Proof-of-concept of a robotic-driven photogrammetric scanner for intra-operative knee cartilage repair.

This work presents a proof-of-concept of a robotic-driven intra-operative scanner designed for knee cartilage lesion repair, part of a system for direct in vivo bioprinting. The proposed system is based on a photogrammetric pipeline, which reconstructs the cartilage and lesion surfaces from sets of photographs acquired by a robotic-handled endoscope, and produces 3D grafts for further printing path planning. A validation on a synthetic phantom is presented, showing that, despite the cartilage smooth and featureless surface, the current prototype can accurately reconstruct osteochondral lesions and their surroundings with mean error values of 0.199 ± 0.096 mm but with noticeable concentration on areas with poor lighting or low photographic coverage. The system can also accurately generate grafts for bioprinting, although with a slight tendency to underestimate the actual lesion sizes, producing grafts with coverage errors of -12.2 ± 3.7, -7.9 ± 4.9, and -15.2 ± 3.4% for the medio-lateral, antero-posterior, and craneo-caudal directions, respectively. Improvements in lighting and acquisition for enhancing reconstruction accuracy are planned as future work, as well as integration into a complete bioprinting pipeline and validation with ex vivo phantoms.

Fast and versatile platform for pedicle screw insertion planning.

PURPOSE: Computer-assisted surgical planning methods help to reduce the risks and costs in transpedicular fixation surgeries. However, most methods do not consider the speed and versatility of the planning as factors that improve its overall performance. In this work, we propose a method able to generate surgical plans in minimal time, within the required safety margins and accounting for the surgeon's personal preferences. METHODS: The proposed planning module takes as input a CT image of the patient, initial-guess insertion trajectories provided by the surgeon and a reduced set of parameters, delivering optimal screw sizes and trajectories in a very reduced time frame. RESULTS: The planning results were validated with quantitative metrics and feedback from surgeons. The whole planning pipeline can be executed at an estimated time of less than 1 min per vertebra. The surgeons remarked that the proposed trajectories remained in the safe area of the vertebra, and a Gertzbein-Robbins ranking of A or B was obtained for 95 % of them. CONCLUSIONS: The planning algorithm is safe and fast enough to perform in both pre-operative and intra-operative scenarios. Future steps will include the improvement of the preprocessing efficiency, as well as consideration of the spine's biomechanics and intervertebral rod constraints to improve the performance of the optimisation algorithm.