itself rather than drug-induced MN.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Glomerulonefrite Membranosa/etiologia , Glomérulos Renais/patologia , Síndrome Nefrótica/etiologia , Anticorpos Antiproteína Citrulinada/sangue , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/sangue , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Glomerulonefrite Membranosa/tratamento farmacológico , Glomerulonefrite Membranosa/patologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Rim/patologia , Glomérulos Renais/irrigação sanguínea , Glomérulos Renais/imunologia , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome Nefrótica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Nefrótica/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Nefrótica/urina , Prednisolona/uso terapêutico , Proteinúria/diagnóstico , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA